The Christian journalist’s dilemma
“Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them. For it is shameful even to speak of the things they do in secret” (Ephesians 5:11-12).
This Bible passage is bound to increasingly have Christian journalists in a bit of a double bind. Which is it—do we expose the works of darkness (verse 11)? Or is it shameful even to mention them (verse 12)?
I’m assuming that since the verses are back to back in the chapter, we need to figure out a way to comply with both somehow. So I will hazard to mention a recent deed of darkness and do it in the least shameful way possible, hoping to expose the act while avoiding the potential prurient pitfalls.
One good thing about not being a TV watcher is that I am impervious to the “frog in the pot syndrome.” Everything shocks me because the last I tuned in was to the 1960’s Bonanza.
So when my friend told me about the Sunday, October 25 episode of HBO’s Curb Your Enthusiasm, I suffered a genuine Alvin Toffler “future shock.” The plotline involves Larry David, who plays a caricature himself on the show, going to the bathroom in the home of a Catholic woman where there is a painting of Jesus on the wall next to the toilet. The David character somehow manages to spray a drop of urine onto the icon, and it lands on Jesus’ cheek, below his eye.
Later the woman emerges from the loo and announces that a miracle has happened: The Jesus picture is crying. The audience has a good laugh at the stupid Christian’s expense.
The German population of the 1930s didn’t wake up one morning and decide to kill Jews. The relentless poisoning of the atmosphere through media softened them up. For instance, Julius Streicher’s Der Sturner magazine ran cartoons featuring characters with large noses, engaged in immoral acts. Ridicule is the passport into the violence to come.
To hear commentaries by Andrée Seu, click here.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top18 Comments to “The Christian journalist’s dilemma”
Amen to that Andree…that verse plays through my head with most TV plots, images, audio I hear of, or get inadvertently caught in watching (yes, indadvertently – really). I would like to be able to sit down and have something entertaining to watch – I’m no different than anyone else in that respect. But I just don’t know how one can call oneself a Christian and sit through the stuff they do sit through – I know they sit through it because they talk about and CAN’T SEE that they are violating that very biblical admonition. I liked Bonanza.
Report comment to moderator
Paul was speaking to the church about the church.
Report comment to moderator
I’ve thought more than once about the growing disdain for Christians that’s become acceptable in our culture. How insidious it is, how it creeps ever-so-slowly and incrementally into a culture’s collective consciousness. But while it’s happening, there seems to be no way to open people’s eyes to it.
“yeah, but this group of people really is dangerous and despicable” is a justification that becomes so entrenched.
It’s hard to see the big picture when you’re in the middle of it, for both the persecutors and the persecuted. (I know, this is nothing compared to what the early church or the Jews in Hitler’s Germany endured. But it is still hard not to see some of the same attitudes becoming more “acceptable” in our so-called jokes and sarcasm.)
The show “Cabaret” (at least the film version) offers that chilling view at the end where everyone’s toasting and laughing and dancing and having such a grand old time — but then the camera pans across the audience, catching the red Nazi arm bands scattered throughout the hall.
Report comment to moderator
“Take no part in the unfruitful works of darkness, but instead expose them. For it is shameful even to speak of the things they do in secret” (Ephesians 5:11-12).
–
I believe this Paul is talking about what the Church and some one it’s member were doing behind close doors. An that that the church needs to address the people, to let them know this actions are wrong. But no to address their sinful behavior.
The problem is how do we address this in today church, with people who have the idea, if you call me out I will just leave your church an go some where else.
Report comment to moderator
I think this can also apply to the idea of “telling all”. Even when a Christian shares his testimony, I believe it is unnecessary to go into detail. Today’s society hangs everything out there for anyone to see/read. I don’t think believers need to follow suit.
Report comment to moderator
Roger is correct. “To the church about the church”. It isn’t an either-or situation. Mentioning some things may be shameful, but needs to be done. The subject is “Christian Journalism”. The task of a Christian journalist is to expose, that is, bring to light the deeds of darkness. “for it is the light that makes everything visible”. v. 14 NIV.
Report comment to moderator
This bears a remarkable pertinence to a recent exchange of comments on Worldmagblog which involved me and another comment poster.
Andrée Seu’s use of this metaphor is much more clever, whether it is a coincidence or a conscious intent. Goof for you, Andrée.
Report comment to moderator
Roger Patno – “Paul was speaking to the church about the church.”
Paul was speaking to the church about members of the church who were doing these things? Really?
Can we look at the passage in context please? Paul was comparing and contrasting the “sons odisobedience” and the “children of the Light”, what they (and we) once were, ands what they (and we who are believers) are now.
Sons of disobedience
1. The wrath of God comes upon them
2. The children of the Light are not to be partakers with them
3. They participate in unfruitful deeds of darkness
4. It is disgraceful even to speak of the things which are done by them in secret.
Children of the Light
1. They are not to be partakers with the sons of disobedience.
2. They (you) were formerly in darkness.
3. Now They (you) are Light in the Lord
4. They are to walk as children of the Light.
5. (The fruit of the Light consistes of all goodness and righteousness and truth.)
6. They are to be trying to learn what is pleasing in the Lord.
7. They are not to participate in unfruitful deeds of darkness.
8. They are to instead expose (reprove) them (the unfruitful deeds of darkness).
It is disgraceful even to speak of the things which are done by them (the sons of disobedience) in secret.
All things become visible when they are exposed (reproved) by the light, for everything that becomes visible is light.
The word exposed can also be translated “reproved”.
The exhortation is for the church to not continue to walk as they formerly walked, as sons of disobedience, but to walk as children of the Light. Not doing the deeds of the sons of disobedience, but reproving/exposing those deeds in the light of goodness and righteousness and truth.
Report comment to moderator
PASTOR ROY: If one leaves because they will not stand to be corrected,Let them go. The proverbial ‘one rotten apple…’?
But always keep them in prayer.
Report comment to moderator
KLASKO: ‘Sons of disobedience’ were infecting the church. I stand on what I wrote.
Report comment to moderator
Klasko, I am with you – that is the correct context. That is why I find the entertainment media and Christians’ engagement in it so insidious. Why do Christians want to know about these things (except in the context of helping an unbeliever or wayward believer out of the darkness), and worse yet, why do they want to VOLUNTARILY participate by watching this junk in movies and TV? If you are entertained by watching or reading unseemliness, then you are participating in it. I hate to sound so black and white, but I am speaking from experience – it’s a quagmire that keeping to the narrow road would keep you from…
Report comment to moderator
roger patno 11.02.09 AT 11:19 AM
PASTOR ROY: If one leaves because they will not stand to be corrected,Let them go. The proverbial ‘one rotten apple…’?
But always keep them in prayer.
-
This is a problem that need to be address. the other problem is when churches decide to change God’s Word to meet the needs of the people. An when the Christian Community confront these churches, the responds is open spiritual war fare.
Report comment to moderator
PASTOR ROY: The problem does indeed need to be addressed in churches. I pray that it is being addressed in yours. I did speak to the pastor of a church I one time attended about dealing with sin in the camp. Nothing was done. Now the church is on the verge of closing its doors.
Pray for a reversal.
Report comment to moderator
roger patno 11.02.09 AT 2:14 PM
PASTOR ROY: The problem does indeed need to be addressed in churches. I pray that it is being addressed in yours. I did speak to the pastor of a church I one time attended about dealing with sin in the camp. Nothing was done. Now the church is on the verge of closing its doors.
Pray for a reversal.
–
Roger, I worked at church as a children pastor, we start with 5 kids it grew to around 25 to 30 kids. Our church out grew the basement we were renting. We got new building and were growing. Then two family on the church council started to fall apart the Pastor did nothing. The youth pastor family started o fall apart and the pastor did nothing. When the some families in the church felt I need to get involved since I was the only other license minster in the Church.
It was to last heft the church left with in six’s months. I was able trace the issue on all three family back to one man in the church. I try to get the Pastor to deal with him and he would not by the time he left the Church, we fell from running 25 to 30 kids, to 8 kids, 15 teenagers to 2 teenagers, 70 adults to 20 adults.
The new pastor came an the frist thing he did was to deal with the person that casued all the trouble. But I am sorry to say we have not recoved at all. It has been an up hill battle.
Report comment to moderator
Too bad Andree doesn’t respond to commnets on here because as a journalish who is a Christian I’m a bit befuddled as to what her real point it. Sigh.
Report comment to moderator
#14
You have mentioned this scenario before. Have you forgiven the offending pastor? Just wondering if your lack of recovery has anything to do with that. And I juse ‘you’ in the plural sense.
Also, has the new pastor realeased the congregation to walk in their faith? There was absoulutely no need of a “licensed Christian minister” to be the only person who could deal with these problems. At least according to the Bood of Ephesians.
Report comment to moderator
adios 11.02.09 AT 2:45 PM
#14
You have mentioned this scenario before. Have you forgiven the offending pastor? Just wondering if your lack of recovery has anything to do with that. And I juse ‘you’ in the plural sense.
Also, has the new pastor realeased the congregation to walk in their faith? There was absoulutely no need of a “licensed Christian minister” to be the only person who could deal with these problems. At least according to the Bood of Ephesians
–
An unlicensed Christian Minister is the one who caused the issues. An yes, I am in touch with the pastor. The point I was tring to make when you do not deal with sin within the leadership, it can an will destroy a church.
One of the problems we have in the church is people are not trained in working as lay leaders. I have in the past had to tell people that they will not do that again. When praying for people.
Report comment to moderator
It seems Andree’s point is that what Christians and even society find acceptable did not start out as such. It has been a slow process.
Recently taking on a citizen journalism position from being a blogger I’m not always sure how to address such situations. As a blogger I can address these things however I want, but as a journalist (of sorts) it is a little different story. I’m learning though.
Of course, it seems this scene from Curb Your Enthusiasm is acceptable. No real outcry that I know of, unless I missed it. It is not like anyone is allegedly flushing a Qu’ran or anything.
What is even more amazing is how it is acceptable for a picture of any historical figure is urinated, etc.
It is like the old adage – How do you eat an elephant? One bite at a time.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!