50 years makes a difference
On Saturday I took the subway to Madison Square Garden in New York City to attend a concert celebrating Polito Vega’s 50 years as “El Rey de Radio” (the King of Radio). Vega was honored for his half-century on the airwaves with a two-day concert series organized by two radio stations, WPAT and WSKQ. The evening featured a star-studded Latin music lineup, with artists like Gilberto Santa Rosa, Víctor Manuelle, Millie Quesada, Olga Tañón, Oscar de León, José Alberto “El Canario,” India, and Tito El Bambino.
Polito Vega, 71, was born and raised in la Playa de Ponce, Puerto Rico, and journeyed to New York in the late 1950s to launch a singing career. Instead, Vega found himself on radio beginning in 1958, and became a historic figure in American music by popularizing the Latin sound along the East Coast and beyond.
Fans of I Love Lucy, featuring Cuban-born Desi Arnaz, might recall an era in music when Latin sounds were being introduced to the American mainstream through television, movies, and jazz. In the mid-1960s, Vega was one of the first radio personalities in United States to identify and ally himself with the commercial potential of the musical style that came to be known as salsa.
In 1964, when “The Motown of Latin Music,” Fania Records, was launched, salsa music exploded in the United States and the Caribbean, and Vega found himself in the middle of music history as the most prominent salsa DJ in the world. Vega can still be heard on WSKQ, Mega 97.9, playing classic Latin favorites on weekends from noon until 8 p.m. Vega’s radio programs are also syndicated and can be heard throughout the United States and in the Caribbean.
While the music at the Madison Square Garden event was spectacular, I found myself returning to the realization that these types of celebrations will not be in America’s future, because gone are the days when people will have 50-year careers in one vocation. Those in my generation were not raised to think that way. When I see men like Vega and the impact he has had in the music industry, I wonder what is lost when Gen-Xers and Millennials continue to spend three to five years, on average, pursuing every new career “opportunity.”














Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top9 Comments to “50 years makes a difference”
This GenXer has been in the same (very specific) career for 15 years.
Report comment to moderator
No more 50 year careers in one vocation? I can think of lots folks who are physicians, attorneys, pharmacists etc who will come close.
In an era where so many will not admit to wanting to be in any status for the rest of his life or see themselves incapable of that (same job? Same wife? Same house?) fewer still are willing to say “This is my calling. This is what God would have me do all the rest of my days”
But the trend pattern I see is someone doing this job for perhaps twenty and then–having grown bored or advanced as far as they can it it–switching to another altogether. The second career will maybe have a career after it
Report comment to moderator
Can you blame the younger Gens, when all they work for is taken away anyway??
Report comment to moderator
Three weeks from yesterday is my 50th birthday.
Looking at that threshold is making a difference in my perspective.
Where do I go from here?
Report comment to moderator
Thorn’s onto it. I’m afraid this leaping about by young’uns began as a reaction to rapidly changing economics. The days of steady employment down at the steel plant are long, long gone, and even if you broaden yourself a bit and choose “IT professional” rather than “Welder,” careers these days are scrambles to keep current and not get pigeon-holed into an obsolescing specialty.
For another matter, every worker must maintain his “rep” as one who continually adds value to the organization. A worker who stays in the same job for long begins to be seen as lacking vision or the competence to move on to something else.
Report comment to moderator
A few thoughts –
A. How many of the jobs people do today existed 50 years ago? How many types of jobs that were common fifty years ago were obsoleted by technological change?
B. People who know what they love and see a way to make a living doing it will probably still stay in their careers long-term. But many people, possibly most, have always taken what they could get because they had to make a living and there are a lot of jobs that need to be filled that are not in themselves particularly fulfilling. (One can find fulfillment in a job because doing a job well glorifies God and provides for loved ones. But one can do that equally well by changing careers as by staying in one.) What virtue is there in spending 50 years as a machine operator, just because that’s the job that was available when you needed one after high school?
C. Second career people often bring new insights and abilities to the new career. Sure, it’s great if someone is a teacher for fifty years. But the businessman or scientist who decides to go into teaching brings something to the classroom that the first career teacher cannot. There are different ways of thinking in different kinds of work, and cross-pollination of different kinds of thinking can be a great benefit.
D. That doesn’t mean that every career change is good. Some of it is because we do a poor job of helping young people pursue realistic job prospects. There needs to be some balance between “you can be anything you want to be” and “your abilities and temperament will contribute more to your success in some kinds of careers than others.” Some of it is because young people have not learned to really stick to something long enough to get past both the initial learning curve and the boredom that sets in once the job becomes very familiar.
But if someone went into a career for the money, then realized there was more to life than money, and it takes a few career changes to figure out what really is a good fit, is that a bad thing? Or if someone with dreams of being a doctor left college to take care of an ailing parent, enrolling instead in a community college that provides technicians for local companies (I had a co-worker who did this), which is more evidence of stick-to-it-iveness – spending fifty years as a technician, or eventually finishing the education to be a doctor?
Report comment to moderator
#6C
I have to agree with you. Some of the best teachers I had had done a myriad of jobs prior to teaching. It was fairly late in my life that I learned that Dr John Daigh (math prof at a Dallas county community college) had graduated Westpoint. My Jr High algebra teacher had been a USAF LTC.
Report comment to moderator
The first forty hours of work are just for maintenance. What you really earn is what you make after the forty hours.
Make your hobbies pay for themselves and you will benefit in two ways. You eliminate a money sink hole and you will better yourself in your hobby because you will devote more thought and time to it. I have several hobbies now and most of them pay for themselves.
In your chosen profession become a virtuoso. In your chosen ‘outside activities” become a learned ambassador.
Report comment to moderator
You don’t do fifty years for a vocation, you do it for love.
It’s actually a spiritual discipline of sorts: stability in one’s life.
Of course, I madly envy Anthony for getting to attend this concert.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!