Confronting Clinton on abortion
Reps. Chris Smith (R-N.J.) and Bob Inglis (R-S.C.) today changed the tune of a House Foreign Affairs Committee hearing by asking Secretary of State Hillary Clinton about the issue of abortion.
Smith asked why she had recently praised Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood. He said,
Sanger was an unapologetic eugenicist and racist who said “the most merciful thing a family does for one of its infant members is to kill it.” And said on another occasion, “eugenics is the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political and social problems.”
Clinton didn’t respond to the Sanger quotes at first, but later in the hearing when questioned again on the matter, she said in all humans (she used Thomas Jefferson’s slave holding as an example) “there are things we admire and there are things we deplore.”
Smith asked whether the administration would be promoting abortion in places like Africa, under the umbrella of “reproductive health.” Clinton responded:
We happen to think family planning is an important part of women’s health – and that reproductive health includes access to abortion….We are now an administration that protects the rights of women including the rights to reproductive health care.
The room exploded into the sole applause of the hearing.
Inglis then questioned Clinton on why she didn’t condemn human rights abuses like forced abortions on her most recent trip to China. “They heard me say it already,” she said, referring to a trip there 14 years ago.
He asked,
Don’t we have to speak with moral authority when we engage countries like China?
She responded,
Yes, we certainly do. It is a broad engagement that we have with large and complex countries. There is always and must be a moral dimension to our foreign policy.
And he said:
When you’re in China next, I hope you’ll speak to these issues.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top23 Comments to “Confronting Clinton on abortion”
Did she indirectly admit that not every abortion is a good thing? Does reproductive health care mean anything but abortion?
If a woman has the right to kill the baby that is a drain on her when will I get the right to abort the government that is draining on me? It is more than a 9 month or 18 year problem. But you all know that.
Report comment to moderator
Clinton 5–R’s O
Report comment to moderator
I wonder, what sort of things Clinton would have us admire about Sanger?
And as for China, America has sold its soul to China for cheap labor and cheap goods and because China now holds more of our debt than any other country, should we pluck up the courage to say something about this or that, it’s mere rhetoric. And no doubt, this administration (like the last several) will quickly apologize for having squeaked at all.
Report comment to moderator
Arcadia,
The real losers are all the children being aborted, as well as the women who will be scarred physically and emotionally by those abortions.
Besides the impact on the U.S. of abortion, did you know that there are more than 16 million Chinese girls missing from abortion? And in India I think the toll on the female population is just as large, if not larger.
Do you agree with the “right” of governments or parents to choose abortion to kill baby girls before they are born? I don’t think Sanger envisioned that outcome when she spoke, only of killing baby blacks and other poor people, but either one is horrible.
Report comment to moderator
It’s also worth noting that Sanger recanted her position on eugentics. Aren’t you all supposed to believe in redemption?
Report comment to moderator
At their current rate of baby girl abortions, soon enough Hillary or a future successor will be pressuring the ChiComms to impose gay marriage. With all those men unable to find a wife, as Gavin Newsom might tell the ChiComms “Gay marriage is coming whether you like it or not!”
Report comment to moderator
Did she recant on the killing of babies?
Report comment to moderator
Prostitution in China will be a big problem. Look for China to go to war looking for brides for all their men.
Report comment to moderator
Mynock, are you sure–I had not heard that and just did a google search. Not finding much to suggest she recanted.
Report comment to moderator
#8
I wouldn’t suggest war for brides but I would suggest civil disorder as a result of men with no family responsibilities and nothing to lose.
Report comment to moderator
War is the traditional thing to do with young men who have no wives. The Chinese did it in the past, as did others, but I suppose there are those who think human nature has changed…. it hasn’t.
Report comment to moderator
Can someone please explain to me how tearing a child’s arms and legs off is “reproductive health”?
Report comment to moderator
Everything comes back to abortion and gays with conservative Christians. Their political and social lives revolve around those two issues. Nothing gets them riled up like those two issues.
Report comment to moderator
Anlir weeps for terrorists who are made temporarily uncomfortable, but is as cold as ice when it comes to pulling the arms and legs off children or sucking out their brains. Evil is good and good is evil in Anlir-land.
Report comment to moderator
Xion sings praises to Christ every time another human being is tortured. Conservative Christians would make some very fine Inquisitors, would they not?
Report comment to moderator
14 is a personal attack.
Report comment to moderator
Anlir-
Remember, the sanctity of life ends at birth.
Report comment to moderator
“It’s also worth noting that Sanger recanted her position on eugentics. Aren’t you all supposed to believe in redemption?”
Never happened. Citation, please.
Report comment to moderator
Anlir.
You sound like you sing praises every time an unborn child is tortured to death. Terrorist have rights to comfort and respect, what about the children?
Report comment to moderator
Anlir,
Another thing, everything in that report, we do to our own soldiers in POW training to train them to withstands harsh interagations. Must not be that bad. Nothing listed was TORTURE!
Report comment to moderator
Anlir
Since a blog on toture was not the correct place to ask questions about abortion and or torture, will you now respond to my earlier questions?
Anlir
So far nothing I have said can specifically define whether I am a christian or not. I merely asked a few reasonable questions.
You have not answered any of them. I wonder what your answers are to my specific questions.
again;
Is abortion an affront to God, or isn’t it?
Let me add another. If it is immoral for the US Government to support torture, what then makes it accepable for it to support Planned parenthood?
Report comment to moderator
#16 What I said about Anlir is not an attack since Anlir admits resounding support for dismembering innocent children and abhors anything that would make a terrorist uncomfortable.
But what Anlir said about me in #15 is clearly false since I have stated numerous times that I oppose actual torture. I define torture as causing permanent harm. Making people uncomfortable or scaring or embarrassing them is not the same thing as medieval torture chambers. If no harm is done then it shouldn’t be called torture.
So how is truthfully representing Anlir’s position a personal attack, while slandering me is not?
Report comment to moderator
Feel sad for the aborted kids.
Dgreetings
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!