“White Messiah” films
The movie The Blind Side, which depicts a white family’s successful adoption of an at-risk black male, has stirred the charge of “racism” for many in the black community. The word “silly” comes to mind as the most charitable word I would use in response to such a charge. A movie depicting a re-told true story recounting what the white Tuohy family actually did for a kid in need, who happened to be black, does not contain what we normally think of as racial dehumanization. It seems that many blacks are confusing “racism” with our distaste for “White Messiah” movies.
The Blind Side—which yesterday picked up Oscar nominations for best picture and best actress (Sandra Bullock)—is not racist, however it does depict the often told story of white people coming to the aid of some indigenous, needy ethnic person. My guess is that many white people appreciate movies like this because they help defend against the constant charge that all problems in America have a direct causal link to white people. Movies like The Blind Side tell the world that, even with America’s complicated history, all white people are not bad people.
Ironically, such movies are convicting to many middle-class blacks because, outside of family members, they are just as unlikely to take in at-risk black males as whites. If suburban blacks had a regular cultural habit of doing what the Tuohys did, it would change America.
Alternatively, movies like Avatar, which also is up for the best picture Oscar, elicit suspicions of racism because they depict a common Hollywood fiction that white people are here to save the universe. A couple of weeks ago, The New York Times’ David Brooks explained the racism of Avatar:
“Avatar is a racial fantasy par excellence. The hero is a white former Marine who is adrift in his civilization. He ends up working with a giant corporation and flies through space to help plunder the environment of a pristine planet and displace its peace-loving natives. The peace-loving natives—compiled from a mélange of Native American, African, Vietnamese, Iraqi and other cultural fragments—are like the peace-loving natives you’ve seen in a hundred other movies.”
Must it always be the case that a white male comes to save the day (again)? Perhaps this may explain the movie’s popularity. There are those who believe that Avatar affirms white supremacy—the same kind of white supremacy that juxtaposed Christian missions with the African slave trade and colonialism in Africa, Asia, and elsewhere, for example, in India, South Africa, and Haiti. Brooks explains that this type of white supremacy:
“. . . rests on the stereotype that white people are rationalist and technocratic while colonial victims are spiritual and athletic. It rests on the assumption that nonwhites need the White Messiah to lead their crusades. It rests on the assumption that illiteracy is the path to grace. It also creates a sort of two-edged cultural imperialism. Natives can either have their history shaped by cruel imperialists or benevolent ones, but either way, they are going to be supporting actors in our journey to self-admiration.”
While movies like The Blind Side are clearly not racist in the least, fictional films like Avatar may explain the growing consternation of stories involving minorities that depict white people as the heroes. I guess this means we need more Will Smith-as-hero movies than Keanu Reeves ones. Who knows? The debate continues.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top74 Comments to ““White Messiah” films”
We would like to expand our family. We know there are over five hundred thousand American children in foster care. Many will age out, never having a “real” family. We have applied for several sibling groups as we do not like the idea of taking the sibling bond away as well as everything else. We have applied for white, black, hispanic, native American, etc. Are we racist?
I will not be watching Avatar, but it seems to me when I have watched movies, the hero has been a woman. Perhaps things are different now.
Report comment to moderator
Anthony Bradley wrote about: “…the same kind of white supremacy that juxtaposed Christian missions with the African slave trade and colonialism in Africa, Asia, and elsewhere, for example, in India, South Africa, and Haiti.”
A good study of the history of missions will reveal that this juxtaposition is more than balenced out by a stronger resistance (from Christians) to it. Colonialism has long risen from very secularist and mercinary motives that distinguished it from Christian missions (mainly a 19th century era phenomenon with ongoing results). But historical stereotypes rarely recognize this. Secularists (and non-Christian biological and social Darwinists) rarely invite moral scrutiny for their enterprizes and deflect it on to Christians through hindsight stereotypes.
History is always a mixed bag just as all human motives come in complex mixtures. We tend to forget that the whole slave trade enterprize was resisted and overcome almost exclusively by Christians seeking healthy distinctions between secular and sacred motives for social change. The secular side was fighting FOR the slave trade. Then, as centuries pass, secularist historians try to convince us that Christians were the ones primarily behind the slave trade, when the secularists were in reality. But none of this denies that history (like our lives today) is a mixed bag.
But many early Christian missionaries worked hard and taught widesly to promote a resistance to the juxtapositioning that Bradley mentions and they were among to first to seek out a healthy sistinction from mercienary secular colonialism.
Report comment to moderator
I guess this means we need more Will Smith-as-hero movies than Keanu Reeves ones. Who knows? The debate continues.
Maybe the non-white community needs to encourage their children to go into the arts and become directors and creators of films they would like to watch. I think this has already been happening with the Christian community in general. Denzel Washington and Mel Gibson are two of my favs.
Report comment to moderator
If Black Americans cannot be racists due to alleged power inequities (according to elitist unintelligent Harvard intellectuals), then I guess white Americans simply cannot be decent or heroic under any circumstances.
God, save us from intellectual theorists who have no roots in reality.
___________________
Report comment to moderator
I had the same reaction to both these movies, Anthony–though I did not see Avatar for a variety of reasons. I loved The Blind Side, but walked out wishing it had not been another film about a white family saving a black kid–even though it was true and I’m thankful it happened.
I guess I wish we could just live without the race filter at all.
Report comment to moderator
You may have an inner PC problem, Michelle. You have apparently been taught to apply racial presumptions to perfectly innocent and healthy situations.
I have long noted that the neo-Marxist left (our entire media culture) views all reality through the secular trinitarian lens of race-gender-class. That mindset has infected this generation to the innermost core, and they don’t even realize it. Many in this college-trained generation simply cannot think out of any other moral or social paradigm.
A better lens would, in my view, focus us on “faith-family-freedom.”
Report comment to moderator
There are only two real “races” out there: the decent and the indecent (as Dennis Prager often says, quoting Victor Frankl). Thinking guided by skin-color, light or dark, (as we noted in Senator Harry Reid recently) will keep us mindlessly at odds with each other for all the wrong reasons, and will blind us from the more meaningful moral distinctions that would heal us.
But keeping us in moral blindness is the whole point of the race-gender-class (secularist) paradigm.
Report comment to moderator
On adoption-
Before we married dh and I decided we would do foster and also adopt “special needs kids”. We had no clue what that looked like but figured most couples looking to adopt want a white healthy baby. I could pop those out without much effort (LOL) but we wanted a ministry to the LORD helping kids who dont have a chance. At first we just told agencies we wanted special needs babies. There was no other stipulation. Imagine our surprise when we were told by DHS that black babies were indeed special needs children just because of their race. When further questioning DHS we were told no one in the black community wanted to adopt at all. Appaarently it was because of the thought of “buying” a baby which is what happened in our countries past. So at first we were told we were not permitted to adopt black, bi-racial, or hispanic children. They said it was because we would not be able to support culturally any of the children even if they were half white. We ended up adopting back then white babies with serious medical conditions. Fast forward 10 years and the laws were changed so that whites were not barred from adopting black or biracial or hispanic children. Trust me DHS was not happy and did not want to comply. In the end we adopted 3 more of our sons all are either black biracial or hispanic. We helped serve multiple Christian adoption agencies with foster care and I will tell you it was hard to place a black baby boy anywhere. I only got to work with one black family willing to adopt. I have since asked my black friends why black people don’t adopt and most say they just have no desire or have never thought about it.
Report comment to moderator
Jiller,
I got “the question” again last week. If we place these kids with you, how will you take care of their hair? The new code word is “they cannot be adopted out of their culture”. Urban kids cannot be adopted into a family in the country. They could never adapt. Who is being racist?
Report comment to moderator
God bless you Jiller and Mumsee. And thanks for putting up with such silliness.
Report comment to moderator
Seems to me a loving home is a loving home no matter what “culture” the child is from. Thank you Mumsee and Jiller for what you do.
Report comment to moderator
MUMSEE I do have a funny story to tell on myself. WHen our first son came to us that was black I was bathing him everyday. I was having a hard time with his dry skin. A black lady in the congregation we were at this time took him out of my arms and said, “Honey, he aint white, stop bathing him so much. And for goodnesss sake put some Eucerin on that poor babies skin!” Now at 14 he bathes everyday, sometimes uses skin lotion and sometimes not. I have encouraged him to let his hair grow and perhaps some neat cornrows. Nope, he likes it short because he doesn’t like his gorgeous soft curls. LOL Kids are funny.
Report comment to moderator
When Joel says: There are only two real “races” out there: the decent and the indecent (as Dennis Prager often says, quoting Victor Frankl). Thinking guided by skin-color, light or dark, (as we noted in Senator Harry Reid recently) will keep us mindlessly at odds with each other for all the wrong reasons, and will blind us from the more meaningful moral distinctions that would heal us.
It makes me want to dye him brown and set him free in a Fortune 500 company or a good ol’boys bar.
Report comment to moderator
Jiller, fortunately in at least some cases black people do adopt. In my Chicago church, we had multiple mixed-race families (mixed by marriage or adoption), and we ended up having two black women taking in children (one an official adoption, one getting the mixed-race children of her white neighbor when the neighbor voluntarily signed over custody). I’m hoping this is a growing trend. It might have been since we were a church with adopted children in it, it was more visible and thus easier. That’s a god thing, either way. (Now, neither of these women was married, so even better would have been adoptions by married couples. But adoption by a stable Christian woman is better than no adoption.)
Report comment to moderator
Jiller,
When we get new kids, we tend to bathe them daily. But quickly learn which ones cannot tolerate it. The very light skinned blondes tend to have dry skin and need to be covered in olive oil and lotion at every bath. My little boy has very dry skin and his cheeks turn bright bright red. People say, “how healthy he looks!” when he is really in discomfort, so we oil him up and bring his face roses down to a more comfortable zone.
Jiller, would you email me so I can bombard you with questions in the event we are selected for some of these kids?
mumsee2002@yahoo.com
Report comment to moderator
I also am an adoptive mom of a child of another race (Asian). When I saw Blind Side I realized that love of a child makes us, in a way, color blind. Once you are overcome with love for this child, you don’t think racially anymore, you just think, “my kid” and the mother bear instinct comes out full force. Whether they are your biological child or your adopted child doesn’t matter; nor does it matter if they are white, black, orange or purple. This child is mine and I will do whatever it takes to raise him or her to a healthy adulthood. Period.
Report comment to moderator
According to Mr. Bradley, “Movies like The Blind Side tell the world that, even with America’s complicated history, all white people are not bad people.”
Gee, Mr. Bradley, It’s nice to know that not all white people are bad.
It sometimes seems that Black people (Oh, I mean…um…people who happen to be Black or…uh…people of color) view Whites like Jews view World War 2-era Germans. You know how it is: there were Germans that were “righteous,” like Schindler, but the rest were scum.
Hey, Thomas1, how am I doin’?
Report comment to moderator
Diana 16,
I wonder if that is how God sees us?
Report comment to moderator
Hey Thomas maybe you should watch some Katt Williams on why Black People need they white friends…His wording not mine. Oh but he makes me laugh until tears roll down my face
Anyone but Thomas don’t look him up…his language is in the blue zone.
Report comment to moderator
DIANA preach it sister
When people ask me which ones are adopted I just tell them I forget! The mama bear in us can be filled with passion when it comes to our kiddos.
Report comment to moderator
MUMSEE I sent you an email. If you dont get it shortly please let me know.
Report comment to moderator
I have plenty of family members and godchildren of different races; it’s the cliche that bothered me.
Report comment to moderator
What I get from the blind side is not so much an admirations the Tuohys as a admiration of Micheal a young man who endured so much yet came through it all with such a gentle spirit. If I were him I would be mad at somebody.
Report comment to moderator
Jiller,
I got it and sent one back, thanks!
Report comment to moderator
Also how are these movies pro-white when one white guy is the hero but the whole white culture is the villain? I haven’t seen this one but “Dances with Wolves” comes to mind.
Report comment to moderator
The hair thing hasn’t been a problem with us. Black friends have been more than happy to help out, recommending conditioners and places to get his hair cut. One friend, an ex barber who cut his own sons hair offered to cut our sons, but we didn’t want to impose on him.
A couple of friends who are foster parents were given three black preschooler with very badly neglected hair. He bundled them up and drove to the nearest style shop.
Report comment to moderator
Race truly does not matter. “Out of culture” is a nonsense phrase used as an excuse for racism. My kids grandkids and great grandkid only have one culture. LOVE. And my family is spread out over six continents.
Report comment to moderator
Frankly, I saw “Avatar”, in 3D no less. I didn’t receive any kind of message (racial or otherwise). I went to be entertained and to see this technological feat.
Report comment to moderator
Racism is so yesterday.
As opposed to Christianity, which is so yester-yester-yester-yester-I could keep this up but I am boring myself. Not to mention you.
Anyway, the real question is what is today?
I know! Homo-hysteria!
Though that is fading………….you are getting sleepy……you will do as I tell you…….you will begin to accept……l.I am Satan……whispering in your ear…..taking control….of your spirit…..you will begin to……..not “love”……not “tolerate”…….but accept …..
Report comment to moderator
Accept what?
Civil unions? Domestic partnerships?
Report comment to moderator
Comment deleted by moderator.
Report comment to moderator
“depict a common Hollywood fiction that white people are here to save the universe.”
The only reason a white guy had to help the Na’vi is because other white people were about to kill them. And black people. And brown people. (But, all human.)
Also worth noting that one out of the four humans who came to the Na’vi’s aid was, in fact, not white. She was ambiguously Hispanic.
Report comment to moderator
#32
It’s a movie. Nothing more.
Well, I haven’t seen it yet. I will see it tomorrow. Maybe I will have a transcendental experience. But probably I won’t.
Probably I will just see a dumb movie with a lot of cool special effects. Just as when some people read the Bible, they don’t see a dumb old book and add a lot of special effects in their nervous system, which other people refer to as superstition and dismay at mortality. Your mileage.
Report comment to moderator
What is the alternative here? Would people struggling with their inner racial demons be happier if Michael Oher remained homeless without any future?
The Blind Side story is non-fiction. It actually happened! A family and a boy overcame a harmful circumstance and succeeded. Didn’t MLK Jr. sing, “We shall overcome”? One of the reasons racism persists is because of the PC crowd who makes sure you will never overcome.
The Blind Side was not really about race. The Tuohy’s weren’t concerned with it and neither was Michael. If people bring their racial baggage to the story, then they are the ones with the problem.
This story is more about the failure of the public school system which lets inner city kids fail their whole lives. A few years in a Christian school with a loving family and Michael Oher became a resounding success. Obviously a number of things came together and there was a lot of hard work. Many people wouldn’t be up to the challenge.
Report comment to moderator
True – the individuals are envious of this young man, AND the family to whom he now belongs, who love him – it blows holes in all their claims.
Report comment to moderator
The Tuohy’s may have been less concerned with race and more concerned with getting Oher into Ole Miss. I don’t know them or Oher, so I’m not going to accuse them of anything, but the NCAA thought it fishy enough to investigate. Oher’s high school coach was eventually found to have committed secondary violations by contacting Memphis area recruits on behalf of Ole Miss before actually taking a job there.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Oher
Report comment to moderator
A wealthy Christian family helps an inner city homeless kid destined to a life of crime turn his life around and get high school and college diplomas and is now a successful starter in the NFL.
Ooo, there must be something sinister going on … Sheesh!
The only thing sinister here is the need for people to imagine something sinister, because the ethnicity, class, religion and political affiliation of those involved aren’t an approved combination.
Report comment to moderator
While I haven’t see it, “The Blind Side” was supposedly based on a true story, right? Did the Tuohys and Michael Oher not have any say as to how they were represented? Why does Melissa Anderson of the Dallas Observer have such a bone to pick with the film?
Report comment to moderator
“Must it always be the case that a white male comes to save the day (again)? Perhaps this may explain the movie’s popularity.”
Well, in the case of “The Blind Side” a white female saved the day, right?
“I guess this means we need more Will Smith-as-hero movies than Keanu Reeves ones. Who knows? The debate continues.”
Frankly, there are a lot of Will Smith, Denzel Washington, and Morgan Freeman-as-hero movies. I haven’t seen Keanu Reeves-as-hero in quite awhile.
Frankly, racism is just another branch of sin. You can cut it off, but the root will still be there. Got to get to the root through the Cross.
Report comment to moderator
Perhaps these critics did NOT see the movie.
Frankly, the movie made it clear to me that Michael Oher himself should get tons of credit for meeting tough goals and following through on tasks and responsibilities. He was NOT “saved” in spite of himself at all. The Tuohy family did open up some opportunities but Michael Oher the boy and the man was the one who rose to harness them.
That was true in real life and in the movie. His success is no different than most any of us. He had some awesome support but the support alone is not what made him. Michael Oher deserves a ton of credit himself and the movie carried that point well.
Report comment to moderator
Joel Mark, that is what I tried to say in post 23. You said it better. He is a very admirable young man.
Report comment to moderator
36. Why do some people feel the need to tear down heroes?
Report comment to moderator
Kbells, that’s a great question – I believe it’s envy – the new parents felt called to reach out to this young guy, and he responded. Everyone’s life was touched by what happened. You see, lots of folks just can’t stand a really great success story, …. this wasn’t just success for the young man, but every single person in the family, and countless others.
Report comment to moderator
#39 HopeSprings “Well, in the case of “The Blind Side” a white female saved the day, right?”
In the movie, Sandra Bullock stole the show. However, in the book the father was much more involved. He was the one who first took an interest in Michael, helping him behind the scenes (such as speaking for him and paying for his lunch program). It wasn’t until the mom saw him walking in the cold that she got involved to buy him clothes, etc.
And Joel is right. Michael worked from sun up to sun down and long after every day. He got 12 years of education in 4 years.
Report comment to moderator
Thank you, Xion. My comment was in response to Mr. Bradley’s “always the case” statement:
“Must it always be the case that a white male comes to save the day (again)? Perhaps this may explain the movie’s popularity.”
It’s too bad that “The Blind Side” wasn’t a little more true to the book.
Report comment to moderator
Thanks to all of you who care for each other so much that you are willing to lay down cultural barriers in order to share the heart of Christ.
Report comment to moderator
We tend to forget that the whole slave trade enterprize was resisted and overcome almost exclusively by Christians . .
William Lloyd Garrison and Abraham Lincoln were not Christians.
Report comment to moderator
MICHELLE I loved The Blind Side, but walked out wishing it had not been another film about a white family saving a black kid–even though it was true and I’m thankful it happened.
EURUS It sometimes seems that Black people (Oh, I mean…um…people who happen to be Black or…uh…people of color) view Whites like Jews view World War 2-era Germans. You know how it is: there were Germans that were “righteous,” like Schindler, but the rest were scum.
Let it not be said that Conservatives are created equal.
Black children run the streets with too little parental and community supervision, but still, nobody wants a pied piper to pipe them away, even to gather them into an orphanage across the border, as the child-trafficking Idaho Baptists discovered in Haiti.
Blacks nor any people want their babies adopted by saviors who think the communities owe them a debt of thanks, rather than the other way around.
Report comment to moderator
Hunamity owes a debt ot thanks to families like the Tuohys and also to those who make films about heros like Michael Oher.
Report comment to moderator
Scroop, you negatively judge the personal faith of men long dead, but you are not God and my point stands. The fact remains that the whole slave-trade enterprize was resisted and overcome mostly by Christians . . like William Wilberforce, and a huge host of Puritans, Quakers, Baptists and countless others who boldly used their pulpits to challenge the slave trade and slavery in general. The fight against slavery rose from the soil of Christianity.
Lincoln and Garrison were just two out of multiple thousands who should be remembered for this fight. And you may well not be correct at all in your negative judgment about them. But it’s still besides the point.
Report comment to moderator
Scroop Moth wrote; “Blacks nor any people want their babies adopted by saviors who think the communities owe them a debt of thanks, rather than the other way around.”
Are you then saying that black people don’t want their babies adopted by good people who deserve our gratitude?
Report comment to moderator
#42:
It’s only “tearing down heros” if their motivations were actually pure. That’s what the investigation was about.
In this sports-obsessed culture of little league dads and soccer moms, is it so inconceivable that the Tuohys’ efforts on Oher’s behalf may not have been entirely altruistic?
Report comment to moderator
Buddyglass,
I’m sorry but you may be missing the point. The fact is that as human beings, it is indeed inconceivable that ANYONE’s efforts on behalf of other human beings be entirely altruistic. The point is that the Tuohy’s acted on behalf of another human being and stood by their positive actions, and they did so with a lot of altruism (even if not purely altruistic–which none of us are or can be).
Report comment to moderator
Are you then saying that black people don’t want their babies adopted by good people who deserve our gratitude?
You’re misreading, JOEL. That’s what MUMSEE, JILLER, and XION — especially XION– seem to be suggesting that people think.
My point was different.
Report comment to moderator
#50
Add Wendell Phillips! People argue about how puritanism shaped his abolitionism, but most participants on this blog would probably classify the Christianity of a guy who said “Write traitor and infidel on my gravestone!” somewhere to the left of Rev. Wright.
I don’t know about “multiple thousands.” Garrison and Philips were leaders of a small, but exceedingly ernest company who were engaged in stirring public opinion about slavery, and they were execrated, despised and hated by millions of their God-fearing, Bible-believing countrymen, North and South.
Christians for the most part considered abolition to be malignant and dangerous fanaticism. After the war started, however, protestant leaders in the North supported Lincoln. According to David Herbert Donald, Lincoln adapted his language to be understood by theologically conventional Americans.
Mary Todd Lincoln and Robert Lincoln said Lincoln (who refused to join a Church), was not a Christian.
My point stands! Your point stands in need of . . a pill! The time is right, but it’s not ready!
Report comment to moderator
I add this passage of Scripture:
Finding fault with good? How sad.
Report comment to moderator
#53 and #56:
You’re kind of missing my point. If they only took Oher in so they could route him to Ole Miss, then that’s not really a “good” act to begin with. It’s borderline despicable. It would be like saying, “I really don’t care about you as a person, but I care about Ole Miss football enough to invest a ton of my time and resources into you. Not for your benefit, per se, but for what you could mean for my favorite football team.”
Can you see why I would “find fault” with that? I’d respond to Victoria’s verse with:
“If I give all I possess to the poor and surrender my body to the flames, but have not love, I gain nothing.”
Motivation is all-important.
(To clarify once more: I’m not accusing the Tuohys of anything. I don’t know them, I don’t know Oher, and I can’t peer into their hearts like God can.)
Report comment to moderator
You’re doing your best to give the family who loves this young man a billboard they don’t deserve – you question love in such a way? sour grapes!
Report comment to moderator
And you’re doing your best to avoid looking at this objectively.
Here’s what we know:
1. The Tuohys went to Ole Miss and are big football fans.
2. Oher ended up going to Ole Miss.
3. Oher’s high school coach took a job at Ole Miss shortly after Oher graduated. Also, he was censured for recruiting on the university’s behalf before actually becoming an employee.
Of course its entirely possible the Tuohys would have taken Oher in even had he not been athletically gifted. But the three points above certainly make me suspicious of that. For now I’m giving them benefit of the doubt; I just wish they’d considered the appearance of impropriety and encouraged Oher to attend a school other than Ole Miss.
Report comment to moderator
Buddyglass,
You’re taking three points, standing on a chair trying to make a case, when there isn’t one.
YOU WRITE:……… “For now I’m giving them benefit of the doubt; I just wish they’d considered the appearance of impropriety and encouraged Oher to attend a school other than Ole Miss.”
I doubt they care whether you approve or not. Many kids go to the same college that their parents attended, that happens all the time.
Report comment to moderator
I think John Lee Hancock summed it up perfectly when he said, “From my standpoint I will only say that on that freezing night in Memphis, Leigh Anne didn’t stop the car and put Michael in the back seat because he was black. She did it because he was cold.”
The Tuohys did a truly amazing thing, but they will be the first to say Michael deserves most of the credit. He really worked so very hard to get where he is. They say they just didn’t screw him up.
He loves them. They love him. I really don’t think they care about race.
Report comment to moderator
Oh, and Buddyglass, Michael Oher spent his first night at the Tuohys sometime in the winter of 2003. Michael Lewis, the book’s author, first met him in 2003. He didn’t become a big football recruit until the spring of 2004. He was already at the school when the Tuohys met him. Lewis says the Tuohys were surprised at Michael’s talent. Sean Tuohy was trying to get him a basketball scholarship to a D2 school. They have the letters to prove it. They also understood the why others would be suspicious, but, frankly, they don’t care what anyone else thinks.
Report comment to moderator
Cate,
YOU WROTE:….. “He loves them. They love him. I really don’t think they care about race.”
I don’t believe they care about race as well. There are a lot of people who do focus on race, finding fault, they will make a case against a family who has more integrity, love, and caring,…. and still doubt their motives. That’s says more about the NAY sayers and what they wouldn’t and don’t do.
Report comment to moderator
Sandra Bullock needs to stick to romantic comedies and stay out of politics.
Report comment to moderator
As I see my name mentioned (54) I will jump back in. As mentioned before, for a different perspective head on over to the Black Social Workers website. They do not want whites adopting blacks, they believe black children are to be raised in the community by the community.
Report comment to moderator
Which is all well and good, Mumsee, if the “community” is stepping up and taking care of the kids. But you and I both know that black boys, in particular, are considered “unadoptable” even as infants. What do they suggest be done? Orphanages? Will the problem somehow be solved if white people’s homes become unavailable? Should the unadoptable children be thrown onto the street or murdered? I don’t understand this perspective–at all. Sure, recruit adoptive parents within black communities . . . but in the meantime, real children need homes.
Bianca, what is your beef with people helping other people? For the last couple months, I only ever see you comment about such topics, and always with disapproval.
Report comment to moderator
Whoever wants to help children who need a home, and is found capable of such, should be given the opportunity. I’m getting really tired of hearing about couples who cannot adopt black children, …..WHY? – does it infringes on a group who refuses to adopt a particular color, leaves these children to live in foster care until they are of age? –
Bianca, …. I side with Cheryl. Who is going to step up to the plate? – how many kids are lonely, discouraged and living without the care of a loving family, for what reason, because they aren’t the same color?
Racism is digusting, it shows no love or kindness – I don’t care what color someone is, if they are keeping children from living in loving homes it’s WRONG!
Report comment to moderator
65. I just read their statement. That is most racist piece of BS I have ever read in my life.
http://www.uoregon.edu/~adoption/archive/NabswTRA.htm
Report comment to moderator
KBells,
You think so? I have mentioned that site a couple of times on here, that is the first time I have seen a response. Imagine if others had said stuff like that. I do understand their point but, my understanding is that it is not based on fact.
Report comment to moderator
It looked to me like it was based on stereotyping of both whites and adoptive parents. Studies have shown that trans racial adoption doesn’t hurt the child.
Report comment to moderator
When my hubby first ran across their site, he was aghast but it helps to explain a few things. People want to thing something, it is pretty hard to change their minds with anything so mundane as the truth. Children tend to do well with a solid family with consistancy and structure. Even when they come in with “issues” those “issues” can be moderated significantly if not altogether erased. The skin color is irrelevant.
Report comment to moderator
Kbells – 70
You’re right it doesn’t – the whole thing is nonsense, envy, but most of all the denial of children to have loving parents, and for parents who dearly want a child to provide the love, comfort, and stability a real home brings.
SHAME on those who stand in the way of a child without a home, and parents longing for the child.
Report comment to moderator
This article on interracial adoption from the same site is far more positive (be sure to read the excerpts at the end, as well, written by the mom): http://www.uoregon.edu/~adoption/topics/familynobodywanted.htm
Report comment to moderator
I read that book many many years ago. Maybe that is one of the reasons I have always wanted to adopt.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!