The right to wear a pro-life pin
Over at First Things, Meghan Duke writes about going to the National Gallery of Art* after attending the March for Life. She was wearing a lime-green lapel pin that had a website address and showed a small hand inside a larger hand. Then she went through security:
After searching my bag, the two guards at the Gallery told me, “You’re good to go in, but first you need to remove that pro-life pin.” … The pin, they informed me, was a “religious symbol” and a symbol of a particular political cause and it could not be worn inside a federal building. Why, I asked, can I not wear a religious or political symbol inside a federal building? Bringing to bear the full weight of the supreme law of the land, the guards informed that it was a violation of the First Amendment of the United States’ Constitution: The combination of me, wearing a pro-life pin, in a federal building was a violation of the separation of church and state.
A spokesperson for the Gallery* later said the museum has no policy against lapel pins, that the guards acted on their own and that they would be censured. Read the rest of Meghan’s story here.
*The museum was the National Gallery of Art, not the Smithsonian as earlier written.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top23 Comments to “The right to wear a pro-life pin”
Security guards probably graduated from the Barney Fife Academy for Federal Law Enforcemt. ProLife Badge? They dont want no stinkin proLife badges!
They have a career ahead of them confiscating 8 oz shampoo bottles and finger nail clippers. This shoulda been immediately brought to the attention of either Fox News or Joseph Farrah’s WND website.
Had it been me I woulda wanted to ask such folks to cite the particular court case which they relied upon to enforce their badge policy.
Report comment to moderator
Could we not combine this PETA thread? I think it should be a regular thread “This Week in the World of the Ridiculous.”
Report comment to moderator
In her story, Meghan notes that, upon questioning, the guards: (a) refused to let her see a copy of the gallery’s rules that supposedly prohibited her from wearing the pin, and (b) said that wearing a cross would be fine, even though that is more closely tied with religion as such than a pro-life pin.
Report comment to moderator
I’m wondering if they were confusing the duty of public spaces to be non-partisan, with that of visitors being “non-partisan”. Public buildings being a no-politics zone so to speak.
Some lesson, somewhere, got misapplied.
Report comment to moderator
The guards were doing exactly as instructed, for the given day.
Likewise, the “spokesperson” nonsense threat.
The “censuring” would then be no more than 2 drinks at an all-expense-paid, fancy restaurant, during the free day-off, they just earned.
Be comforted ye commoners.
It was all a “mistake”.
Report comment to moderator
That’s like the zealous teacher who takes the “separation” a bit farther than counseled and bans drawings, Bibles, book reports, t-shirts, etc. from the classroom.
Many teachers are already whitewashing our childrens’ minds.
Report comment to moderator
If true, this is stunning. As a federal employee, i have never been told such a thing.
But, it could fortell the future. What do we do? Do we fight it? Or do we just live our lives and not rely on lapel pins and slogans.
David
Red Letter Believers
http://www.redletterbelievers.com
“Salt and Light”
Report comment to moderator
Where did I read that some teachers want to teach Bible as a history lesson in school?
I think that would be a very bad thing in the hands of the wrong person.
Report comment to moderator
What if you could not walk down the street with a non-PC message t-shirt or pin?
People say they don’t want our children “exposed” to certain writings like the 10 Commandments. Their young innocent minds being influenced before they are old enough to decide for themselves. Some people can be very calculating.
Report comment to moderator
Harris – The duty of public spaces to be non-partisan…
What are you talking about?
Report comment to moderator
“As a federal employee, i have never been told such a thing”
#7.
You didn’t make the short-list that day.
Report comment to moderator
Reminds me of the time hubby went through security at one of the many places he has to go through security, and was told he had to get rid of the finger nail clippers but the knife with the two inch blade was fine.
Report comment to moderator
#7
You could also use the pin as a decoy. Let the guards bask in the fantasy of self-importance, as good-guys of the system.
Then later leave all kinds of chick.com tracts throughout the place.
“Therefore they that were scattered abroad went every where preaching the word.” (Ac 8:4)
Yippee!
Report comment to moderator
How was this deemed a religious symbol in the first place? Is pro-life synonymous with religious now?
Report comment to moderator
13. LOL
Report comment to moderator
Nice, mytoosense – I love the idea.
Report comment to moderator
#14 There are all types of proLifers. Every heard of PLAGAL? ProLife Alliance of Gays and Lesbians? It exists. There is also the RCAR Religious Coalition for Religious Rights.
Report comment to moderator
Do they let women in burqas into this museum? What a howl that would raise if they denied them access while so attired!
Report comment to moderator
Well, this is pretty silly. Am I missing something?
Report comment to moderator
The irony in all this is that “the guards informed that it was a violation of the First Amendment of the United States’ Constitution”. Yet, the First Amendment is about the PROTECTION of speech, not its suppression. This nation is going bass ackwards.
Report comment to moderator
This is the same crowed that was outraged by the fact that Obama didn’t where a Flag lapel pin. Why is the right-wing so obsessed with people’s lapel pins?
Report comment to moderator
Before everybody gets so outraged, I’d point out that the system “worked”. The National Gallery in fact does not have such a policy, and the mistaken guards were censured.
Report comment to moderator
The guards clearly made a mistake–a mistake that was clearly harmless. But I guess that wouldn’t play into the victimization theme that underlies the evangelical psyche.
People in Haiti are dying, and the evangelical world is in an uproar over a lapel pin. If that’s not gnat straining…
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!