Healthcare update
WORLD Washington Bureau reporter Edward Lee Pitts has been closely following healthcare reform this week on Capitol Hill. He reports:
Healthcare reform advocates took two major steps forward this week, but conservatives fear those steps could represent two giant leaps backward for those with pro-life, limited government, and anti-tax interests.
Concerning the inclusion of abortion funding in healthcare legislation, Lee writes:
. . . the biggest burden the House bill places on the nation may be its treatment of abortion.
“Language in the bill still does not do enough to prevent federal funding from going to abortion services,” worries Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich.
Stupak and as many as 40 other House Democrats fear that the creation of new federal insurance subsidies for low-income earners would go toward purchasing healthcare plans that include abortion coverage.
Current law prohibits federal funding for abortion through Medicaid, the federal employee health plan, and military plans. But the new health bill creates new federal funding avenues that are not covered under current law—and theses new streams have the potential to reach a greater number of Americans than the already restricted plans.
To stop this, Stupak is pushing for an amendment that adds the abortion prohibition to the new federal subsidies. He says that pro-life Democrats combined with Republicans could derail the House bill. Stupak is continuing to negotiate, but Pelosi may try to get the House bill through under a procedure that does not allow amendments.
“Anyone voting to forbid amendments to this bill is in effect voting to set up a federal government program that will directly fund abortion on demand,” warns Douglas Johnson, legislative director for the National Right to Life Committee. “Prominent Democrats who have claimed that the federal government could pay for abortion with ‘private’ funds have been engaged in a big snow job.”
The fight over the pro-life amendment could come as early as next week.
Read Lee’s report in its entirety here.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top16 Comments to “Healthcare update”
These “pro-life Democrats” should have anticipated such foolishness before voting for Pelosi for Speaker.
Report comment to moderator
Healthcare is not supposed to make you sick.
Report comment to moderator
Andrew Napolitano wrote an essay for the Wall Street Journal some time ago regarding the constitutionality of this health care business. You might want to google it. It was quite good.
I don’t know how the government can constitutionally use “private” funds for abortion.
The pro-life Dems had been stand their ground not only for the unborn, but also for the Constitution itself. I am so enraged at the games this Pelosi woman plays. She totally disregards The People.
Report comment to moderator
Pelosi has to decide what’s best for the people. No?
We have shown that we can’t choose right from wrong.
Well…she might be right. Obama is President.
Report comment to moderator
No tort reform mean that still, to this day, nothing serious is on the table. Only exploitative big gov’t power politics.
Report comment to moderator
Grammar check & restated: No tort reform means that, to this day, nothing serious is on the table. Only exploitative expensive big gov’t power politics.
Report comment to moderator
All I am going to say is 1,990 pages. The first House bill came in at 1,300 pages. What is in the extra 690 pages?
Report comment to moderator
“What is in the extra 690 pages?”
Gremlins…
Report comment to moderator
#s 7 & 8: cross-references to your loss of liberty that will make not only me and NJL sick, but eventually the whole country
Report comment to moderator
Think about it: it’s 4 reams of paper!
Report comment to moderator
That’s right, NJL, and 4,000 dreams of penalties!
Report comment to moderator
Seriously, we have to continue emailing and calling – not ONLY to urge “no” votes, but to agree with and encourage those who’ll try to stand against this, especially the Dems. It’s going to come down to process and procedure from the Rules Committee and only Nanny Pelosi’s Dems will carry any weight at all as they align w/pro-life Republicans.
Report comment to moderator
And that includes calls and emails of support to the Republicans. Believe me, they keep track and careful count of them. Even reminding them that they’re in our prayers when they’ve identified themselves as Christians.
Report comment to moderator
Folks, you want to make an effort to kill the bill? Mail an envelope with a note in it that says; “Pink Slip, 2010″ to your perspective Congressman/woman.
Not all Democrats are bad, but these on this list are real bad. I didn’t include any Republicans, for I don’t think they are going to swallow any of it.. . .. . We can try can’t we?
Neil Abercrombie HI, Tammy Baldwin WI, Xavier Becerra CA, Earl Blumenauer OR, Bob Brady PA, Mike Capuano MA, Andre Carson C, Donna Christensen Virgin Is., Judy Chu CA, Yvette Clark NY, William “Lacy” Clay MO, Emanuel Cleaver MO, Steve Cohen TN, John Conyers MI, Elijah Cummins MD, Danny Davis IL, Peter DeFazio OR, Rosa DeLauro CT, Donna Edwards MD, Keith Ellison MN, Sam Farr CA, Chaka Fattah PA, Bob Filner CA, Barney Frank MA, Marcia Fudge OH, Alan Grayson FL, Raul Grijalva AZ, Louis Gutierrez IL, John Hall NY, Phil Hare IL, Alcee Hastings FL, Maurice Hinchey NY, Mazie Horono HI, Michael Honda CA, Jessie Jackson Jr. IL, Sheila Jackson-Lee TX, Eddie Bernice Johnson TX, Hank Johnson GA, Marcy Kaptur OH, Carolyn Kilpatrick MI, Dennis Kucinich OH, Dave Loebsack IA, Barbara Lee CA, John Lewis GA, Ben Lujan NM, Carolyn Maloney NY, Ed Markey MA, Eric Massa NY, Jim McDermott WA, James P. McGovern MA, George Miller CA, Glenn Moore WI, Jim Moran VA, Jerrold Nadler NY, Eleanor Holmes Norton DC, John Oliver MA, Frank Pallone NJ, Ed Pastor AZ, Donald Payne NJ, Nancy Pelosi CA, Chellie Pingree ME, Jared Polis CO, Charles Rangel NY, Laura Richardson CA, Lucille Roybal-Allard CA, Bobby Rush IL, Linda Sanchez CA, Bernie Sanders VT, Jan Schakowsky IL, Jose Serrano NY, Louise Slaughter NY, Pete Stark CA, Bennie Thompson MS, John Tierney MA, Nydia Velazquez NY, Maxine Waters CA, Diane Watson CA, Mel Watt NC, Henry Waxman CA.
Report comment to moderator
The government that wants to control your health care is having trouble delivering vaccine. However, the vaccine is readily available at taxpayer expense to terrorists who want to slaughter innocent Americans.
Report comment to moderator
Brings a new meaning to ‘Git Mo’ doesn’t it?
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!