Honoring Ronald Reagan
A new statue of Ronald Reagan was unveiled in the Capitol Rotunda on Wednesday at a ceremony featuring bipartisan commemoration of the late 40th president. (You can read the full story here.)
Republican and Democrat leaders spoke well of Reagan and his wife, Nancy, who attended and shared a few words.
One of the qualities Reagan was commended for during the ceremony was his leadership in turning the dark 1970s into the prosperous 1980s, leading the country into strong economic growth. It is interesting to note that Reagan’s tax-cutting policies were quite the opposite of the current administration’s spending policies. Nevertheless, President Obama signed a commission the day before to establish an 11-member panel to plan events to honor Reagan’s 100th birthday on Feb. 6, 2011. Obama said:
“President Reagan helped as much as any president to restore a sense of optimism in our country, a spirit that transcended politics—that transcended even the most heated arguments of the day. It was this optimism that the American people sorely needed during a difficult period—a period of economic and global challenges that tested us in unprecedented ways.”




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top27 Comments to “Honoring Ronald Reagan”
Reagan’s tax-cutting policies were quite the opposite of the current administration’s spending policies.
Huh?
Report comment to moderator
Not sure why Obama is bending the knee before the Reagan idol. I agree with Krugman:
Debunking the Reagan Myth
Report comment to moderator
#1 – Good point … As Cheney once said, “Reagan showed us that deficits don’t matter.” Providing the excuse for Bush spending and re-running up the deficit Clinton had brought down …
Report comment to moderator
More recently from Krugman:
Reagan Did It
Report comment to moderator
Spin @1: It’s Pavlovian. Every time someone says Reagan, they all bark “tax cut”. And,they’re working on the Obama/spending reflex. (Most of ‘em have figured out that Obama/socialism is a bridge too far).
Report comment to moderator
Oh yeah, well, Kennedy wasn’t all that either.
Report comment to moderator
Scroop Moth, Spinoza, Krugman, Arcadia,
“There you go again.”
Report comment to moderator
President Reagan:
* “The ultimate determinant in the struggle for the world will not be bombs or rockets, but a test of wills and ideas-—a trial of spiritual resolve.” —Ronald Reagan, 1964.
____________
* “The government is like a baby’s alimentary canal, with a happy appetite at one end and no responsibility at the other.” ~ Ronald Reagan, Saturday Evening Post, 1965.
___________
* “If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. And if it stops moving, subsidize it.” ~ Ronald Reagan. On the government’s view of the economy.
__________
* “Those who say that we’re in a time when there are no heroes, they just don’t know where to look.” Ronald Reagan, 1981. First Inaugural Address.
_________
I think I like that last quote the best!
Report comment to moderator
Krugman’s a goof (sorry Random!), but Scroop, Spin and Arc are right.
Report comment to moderator
How did blacks fare under Ronald Reagan?
* From the end of 1982 to 1989, black unemployment dropped 9 percentage points (from 20.4 percent to 11.4 percent), while white unemployment dropped by only 4 percentage points.
* Black household income went up 84 percent from 1980 to 1990, versus a white household income increase of 68 percent.
* The number of black-owned businesses increased from 308,000 in 1982 to 424,000 in 1987, a 38 percent rise versus a 14 percent increase in the total number of firms in the United States.
* Receipts by black-owned firms more than doubled, from $9.6 billion to $19.8 billion.
While the gains made by blacks often out-paced those of whites under President Reagan’s watch, the important point is non-racial: namely that both groups made gains. Under Reagan, the rich got richer and the poor got richer. And it stuck for decades.
[Credit Larry Elder for those * points above].
Report comment to moderator
#3, that Cheney might say, “Reagan showed us that deficits don’t matter,” only reveals that Cheney can be dead wrong. Conservatives have all along been the most sincerely critical of Bush-Cheney for the way they spent and ran up deficit spending.
Cheney’s rendition has nothing to do with President Reagan and his priorities during the Cold War context. I recall Reagan shoving an outrageously irresponsible Democrat budget package right back at them that would have run the deficit up far far far far more than what Reagan proposed and did. And the prosperity and peace that Reagan’s policies brought to the private sector and the nation and the world increased the revenue to the gov’t and this prosperity continued through the ninties when surpluses eventually came. Squack all you want, but I am grateful mostly to Reagan for that long term economic success.
I agree that Cheney may have been [ab]using Reagan to make an excuse for excessive gov’t spending, and conservatives have criticized Bush-Cheney for this from the start.
In any case, deficits do matter but must be assessed in historical context. Winning a war (cold or hot) can often take legitimate priority over a strictly balanced budget–but that’s always up for honorable debate. The fact remains that President Obama has quickly quadrupled our deficit–a deficit that was far too high already due to both a Bush administration AND a Dem-led congress since 2006. If liberals and Dems don’t like deficits, let them criticize their own for them just as conservatives do often criticize Republicans for them.
Report comment to moderator
SPINOZA, perhaps Obama admires Reagan’s genius for implementing policies that the country didn’t really want. If Reagan could do that, how much more possible should it be to give the country policies that its people want.
Report comment to moderator
JOEL MARK: The fact that conservatives criticize Republicans for overspending is inconsequential except as to credibility. They don’t mean it. If they did Republicans would be on the floor of Congress daily trying to repeal the prescription drug benefit under Medicare, or Medicare itself.
Report comment to moderator
I grew up in a Republican house, and within 3 miles of the Jelly Belly jelly bean factory–which is basically the Reagan Presidential Library. So I know a little of what “pop-Reagan” means to Republicans.
Face it. He’s an American hero. Jacob’s naive over-praise and Obama’s kind words to his political skills come from the same place. Symbols don’t have to make sense 100% of the time when people need heroes.
Let’s just play along. Honor Reagan. Fix the economy. And 30 years from now Obama will be Reagan, Reagan will get bumped down to Eisenhower, and Eisenhower will have to deal with being somewhere in the Ford range.
I like that Obama wished peace upon Muhammad when he needed to show respect and outreach to Muslims. And we can show at least that respect to the GOP’s own little Muhammad if we (liberals) want to run rather than divide this country.
Report comment to moderator
MYNOCK, remember also all the high praise and respect Obama gave to Jeremiah Wright (whom he had known well for 20 years) before it became necessary and expedient to throw him under the bus?
I no longer flinch much either way when Obama praises or criticizes anyone. I realize that political factors are at play either way (which is not necessarily always so bad).
Report comment to moderator
An Idol of Reagan. It made John “Crocodile” Boehner cry — again.
Report comment to moderator
“Let’s just play along. Honor Reagan. Fix the economy. And 30 years from now Obama will be Reagan…”
Obama doesn’t have what it takes to fix the economy. Reagan got away with deficit spending because he had a way to pay it back.
We now don’t have anything to pay it all back. No savings, no manufacturing, nada….
If Obama was smart, he’d unleash wealth creating mechanisms so the economy would get fixed. New government programs (read “bureaucracies that never die”), more spending, and massive debt, will not balance the budget.
Report comment to moderator
Here’s a BIG Gipper nugget:
* “An informed patriotism is what we want. … Those of us who are over 35 or so years of age grew up in a different America. We were taught, very directly, what it means to be an American. And we absorbed, almost in the air, a love of country and an appreciation of its institutions. … But now, we’re about to enter the nineties, and some things have changed. Younger parents aren’t sure that an unambivalent appreciation of America is the right thing to teach modern children … well-grounded patriotism is no longer the style. Our spirit is back, but we haven’t reinstitutionalized it. We’ve got to do a better job of getting across that America is freedom–freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of enterprise. And freedom is special and rare. It’s fragile; it needs protection.” Ronald Wilson Reagan, 1989 – from his Farewell Address.
Report comment to moderator
#14 Mynock
“I grew up in a Republican house…”
“I like that Obama wished peace upon Muhammad when he needed to show respect and outreach to Muslims.”
“…if we (liberals)…”
“1 Samuel 15:23
For rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft, and stubbornness is as iniquity and idolatry. Because thou hast rejected the word of the LORD, he hath also rejected thee from being king.”
Report comment to moderator
Joel-
We refer to what dogs leave on lawns as nuggets.
Report comment to moderator
Then you’re no true Alaskan…
I bet you never picked up a gold nugget in your life…
Report comment to moderator
Careful, Joel: If Ronald Wilson Reagan enters the pantheon, Barack Hussein Obama may follow…
Report comment to moderator
22. Hawaii or Illinois have that option.
Report comment to moderator
Arcadia, there is no one to keep Obama out of the “pantheeon” if he earns it. It will take more than words and plastic Greek columns on a stage though.
Report comment to moderator
My family benefited from the booming economy of the 1980’s. My life is a testimony to what Reagan did for the country. My stepfather was laid off during the downturn in the 1970’s. For awhile my family was on government assistance as my stepfather did odd jobs. He eventually got a job with a construction company. Under President Reagan, the company prospered, my stepfather had money to get more education, he got promoted and got a raise. Thank you, Ronald Reagan.
Not only was the economy booming but people like my stepfather had optimism and restored faith and hope in the future. That’s what real hope is–believing that one has potential to succeed because of an economic climate of freedom.
Oh, and I had the privilege of visiting Ukraine after the fall of the Soviet Union. It was gratifying to see churches open again and people talking freely about politics and religion. Thank you, so much, Ronald Reagan.
Report comment to moderator
Reagan’s policies increased the economy and ended the Cold War.
Obama’s tax and spend policies will decrease the size of the economy which will be destabilized by political manipulation and corruption. Increasing taxes will take money out of the economy. Cap and trade will cause energy costs to skyrocket making everything more expensive. Printing money will cause inflation. Government takeover of health care will decrease the quality and cause rationing of services. Appeasing our enemies puts America at risk.
Obama keeps blaming Bush for everything, but Obama inherited a far better economy than he will leave office with. He will make Jimmy Carter’s disastrous mismanagement actually look good.
Report comment to moderator
“If virtue goes, the government fails.” ~ Ronald Reagan, radio address, July 9, 1979.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!