Vanity Fair profiles Palin
Without interviewing the Alaskan governor, Vanity Fair’s Todd Purdum did an extensive profile on Sarah Palin, a woman he calls the “sexiest and the riskiest brand in the Republican party.”
Here are the questions Purdum asks rhetorically in his piece titled “It Came from Wasilla”:
What does it say about the nature of modern American politics that a public official who often seems proud of what she does not know is not only accepted but applauded? What does her prominence say about the importance of having (or lacking) a record of achievement in public life? Why did so many skilled veterans of the Republican Party—long regarded as the more adroit team in presidential politics—keep loyally working for her election even after they privately realized she was casual about the truth and totally unfit for the vice-presidency? Perhaps most painful, how could John McCain, one of the cagiest survivors in contemporary politics—with a fine appreciation of life’s injustices and absurdities, a love for the sweep of history, and an overdeveloped sense of his own integrity and honor—ever have picked a person whose utter shortage of qualification for her proposed job all but disqualified him for his?
His points – that Palin clashed with staff of the McCain campaign, that she is something of a diva – are not groundbreaking. Here’s his assessment of the campaign:
It is the story of a political novice with an intuitive feel for the temper of her times, a woman who saw her opportunities and coolly seized them. In every job, she surrounded herself with an insular coterie of trusted friends, took disagreements personally, discarded people who were no longer useful, and swiftly dealt vengeance on enemies, real or perceived.
The author puts another question to his readers that is perhaps more serious: Palin has complained of the media’s treatment of her and her family – should she be more open to giving interviews for pieces like this?
Update 4:30 p.m. – The Washington Times has two McCain staffers going on the record about the Vanity Fair piece:
Jason Recher, who worked closely with Mrs. Palin as a vice presidential candidate, said “The mean tone of this article is completely false, this is not the Sarah Palin I knew and spent two and a half months with.” He also said he was tired of reporters using information about Mrs. Palin from people unwilling to go on the record.
And another said something similar:
David Welch, deputy research director for the McCain-Palin ticket, said he was “shocked to read the Vanity Fair article about Governor Palin and the allegations made against her by former staffers” and complained “significant parts of the story are based on half truths and gossip from staffers who refused to go on the record.”




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top47 Comments to “Vanity Fair profiles Palin”
First of all, no one can know everything. It is refreshing that someone in politics can admit that.Secondly, he’s trying to keep alive the “myth” the MSM created during the campaign. When he calls her a diva, all he’s really doing is showing his own inability to deal with a woman’s sexuality. If he can put her down — and he hopes far enough down — no one will have to deal with her. I think in the long run, this won’t succeed. Palin is one tough cookie, and she’ll stare the old boy network down.
In other words, this man is afraid of her.
I hope Lynn convinces her to deal with this issue in their book.
Report comment to moderator
In other words, this man is afraid of her.
lol
Report comment to moderator
SteveG, I hope this was a positive response!
If Palin didn’t have a chance, this guy wouldn’t care, wouldn’t have wasted his time trying to destroy her. He needs new material, though, because she survived his rewarmed nonsense.
Report comment to moderator
Vanity Fair: “What does it say about the nature of modern American politics that a public official who often seems proud of what she does not know is not only accepted but applauded?”
This is clueless and insidious cynicism, unfounded too.
* First, I saw no such “pride,” just honesty from her. Vanity Fair is just judging her inner motives maliciously, presuming her to be ignorant and proud of it at the same time. It is mean-spirited.
* Second, “What does it say about the nature of [Obama] worshipping mainstream media when a major journalist who often seems blind to objective fact still thinks he has something insightful to say about a politician he has already prejudged?
* Third, the only mainstream media applauding that is going on is directed toward the left, blindly too. In fact, they are protecting the left. I have heard it said that the media and Obama should “get a room.”
Report comment to moderator
Vanity Fair: “What does her prominence say about the importance of having (or lacking) a record of achievement in public life?”
The lack of a record of achievement in Obama’s public record was far more “lacking” than that of Governor Palin. But the media are hypocritically blind to that fact. Most of what Obama did prior to his presidency was agitate people and vote ‘present.’ The “shortage of qualification” we saw in Obama was far far far more obvious than in Governor Palin.
However, the hatred for Gov. Palin may indeed ultimately be successful. The hatred of President Bush was richly rewarded by the American people.
Report comment to moderator
Sounds like this guy took a bunch of hearsay, rumors and the opinions of her enemies and wrote an article. Let’s not confuse the issue with facts.
Report comment to moderator
Certainly Fawn Brodie wrote a superb book about Thos. Jefferson and she never interviewed him, so I’m not prepared to condemn Purdum for relying on secondary sources for a work some will label a hatchet job. But if you have a living person to interview, it seems daft to pass up that opportunity.
What major politician in US history from at least Lincoln onward WASN’T surrounded by a loyal coterie. All the accusations leveled at Palin fit the Boston Irish mafia of JFK, no?
I think Palin’s had her day. No one wanted to place Gerry Ferraro in nomination in 1992 and I’m wondering why all the anti-R journalists are pushing so much Palin newsprint.
Come to think of it, didnt someone point out that Palin was certainly every bit as qualified for Veep as Ferraro was?
And already I think Biden has substantially dropped the bar for future vice presidents.
Report comment to moderator
It seems that Vanity Fair’s Todd Purdum is subject to Psalm 18:2.
Report comment to moderator
Reading this Vanity Fair article for insights into who Palin is is like watching The Flintstones to prep for an archaeology exam or reading PLAYBOY to gain better understanding of women!
Report comment to moderator
Pretty good comment, Sawgunner. Smile!
Report comment to moderator
Like it or not, Palin scared a whole lot of people.
If she really wants a shot in 7 years, she better start reading a lot, developing a thicker skin and talking a lot to the MSM.
Winning a Senate seat wouldn’t hurt, either.
Report comment to moderator
My favorite part:
“people would never have given someone with Palin’s record a second glance if Palin had looked like Susan Boyle.”
So true.
Report comment to moderator
Except for wasting her time trying to impress the MSM, I agree with Arcadia that she should start reading, etc. Her skin is pretty thick already, considering what she’s had to endure, and the fact that she hasn’t cracked is what scares the MSM. They will be able to get away with that just so long.
And she does have a record of achievement: she’s been a mayor and she’s a governor. She gets the job done. She has common sense, will work for the people, is not afraid to take a tough stance or make a tough decision. Book learning doesn’t teach you common sense, nor does it give you the ability to make a hard decision. That comes from within. She’s also had life experience.
Maybe Alaskans will send her to the Senate, but I think if she gets to know more people, gets around the country, that the voters will like her. She’s not finished.
Report comment to moderator
And the comment about Susan Boyle shows the writer’s crassness, his shallowness, and very little about Palin or Boyle. Interesting that it finds support.
Report comment to moderator
If the left isn’t afraid of Palin, then why do they keep on slandering her? Why is she even a subject they write about?
If it isn’t fear of her candicacy, and subsequent win, then what is the interest? Why give her a second thought?
I never had any more interest or comments about Kerry after he washed up… and I just wished he’d go away, and that folks would stop talking about him.
Report comment to moderator
All I can say is thank God Sarah Palin was not elected to Vice President of the United States.
I think I see here the origins of the “liberal media” myth. Vanity Fair reports something that many here don’t want to believe about Palin. Rather than deal with any of the specific criticisms of their golden child, it’s so much easier for some on the right to simply shoot the messenger and call it a wash.
(Or, with mind-blowing absurdity, to chalk all criticism up to fear of Palin’s sexuality — a ridiculous notion that I had hoped died with her vice presidential bid.)
Report comment to moderator
Report comment to moderator
(sorry, wrong thread)
Report comment to moderator
#9 Sawgunner,
I read BETTY & VERONICA to better understand women.
Report comment to moderator
Despite the above, I consider that Sarah Palin is an extremely attractive woman on the outside. And an extremely attractive person on the inside. Imperfect, certainly. Treated fairly by the media? H E double hockey sticks, NO! But the worry that the Democrats have is that she is getting training and that the next time if there is one….. the MSM may not be able to ‘contain’ her. Hence they keep sniping even though that only reminds us what hypocrites the media have become.
Report comment to moderator
NJL: Book learning doesn’t teach you common sense
As opposed to, say, a medical or legal degree, eh?
Or even a picture book, like maybe an atlas?
You really need to stop making excuses for this woman, NJL.
By the way, which one of her two diametrically opposed opinions on the “Bridge to Nowhere” whas “tough” and “the right thing for the people”?
Report comment to moderator
Think what you want, but I guarantee that 9 out of 10 Democrats would love to see Sarah Palin as “next time’s” Republican candidate. They giggle to themselves in glee at the prospect.
Report comment to moderator
“Rather than deal with any of the specific criticisms of their golden child, it’s so much easier for some on the right to simply shoot the messenger and call it a wash.”
Or call it projection. And stereotyping.
Here is the author’s apparent “research”:
Woman = ignorant
Small-town woman = very ignorant
Small-town, conservative woman = very, very ignorant
Pretty woman = diva
Pretty woman in power = diva + b—h
And those things must be true, because “everybody” says so.
Report comment to moderator
My daughter recently talked to another woman who was attended several campaign functions with Palin because of her job. She told my daughter that Palin certainly never acted like any kind of diva.
I have to kind of laugh, though, about the lack of a record. Our standing president didn’t have a whole lot of that himself.
Report comment to moderator
Oops! I meant who had attended.
Report comment to moderator
It seems apparent to me that the world is really rebelling because Sarah Palin is living out her Christian testimony. Praise GOD!
Report comment to moderator
I hope Sarah Palin will do whatever she thinks the Lord wants her to do. Whether she continues in her job or becomes a SAHM or runs for a higher office is not a big concern of mine. I do think it is strange that people who keep belittling her and telling us she has no chance, seem bent on putting her down. Me thinks they protest too much.
Report comment to moderator
The Lord wants Sarah not to blaspheme.
When Trig was born, Palin wrote an e-mail letter to friends and relatives, describing the belated news of her pregnancy and detailing Trig’s condition; she wrote the e-mail not in her own name but in God’s, and signed it “Trig’s Creator, Your Heavenly Father.”
- from the Vanity Fair article.
Report comment to moderator
SAWGUNNER: But if you have a living person to interview, it seems daft to pass up that opportunity.
You’re mistaken. Vanity Fair didn’t neglect to talk to Palin, she refused a request for an interview. With Lynn Vincent working on the official autobiography, Palin no doubt had commercial reasons. But she has been unique in American politics in refusing to subject herself to long and detailed interviews.
Report comment to moderator
Just for Scroop Moth
From the Bulwer-Lytton Fiction Contest
Upon discovering that Miles Black, the famous phrenologist from Yorkshire was going to take up yodeling to lonely goats in Bali, James White decided to balance four planks of wood on a beer keg and call it an abstract work of art in the style of a famous fourteenth-century architect, just going to prove that people will read any old garbage if they think there will be a good pun at the end of it.
Don’t ask me why but the passage for some reason reminds me of you, Scroop.
Report comment to moderator
Not qualified? Sarah Palin was the only one qualified to be president out of Obama/Biden/McCain. The only thing I question about her is that she was willing to support such a fop as McCain.
Report comment to moderator
JJF says:
All I can say is thank God Sarah Palin was not elected to Vice President of the United States.
So is the converse true? Are you thankful that loose cannon Joe Biden is vice president?
We’re just a heartbeat away…
Report comment to moderator
No one is taking a shot at my questions eh? Why is the left still so interested in Palin?
Report comment to moderator
Thank you for reading and responding, FISH.
Report comment to moderator
#32, MIM,
You are right….. we are just a heart beat away….. Just one silly little heart beat away.
I find it interesting that Joe who was put on the ticket for his ‘foreign policy’ experience. isn’t saying much at all about Iran or Korea, or what? What has the Veep been doing? Has he run off to South America?
Report comment to moderator
The way liberals deal with people they disagree with is character assassination. CNN does a spot on Palin nearly every night and it is always a self-righteous chortling to themselves. This reporter is muckraking and offering opinion, not actual journalism.
They disparage her and her family in every way. But calling her inexperienced is funny considering that Obama had far less experience which is clearly showing now.
I am not sure I want Palin to be president, but the sophomoric ridicule from the left is churlish.
Report comment to moderator
When reading history or biography, I was always taught to be wary of anything written by a person’s enemies.
Report comment to moderator
I have often wondered if Obama would have been elected if he were fat and ugly.
Report comment to moderator
Addendum to #38- or white.
After all, Dan Quayle was also a young senator from a midwestern state, and no one thought he was ready for the White House.
Report comment to moderator
Reply to #39: Yup
Report comment to moderator
Governor Palin has committed a huge sin against leftist feminism — she rose to significance and influence on her own merits, hard work and convictions and without the help of some association with a husband-politician. Her husband seems like a fine man, and he is not a political means to and end to his wife.
This is apparently unforgiveable to modern leftist feninists.
Report comment to moderator
So you say.
The guy who actually looked into the matter — Todd Purdam — said she used a small coterie of intensely loyal supporters, some of whom she subsequently stabbed in the back.
Report comment to moderator
Make it Man, to answer your question; the Left is not afraid that Palin would be a threat to Obama in 2012; far from it. She would get her clock cleaned.
What the left fears is that a significant minority in this country actually consider this intellectually vacuous ruthless self promoter presidential material. What the left fears is an anti-intellectual cult of personality opposition party whose first priority is to ensure that the Democrats fail in fixing the problems of America. With all due respect, I can’t possibly understand how 40% of this country thinks she has what it takes to be President. She doesn’t know much about anything. She doesn’t give interviews because she embarrasses herself every time she does. I’m embarrassed for her and all her supporters. She and they deserve all the ridicule that can be heaped upon them because they are so wrong and so dangerous.
She’s done. Her supporters just haven’t figured it out yet. Not that they would be expected to, half of them probably think man walked with dinosaurs.
Report comment to moderator
What I’m saying is that Sarah Palin is attacked from the left, not because she is any sort of threat to Obama in 2012, but because she is a symbol for all the wrongheaded simpleminded lunacy of the religious right. She is the embodiment of the anti-intellectual, creationist, global warming denying, government is the problem, anti-middle class, pro corporate, faith based, gun loving, exorcism performing, pro white, pro war, anti-privacy, pro pollution, praying for rapture, base of the Republican Party.
Report comment to moderator
Or maybe, MiM, the premise of your question is just false. Maybe articles like these are not slander. Maybe Sarah Palin really is just not national leadership material.
Report comment to moderator
What’s amazing about this Palin Vanity Fair piece is that some big players in the McCain campaign and Bill Kiristol are in open warfare, not about the accuracy of the story, but about who the sources where for the article.
Report comment to moderator
intellectually vacuous ruthless self promoter
Is kwatson describing Palin or Obama? I don’t find Obama to be much of an intellectual heavy weight in reality. He is borderline ruthless and definitely a self promoter. Vacuous? Somewhat. But fortunately less so than his VP.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!