“Stand up and fight”
Once a liberal atheist, Mike Adams is now a Christian who believes “socialism and communism are for losers.” Adams, who has been a professor of criminology at the University of North Carolina Wilmington since 1993, spoke to students of The King’s College in New York City on Sept. 11, 2009, as part of the college’s Distinguished Visitor Series.
Adams’ best-known book, Welcome to The Ivory Tower of Babel, is a scathing critique of higher education. He said the unconditional security of tenure has created campuses “crawling with lunatics” who are not held accountable for what they teach, leading to a higher education environment driven by ideology and politics. According to Adams, the professors and administrators on American college campuses are “the czars of tolerance,” promoting free-speech codes that “give people a constitutional right to not feel uncomfortable.” However, these “czars,” he points out, are not tolerant with Christian, conservative, or Jewish beliefs.
Thanks to a free-speech conflict with a student, Adams rose to national prominence shortly after 9/11. The media attention generated by that controversy eventually led to him writing a weekly column for Townhall.com. Adams said one of the ironies in his situation is that since his conversion to Christianity in 1999, he has been increasingly outspoken and conservative. The tenure system, he acknowledged, probably saved him from being fired when he was being attacked by liberal ideologues.
Despite the challenges Adams faces as a lone conservative on a liberal campus, he can “see the beginning of something that is very, very exciting” for America’s colleges, as Christian students defend conservatism.
Overall, Adams said he “thanks God” he was hired at UNCW while an atheist, as it has enabled him to bring to light the confusion on college campuses. His advice to students today: “Stand up and fight” the rise of liberalism and discrimination against Christianity and conservatism. He implored King’s students to be bold and speak out because “as Christians we always win. The truth is on our side.”
Kristin Rudolph is a student at The King’s College in New York City.
Editor’s Note: Be sure to read Marvin Olasky’s interview with Mike Adams in the current issue of WORLD and listen to podcasts of Marvin’s conversation with Mike at The King’s College in September.














Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top26 Comments to ““Stand up and fight””
I always read Adams. He is entertaining and points out the real imbalance in higher education.
I am glad he is a conservative
I do struggle with his faith component. He seems to be unable to tell the truth in love…and his poignant writing is laced with sarcasm and name calling — much like Ann Coulter.
Isn’t there a way to make these points without name calling?
David @ Redletterbelievers.com
“Salt and Light Blog”
http://www.redletterbelievers.com
Report comment to moderator
I like reading his columns very much.
Compared to the name-calling done to Adams and others like him, I would say that his name-calling is quite mild. It is also humorous. I actually think that Christian citizens in America are too cautious about calling people and things what they are.
Nobody listens to a dry conservative droning on about the dangers of liberalism. You have to be entertaining and witty in order to attract an audience. That’s why he became so popular so quickly.
I particularly like that Adams is a student advocate. He urges students to assert their rights on campuses where administrators have tried to stamp out their rights n the name of “tolderance” and “diversity.”
Report comment to moderator
And “diversity” does not mean diversity of opinion, which campus liberals are dead set against.
Report comment to moderator
“As Christians we can win.”
What’s the prize?
Report comment to moderator
Somehow I can’t find that verse about “defending conservatism”. As a believer, I am called to fight:
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.” (Eph 6:12)
And, yes, there is a prize:
“I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus.” (Php 3:14)
The battle we are fighting is There is a prize, for sure
I press toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Jesus. (Php 3:14)
Report comment to moderator
Sorry, take out those last two sentences. This posting set up drives me buggy sometimes.
Report comment to moderator
“socialism and communism are for losers”?!?!?!
/slanted expression. Did “socialism and communism” just become stand-ins for “drugs and alcohol” in a high school motivational assembly with Bob Golic?
Maybe conservatives are losing ground with youth because the can’t figure out how to not talk like dorks?!
The only thing of consequence here is “The tenure system, he acknowledged, probably saved him from being fired.” That’s what it’s there for.
Report comment to moderator
Thomas, how long have you been here and you don’t know the answer?!
Report comment to moderator
Thomas1 11.18.09 AT 5:14 PM
“As Christians we can win.”
What’s the prize?
– for us Christian a manison.
Report comment to moderator
Mynock, again, wake up.
Conservatism is gaining that the college level. Socialism and communism is the end result of today’s bankrupt liberal left.
“The problem with socialism? You run out of other people’s money”.
“Dorks”? Who uses that term today?
Report comment to moderator
HopeSprings wrote; “Somehow I can’t find that verse about ‘defending conservatism’.”
Then don’t do it. If you need a proof-texted verse for anything and everything you decide to do in life, you will likely lose your genuine freedom in Christ in the real world. So, fine, leave the good fight for others, if you so chose.
I really do respect your right not to defend conservatism if you so please. But I think you are missing the opportunity to freely seek that which is good for others and for this country.
Report comment to moderator
I agree w/Mynock. Adams is a certifiable DORK!
Report comment to moderator
p.s. He was clearly a dork as an atheist as well – he claims he chose that philosophy, not because he thought it was true, but because it supported his sexual lifestyle. I suppose he also has an alterior motive for changing his view that has nothing to do with actually examining the evidence for and against his beliefs.
Report comment to moderator
I haven’t heard the word “dork” used for a long, long time. Even the kids have stopped using it!
Report comment to moderator
Since there’s no good reason to be an atheist, everyone who chooses that philosophy does so for psychological reasons, not intellectual ones. Man’s problem with God is not intellectual, but psychological: man in his natural state simply does not like God. The end result is idolatry: worshiping a substituted god, one that we can control. The three-step psychological process involved is described in the first chapter of Romans: (1) trauma (2) suppression (3) substitution.
Report comment to moderator
12. You say that like it’s a bad thing.
Report comment to moderator
SPinoza,
You knew him before – while he was an atheist? And you called him a dork then? Or are you just spewing insults?
Report comment to moderator
When I first read this article in world mag. it concerned me that he felt the liberals couldn’t touch him. I feel he might be getting a little to prideful and careless. I hope God doesn’t let him take a fall for letting his pride get the better of him.
Report comment to moderator
I have known people who were fervent Christians who became atheists. I have known people who were fervent atheists who became Christians.
Is this how you keep score?
Or is a thread such as this one a chance to reassure yourself that your dubious and wishful thinking belief is really true?
Report comment to moderator
“What’s the prize?”
A country with just, moral laws. Freedom. A return to the Constiutional republic given to us by the Founding Fathers.
Report comment to moderator
In another country, under another ‘peaceful’ religion, Mr. Adams would have been charged with “propagation of [the 'bad' religion],” apostasy (for converting from [the good, 'peaceful' religion]), and “anti-state activity.” Can anyone guess what country this might be? Since The Constitution still has some semblance of authority with the SCOTUS, it’s unlikely the state will get involved with Mr. Adam’s ‘heresy’ right now. However, the institution he works for could finally say enough is enough of “unconditional security of tenure” and revoke his. This would lead to a showdown with the SCOTUS and the clerics in black robes could finally regulate the first amendment out of existence.
Report comment to moderator
CCC- what country are you from? Did you seriously just advocate for communism? China has plenty of room for “dorks” like you who don’t understand that this country has to do with FREEDOM. This is a FREE country and as long as it is FREE (which is under attack by liberals, socialists and others who think that the next generation should be snowed under by their debt and wasteful spending) we must defend everything about this country that makes it free.
Which means that you are FREE to make statements that are dorky. Which means that our universities are FREE to employ dorks that think that socialism works because they have never had to actually WORK for a living.
Report comment to moderator
IAF, Obviously, we understand communism differently. My post was intended to be a diatribe against Communism, and its equally ugly sister, Socialism. What do you think Social Security is? Socialism. What do you think Medicare, Medicaid and welfare is? Socialism! The Constitution never gave the government the power to create these socialist institutions. Yet, the SCOTUS did not strike them down as “unconstitutional”, as they did with abortion laws. Why? It’s all about ideology. For liberals, freedom = license. It’s about amoralism, God is a myth, ergo, evil is a myth, and the “Do what thou wilt” stance toward ‘freedom’; to do whatever one’s predilections tells one to do. In another vernacular, it’s called ’sin’. Unfortunately, these ‘dorky’ words will likely be drowned out by liberalism’s tried-and-true response, ad hominem.
Report comment to moderator
#17 – “You knew him before – while he was an atheist? And you called him a dork then? Or are you just spewing insults?”
No – Unlike you, apparently, I read his interview, in which he explains why he was an atheist. I think he would currently agree that his former philosophy/style of life was worthy of pejoratives. Where we disagree is that I think his current one is too!
Report comment to moderator
I think conservatives are missing the bigger picture here. It’s not just liberals in academia, it’s liberals in science, engineering, medicine, journalism and the arts. It’s liberalism wherever smart educated people are expanding the frontiers of human knowledge and understanding.
Report comment to moderator
Another picture that conservatives are missing is that smart educated liberals have beliefs too. They’re just as religious as anyone else, but then deny their religiosity by holding up their smart educated diplomas.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDonTheWeb.com to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!