Ethics complaints against Palin
So what is the extent of the ethics pressure that Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is under? The Associated Press compiled a list of the ethics complaints filed against Palin, who will step down as governor soon saying she is a victim of “the politics of personal destruction.” Palin said the ethics investigations are unnecessarily consuming state resources.
In all, state officials say they have spent $1,963,840 to answer records requests from the ethics filings and to respond in other ways to them. Records show that since January 1, 2008, the state has spent $296,043 on such investigations.
Since Palin took office, 19 complaints have been filed, with a new one filed since the AP compiled its list at the end of June. Four of the resolved complaints have to do with “Troopergate.” Palin also reimbursed the state over $8,000 for travel with her children.
One of the more bizarre complaints:
Jan. 12: Complaint alleging interference in a job hiring was filed under the name of Edna Birch, a busybody character on the British soap opera Emmerdale. Palin’s attorney, Thomas Van Flein, said no one by that name could be found living in Alaska and the filer refused to use a real name, so the complaint was dismissed Feb. 20.
Palin was also charged with a conflict of interest for wearing gear with the Arctic Cat logo at her husband’s snowmobile race – the company sponsors Todd Palin.
All of these have been dismissed or resolved; four, including the one filed days ago, are pending. The cases allege that Palin has misused the state office for personal or political gain.
Update: TIME magazine’s cover story on Palin this week has this comment about what one of her advisers sees as the source of the trouble:
“A lot of this comes from Washington, D.C. The trail is pretty direct and pretty obvious to us,” says Meg Stapleton, a close Palin adviser in Alaska. Awaiting a flight back to Anchorage from distant Dillingham, Stapleton adds that the anti-Palin offensive seems lifted straight from The Thumpin’, which describes the political strategies of Rahm Emanuel, who is now the White House chief of staff. “It’s the Sarah Palin playbook. It’s how they operate,” Stapleton says.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top46 Comments to “Ethics complaints against Palin”
So, they have found a new to shut up the opposition. Sue them out. This will pretty much eliminate anyone who is not rich enough to fight it.
Report comment to moderator
In other news, Obama’s approval ratings are headed where they oughta be. Buffet predicts the unemployment to go up to 11% (no duh).
Too bad the folks dreaming up these lawsuits don’t have a REAL job. They could be productive instead of wasting taxpayer dollars.
I’ve already predicted that these cases will all go away, without knowing any details about them, and I’ll say it again. She won’t be convicted of anything.
A clue for they jerks still trying to take Palin down. The election was over six months ago… And she’s resigned as governor. You people ought to have to foot the bill for these silly lawsuits.
Report comment to moderator
The media sent multiple brigades of newshounds to investigate alleged corruption in Wasilla and the Alaskan capital during the last prez campaign. But corruption investigations in BHO’s home state and hometown of Chicago? Not so much. Move along- nothing to see here, folks!!
Report comment to moderator
There should be some sort of “loser pays all costs” enacted in the USA to lessen these and other bogus charges. They would be laughed out of court or never see the light of day.
Report comment to moderator
Soundds exactly like an Obama tactic. He did that to his opponents in Chicago. Sad and maddening to see it played out again and again. These Democrats are monsters.
Report comment to moderator
tin hat time at WMB
Investigating and publishing stories of corruption in Chicago is similar to dog bites man story. Have the corruption allegations on Palin since the election been national news? I doubt it.
Part of the problem is she makes newbie errors allowing her opponents to score cheap points — wearing Arctic Cat or any other company apparel will appear as an endorsement especially if her husband has ties to it. Its her inexperience showing through.
Report comment to moderator
On one hand, I’m dubious of the Rahm Emanuel connection, more assertion than anything else. Still, Dahlia Lithwick, no sympathizer herself, thinks there may be something to all the lawsuits: they were a burden.
As irritating as these lawsuits may be, are they a sufficient reason for the Governor’s departure? That seems more dubious. Indeed, if you blame the lawsuits for causing you to leave, it does seem to encourage that tactic for the next luckless governor. For that reason, I think it would be have been better for the Gov. Palin to have developed a thicker skin.
Report comment to moderator
The most recent ethics complaint field against Sarah Palin was filed by an Alaska citizen who objects to Palin illegally collecting per diem money to stay in her own home. It has nothing to do with Rahm Emanuel, or anyone else in Washington.
Poor Meg Stapleton must be realizing that she is going down with the Palin ship. This is the same communications director who was tasked with rebutting Levi’s appearance on Tyra!
“Soundds exactly like an Obama tactic. He did that to his opponents in Chicago.”
Filing (in the last case completely legit) an abundance of ethics violation complaints through proxy is “an Obama tactic”? He’s done it before? Cite an example!
Report comment to moderator
Someone buy poor Sarah a can of WD40 — she is stuck in Perpetual Victim Mode©
Report comment to moderator
The Sarah Palin playbook is apparently to make unsubstantiated and absurdly self-important allegations about the White House’s involvement.
(1) Every Democrat in America would love for Sarah Palin to be Obama’s opposition in 2012. The woman is hated by moderates, even Republican moderates. The White House has no reason to want to destroy her.
(2) The President of the United States has bigger fish to fry than the ignorant and inarticulate governor of a state with fewer people than Detroit.
Report comment to moderator
The “millions of dollars” that are being wasted on these investigations aren’t really costing the tax payers of Alaska one extra dime. The state lawyers working on this stuff would draw the same salary no matter what. True, the lawyer’s time could probably be better spent on other things, but to imply that the Alaskan tax payer is being soaked because there are a few more charge numbers showing up on the lawyer’s time sheets is disingenuous.
Report comment to moderator
Can y’all come up with another politician who has had more trivial lawsuit(none of which have stuck) filed against them? I mean is this normal?
Report comment to moderator
Stapleton’s assertion doesn’t square with facts.
90% of the complaints were filed by Alaskans (Sarah’s employers). The only one with a connection to D.C. is the complaint about Wardrobegate which was filed by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington.
Report comment to moderator
12- “none of which have stuck”
Where there’s smoke, there’s fire. The kids-travelgate investigation resulted in Palin having to repay the state “$10,000 for costs associated with 10 trips found to be of questionable state interest”
Several others remain unresolved.
Report comment to moderator
12 Kbells,
Look towards Democrats using this ploy more and more. What is disingenuous is the fact that they know they can hurt over absolutely nothing. And we as good people have to object.
I will go out and buy Arctic Cat for about fifty friends.
Report comment to moderator
#11, what is disingenuous is the lame attempt to deny that this is costing the state of Alaska a ton of money all on false partisan pretenses.
Even those making a salary anyhow are not being able to do the legitimate work of the state that they are being paid for.
Report comment to moderator
#13, do your really think we are so stupid as to believe that just because the official name on a vicious unfounded compliant is technically an Alaskan citizen, that it is really coming from such a source? That’s all part of the legal pretense and the cover-up strategy, RPN. There is no way that thugs would do it any differently. Sheesh.
Report comment to moderator
If the worshipful media were fair, the left would not get away with all this hateful meanness and McCarthyism.
Democrats in high places with much power are causing this. No honest person can deny that with a straight face. They also went to great expense for 8 years to smear President Bush, often on false pretenses, and the media aided and protected them all the way. That’s why so many loathed President Bush too. Generating widespread hatred for their opponents (often on false pretenses) is plan A for Democrats on a mission. WEe have seen too much of it already. Look what they did to Bork, to Thomas, to Dan Quayle, to Dick Cheney, to George Bush, to Sarah Palin, none of whom did anything scandalous to deserve it. They merely served their country with integrity.
This will continue, Chicago style.
Report comment to moderator
Joel-
Could you send me one of your tin hats?
Report comment to moderator
KBells hit is right out of the box — sue the person into oblivion. Bankrupt them. The left SHOULD be ashamed, but it won’t be, and any lefty here who thinks this is a good thing for the country is a fool. Note that I did not call anyone in particular a fool.
I think Palin made a wise decision in leaving Alaska’s government. Don’t give people anything to feed off of. And for people who say they are happy to see her go, for people who say she is washed up, the left spends an inordinate amount of time in trying to dispose of her.
You don’t fight what you are not afraid of especially when it’s in retreat.
Report comment to moderator
Democrats are not good (or nice) winners.
Report comment to moderator
20-
Did you see the new Rassmusen Poll of Republican voters showing how polarizing Poor Sarah is for Republicans?
1* I know it’s a long way off, but suppose the 2012 Republican Presidential Primary were held in your state today. If you had a choice between Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, Newt Gingrich, Haley Barbour and Tim Pawlenty, for whom would you vote?
25% Romney
24% Palin
22% Huckabee
14% Gingrich
1% Barbour
1% Pawlenty
6% Some other candidate
6% Not sure
2* Okay…regardless of who you would vote for, which candidate would you least like to see win the Republican nomination in 2012…. Mitt Romney, Sarah Palin, Mike Huckabee, Newt Gingrich, Haley Barbour or Tim Pawlenty?
9% Romney
21% Palin
10% Huckabee
15% Gingrich
21% Barbour
15% Pawlenty
11% Not sure
Report comment to moderator
Quick, RPN, tell us who the leading Democratic presidential hopeful was in 2005?
Kerry?
Gore?
Edwards?
Clinton?
Dean?
None of the above?
Polls taken today for the 2012 election are totally meaningless.
Report comment to moderator
I realize this is true, Scott, and was not the point I think the poll makes. It shows how polarized even the GOP is over Poor Sarah.
Report comment to moderator
Meanwhile, back in Washington: From the Washington Times, June 26, 2009″ “Conyers backs off probe of ACORN practices”
“While obviously of a much lesser magnitude, the House Judiciary Committee chairman’s May 4 statement exonerating ACORN couldn’t have come out at a worse time. “Based on my review of the information regarding the complaints against ACORN, I have concluded that a hearing on this matter appears unwarranted at this time,” Conyers said in a statement aired that night on CNN’s “Lou Dobbs Tonight.”
Mr. Conyers, Michigan Democrat, earlier bucked his party leaders by calling for hearings on accusations the Association of Community Organization for Reform Now (ACORN) has committed crimes ranging from voter fraud to a mob-style “protection” racket.
“The powers that be decided against it,” Mr. Conyers told The Washington Times as he left the House chambers Wednesday.”
We will have ACORN counting votes in the next election.
That’s the way they do it in Chicago.
Report comment to moderator
RPN, whatever point you think the poll makes, Scott is still correct: “Polls taken today for the 2012 election are totally meaningless.”
Report comment to moderator
Continuing from The Washington Times
Pittsburgh lawyer Heather Heidelbaugh, said,
“If the chair of the Judiciary Committee cannot hold a hearing if he wants to, [then] who are the powers that he is beholden to?” she said. “Is it the leadership, is it the White House, is it contributors? Who is ‘the power’?”
Capitol Hill had bristled at the prospect of hearings because it threatened to rekindle criticism of the financial ties and close cooperation between President Obama’s campaign and ACORN and its sister organizations Citizens Services Inc. and Project Vote.
The groups came under fire during the campaign after probes into suspected voter fraud in a series of presidential battleground states, including Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, New Mexico and Nevada.
ACORN and its affiliates are currently the target of at least 14 lawsuits related to voter fraud in the 2008 election and a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act complaint filed by former ACORN members.
But ACORN will not be debated in the MSM the way Sarah is. Except on FoxNews.
Report comment to moderator
How much will the special session required for the legislature to appoint a new Lt. Governor cost Alaskan tax payers? I’ve seen it estimated at $200,000, possibly more.
And Joel- It appears you misunderstand again. I point out the poll because it illustrates how polarizing Victim Sarah is, even among Republicans.
Report comment to moderator
Well gosh NJL, I think Palin made a wise decision exiting the government too. If only Mark Sanford would follow her studious example.
Kbells, the problem with your conspiracy theory is that legal costs for Palin’s defense are being paid by the state. And they haven’t cost the state real expenditure, because we’re talking about lawyers who would collect funds irregardless. They were already part of the budget.
As for examples of governors who have received similar treatment, I am unaware of any other state governor who has collected per diem money for living in his/her own home.
But alas, she is gone. And we’ll just have to wait and see who steps into her poorly fit shoes. I’m hoping Carly Fiorina is getting opportunistic.
Report comment to moderator
KBells hit is right out of the box — sue the person into oblivion. Bankrupt them.
Similiar to SLAPP suits?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SLAPP
Report comment to moderator
HRW- 30
That’s what Palin and her lawyer were/are trying to do to Shannyn Moore, an Alaska blogger who reported rumors about Palin’s resignation as, well, rumors about Palin’s resignation. Obviously nothing to sue over, but they just wish to use lawsuits to stifle Shannyn’s free speech.
http://shannynmoore.wordpress.com/2009/07/05/shannyn-moore-will-not-be-muzzled/
Report comment to moderator
Barack Obama also did NOT finish the term for which he was elected by the people to serve as senator. He quit and I don’t blame him either. I don’t blame Palin either. Maybe it comes down to the correct assessment on her part that no job is worth vicious attacks on one’s family and spending one’s life being attacked from super high places of power–incurring horrible legal expenses for her and her state.
But both quit before finishing their terms. Why be so mean and partisan about it?
Report comment to moderator
“spending one’s life being attacked from super high places of power”
I gotta get me one of those tin hats!! Come on Joel! Send me yours! I’ll pay shipping.
Report comment to moderator
RPN, you misunderstood me. Scott was correct about polls. Simple enough? It’s my point of view.
But regarding “polarization,” that is nothing more than what the leftist media manufactures to smear people and gain political ends. Polls often only reflect what the media manufactures and manipulates. They are worthless at this point for any fair-minded person seekeing to assess candidates or potential candidates at this time.
Media strategy: smear and disparage Sarah Palin as viciously and as long as possible, then run a poll to see if people were listening or falling for it.
_______
Report comment to moderator
Decent people need not vote for Sarah Palin, if she runs. Decency does not demand that. But decent people will see through the partisan Democrat hate-mongering and legal McCarthyism the left is using on her.
Report comment to moderator
Joel-
The poll was not done by Rasmussen Reports, not “the leftist media”…. Your hat is crooked.
Report comment to moderator
or WAS done by Rasmussen, rather.
Report comment to moderator
One of my favorite paragraphs in Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged was Part II, Chapter 3, when government hack Dr. Ferris explained white blackmail to industrialist Hank Rearden:
“Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed?” said Dr. Ferris. “We want them broken. You’d better get it straight that it’s not a bunch of boy scouts you’re up against—then you’ll know that this is not the age for beautiful gestures. We’re after power and we mean it. You fellows were pikers, but we know the real trick, and you’d better get wise to it. There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren’t enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted—and you create a nation of law-breakers—and then you cash in on guilt. Now that’s the system, Mr. Rearden, that’s the game, and once you understand it, you’ll be much easier to deal with.”
That’s the system we have in D.C. today, and Palin better get wise to it.
Report comment to moderator
I was cleaning out my stored links today and found Peggy Noonan’s infamous WSJ column on Palin from the campaign: it seems more apt today than even then:
But we have seen Mrs. Palin on the national stage for seven weeks now, and there is little sign that she has the tools, the equipment, the knowledge or the philosophical grounding one hopes for, and expects, in a holder of high office. She is a person of great ambition, but the question remains: What is the purpose of the ambition? She wants to rise, but what for? For seven weeks I’ve listened to her, trying to understand if she is Bushian or Reaganite—a spender, to speak briefly, whose political decisions seem untethered to a political philosophy, and whose foreign policy is shaped by a certain emotionalism, or a conservative whose principles are rooted in philosophy, and whose foreign policy leans more toward what might be called romantic realism, and that is speak truth, know America, be America, move diplomatically, respect public opinion, and move within an awareness and appreciation of reality.
But it’s unclear whether she is Bushian or Reaganite. She doesn’t think aloud. She just . . . says things.
Her supporters accuse her critics of snobbery: Maybe she’s not a big “egghead” but she has brilliant instincts and inner toughness. But what instincts? “I’m Joe Six-Pack”? She does not speak seriously but attempts to excite sensation—”palling around with terrorists.” If the Ayers case is a serious issue, treat it seriously. She is not as thoughtful or persuasive as Joe the Plumber, who in an extended cable interview Thursday made a better case for the Republican ticket than the Republican ticket has made. In the past two weeks she has spent her time throwing out tinny lines to crowds she doesn’t, really, understand. This is not a leader, this is a follower, and she follows what she imagines is the base, which is in fact a vast and broken-hearted thing whose pain she cannot, actually, imagine. She could reinspire and reinspirit; she chooses merely to excite. She doesn’t seem to understand the implications of her own thoughts.
Report comment to moderator
I don’t often agree with Noonan, but she has Palin dialed in.
Report comment to moderator
Joel,
Send RPN a raw steak instead.
Report comment to moderator
Keep in mind that when you read political pundit journalists (including Peggy Noonan) commenting extensively on people they don’t even know, they are really talking about themselves.
Case in point: Noonan wrote: “But it’s unclear whether she is Bushian or Reaganite. She doesn’t think aloud. She just . . . says things.”
Noonan is paid to just say things. These words describe the author of the statement more than it describes any person that the author wants us to think she knows inside and out. Noonan is paid to caricature and pigeon-hole people she does not even know. We are not that easily fooled.
Report comment to moderator
I still don’t know who will be in the Republican primary nor do I know which one I prefer. But I know I don’t prefer the politics of political destruction from hateful hypocrits who have immunity from the leftist media.
Report comment to moderator
Whozat talk about ACORN in a trash Sarah thread?
Report comment to moderator
Mynock @#29: As for examples of governors who have received similar treatment, I am unaware of any other state governor who has collected per diem money for living in his/her own home.
Former Illinois Rod Blagojevich may not have gotten a per diem, but he flew back and forth from his Chicago home to Springfield on a state owned plane, at taxpayers expense (St. Louis Post Dispatch, June 21, 2007). And not just on weekends, but daily, and this during a state budget crisis!
Report comment to moderator
“Send RPN a raw steak instead.”
If you send a nice thick ribeye I’ll grill it tonight!
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!