No truth, no love, no justice
On Tuesday, Pope Benedict XVI released his first social encyclical, “Caritas in Veritate.” Social encyclicals are fascinating documents that demonstrate some of the best synthesis of theology, anthropology, economics, philosophy, and so on. This latest encyclical, translated “Love in Truth,” addresses key issues of our time, ranging from moral relativism to globalization to caring for the environment.
The strongest and most compelling portion of the encyclical is the introduction, where a necessary connection is made between love and truth. Without truth, that is, the truth, love (referenced in the letter as “charity”) cannot be fully realized:
Without truth, charity degenerates into sentimentality. Love becomes an empty shell, to be filled in an arbitrary way. In a culture without truth, this is the fatal risk facing love. It falls prey to contingent subjective emotions and opinions, the word “love” is abused and distorted, to the point where it comes to mean the opposite. Truth frees charity from the constraints of an emotionalism that deprives it of relational and social content, and of a fideism that deprives it of human and universal breathing-space. In the truth, charity reflects the personal yet public dimension of faith in the God of the Bible, who is both Agápe and Lógos: Charity and Truth, Love and Word.
Moreover, a Christianity without love is nothing but good sentiments, helpful for social mercy, but in the end, limited and temporal. Without full submission to the truth, love becomes distorted, confused, and misdirected. If we, as Christians, are committed to improving human society, we must be committed to giving people the truth that sets them free to be the people God created them to be.
Many will raise questions about the unclear economics in the encyclical, with the language of wealth “redistribution,” economic “inequalities,” the support of labor unions, and so on. Pope Benedict, however, has very strong critique of laissez-faire capitalism devoid of any moral direction or end. A healthy and free market seeks to create conditions where profit is a means to greater ends like social solidarity and the common good.
As would be expected, there is an excellent section describing the consequences of artificial contraception and abortion. Low birth rates in formerly prosperous nations are contributing to their decline, and when a nation’s best social and economic resource, i.e. people, are kept from contributing to society because of pills, plastics, and other synthetics, the entire nation suffers. Here’s how the encyclical addresses the life issue:
Openness to life is at the centre of true development. When a society moves towards the denial or suppression of life, it ends up no longer finding the necessary motivation and energy to strive for man’s true good. If personal and social sensitivity towards the acceptance of a new life is lost, then other forms of acceptance that are valuable for society also wither away. The acceptance of life strengthens moral fibre and makes people capable of mutual help.
Pope Benedict is also careful to note that a right understanding of the environment as “God’s gift”—to be used with responsibility, and as display of his wonderful “creative activity”—keeps us from the extremes of nature worship and abuse. The natural world is good and should be used for good ends.
On balance, the pastoral letter is a timely contribution to the international dialogue on the role of religion in public life in a world that is increasingly globalized. There is much more to do as we discern the most effective ways to stave off moral relativism while creating contexts, oriented by virtue, for sustainable wealth creation in the developing world so that things like clean drinking water and well-built homes are internationally normative.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Special Student Discount for WORLD!








Click to Print
Include Comments










back to top9 Comments to “No truth, no love, no justice”
A global economic political authority? No, thanks!
Report comment to moderator
I think there ought to be a law that no Christian can talk about “love” unless he/she means the love by which Christ loved us. And that would be defined as “seeking the other person’s highest good”. Without a strict definition of what we mean by love, the conversation quickly becomes just so much hot air.
Report comment to moderator
The question is not whether we should have global economic authority/institutions but for whom does the current economic institutions benefit or work for. The World Bank, IMF, G8, G20, OECD etc are all global institutions already created however the direction and for whom is something we should and can advocate.
As for his demographic warning, that’s why developed nations should have an active immigration policy.
Report comment to moderator
Would a Catholic care describe the parameters of what the Pope says truth is and isn’t. I’m very sure his parameters are very different than what non-Catholics would give. If a Protestant, a Catholic, and a Mormon wrote the exact sames words, they would each have radically different meanings even though the words were all exactly the same.
Report comment to moderator
Christ’s love for us is a special love.
Report comment to moderator
Mr. Bradley brings up good things regarding the Pope’s encyclical. I think the Catholics have at least retained one thing from their heritage that many Protestant/evangelicals have abandoned – namely the realm of the mind and thinking biblically through every aspect of our culture.
Not a huge trend I see in evangelical protestantism, however.
Report comment to moderator
In addition, I am impressed with the notion that the Pope sees the need for a market economy to be subservient, not a master. The highest “end” for man is not buying and selling but serving, glorifying and enjoying God. “Unrighteous mammon” is a means, not an end in and of itself.
Thank you Mr. Bradley for the article.
Report comment to moderator
“Without truth, charity degenerates into sentimentality.”
And, I would add, into flattery. That has been my experience… among many Evangelicals. To take a biblical stance against sins commonly accepted within churches–for example, remarriage that fits Jesus’ criteria as adultery–is to be judgmental, pharisaical, unloving, and not understanding of “grace.” Flattery has become the new “love.”
I am not Roman Catholic, but I agree fully with that first excerpt from the encyclical provided by Mr. Bradley.
Report comment to moderator
The Pope is calling for a one world government people! I have not much respect for the things he says afterwards. However…
The best form of economic activities is still capitalism. The problem is when capitalism runs amok of God’s way of doing it. The parable of the talents is a perfect example of what God expects from people. This is the way it’s always been and always will be. When people want to add or subtract from what God’s Word says, you will always have problems.
Most European countries are really Communist. This is what the Communist Party USA (CPUSA.org) banner states about communist/socialism.
“fight for peace, equality, democracy and socialism”
Countries espousing socialism (almost every European country) are a mess and have been a mess for a long, long time. Look at Italy, Germany, England, Portugal, Greece, Greenland, Spain. Not only are unemployment rates in most much higher, so are drug use, suicide, euthansia rates, welfare rates, and almost every other measurable rate.
The Pope is asking the world to be more like European countries. I think he’s absolutely dead wrong.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!