The American cause this Memorial Day
“Based upon our observations of American soldiers and their officers captured in this war, the following facts are evidenced,” a foreign intelligence officer wrote. “There is little knowledge or understanding, even among United States university graduates, of American political history and philosophy . . . of safeguards to freedom, and of how these things supposedly operate within their own system.”
Believe it or not, an al-Qaida operative did not write those words. The chief intelligence officer of the Chinese People’s Volunteer Army in North Korea wrote them during the Korean War (1950-1953). In a 1957 response to these remarks, Russell Kirk wrote, “Many Americans are badly prepared for their task of defending their own convictions . . . against the grim threat of armed ideology. . . . And in our age, good-natured ignorance is a luxury none of us can afford.”
As we pause this weekend to honor those who died to preserve our freedom, it’s a good time to take stock of the threats to our nation. I believe that the greatest threat is internal decay that results from a lack of knowledge of those things that make America great.
The Chinese officer’s gloating inspired Kirk to write a primer on American political, economic, and civil principles titled “The American Cause.” Kirk defined the American cause as “the defense of the principles of a true civilization. This defense is conducted by renewing people’s consciousness of true moral and political and economic principle. . . . The American cause is not to stamp out of existence all rivals, but simply to keep alive the principles and institutions which have made the American nation great.”
Our modern enemies might have rejoiced in data released last fall by the Intercollegiate Studies Institute demonstrating that 71 percent of Americans in their survey failed a basic civic literacy test with an average score of 49 percent. Incredibly, the average elected official in their sample scored just 44 percent.
Last Saturday, I heard a stirring commencement address by Judge Alice Batchelder of the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals advocating the form of education that Kirk supported—education that will turn back the wave of national civic ignorance and strengthen our country. Following that address, an attorney and I discussed the deplorable treatment of the U.S. Constitution by the executive and congressional branches of the federal government that led to the approval of a 2009 budget deficit of $1.84 trillion. “Grotesque,” lamented the attorney. We talked about how many of the world’s countries have had multiple constitutions while America has had just one. We concluded that America operates from a new unwritten or “parallel constitution” that allows the government to spend whatever amount it desires without restraint by constitutional, moral, or economic principle. This new constitution, birthed by civic illiteracy, is fostering the decay of a great nation—$60 trillion in deficits and unfunded liabilities, a failing educational system, breathtaking federal government interference in business, an out of control Federal Reserve that is putting the American dollar and the world’s economic system at great risk, and social programs that promote family breakdown and dependence on government. And we have governments in Washington, D.C., and in many of our state capitals that want even more.
Kirk’s book was written as an intellectual bulwark against the foreign threat of Soviet communism. He was concerned that we could not defend ourselves from foreign enemies unless we understood what we were defending. “Our danger at home is that a great part of the American people may forget that enduring principles exist,” he said, foreshadowing today’s striking civic illiteracy. “Our danger abroad is that the false principles of revolutionary fanaticism may gain such an influence as to wound us terribly.”
I wonder where Kirk would think the greatest immediate threat to America lies today. Is it al-Qaida or is it a domestic menace in the form of elected officials and bureaucrats whose actions demonstrate they know or care very little about the American cause? I think it is the latter. A country that has lost touch with its core principles is threatened more by Constitutional decay than by foreign radicals flying airplanes into skyscrapers. And, unfortunately, the domestic threat of civic illiteracy makes foreign threats more potent.
There is hope, of course. But it will require work. The task that Kirk assigns us is “to keep alive the principles and institutions which have made the American nation great.” Principles like religious, political, and economic liberty. And institutions like limited constitutional government and strong churches and families. The educational institutions that give me the most hope today are the private Christian schools, classical Christian schools, the homeschooling movement, and private colleges that have a hefty Western civilization curriculum viewed through the lens of Scripture. There is hope in America because a vigorous remnant of institutions is working to preserve our core principles. We should enlist in their work.
As we honor those who made the ultimate sacrifice for our country this Memorial Day weekend, let us fulfill our duty to the American cause. Kirk says, “We do not need to invent some new theory of human nature and politics; but we do need, urgently, to recall to our minds the sound convictions that have sustained our civilization and our nation. Our enemies, no matter what resources they may have, cannot defeat us if we are strong in our own principles.”




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top16 Comments to “The American cause this Memorial Day”
At the very least, let’s at least note the book is available at Amazon (shouldn’t there be a link to a World site?).
Report comment to moderator
Thanks for sharing this! I quoted parts of it on 2 of my blogs.
Report comment to moderator
Thanks Harris!
Report comment to moderator
Thanks so much, Lee ?wishing for these comments, and for Harris for the amazon reference. This is very important. I hope to pass it on to all I know, especially those young people graduating from high school, college, even junior high school. Oh that we all would work so hard to save this country, with the power of God’s guidance and mercy! We must never give up, in spite of the government we have now!
Report comment to moderator
Lee Wishing, please excuse!
Report comment to moderator
Bill Bennett DID write a splendid book called “Why We Fight” published at the start of the Afghan war. I think what we really need are films for mass market along the lines of the WWII Frank Capra flicks.
Will we ever see them made? Doubt it.
Report comment to moderator
Interesting that Lee didn’t get concerned until 2009. It makes one think that his concerns are more politically based than principally based. I wonder where he was when President Bush and his fellow Republicans took this country from a surplus to a deficit? I wonder where Lee was when President Bush created the largest new entitlement in history with the Medicare Prescription Act?
I wonder where he was when things like the FISA act passed, and the President declared a unilateral right to declare anyone (including American citizens) an “enemy combatant” and hold them in perpetuity without access to an attorney or the courts? I think history will show that those things have done more damage to American democracy than the 2009 budget.
Report comment to moderator
I agree with Lee Wishing. Most Americans these days, especially the young products of the last few generations of public schooling, know next to nothing about real American history. What little they know is the politically correct version that comes from the mouths of the 60’s/70’s radicals who now dominate our public educational system. In these minds there is little about the original America that is worth saving, much less fighting for. Their goal, as the Obama gang puts it, is to fundamentally change America into an image more to their liking.
With the last few ignorant generations already conditioned by our public schools to abandon the original America, today’s Americans has been prepared to accept changes that they do not really understand. Most of today’s electorate, especially the youngest, have no understanding of the gradual leftward shift of the Democratic party since FDR. Ever since FDR the political orientation of the Democratic Party has been gradually shifting left towards Marxist socialism. Socialism is characterized by such things as a strong welfare state, forced wealth redistribution, state ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods, high taxes, class warfare, and constant hostility towards capitalism, free markets and religion. All of these characteristics are increasingly prevalent in the Democratic Party. The acceleration of this shift increased greatly in the years since the 60’s and 70’s.
The 60’s saw young Marxist revolutionaries taking to the streets in great numbers. They are older now and almost all of them have found a comfortable home in the leadership ranks of the Democratic Party. Bill Clinton’s draft dodging, his 1970 trip as a student revolutionary to Moscow, Hillary’s praise of the Marxist Saul Alinsky, Bill Ayers’ terrorist bombings, Jane Fonda’s treason in Hanoi, John Kerry’s lies and military betrayals, etc., — all of these and much more are hallmarks of Democrat leaders going radically left. Their influence has been strong and it has changed the face of the party towards Marxism.
Now we have Barack Obama. He has an engaging smile, charisma, and lots of smooth words—all the essential tools of a con-man. In “Dreams of My Father” his early mentor was noted to be the black communist Frank Davis. In college Obama gravitated towards Marxist teachers and fellow Marxist students. Then he sat for twenty years under the tutelage of Marxist, black liberation theologian Jeremiah Wright. His politics were Marxist then and they remain Marxist today. Obama’s belated denials are con-man deceits easily foisted upon a lobotomized electorate conditioned by years of liberal indoctrination in our public schools and universities.
How does all this relate to the Memorial Day theme of this thread? I’ll sum it up in a letter I recently wrote to our local paper:
Lee: As we pause this weekend to honor those who died to preserve our freedom …
Frank: Lee, are you asserting that every American military man or woman who has died in wartime “died to preserve our freedom”?
Report comment to moderator
Or, to put it another way, “Shouldn’t we honor all American military personnel who have died in wartime, whether they died to preserve our freedom or not?”
Report comment to moderator
Russell Kirk’s premise is right on. We cannot be reminded too often that seeking virtue and being true to core principles is fundamental to defeating evil. We owe it to those who have died on our behalf to live humbly before our Maker and Redeemer. Their motives, like ours, were not always right but they still died on our behalf. We also owe it to them to work on getting our motives right so that we might be more unwavering in support of future sacrifices. Thank you Mr. Wishing for your reminder, Mr. Martin for your service, and Victoria for your encouragement. May God get the glory.
Report comment to moderator
My husband, who has degree in history, has long lamented the ignorance of our citizens. We saw it in what was being taught and what was not being taught at all to our own children. We were there to fill in the blanks and they are well-able now to do their own reading and research. We are very aware that many other children would not be so blessed.
Report comment to moderator
Just remember that Kirk was a real paleo-conservative, or perhaps better, a Burkean Conservative, so the choice of government expansion v. AQ may be a false one. If nations and their politics are built on their values, then the greatest danger may be cultural in form. You can win the war and lose your soul. Off hand the ol’ Sage of Mecosta might have more to say about the trivialization of current conservative thought and the general decline of our culture(s). As the linked article reveals, Kirk was an incredibly interesting figure. Even for this (ahem) Democrat.
Report comment to moderator
Michael Martin (8): The best tribute that could possibly be given to Vietnam Veterans would be for Americans to support what they fought for …
Frank: What precisely did they fight for?
“To preserve our freedom,” as Lee has suggested? (Thus the gist of my question to him at (9).)
And just how “free” is a country that conscripts its young men (”if you don’t go fight, we will prosecute and imprison you”) — especially to go fight a nation that had neither attacked nor threatened us?
Report comment to moderator
Harris (14): Just remember that Kirk was a real paleo-conservative, or perhaps better, a Burkean Conservative, so the choice of government expansion v. AQ may be a false one.
Frank: I don’t pretend to know what Kirk would have to say about our present “war on terror” in Iraq and Afghanistan/Pakistan.
But he absolutely lambasted George H.W. Bush’s Gulf War-for-oil:
Does anyone here deny that Gulf War I was “to maintain the free flow of oil at market prices”?
And does anyone here suggest that Americans who died in that war “died to preserve our freedom”?
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!