Calling vs. desire
Many Christians consistently misuse the word “calling,” which leads to a person who has a “desire” to do something being wrongly viewed as unspiritual or “fleshly.” Is it accurate to say “I feel called to be pilot” or “We feel called to live in the city”? Not really. I guess God could “call” people to vocations and ZIP codes, but that’s not the main emphasis of the concept in the Bible. Calling has more to do with becoming a member of the people of God and living a holy life rather than deciding which job to take or whom to marry. Those items are actually choices.
The Greek word that Paul uses to describe his “calling” to be an apostle is the same word he uses to express the divine calling to be in union with Christ (Romans 1:1, 1 Corinthians 1:1) and is only used 10 times in the New Testament. To say that you’re called to missions or to parenting like Paul says he was called to the office of the apostle is to grossly misuse the term or concept.
As a matter for fact, the Bible primarily explains that when God “calls” people, he calls them to intimacy with Him, union with Christ, join the Kingdom, get saved, live holy lives, and so on (Matthew 22:14; Romans 1:7, 8:28-30, 9:26; 1 Corinthians 1:9, 1:24, 1:26, 7:15-24; Galatians 1:6, 1:15, 5:13; Ephesians 1:18, 2:11, 4:4; Philippians 3:14; Colossians 3:15; 2 Thessalonians 2:14; Hebrews 9:15; 1 Peter 2:21; etc.).
We spiritualize our desires as if wanting to be a missionary, cop, pastor, seminary student, or mom, or wanting to live in Peru, Kenya, Spain, the city, the suburbs, and the like, for a season, were all unspiritual as personal preferences. If it’s true that God gives us the desires of our hearts, and it’s true that all good things come from God, why is not OK to say, “I want to be a missionary for a while.” Why add “calling” to a choice or desire as if one were speaking in ways consistent with the Bible’s use of the concept.
The Holy Spirit can equally compel preferences, desires, and choices, but this is different from “calling.” The misuse of the word “calling” can lead to painful theological crises whenever situations don’t turn out as expected. “But I thought I was called to this,” we wonder. You weren’t called. You freely chose what you did and it didn’t work out. So what? Move on something else. Your decision was not necessarily wrong, and God’s not punishing you (unless it was clearly a sinful choice).
Since a Christian’s “calling” is to live in righteous harmony with God, this can be done in any vocation or geographic area. I’m cautious now when I write checks to people who say they are “called” to “this” or “that” ministry, vocation, region, because I would hate to send people off with a bad functional theology. The good news about freedom in Christ is that desires and preferences change, but callings do not.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top24 Comments to “Calling vs. desire”
Good post Anthony.
My theory is that most people say they are “called” or “led” to do something when they don’t want anyone to question them about it. In other words, if you invoke the Holy Spirit then of course whatever it is you are doing must be right and you had better not cross that person.
Mike
Report comment to moderator
That’s not how I use “led” or “called,” Mike. It’s usually done with a lot of trepidation and uncertainty followed by waiting to see how God will use whatever I think he wants me to do. Today’s My Utmost for His Highest speaks to that issue:
http://www.rbc.org/utmost/index.php
Report comment to moderator
1 – I agree. It is a good post. Anthony brings up very good points regarding yet another example of subjectivism in evangelicalism.
Report comment to moderator
Michelle,
Your approach sounds confusing. Certainly we don’t the future, but we don’t need to know it to do what God has said to do.
God has revealed all we need in the Bible. We do not have to wait for inner impressions or lay out the fleece (in fact we should not) to know what we should do. God does not reveal to each one of us our own special individualized program for life. Certainly the Spirit leads us, but it isn’t on a concious level where we can say, “God just told me to do such and such.”
Mike
Report comment to moderator
I hesitate to use the word “calling” because I have seen it misused in such a way (God’s will can even be used to justify outright sin, and I’ve seen people “led” into what are clearly bad marriage choices). I would say, however, that God can clearly lead us in some fashion that isn’t quite the same as my own choice.
I lived in Chicago 14 years, longer than I personally would have chosen to stay there, but I felt God’s hand on my ministry in a poor neighborhood. When the kids I was ministering to grew up, I felt God’s freedom to leave. At that point, I felt very much as though I had a choice to stay or to go (neither choice would have been a sin), but at some points earlier I felt that God had me where I was supposed to be, and I couldn’t walk away. Is that the same as being “called”? Dunno.
I feel the same about marriage. If the right man comes along, I’m free to get married. In the meantime, I’m free to be single–either way I can serve God and other people, just in different fashions. (If I marry, my “freedom” is more constrained, but my avenue of ministry would be clearer.)
Report comment to moderator
My husband did not “want” to become a pastor. He tried to ignore what he sensed as the call of God in that direction – and succeeded for over ten years. But the “call” or whatever it was persisted and became stronger until he couldn’t ignore it. The way he puts it is that God put his heart in a nutcracker and twisted until he cracked. (You have to have used one of the kind of nutcrackers with a piece that twists in order to understand his imagery.)
I never sensed that kind of call, which was one reason I never went to the mission field even though for a time I tried to convince myself I was. It was difficult, when my husband was preparing for the ministry, to know what to do with my lack of a sense of calling, as he and others seemed to think that I should confirm the sense of calling in some way rather than just go along because he felt called. But as he felt the “call” strongly and others (the pastor and elders of the church where we were members and where he was ordained) confirmed it, I figured I must be called to be a pastor’s wife.
When his second “call” to a church did not work out (they asked him to resign less than a year after calling him), he naturally started wondering if he had been mistaken all along. And I really don’t know what to tell him. Since I first heard the same perspective Anthony describes here (when I was in Bible school, still planning on being a missionary), I have thought that seems to match up better with Scripture and with experience of many people I know.
I think there are certainly instances where God clearly does call some people to a specific ministry or a specific place, both in Scripture and church history including today. But I don’t think that those examples are a good reason to think everyone is called in that sense. Or that all pastors and missionaries need to be called in that sense. We are all called in the sense that Anthony talks about, and that can include the kind of ministry that pastors and missionaries have.
Report comment to moderator
OK, never mind what I said about the “twist” kind of nutcracker. What my husband says is “squeezed” not “twisted” – but somehow in my mind I translated it into the kind of nutcrackers my parents had when I was growing up, where you did twist a part of it inward in order to crack the nut.
Maybe I’m cracked. I have a cold and my brain is just not working very well.
Report comment to moderator
“if you invoke the Holy Spirit then of course whatever it is you are doing must be right”
Thus was born Papal Infallibility, which we all agree is bad, right? Legalistic and all.
I personally feel called to marry a supermodel and be a motorcycle racer. It’s funny how nobody is ever called to be garbage collector or mortician.
I’m also surprised how many church soloists are called to “be obedient” and deliver yet a third encore of their latest composition in church.
It’s time we realized that the mundane details of our lives are just that, and to be comfortable with the idea that all of us are not the centerpiece of some grand cosmic drama. I am not Paul. I’m not even Billy Graham. But God loves me anyway.
Report comment to moderator
Maybe I can’t explain it. It seemed like the Lord was calling us to have a fourth child. I didn’t want a fourth child. I spent months explaining all this to God. I would explain why it wouldn’t work–circumstances changed so it became clear my excuses were merely excuses.
I “felt” it was my choice, but the Lord was encouraging me to examine my heart, to search the Word, to look at where he seemed to be leading my family. After four months of this, I became convicted by the passage, “Behold the Lord loves obedience more than sacrifice.” I decided, okay, a fourth child.
I got pregnant. It turns out I had a lump in my breast. The potentially difficult pregnancy I didn’t want became a massive lesson in faith for me, my family, my friends and our church.
Fortunately, I didn’t have breast cancer. We got a lovely daughter. The Lord was praised and we all learned lessons.
It’s not something I wanted. But I “felt” that’s what God wanted me to do. Scripture, counsel, my husband and circumstances all confirmed. That’s what I mean by “feeling” “called” to do something by God.
It wasn’t easy. It wasn’t something I wanted. But I ended up blessed all the same. Thanks be to God.
Report comment to moderator
I worked for a ministry for 19 years and quite frankly felt that my calling there was over years before I quit. For those last years it was just a job, I just couldn’t find another way to make a living. Maybe God used me in those last years in ways I just haven’t seen yet or maybe I should have just made a leap of faith sooner.
Report comment to moderator
um. . .i think the etymology of “vocation” essentially means “calling.”
Report comment to moderator
You got it Tammie. Vocation is Latin for calling. Read a little Luther on the masks of God and then read your Bible about the Holy Spirit. When my son calls out at 4:00 in the morning there is little to do with my desires. The Spirit is not a desire. Jonah did not desire to go to Ninevah. In my church the call to the Holy Ministry is tested and approved by the seminary and then affirmed by congregation. My desires can be up and down but the call is in-line with how God said the Holy Spirit would enable people to know and confess that Jesus Christ is Lord. Luther suggested that whenever we do things for the least of these we are doing them for the Lord in holy service. Holy service is not a desire we have or schemes we make up it is doing what God gave us to do. Love our neighbor. Raise our children. Pray for our government. Believe in Jesus Christ. These are all things God has called us to do.
So do not confuse desire with calling. Do not confuse Spirit with desire. But do not overspiritualize calling so that it does not include changing the diapers, taking out the trash, or doing any of the other things that God has given us to do in order to serve our neighbors.
Report comment to moderator
While the author makes a good point concerning how God ‘calls’ us in His grace by the Spirit and the Gospel, yet he is mistaken by implying that this is the only sense in which ‘calling’ is used in Scripture. There is such a thing as God’s providence. Thus, the Apostle Paul declares in I Corinth. 7:20f, “Let each one remain in the same calling in which he was called.” This clearly refers to a vocational matter other than our calling in Christ to be God’s child.
Christians have a duty to seek to discern God’s calling in their lives. An excellent resource for this is Sinclair B. Ferguson’s “Discovering God’s Will.” Not only are men called to Church office – the preacher is ‘called to preach’; But God calls men and women to be doctors, lawyers, teachers, administrators, and a whole host of other …. oh yes, that’s why we call them vocations!
The author has a problem with when, “We spiritualize our desires as if wanting to be a missionary, cop, pastor, seminary student, or mom, or wanting to live in Peru, Kenya, Spain, the city, the suburbs, and the like, for a season, were all unspiritual as personal preferences. If it’s true that God gives us the desires of our hearts, and it’s true that all good things come from God, why is not OK to say, “I want to be a missionary for a while.” Why add “calling” to a choice or desire as if one were speaking in ways consistent with the Bible’s use of the concept.” Why ‘spiritualize our desires’? (1) It is not spiritualizing desires to remember that whether we eat, drink, or whatever we do, we are to glorify God and in all our ways acknowledge Him. (2) It isn’t OK to simply say ‘I want to be …… for a while” because this is simply a statement of personal preference, whereas the Christian realizes that life is not all about me and my personal preferences. The Christian realizes not only that God’s providence rules over all things, but that since he/she has been bought with a price they are not their own and so must self-consciously glorify God, body and soul — which includes vocation. (3) It is a gross oversimplification to say ‘God gives us the desires of our hearts’ and ‘all good things come from God” therefore if I desire this good thing then I may leave off consideration of God’s calling because heart-desire in the Christian equals God’s calling. Christians realize that there is still significant sin and corruption in their lives and their ‘desires’ may not be pure. What are the motivations of my desires? What are the goals of my desires to do this? Not to mention what if the choice is between two comparatively ‘good’ things? The author simply misses the larger issues of calling in Scripture. Sola Deo Gloria
Report comment to moderator
Reibhaus,
I don’t think you get what Anthony is saying. So many people claim some kind divine inspiration in the their decision-making that it gets to be a bit much.
I didn’t need God to personally impress it upon my heart that I should go to work today, that I should tie my shoes, etc. If I wait around for impressions from God before I do anything then I might not even finish this….
Report comment to moderator
NOPM,
I do think I have understood and paid attention to what Mr. Bradley is saying. You are right that there are plenty of folks who run around sayiing ‘God told me to…. say, do, go, come, etc.’ Or have ‘I feel led’ falls from their lips often and easily. And their ideas do amount to a claim to special revelation – inspiration, which is indeed a grave mistake and open to horrible misuse. By such things people continually supplant the plain, clear, revealed will of God the Word of God.
However, if you note the author says a good deal more than that concerning ‘calling,’ some of which I find to miss the scope of biblical teaching. We live in a day when ‘personal preferences’ are held to be the norm of all things. Christians must not simply trust their heart’s desire and their choices based upon those desires. You will no doubt have spoken with those who ‘felt’ that they should do this or that, saying “that God gives us the desires of our hearts, and… all good things come from God” — when all the while it was their choice was for path of least resistance, the easiest path, or simply the path that appealed to them — Not necessarily the godly, obedient path of discipleship to Christ.
God has told us how to live in His Word and it would be a futile and worthless exercise to wait every morning for some sign, some feeling, to get up, shave, bathe, and go to work! But then given the scenario espoused in the article above, “that God gives us the desires of our hearts, and… all good things come from God” perhaps the desire of my heart would be the ‘good thing’ to just take the day off?!! Maybe it would be better to simply obey God’s Word which commands me to provide for my family, work hard not to please men, but as to the Lord, and to keep my word – my contract that I would come to work regularly and on time for my employer, and to be deligent in my ‘calling’ whatever legitimate vocation that may be.
Solo Christo
Report comment to moderator
OK
I took it for granted that Anthony would say that whatever is not sin is permissible. Certainly we have personal preferences since we are not carbon copies (outdated expression and politically incorrect since a carbon copy would increase the carbon footprint!) of one another. We are free to exercise those personal preferences. I know that means a little more than just doing what I want, but you also don’t need to search the Scriptures and make a pro/con list every time you have to go to the bathroom.
Mike
Report comment to moderator
“Calling has more to do with becoming a member of the people of God and living a holy life rather than deciding which job to take or whom to marry.”
Yet marriage is a reflection of what? That intimacy of calling is it not? Christ pursuing us, the church?
“The misuse of the word “calling” can lead to painful theological crises whenever situations don’t turn out as expected. “But I thought I was called to this,” we wonder. You weren’t called. You freely chose what you did and it didn’t work out. So what? Move on something else.”
It is not the words fault if we associate calling with our idea of perfect results. That is never promised. Being in union with Christ is seeking his will and purpose for our lives in all that we do. James Ch 4 vs 13 and following reminds us that we should only consider what we will do tomorrow in light of the Lord’s will.
I understand your point, but if its merely based on people’s preconceived outcomes, then it doesnt change the fact that God calls us to different areas in life.
Take Jonah, who desire was to NOT go to Ninevah, despite God’s call, to do so. Who won that arguement? But the point is, if God’s calling us to be in union with him, does that not also mean living according to HIS will, and not our own? Seems to me that should saturate every aspect of our lives, and in the least who we marry, where and how we work, and those we minister too.
I guess I dont find the word calling very different than abiding by God’s desire for our life. You certainly cant go wrong asking the Lord about every direction…esp if you understand that the direction may not be what you personally desire or like.
Report comment to moderator
Thorn,
You say, “You certainly cant go wrong asking the Lord about every direction…esp if you understand that the direction may not be what you personally desire or like.”
How do you ask the Lord for His direction and how do you know what the Lord’s answer is? Let us say a man wants to marry a woman. Both are Christians and they love eachother. Both are old enough and the man has a job to support her. Let us even say the parents approve. What else should they seek to know in this situation that will come to them from the Lord.
I’m not suggesting that prayer is unimportant here. Hopefully they have already been praying for themselves and for eachother. But what should the be looking for from God that God has not already told them to look for in a spouse and how do they know when they can safely marry? Should they be praying, “God, please show me what to do?” when it seems quite clear that there is nothing standing in the way?
Mike
Report comment to moderator
A good book is:
Decision Making and the Will of God by Garry Friesen
Mike
Report comment to moderator
I will second that good book. It changed my life 25 years ago.
Report comment to moderator
etymology = The study of the origin of words and the way in which their meanings have changed throughout history. the origin of a word and the historical development of its meaning.
Report comment to moderator
In re 19:
Mike,
I think at that point, i’d be pretty confident esp through prayer that it was the right direction.
I have known a couple of couples that were that far along, and then didnt get married though.
The point is, we should always be seeking the Lord and his will for us.
Report comment to moderator
groups of people use the word in a way that they perceive will gain them approval from certain others
they aren’t thinking, much
thanks for this post and the informative nature of it!
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!