The megachurch as corporation
Triple Canopy’s Joseph Clarke compares megachurches and corporations in a brief presentation called “Infrastructure for Souls.” His thesis:
Successful megachurches are like well-run companies, with intricate corporate structures devised to keep each member personally engaged; their pastors are like chief executives, maximizing the productivity of laborers in the evangelism enterprise. Jumbotron notwithstanding, the architectural and organizational tropes of the megachurch are best compared to those of the modern white-collar workplace.
He goes back to the roots of the megachurch in 19th century Protestantism, camp meetings and revivals. He looks at the paralell developments in church and corporate architecture, and the reasons behind the changes. In his ending comparison, he says that the corporate metaphor of a “body” is nothing new. It should sound familiar to the church:
In the corporate world, even in the midst of today’s layoff campaigns, companies strive to maintain an image of caring, and human-resources departments cultivate the psychological well-being of their employees by providing depression and anxiety counseling, online databases of relationship and parenting advice, and referrals to life coaches. Modern-day management acts as an organizational superego, struggling to order the behavior of employees and keep existential terror at bay.
The corporation achieved the status of legal personhood more than a century ago (and enjoys this benefit without having to suffer the frailties of the human body). But the underlying corporeal metaphor for an all-pervasive organizational infrastructure had been established long before the advent of modern companies. As Paul’s Epistle to the Ephesians says: “No man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even as the Lord the church: For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.”
Take a look at his view of the architecture and the worldview behind it. It’s true that megachurches have a distinctive kind of architecture and it’s interesting to reflect on the reasoning behind it.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top19 Comments to “The megachurch as corporation”
God as a CEO.
Report comment to moderator
successful megachurches… some might say that’s right up there on the oxymoron list with fragrant dung pile. I on the other hand recognize the old “economies of scale concept” and value a church small enough to care about me yet big enough to help the surrounding community.
What makes the megachurch work is meaningful small groups or cell church groups. Those depend on caring mature believers willing to step up to the plate and serve in a variety of unpublicized unglamorous roles.
Too many megachurches are ripe for (here I borrow from Khrushchev) a “cult of personality”. Make sure when the senior pastor of a megachurch retires that you send him off on a long cruise or off to do missions in a distant third world locale. We had a new pastor who at the end of ea service would turn to the hugely popular predecessor and ask “Do you have anything to add, Dr X?” and that helped a great deal.
I wish churches would embrace the “change of command” guidon passing ritual of the military. Everyone then knows who’s out and who’s in with no second guessing.
Report comment to moderator
http://www.hymnsite.com/lyrics/umh575.sht
Report comment to moderator
On the other hand a small church that has stayed small for decades has a problem.
Report comment to moderator
I think maybe Protestants have more trouble keeping their act together than does The Mother Church.
Face it, Protestant churches are bland and boring. No pageantry, no incense, no Popes, archbishops and grand viziers.
No Popes, now there’s the rub…
Nobody to keep everybody in line, to deal with heretics and dissenters. Nobody with a personal pipeline to god, a power wardrobe to die for and gold clad minions to keep order.
So–everytime someone has a doctrinal disagreement, off they go to the nearest strip mall vacancy or high school gym or
wherever.
It’s a bit like the Democratic Party.
If you want to build a Protestant “Megachurch”, you’ve got try to jazz things up a bit. And keep the message bland, bland bland. Or focus on things like politics, personal development and money. Is Tony Robbins a pitchman, a psychologist, or a preacher?
Hellfire and damnation don’t sell well anymore. Unless they’re sold by men in fancy suits in really fancy houses with spires that reach all the way to heaven…
Report comment to moderator
KBELLS #4 –
Not necessarily. If the lack of growth is due to the church’s unwillingness to do outreach or evangelism, then it definitely is a problem. But the lack of growth alone is not itself an indictment of the church. One could have a small rural church that does not experience growth because there is no one else withing reasonable distance to reach, or a small group of believers in an area that is particularly hostile to the gospel. The church may be diligently evangelizing, but will not see the fruits of their labors until later.
Report comment to moderator
‘On the other hand a small church that has stayed small for decades has a problem”
Not necessarily, mainly because we can do all the right things, we can outreach, minister to the community, support missions etc, and the Lord may not add any to a churches numbers.
Numbers are a poor determinent of a faithful obedient church.
Report comment to moderator
“Those depend on caring mature believers willing to step up to the plate and serve in a variety of unpublicized unglamorous roles.
Too many megachurches are ripe for (here I borrow from Khrushchev) a ‘cult of personality.’”
A small church depends on the stepping up of mature believers also and is in danger of the same–sometimes more so if it is a closed system–cultish tendencies.
Clarke’s premise is interesting, but he didn’t quite make to point for me.
Report comment to moderator
I am a bit corn fused and I think dismayed by several concepts assumed in this set of posts.
God as a CEO. God is the loving father. We as children do His will.
successful megachurches = oxymoron…. disparate words but not oxymoron. The words focus in different directions. “Success” is a man directed measurement against some standard. “Megachurch” or “church” is a God directed indication of the Love which God has for us. And the plan for our lives if attuned to His will.
Would I prefer to be a ’success’ or ‘in God’s will”? There is no contest. I would prefer to be in God’s will.
a church small enough to care about me yet big enough to help the surrounding community. (Psalm 8:4 what is man, that you think of him? What is the son of man, that you care for him?) Church is where I go to serve. Or to be served as God wills it. Will a church help me? I never know what God has in store. Even if I am delivering the sermon or helping as a deacon or just sitting in the pew I want God’s will to happen. And for God to use me as He will. Big enough to help the surrounding community????? I have served in churches of less than a dozen people and yet there is a great help to the community surrounding.
What makes the megachurch work is meaningful small groups or cell church groups. What makes any church ‘work’ needs to be an attunement with God’s will. Small groups are fine… if they are God’s will. Cell church groups are fine … if they are God’s will. Every church should have meaning in the context of God’s will. The church is made up of each congregant as an ‘individual’ small group and every congregant as a super megachurch.
a variety of unpublicized unglamorous roles A variety, yes. Unpublicized? Sometimes yes, sometimes no. Unglamorous? Never! If the role you are fulfilling is for God it is never unglamorous even if the only ones who know about it are you and God. No matter if it is cleaning out the drain lines under the tennis court in the desert.
caring mature believers Believers, we hope. Caring. Would be nice. Mature??? One, are any of us thoroughly mature? And if mature are we over ripe? Isaiah 11:6 And the wolf will dwell with the lamb, And the leopard will lie down with the young goat, And the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; And a little child shall lead them. If God choose / us to use / it is righteous.
“Cults of personality” are everywhere. And everywhere they are a pitfall. If you can learn something from someone else that is good then God be Praised. But that someone else does not have to be a personality. There is only one head of the church, that is Jesus. All the rest including the ministers old and new are deacons. We are all leaders and all followers and we work together. If a minister becomes senile then his role should change. If a pastor grows tired of ministering he should be prayed for. The place for all of God’s children is where He places them. Leadership is not a status symbol. Being lead is no diminution. If we live in God’s will then it is righteous.
Report comment to moderator
6 JBH and 7 Thorn. Amen
I agree with you 100 per cent. I am thinking of one particular church. Extremely good pastors. Great visiting speakers. Great music by trained musicians and directors. Great relationships inside and outside the Christian community. And yet after over thirty years the numbers who show up on Sunday are ‘relatively’ small. But those who show up get great worship. And they take that experience through out the world. They are “Christians only but not the only Christians”.
Report comment to moderator
#3 RANDOM NAME,
Thank you for posting that website.
I have made a gift post to you in another thread.
Report comment to moderator
6. Good point. Having lived my whole life in the suburbs I didn’t think of that. Still I know too many churches who are happy with their little inside group. Without younger members to take over many of them eventually just die off.
Many mega churches come about because of successful outreach and fulfilling needs.
What do some of you anti mega church folks think they should do when they get too big; divide, turn people away or stop being successful?
Report comment to moderator
Any church which has 501(c)(3) IRS status is a corporation, and this includes even most small confessional reformed churches. It doesn’t have to be a megachurch.
Report comment to moderator
Our church has had a two-fold approach to growth – plant churches and add campuses. We’ve taken an atypical approach to adding campuses, though, I think. Except for rare occasions, all the campuses (we currently have 3) hear the same sermon, which is taped from our Saturday night service. In my opinion, the decision to add campuses was wise, as the alternative would have been to build a HUGE sanctuary at the original site downtown, which would have been a logistical nightmare.
I think one of the dilemmas with multi-campus churches is to keep the campuses small enough that intra-campus fellowship is still possible, while at the same time making sure the campuses don’t become isolated.
Report comment to moderator
#12, Kbells,
When I contemplate the numbers in Heaven, I should hope that no Mega Church would ever be too big. And since I consider that we all belong to the same super mega church , buildings don’t matter. Overflow is not important if all get the chance to worship.
.
I find it strange that any Christian would be ‘anti’ any church. As Christians we seek to be attuned to God’s will. We are ‘anti’ bad teaching. We are ‘anti’ sin. We are ‘anti’ certain things. But if one find theirself ‘anti’ a meeting place then that is a call for a lot of prayer and self assessment.
Are there any perfect churches on this Earth? I have not found one yet. And I have been to many.
.
We are not perfect. Just forgiven.
Report comment to moderator
#13 Bianca,
You are correct in that any organization under 501 3 c is required to be organized as a corporation, a trust, or an association in order to receive tax exempt status. That being said there is not a lot of reason that every church needs to be tax exempt.
Does-a-house-church-need-501-3c-status
In real terms at least as far as it has been experienced in most of the country, having 501.3c is as restrictive as having a hinge on a window. It is a paper in a drawer that gets consulted from time to time by the accountants. Beyond that to call a church a corporation is virtually meaningless.
Report comment to moderator
Yes I know I am dyslexic, 501 (c) 3


Report comment to moderator
Darn, I thought you were dyspeptic.
Report comment to moderator
I’m a Pepper. He’s a Pepper. She’s a Pepper Wouldn’t you like to be a Pepper , too
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!