Inaugurating presidential disappointment
A year ago the world was waiting to see if Americans would elect a president who would bring about sweeping social, cultural, and political change. As Sen. Barack Obama became President Obama it brought a mix of ridiculous expectations and unfounded fears regarding what “Superpresident” would accomplish. I was so captivated by the spectacle of it all after Election Day I committed to attend the presidential inauguration ceremony. I have kept my attendance quiet until now.
Although I strongly disagree with the way House Speaker Nancy Pelosi views America and with many policy initiatives of the Obama administration, in the spirit of honoring the office of president (1 Peter 2:17) and recognizing the legitimacy of government (Romans 13:1), I met family members and friends in Washington, D.C., to witness the transition from President Bush to President Obama. Standing in front of the Washington Monument I felt the magnitude and weight of the office in ways I had not experienced before. It was fantastic to witness all the pomp and circumstance. Watching the procession of congressional leaders, Supreme Court judges, and so on was thrilling. I was particularly surprised by the cold interactions between Presidents Clinton and Carter witnessed by millions on JumboTrons before they took their seats. These two families obviously do not like each other.
Many voters on Election Day and at the inauguration were excited because “change” was coming. We were supposedly ushering in a new era of governance. In the past nine months, however, not much has changed and the Obama administration continues as is normal for Democrats—and for an ever-growing number of Republicans—to expand the tentacles of government into areas where government is neither designed nor equipped to manage. Oddly, there has been much disappointment among many liberals because Obama has not gone far enough in bringing about “change.”
According to The New York Times, Europeans are growing critical of Obama because “Mr. Obama has not broken clearly enough with Bush administration policies that they dislike.” I say if the Europeans are frustrated with Obama, then he must be doing something right. Why then has there not been “change” enough to satisfy liberal critics? The answer is found in the reality check President Obama encountered when his campaign rhetoric was met with real facts about the world and by the independent agenda of Speaker Pelosi.
The Rasmussen Reports‘ daily Presidential Tracking Poll from yesterday showed that 28 percent of the nation’s voters “Strongly Approve” of the way that Barack Obama is performing while 41 percent “Strongly Disapprove,” giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -13. What does this mean? Friends, the Obama honeymoon is over and most people, with the exception of the Nobel Peace Prize committee, are realizing that President Obama is a regular politician. No change, just Washington politics as usual.




Learn it! Speak it! Live it!
Bring Christmas to a child in need!








Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top13 Comments to “Inaugurating presidential disappointment”
Yes, politics as usual–spend more than you have and then spend some more.
Report comment to moderator
what do you mean “no change” – the state is more involved than ever in our lives. exactly as promised.
perhaps the voters should have paid more attention to and thought through his explanations of “change” before 11/4/2008
Report comment to moderator
No change, just Washington politics as usual.
I wish.
Report comment to moderator
Anthony, I think Reader has a point, and that your analysis mixes two distinct things: the Europeans are unhappy because Obama’s foreign policy, while more dovish than Bush’s, did not represent as sharp a turn to the left as they would have preferred. That is distinct from his domestic policy (which Europeans understandably care much less about), which does reflect a sharp Left turn. The “change” at home — toward socialism and an accelerating national debt — is going too fast for many Americans, which is why Obama’s popularity is suffering.
Report comment to moderator
It most certainly DOES NOT MEAN politics as usual –
“NO CHANGE”? – this president has put America in a terrible financial position. He does what he wishes, he does not allow the Republicans to be involved in the health bill, they are NOT included in the White House meetings –
“NO CHANGE”? – this president is determined to include abortion in the health bill, and then there is the ‘end of life’ death portion –
“NO CHANGE”? – this presidents dismissal of the Republican’s involvement OR the VOICE of the PEOPLE of this country is blatant – he has ignored what the majority choose.
THE CHANGE will come when Obama packs up and moves out of the White House, that will be the “CHANGE we can all BELIEVE IN”
Report comment to moderator
It’s to bad we can’t get an “ANNULMENT or a DIVORCE” - He hasn’t lived up to the transparency he promised, the OPPOSITE has been the case – SOCIALISM and more ,………….!
Report comment to moderator
I find this an interesting criticism coming from a conservative point of view.
As several have pointed out, there have been a sobering number of significant changes since Mr. Obama was elected (some beginning before the inauguration. Most of these have been negative changes, in the view from the right. On the other hand, changes that conservatives would have appreciated – true transparency, reduction of earmarks, elimination of cronyism – have NOT occurred.
But the type of change that Mr. Bradley discusses as not having happened are the changes that we conservatives have dug in our heels to fight. In those areas, the lack of change actually represents a victory for the right! But the view from my liberal friends and correspondents is the same as I had 8 years ago when then-President Bush was trying to make significant changes: “You [liberals] lost the election. Bush could make a difference if you’d just accept that and get out of the way.”
Report comment to moderator
Business as usual is not acceptable in a time of economic crisis. Neither is irresponsible spending. Obama does seem more focused on upending our healthcare system to satisfy his far left supporters than in implementing policies to resolve our economic problems.
In the meantime, our big businesses who are deemed “too big to fail”, are only getting bigger and bigger. And I seriously doubt Repubs will repeal the worst of the legislation or institute regulations when they regain power. They have their own agenda too; and it usually involves pandering to big business. There’s nothing new under the sun.
Report comment to moderator
One thing has remained the same:
Neither Bush nor Obama seemed to realize that we have already run out of money.
It just isn’t there anymore. There is no such thing as 1.2 TRILLION DOLLARS!
Report comment to moderator
But see, the approval NUMBERS aren’t important. The people who disapproved of Bush were all enlightened citizens, but the people who disapprove of Obama are all benighted racist rubes. They should be ignored and denied enfranchisement. It’s quality, not quantity, that counts. After all, this is a mediorcracy, not a republic.
Report comment to moderator
Anthony, thank you for sharing. I trust you learned a great deal when you were in D.C. Astonishing how power and politics can change and alter familial relationships, isn’t it? Disappointing, also.
Report comment to moderator
Good post Kennethos; the way we interact with each other (even former presidents) is what matters. I suppose Peter and Paul both told us to submit to authority since in the realm of the eternal, such matters of state and civil governance are trivial.
Mr. Bradley, were all learning as we move along with this presidency. Regardless of the shenanigans in Washington, we came a long way last November when we elected a man of color; though I voted against him. I hate abortion, yet the actions of President Obama and Congress on this issue are bringing to light its evil. I hate debt, yet the actions of the American people and our insistence that we “have it our way” have driven our national debt more than anything. The President, his staff and Congress can ignore the American people (who perhaps are starting to realize just how lost we have been under both Democratic and Republican administrations), but through it all, God’s will is done. He always works things for good; regardless of one ruler’s intentions.
Report comment to moderator
“I suppose Peter and Paul both told us … ”
And apparently their relationship was even less cordial than Clinton and Carter:
“When Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he was clearly in the wrong.”
Paul in Galations 2:11
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!