The Supreme Court shifting right?
Chief Justice of the Supreme Court John Roberts is shifting the court’s decisions to the right, according to an analysis piece by The New York Times reviewing the court’s now-finished season. Roberts was able to wrangle more conservative rulings, the piece argues, because he found an ally in swing vote Justice Anthony Kennedy, who voted with the chief justice 86 percent of the time. That’s important, according to the Times, because Kennedy is “the most powerful jurist in America.” Kennedy wrote the opinion for the most recent ruling on behalf of white firefighters in New Haven, Conn.
He joined the liberals 5 times and the conservatives 11. That was a significant shift to the right: in the previous term, Justice Kennedy voted four times each with the liberals and the conservatives in cases divided along the traditional ideological fault line.
The potential addition of Sonia Sotomayor will probably not affect this shift.
The arrival of a neophyte justice coupled with Chief Justice Roberts’s increasing mastery of the judicial machinery foreshadow a widening gap between the Democratic-led political branches and the Supreme Court. Indeed, the court appears poised to move to the right in the Obama era.
Interesting judicial politics!




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top10 Comments to “The Supreme Court shifting right?”
The old phrase was “Give me control of a nation’s currency and I care not who enacts its laws”.
I think now in America for lotsa folks it’s more like “Gimme control of the high court and I don’t care who enacts the laws since the judges can strike them down with simple 5/4 majorities”
I think we’ve seen the end of zip-lipped little Souter types quietly coming aboard the court with no thorough probing.
Report comment to moderator
Checks and balances at its finest.
Report comment to moderator
The notion that the court is tilting right betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of the role of the SCOTUS and the its judges. It doesn’t matter what a judge’s political preferences are. What does matter is whether he or she will render decisions based on what the laws and the U. S. Constitution actually says and means as can be best determined by the original understanding of those who received and acted upon it, and leave political decisions to the people and their respective legislatures, or will that judge attempt to subvert the Constitutionally defined (and constrained)process and impose their policy preference by artfully discerning penumbras and shadows in the spaces between the words that correspond with those preferences.
Left or right, capitalist or communist, libertarian or nanny state, all are irrelevant. Fidelity to the expressed and articulated words of the Constitution itself is the sole polestar for Supreme solons.
Report comment to moderator
Sawgunner writes: “I think we’ve seen the end of zip-lipped little Souter types quietly coming aboard the court with no thorough probing.”
I know what you are trying to say, but do you really think there will be thorough probing of Sotomayor? Really? If Alito or Roberts had been reversed four out of six cases, do you think they’d have gotten on the Court? I don’t think so.
Report comment to moderator
I note that Justice O’Connor voted with the majority in the Fireman’s Test case. Neglecting the fact that she would have had to recuse herself, Sotomayor would have voted with the minority, reversing the decision.
Report comment to moderator
NJLawyer, I agree with you wholeheartedly.
I cannot see how the Supreme Court can have increased Dignity when it will have not only a neophite but an outspokenly racist jurist on the bench. And Sotomayor is not going to be the only Obama appointee.
Report comment to moderator
The court is tilting toward the CORRECT, which also means right.
Report comment to moderator
As long as the Court leans away from the “Living Document” view of the Constitution, I am all for it. When it goes back to that view (or basing decisions on European cases), I am against it, no matter who is on the bench.
Report comment to moderator
Monty, you never know. Hanging around with Alito, she may actually learn something. And I’ll bet you that Ruthie will be teaching her a thing or two as well. I think she’ll shock Ruthie the most. I may not agree with Ruthie, but she knows how to put an opinion together.
So, now we have a president with no experience and soon we’ll have a justice who is biased. Way to go, huh?
Report comment to moderator
#3 You’re right that it’s a little misleading to label the justices “left” or “right” because they are more defined by their judicial philosophy – I believe the article addresses that issue.
But it is true that when you look at the court’s opinions, the “liberal” justices and “conservative” justices are typically divided.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!