Banned words
An eye-opening book titled The Language Police lists about 500 words that are banned from school textbooks. Some are amusing, some stupid (probably a banned word), and some are chilling. Here is a very partial list of banned words:
- Founding Fathers—Banned as sexist. Replace with Founders or Framers. (Because we would not want to note that the men who wrote the documents were men)
- Caveman—Banned as sexist, replace with cave dweller. (Wonder if that makes the Geico Cave . . . uhhh . . . dweller feel a little better?)
- Disadvantaged—Banned, replace with reference to the resources or rights that are absent in an individual’s life circumstances. (Example: Dave cannot sing because of resources that are absent in his individual life circumstance. Like talent.)
- Courageous—Banned as patronizing when referring to persons with disabilities. (Some of the most courageous people I know are those who are disabled. I really don’t get this one.)
- God—Banned for being . . . steady yourself . . . too religious. (I can’t even muster the strength to respond.)
- Lunatic—Banned as offensive, replace with person with a psychiatric illness. (C.S. Lewis would have to change his famous argument about Jesus being Lord, liar, or lunatic. His PC argument would be something like this: Is the revered moral teacher a higher power, untrustworthy source, or person with a psychiatric illness? Kind of loses its pizzazz doesn’t it?
- Soda—Banned for regional bias, replace with Coke, Pepsi. (Seriously? Regional bias? I grew up drinking “pop” and moved to “Coke” territory. That has not been my biggest life issue so far.)
- Teenager—Banned, replace with adolescent. (I was all for banning teenagers at various times in my household. Especially when they acted like lunatics.)
I fear that we might subtly be doing the same thing with our Christian language. CNN’s Larry King asked a famous television preacher if he used the word “sinner.” (I don’t use the preacher’s name because I would get bombarded by his fans who would ignore my point entirely.) Here’s the upbeat preacher’s reply:
“I never thought about [using the word 'sinners'], but I probably don’t. Most people already know what they’re doing wrong. When I get them to church, I want to tell them that you can change.”
But how can you be cured if you don’t know the disease? I understand that many of us (present company included) were damaged by a legalistic and graceless upbringing. But that is a theology problem. The truth remains the same. The late Howard Cosell’s signature phrase was “telling it like it is.” Our culture seems increasingly less capable of calling simple concepts by their names, and it carries over to the church.
Our politically correct society has made sin an archaic and intolerant word. But there is no other word that communicates any behavior that separates me from a Holy God as powerfully as sin. The law does not convict us of blunders and slip-ups. It convicts me of sin. By reducing the power of the concept of sin we have negated the awesome gift of grace. You don’t need grace to rescue you from idiosyncrasies. I haven’t been moved by a hymn that says:
Amazing Grace. How sweet the sound,
That empowered a dysfunctional but spiritually seeking and fundamentally good person like me.
Somehow John Newton’s original line about saving a “wretch like me” hits a little closer to my story. I am not talking about self-bashing and looking for fault. I am talking about the mind-boggling prospect of facing a holy and sinless God with a résumé that I would have to present. Am I a good person? Yeah, I think so. Am I up to that appointment without the redemptive endorsement of Jesus? No way.
The classic hymn “He Took My Sins Away,” by Margaret Harris would lose some luster if many of us in the body of Christ were writing it about ourselves. Here is the refrain as she wrote it in 1901:
He took my sins away, He took my sins away,
And keeps me singing every day!
I’m so glad He took my sins away,
He took my sins away.
One hundred and seven years later it might go something like this:
He recognized my dysfunctional past, He helped me find my inner voice,
And showed me it was not my fault!
I’m so glad He understood my syndrome,
He took away my responsibility.
Same verse . . . everybody sing along now.
Pastor Mark Driscoll says a little talk of hellfire, so out of fashion these days, would do the world good. Driscoll founded Mars Hill Church in Seattle, a non-denominational megachurch with 7,000 in Sunday attendance, chiefly singles in their 20s. He defines sin as “anything contrary to God’s will. People assume the way they are is normal, not that something has gone terribly wrong, and this world is abnormal.”
Without the concept of sin, the idea of salvation is moot. Anything that breaks the covenant between me and a Holy God is sin. God doesn’t have scales to weigh our sins. Really good people still fall short of the mark. I fall short and I need that fixed. Jesus came to fix it. That gift of forgiveness is incomprehensible.
Jesus called sin by its name. But here is the miracle: If we believe in faith that He came to deal with that sin-debt, then He calls us by another name . . . His child. All it takes is accepting the gift of salvation.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top38 Comments to “Banned words”
This post is an excellent argument for ensuring the word “sin” is purged from our public school curriculum. Sin, salvation, grace and hellfire have absolutely no place in our public schools.
Report comment to moderator
Whoa! Lots to discuss in this blog. I don’t get banning “courageous” either. That’s lunatic-al.
And banning “God” from the dictionary? As if He needs the endorsement of a school textbook!
I have found it interesting that two perfectly good biblical words now have completely different meanings i.e. “gay” and “liberal”.
Now, as far as John Newton’s hymn. I have been in churches that have replaced “a wretch like me” to “a one like me”. More PC? We wouldn’t want to think of ourselves past or present as wretches, now, would we?
Report comment to moderator
We must respond with the precise words that accurately communicate what we are trying to say while basically ignoring the blind and ignorantly harmful attitudes of the PC followers.
KWATSON (like every person in all of human history) is a sinner who is going to hell to suffer eternal seperation from God if he does not accept the salvation that God graciously offers to us all. No amount of denying or changing the words used will change the truths they describe.
Report comment to moderator
I am going to guess the famous television preacher is Robert Schuller.
Report comment to moderator
Christian terminology that got dumped:
Started with “Profession of Faith”
Became “Testimony”
Is now “Your God Story”
This terminology seems to focus in more on how subjective religion is becoming.
Report comment to moderator
It certainly is appropriate to be kind, and courteous with our words. But it is neither appropriate nor kind to use watered down or changed words that miscommunicate or alter truth.
It would not be appropriate or kind to say to KWATSON or others something like:
“There are some people in our world who are not as nice as others and they risk some unhappiness if they don’t consider that God loves them.”
Ideas and the words describing them have real meaning.
Report comment to moderator
KWATSON #1
I might understand the arguments against these words not being taught in public schools. AT least not taught like they are taught in Church, anyway.
But how does this post actually confirm your argument?
Also, what about grace? Can’t that be taught in a non-religous manner? And salvation?
Report comment to moderator
The other word that will soon be banned is “truth” because we wouldn’t want people to know the Truth, that would be way too narrow, almost like saying that “God” exists and we wouldn’t want to upset the pathetic minority who insist we don’t use words that may be against their judgement but who freely call everybody who doesn’t agree with them a fringe lunatic.
Report comment to moderator
So, how does one teach history without using the word “God?” How anyone can say God is “too religious” is beyond me — it’s inane and insane.
And considering there are so many sodas out there, how does one choose coke or pepsi, by region no less? I’ve been exposed to coke and pepsi all my life. And what’s wrong with regions? For a group of people (leftys) who are always talking about diversity, they don’t seem to be able to handle any.
Courageous is a good word, so is disadvantaged.
Report comment to moderator
A book such as the one mentioned above hasn’t stopped teachers and others from using these words.
Let’s face it there is a book on just about every subject, but whether it makes sense or not doesn’t make any difference. I would think most people would ignore it.
Report comment to moderator
I have a list of words that I would like to disappear from the public lexicon:
1) Abortion. May its practice cease world wide.
Global warming.
2) Homosexual. I really don’t care about your orientation, unless you wish to repent, or change.
3) Neo-con. Isn’t this just another way to label conservatives as Nazis? I could be wrong, but that’s always how I have percieved it.
4) Progresives. A rose by any other name is still a rose.
5) Extremists. As an adjective to label any particular group.
6) Pedophile. NAMBLA. No comment needed.
7) Evolution.
9) The phrase, “It’s Bush’s fault”.
I’m sure that more can be added.
Report comment to moderator
That’s funny, I didn’t mean for the emoticon for #8. Cool though.
Report comment to moderator
Brother Dan – I like number 8 – it fits just fine.
Report comment to moderator
Now I’ve learned how to make a
Report comment to moderator
“anything contrary to God’s will…”
It runs deeper than that..
“Wherefore, as by one man sin entered into the world, and death by sin; and so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned:” (Ro 5:12)
While one sleeps, before one “thinks” or “does” the “contrary”, there is need of the Saviour.
:-O
Thank God for 24/7 security..
“Jude, the servant of Jesus Christ, and brother of James, to them that are sanctified by God the Father, and PRESERVED in Jesus Christ, [and] called:” (Jude 1:1)
Report comment to moderator
“I never thought about [using the word 'sinners'], but I probably don’t. Most people already know what they’re doing wrong. When I get them to church, I want to tell them that you can change.”
Let’s take a little liberty..what was his next line?
Perhaps..
“I never thought about [using the words 'Jesus Christ'], but I probably don’t. Most people already know about what He did. When I get them to church, I want to tell them you can change.
Change from “what”, through “who”, to become “?” ?
Maybe they go to the “church”, hear a little tune and fell better about self-fixing.
Yikes!
Report comment to moderator
NOPM,
Your guess is close but incorrect. (I looked it up after I thought who it might be. Schuller was my ‘other’ choice.)
What concerns me about banning words from textbooks is that it goes beyond the actions of one’s local school board. How can the board make a good textbook choice if ALL of them are banning this type of language?
Orwell would be proud.
Report comment to moderator
Some language choices are more ethical than others. Do you disagree?
Report comment to moderator
ITSABOUTFREEDOM (8)
I don’t think ‘truth’ will be banned because today it really doesn’t express a concept we agree upon. ‘His truth’ and ‘my truth’ may be diametrically opposed but our society today is so tolerant and so inclusive, and few individuals are so discerning as to argue the point. We don’t care any longer, what difference does it make? ‘Truth’ will more likely cease to be used and become merely obsolete. ‘Opinion’ and ‘idea’ may be substituted because they carry little weight. Who cares what my opinion is about the way to God as long as I’m not dogmatic about it?
Os Guinness has written a fine little book Time for Truth: Living Free in a World of Lies, Hype, and Spin. It’s well worth reading. Several of us at our church have used this book in a study group.
Report comment to moderator
That sounds like an awesome book Allen…..I may actually try to download this on my Kindle.
Report comment to moderator
I hope you do, my friend. Some of the examples of flat-out lies passed off as true and believed as true will open your eyes. Guinness’s book is not difficult reading and the stories are often astounding. We believe precisely what we want to believe, even it it’s not verifiable (there, I avoided the t-word).
Report comment to moderator
Alas, ITSABOUTFREEDOM, it’s not on Kindle yet. I just put in a request.
BTW, I just got a Kindle for my B-day. I am REALLY enjoying it! Especially the “sample” feature, and the ability to convert word docs. to Kindle. There are many articles in my Logos Bible Software that I will be converting to word doc, then Kindle.
How are you enjoying yours?
Report comment to moderator
I’m glad my autistic child is homeschooled so I can tell him that though he is disavantaged – he really is quite courageous!
I had a friend who taught Bible in Schools back when it was still legal. There was a long list of words disallowed, including sin, hell, the devil, satan. She was not allowed to even teach about these subjects, and was required to tell students that everyone goes to heaven. She also was not allowed to give students Bibles, so she gave them a book of Matthew one week, a book of Mark the next week and so on. She was blown away by the reaction of the students (all of whom chose to go to her class voluntarily). They were so excited by the books she gave them, they read each book before the next week and couldn’t wait to get the next. They’d never heard of anything like that before. They said it was much more exciting and interesting than the boring stuff they usually get in school.
If the schools keep banning words, children who manage to come across the Bible will be amazed at how fresh and relevant and true it is.
Report comment to moderator
Thanks, Contented-Joy. Your story is very edifying. (I wonder if “edifying” will ever be on the hit-list). Bless you and your courageous child, and may the God of all peace make His face to shine upon you!
Your story is a joyous reminder that the Word of God is like a glass of cold fresh water to those that are not even aware that they are dying of thirst! May we, His children, never forget.
Report comment to moderator
I actually went to a church (once!) that sang “Amazing Grace” without the “wretch like me.” I can’t remember what they changed it to, but it was something totally PC and acceptable.
At the time, I was relatively liberal in my Christian thinking (we were just starting to go to Church again after years away), but I remember telling my husband:
“*I* believe that way, but I don’t want my *church* to.” LOL In other words, I recognized (somewhere) the disconnect between how I was thinking and what the Truth was.
We never went back to that church and ended up at a nice, Conservative Free Methodist for many years.
Report comment to moderator
Oh, and that original church? They also had couples stand up who were celebrating certain anniversaries, and they had a same-sex couple stand up. Also bothered me, even though *I* didn’t have a problem with it. But, I thought the church ought to.
And, when asked what I grew up as, the members of the church didn’t even know what a Pentacostal or Assembly of God was, and called it “another religion.” LOL
Report comment to moderator
Quote from original blog entry:
“He recognized my dysfunctional past, He helped me find my inner voice,
And showed me it was not my fault!
I’m so glad He understood my syndrome,
He took away my responsibility.”
I know the original writer was being facetious, but I think a few words need to be clarified. The thing is, He DOES recognize our dysfunctional pasts. Because we are all products of the Fall, I think we all have a dysfunctional past apart from Christ. Of course, He knows our sins. However, He also knows our heartaches and that we are all prone to various weaknessess. Maybe we have “syndromes”, but that’s the beauty of Calvary; it’s all encompassing.
Report comment to moderator
DAVE BURCHETT’s entire essay is based on the passive voice. No agent is named. Very Kafkaesque. A vague force of banning can be sensed. A tacit spirit of prohibition certainly detected. Dave’s bootless cries are remanded from the publishers without comment.
DAVE is mistaken to suggest that language standards require us to erase the prejudices of the past. That would be impossible. We have a responsibility not to enable and perpetuate ancient prejudices. Language indiscretions by famous men (CS Lewis’ “lunatic”) are a teaching opportunity. Fig leafs are a conservative correction.
Finally, grace offers no advantages over changing antecedents and consequences and has the disadvantage of requiring punishment, which is the least useful means to improve behavior.
Report comment to moderator
BY kwatson 08.10.09 AT 12:33 PM
This post is an excellent argument for ensuring the word “sin” is purged from our public school curriculum. Sin, salvation, grace and hellfire have absolutely no place in our public schools.
I’m amazed that anybody would have the words sin, salvation, grace and hellfire banned from public school curriculum. Were this to be the case (the banning of religious sounding words) good bye Steinbeck (his books were all about ssgh), Vonnegut, Twain, Shakespear, Hemingway, and let us not forget Camus and the other philosophers who dared to try to understand God, ssgh! Not much literature to teach, is there.
Report comment to moderator
Fisherman We must respond with the precise words that accurately communicate what we are trying to say while basically ignoring the blind and ignorantly harmful attitudes of the PC followers.
KWATSON (like every person in all of human history) is a sinner who is going to hell to suffer eternal seperation from God if he does not accept the salvation that God graciously offers to us all. No amount of denying or changing the words used will change the truths they describe.
What ever happened to “speaking the truth in love?” (Ephesians 4). Are you expressing your Christian faith (I hope not!) or are you writing satire. I personally hope you were just having fun. If not, I’m sorry, I had better not write any more, or I’ll get in more trouble than I already am.
God Bless, and yes, Jesus does save. That isn’t hard to understand.
Report comment to moderator
Sorry for a confusing comment. My comment begins with “What ever . . .”
Report comment to moderator
to Scott Robinson @ # 17: My first inclination is that it sounds more like Joel Osteen.
Report comment to moderator
Contented Joy
I totally agree! I know that it requires dedication, and love, and trust in the Lord to homeschool a special needs child. (am I allowed to say that?) I have 3 children with Asperger’s Syndrome, and I am happy to say that they enjoy the freedom of homeschooling. No politically correct nonsense in our school! :0)
It is amazing how fresh, true, and relevant the Bible is, especially for those who have never heard.
***********************************************
BY kwatson 08.10.09 AT 12:33 PM
“This post is an excellent argument for ensuring the word “sin” is purged from our public school curriculum. Sin, salvation, grace and hellfire have absolutely no place in our public schools.
*************************************************
I would like to add that innocent children have no place in our public schools. The filth in the public schools is shocking! The children that do go there are not properly socialized. In general they come out cruel, dishonest, cheaters, undisciplined, rude, violent, depressed, and apathetic. But the worst part of it all is that they are not allowed to live in the WAY, the TRUTH, and the LIGHT. Man(kind) does not live by bread alone. These poor children are being starved.
Report comment to moderator
Rossignol Post 33 I would like to add that innocent children have no place in our public schools. The filth in the public schools is shocking! The children that do go there are not properly socialized. In general they come out cruel, dishonest, cheaters, undisciplined, rude, violent, depressed, and apathetic. But the worst part of it all is that they are not allowed to live in the WAY, the TRUTH, and the LIGHT. Man(kind) does not live by bread alone. These poor children are being starved.
Isuspect you would like to see all Christian children shielded from the reality of the world. Noble idea, nonsense to execute. I think Jesus said we are to be “in the world, but not of the world.” The paragraph I copied strikes me as something written by one who is afraid of the world. Sure, it is a big bad place. Like it or not, I add to it, as do you. You can lock yourself and your “innocent children” (in God’s eyes, there isn’t such a person) up in a cloister until the bad guys are gone.
I frimly believe that will happen some day, but not until the Day of the Lord, when the Sheep and the Goats are separated for eternity.
Until that unknown day arrives, the Holy Spirit has a filthy world to clean up. And He has chosen such filthy beings as me and all who live under sin, death and the power of the evil one to be the ones who brings the WAY, the TRUTH and the LIFE to a dying world.
“The children that do go there are not properly socialized. In general they come out cruel, dishonest, cheaters, undisciplined, rude, violent, depressed, and apathetic.”
With that statement, you have stereotyped our public schools and the students who attend at the expense of facts. All of the CDS students who graduate 8th grade have all the characteristics you list. Not all the time, but enough to make this Christian parent ready to pull his hair out.
I have seen students in both CDS and PS. I was a pastor of the congregations which sponsored the CDS (one school had about 100 students, the other over 300 students). I am also a substitute teacher in area public schools. Yet, I see many, let me rephrase that, I see most graduating from public school honest, disciplined, peaceful and full of excitement about the opportunities that lay before them.
All of my kids spent anywhere from 4 to 8 years in Lutheran Day Schools. As a pastor of the congregations, I saw what CDS is like. In most of the CDS, the administration and staff worked hard to enforce discipline and show a genuine Christ-like spirit. However, the students from these Christian Day Schools were (and are) like their PD counter-parts. More than one CDS student was sexually active. At least one student became pregnant. One other student pulled out a very small knife and stabed another in the leg. The list can go on and on. My point is simply this. When we live in a world of sin and death, we live in a world of sin and death. That will not change this side of heaven.
Rather than fear the world, we are to rely on the power of God and face the world head to head, demonstrating God’s love in Jesus Christ.
Sorry for my rambling reply. I had better hit the sack before I ramble any more.
Peace, joy and love be yours in Jesus.
Report comment to moderator
Hi kleimoladmk,
Thanks for your reply. You said “Isuspect you would like to see all Christian children shielded from the reality of the world. Noble idea, nonsense to execute.’
I agree that it is impossible to shield Christian children from the reality of the world. Unfortunately they are sinners, as I am reminded every day. Even with the TV and computer off, and close attention to the content of their reading, their behavior shows me that they are sons of Adam. You are presupposing that homeschoolers “live in a cloister”. A few probably do, but most of us do not. We go to church, music lessons, karate, ballet, movies, roller skating, play tackle football(we have our own teams), take a walk, visit nursing homes. We even play with our neighbors kids. And my kids all read WORLD magazine, even the nasty depressing parts! (They even fight over it!!!!!!) What kind of a world view do you think they will have when they are grown? Not the politically correct garbage being handed out at the public schools.
Some private Christian Day Schools include children who are non-believers for the sake of evangelization. Usually the worst children end up corrupting the Christian kids. We have a Private Christian school here that requires kids and parents to make a profession of faith, and will discipline a child by kicking them out if they don’t live accordingly. From what I hear, they’re doing a pretty good job. If I could afford it, I would seriously consider sending my kids there.
I hope you will not be offended by my suggestion that for a Christian child’s education your standards are too low. We always look at violence and sexual immorality as indicators of how we are doing, when really we should be looking at what is behind this behavior. Homeschooling allows you to really know your child’s heart, and to train him /her up in the love and admonition of the LORD. This is what I find disturbing. At ballet class my daughter would hear a parent bragging on their child, how they did so well, got A’s in all their classes, then she would go to the dressing room and hear that parent’s child bragging about how they cheat on all their biology tests and get away with it. ( and how boring biology is, and how stupid their teacher is.) I find this attitude truly apalling, not to mention the parent’s ignorance. Not that all kids in the public schools are like this, but in my experience the vast majority are. My kids love learning. They are always reading or working on some kind of a project. Their attitudes are not the result of preaching, or somebody telling them to be good. They just never got stuck in a system that made learning painful, where the goal was a letter grade, and where they would be preyed on by children who resemble packs of wolves.
Look who’s rambling now? Sorry :0)Think I’ll hit the sack too!
Peace, joy, and love be yours in Christ Jesus!
Report comment to moderator
Another banned word is “bum.”
It has been replaced by “homeless.” The irresponsible and shiftless bum is now transformed into the pitiful victim of our mean, capitalistic society.
Report comment to moderator
“God” as been banned in most schools, especially if His incorrect “last name” is used (the ‘d’ word, that is).
The more words that get banned, the sooner school children will be left with the 600 word vocabulary of early readers like “Dick, Jane and Sally”. Oh, but those books were written in the olden days, and probably have a lot of non-PC language, as well as being devoid of minorities.
Report comment to moderator
#36, The hilarious thing is that, needing a word for “bums,” we now call them “homeless-es,” which has now taken on the same meaning and is spoken with the same intonation as good ol’ “bums.”
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!