Spanking gets a good report card
This just in (sorry, kids): Spanking children makes them happy.
According to a recent Wall Street Journal article by Mollie Ziegler Hemingway, a new study by Calvin College’s Marjorie Gunnoe found that teens who were spanked as children ended up with a “sunnier outlook,” were “better students,” had “more positive academic records and optimism about their future,” and volunteered more than their unspanked peers. In fact, Hemingway wrote, “the never-spanked group never scored the best on any of the 11 behavioral variables analyzed.”
Hemingway mentioned two extremes in the spanking camp, No Greater Joy’s Michael Pearl on the spanking side and ParentingInJesusFootsteps.org on the non-spanking side, as well as Scriptural proof texts for corporal discipline. Before anyone accuses her of abuse, Hemingway jumps in with admonitions of balance, reminders to use all of Scripture for discipline, not just the verses about the rod, and for this, we salute her. Too many—like the woman I know who swatted her children 400 times for telling a lie—vehemently adhere to passages on the rod outside of the context of their balancing counterparts: not provoking our children to wrath and being sure we put on humility, gentleness, and forgiveness in our parenting.
Parents, Christian or not, will likely continue the spanking debate ad infinitum, the question being is spanking abuse or an effective tool in the parenting tool belt? No rational person would advocate lashing out in anger and beating a child (which is what most people in the anti-spanking camp call “spanking”). Yet many of those who claim to be against spanking because of its “abusive” nature think nothing of verbally tearing into their children, giving them the silent treatment, sending them to their rooms for hours on end to contemplate their misbehavior, shaming them, or scolding them within an inch of their life. Because no bruises are visible, they feel their form of discipline is less harmful than spanking.
I recall a neighbor who vehemently vocalized her distaste for those who spank their children, yet regularly shouted so loudly at her little boy that my father once said, “Boy, it would be better if she shut her mouth and just gave that child a good spanking.”
Is spanking abuse? It can be. But, with new studies like Gunnoe’s showing the upsides of corporal discipline, opponents might want to reevaluate their tired rhetoric, because the proof that spanking is good discipline is starting to show up in the parental pudding.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top33 Comments to “Spanking gets a good report card”
Um actually that study by Gunnoe is not even close to completion:
One of those new population studies underway is called Portraits of American Life. It involves interviews of 2,600 people and their adolescent children every three years for the next 20 years. Dr. Marjorie Gunnoe is working with the first wave of data on the teens.
http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/nurtureshock/archive/2009/12/30/never-been-spanked.aspx
It is iroic that those who were unsatisfied with Pro. Maury Straus’s thoroughly completed study that statistically found lower IQs in children who had been physically struck than those who had not stated that Straus had a bias against “spanking” before he went into the study.
However, I have not heard the same people state that Gunnoe’s study is biased because she is a professor at Calvin College which is a fundamental college and has not even completed the study Hm.
Report comment to moderator
Spanking, properly done, is not abuse.
A lot of good food for thought here. It is interesting that in the 23rd Psalm, is the line, ‘your rod and your staff, they comfort me.’ How often do we think about a rod and staff being a comfort. Sheep need to know they are protected and kept from harm. Proper discipline does that.
My parents spanked, but I was seldom spanked. The reason was that a look from my parents was usually enough for me. It was not for my brothers and my younger sister. This is just one factor in thinking about what works for each child.
Report comment to moderator
I think your dad touched on an important point. Done properly, spanking is a singular event–three or four swats taken out of real life and made an issue–enables the punishment to be done. Relationships then are restored with a sorrowful hug–sometimes on both sides–and life goes on.
Constantly shouting at a child in lieu of stopping the offense and dealing with it, doesn’t teach anyone anything and raises the emotional tension within the family–often then causing a painful explosion that can do more damage than three or four swats.
And if you set up your discipline early in their lives–the concept that you need to obey–it’s amazing how you rarely have to resort to spanking when they’re older. I doubt we spanked any of our children after they were more than five or six years old.
Which is as it should be–by that age they need to learn natural consequences to their choices.
Obviously, beating is wrong. If the kid isn’t “getting it” after three or four swats, you’re not “doing” spanking correctly and need to return to the guide book on parental discipline.
I, personally, can’t stand the constant shouting and haranguing of parents who don’t stop to deal with their kids.
Report comment to moderator
I agree, Michelle. I think words hurt far longer.
Report comment to moderator
Words hurt longer, and it also hurts more to have a household in disarray, with the children never having the security of their parents being in charge. (Being in control of the household is way too much “authority” to give to a five-year-old. Today’s generation of non-spankers tend to be child abusers on this issue–never letting the child have the security that comes from not having to be in charge.)
Report comment to moderator
I semi-agree. With a younger child – 2-5 or so – a swat on the bottom gets their attention and is particularly useful in situations where they’re attempting something dangerous.
After that, I’m in favor of The Look, which worked quite well on me and my sisters. Also – sending a kid to a toy-filled room and anticipating woeful repentance isn’t going to work.
A 6 year old can understand verbal direction. But a child of 6 – 8 misbehaving in a restaurant should be removed for a swat or two, followed by verbal direction.
There are many kinds of child abuse. A parent who wants to avoid it will tailor their discipline to what they know about their child.
Report comment to moderator
I was spanked and it did me good.
I spanked my kids and it did them good.
Yes, some will carry it too far and we need to deal with those parents individually.
David
“Salt and Light”
http://www.redletterbelievers.com
Report comment to moderator
A spanking is not the discipline. A spanking gets the childs attention so the real discipline can begin. God also gave us the perfect tool to spank with..our hand. If you spank too hard it hurts your hand so you know not to spank that hard.
Report comment to moderator
Spanking, along with training and explaining caused my teen and adult children to have self discipline and grow up to be find adults. I rarely had to spank my children after about age 5 because they had learned to obey by then, each child in their own time.
I think it is too bad that the Pearls are proclaimed to be the extremists in the spanking camp because I find their teaching to be very balanced and Biblical. As with most good parenting teachers they recommend spanking when a parent is calm, when a child has been trained and understands their offense, and when it was done in rebellion.
Discipline must also be followed by love and reconciliation, a crucial element the “no spanking” camp often leaves out. Swift justice is not only valuable in the criminal world, but also the parenting.
Report comment to moderator
Michelle, I agree. I have know permissive parents whose children are so bratty and out of control that the parent has gotten to the point where they no longer even like the child. To let a child get to that point is real abuse.
Report comment to moderator
In my house, a short discussion accompanied the spanking in which I had the child explain to my whay he or she was getting spanked. More often than not, they knew exactly why and even thought they deserved it. When the spanking was over the matter was dropped, unless it needed to be revisited at a later date with it’s own reminder. That was a rare occurrence. my children didn’t get spanked much after they started school. Once they could write, they wrote sentences for me, and sometimes pertinent Bible verses. Then I made them look up their own verses when they got older and when they were in high school, they wrote reports for me.
I didn’t have to read many sentences or verses or reports.
Report comment to moderator
Anecdotally spanking didn’t help me. I do not have a sunny disposition. When following children over the long term there are far too many factors to state definitively that one thing makes a child happy.
Report comment to moderator
I did spank our girl when she was old enough to know better and young enough to have results. I just gave a couple of swats on her butt with my hand. I didn’t do it very many times–just when she was out of control, and never in public. The few times she got spanked worked like a charm. It was almost as if a demon had popped right out of her. It was very odd. I always remarked about it. She would calm down and the look in her eyes would change.
It was almost like the commercial where someone slaps the guy in the face with aftershave and he says, “thanks I needed that.”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1prd0Dpfytw&NR=1
Children are different. Some say that spanking works on one child in their family, but another gets their feelings hurt when spanked, and another is totally defiant when spanked–like “that didn’t hurt.” Some can get their feelings hurt just by giving them THE LOOK. I don’t know, I only had one.
Report comment to moderator
New Research: Spanking gets a good report card.
Interesting conclusions: occasional spanking is not damaging for our pre-teen children-that’s if a culture views spanking as the normal consequence for bad behavior. And the inferred conclusion is that occasional spanking is good for pre-teen children, good meaning less “bad outcomes” and more “good outcomes (Gunnoe’s list).”
Stop the press. There’s more to the parenting pudding. Two questions need to be addressed before these conclusions can be safely implemented by parents: 1) do Gunnoe’s outcomes constitute what’s basically good for children, and 2) what are all the other parenting factors, besides spanking, that occurred with the occasionally spanked pre-teens or the never spanked pre-teens? (Bronson wisely speculated “consistency of discipline is more important than the form of discipline.”) Here are my answers to these questions based upon nearly forty years as a child mental health counselor and being a Dad of four grown children and seven grandchildren.
Starting with question #2: what are all the other parenting factors besides spanking that occurred with the occasionally spanked pre-teens or the never spanked pre-teens?
There are two primary discipline pieces, consistency and form of discipline. There’s not one study that shows consistent spanking is the best discipline. There are many studies that show consistent, respectful, firm, limit-setting is the best discipline. The discipline form should be determined by the terms “respectful” and “firm.” Spanking qualifies for “firm” but “respectful” (well, you be the judge). And just because “I turned out Okay and my kids did too with spanking being part of the discipline” doesn’t automatically qualify as the best form of firm discipline.
Questions 1: Do Gunnoe’s outcomes constitute what’s basically “good” for children? No one will argue with the bad outcomes but the good outcomes are not basic enough. (True, these outcomes are indicators of a successful teen.) Here’s what I’ve found to be the most important basic outcome from respectful, firm, limit-setting: a child believing “I’m good for who I am on the inside.” Many successful indicators will flow out of this belief, including happiness and respectful for others. Do we need to add “occasional spanking” to achieve this outcome? Hopefully Gunnoe’s research will answer the question.
I offer this take-home-lesson. Consistent, respectful, firm limit-setting is essential for a kid to believe, “I’m good for who I am on the inside” Don’t use spanking until you’ve exhausted all other forms of firm discipline.
Report comment to moderator
I agree totally with this article. I also agree with the person that commented that they were diappointed to hear Michael Pearl of No Greater Joy listed as extreme. I found his writings to be very balanced. I have 4 daughters ages 9, 6, 4, and 2 and totally credit his teaching with their good behavior. My oldest was what one would consider “A strong willed child.” I had already bought many parenting books and specifically discipline books by the time she was 2 years old and nothing helped. I already did spank, but by the time I did after “time outs” and exhausting everything else, I was mad and it was ineffective. She was not enjoyable to be around and I was starting to see this reaction from others as well. When she was 3, someone gave me the book “To Train Up a Child” from Mr. Pearl. It was so short, sweet, and simple. Mr. Pearl’s teaching to just do it right away with a calm and gentle attitude made all of the difference. I started this way with my other 3 and they never went through the “terrible twos” and are very sweet. I am so thankful for his “old fashioned” advice.
Report comment to moderator
Actually, Gary, from what I understand, the earlier one spanks (within reason), the more effective it is. In other words, don’t wait till the child is six and you’ve exhausted all other discipline options before trying spanking, or you may find spanking doesn’t work as well as it should.
Since Scripture advocates spanking, that is good enough “advice,” and better than a study–and honestly, in today’s anti-spanking culture, it might be rather hard to find an unbiased study, or even to find enough parents who spank correctly (for example, never spanking in anger, but spanking hard enough to actually hurt). So, the fact that Scripture endorses it really is enough.
I personally don’t think spanking should be used for any and all infractions. But for rebellion and defiance (in a child under the age of ten, or whatever a family has defined as their top spanking age), spanking is far and away the best discipline, if it is done correctly by a loving parent.
Report comment to moderator
If correctly appropriated spanking produces good results just think what level-headness, even-tempered, loving respectfulness could accomplish!! Everywhere, not just in the home.
Report comment to moderator
Victoria has just shown the group in another thread how to make the heart symbol by using the ampersand codes. I am trying a few out here as this blog will soon be archived.
First the 9000 series
&9001; &9002; &9003; &9004; &9005; 9005 &9006; &9007; &9008; &9009; &9010;
&9011; &9012; &9013; &9014; &9015; 9015 &9016; &9017; &9018; &9019; &9020;
&9021; &9022; &9023; &9024; &9025; 9025 &9026; &9027; &9028; &9029; &9030;
&9031; &9032; &9033; &9034; &9035; 9035 &9036; &9037; &9038; &9039; &9040;
&9041; &9042; &9043; &9044; &9045; 9045 &9046; &9047; &9048; &9049; &9050;
&9051; &9052; &9053; &9054; &9055; 9055 &9056; &9057; &9058; &9059; &9060;
&9061; &9062; &9063; &9064; &9065; 9065 &9066; &9067; &9068; &9069; &9070;
&9071; &9072; &9073; &9074; &9075; 9075 &9076; &9077; &9078; &9079; &9080;
&9081; &9082; &9083; &9084; &9085; 9085 &9086; &9087; &9088; &9089; &9090;
&9091; &9092; &9093; &9094; &9095; 9095 &9096; &9097; &9098; &9099; &9000;
Report comment to moderator
now the 9800 series;
&9801; &9802; &9803; &9804; &9805; 9005 &9806; &9807; &9808; &9809; &9810;
&9811; &9812; &9813; &9814; &9815; 9015 &9816; &9817; &9818; &9819; &9820;
&9821; &9822; &9823; &9824; &9825; 9025 &9826; &9827; &9828; &9829; &9830;
&9831; &9832; &9833; &9834; &9835; 9035 &9836; &9837; &9838; &9839; &9840;
&9841; &9842; &9843; &9844; &9845; 9045 &9846; &9847; &9848; &9849; &9850;
&9851; &9852; &9853; &9854; &9855; 9055 &9856; &9857; &9858; &9859; &9860;
&9861; &9862; &9863; &9864; &9865; 9065 &9866; &9867; &9868; &9869; &9870;
&9871; &9872; &9873; &9874; &9875; 9075 &9876; &9877; &9878; &9879; &9880;
&9881; &9882; &9883; &9884; &9885; 9085 &9886; &9887; &9888; &9889; &9890;
&9891; &9892; &9893; &9894; &9895; 9095 &9896; &9897; &9898; &9899; &9800;
Report comment to moderator
&9801; &9802; &9803; &9804; &9805; 9005 &9806; &9807; &9808; &9809; &9810;
&9811; &9812; &9813; &9814; &9815; 9015 &9816; &9817; &9818; &9819; &9820;
&9821; &9822; &9823; &9824; &9825; 9025 &9826; &9827; &9828; &9829; &9830;
&9831; &9832; &9833; &9834; &9835; 9035 &9836; &9837; &9838; &9839; &9840;
&9841; &9842; &9843; &9844; &9845; 9045 &9846; &9847; &9848; &9849; &9850;
&9851; &9852; &9853; &9854; &9855; 9055 &9856; &9857; &9858; &9859; &9860;
&9861; &9862; &9863; &9864; &9865; 9065 &9866; &9867; &9868; &9869; &9870;
&9871; &9872; &9873; &9874; &9875; 9075 &9876; &9877; &9878; &9879; &9880;
&9881; &9882; &9883; &9884; &9885; 9085 &9886; &9887; &9888; &9889; &9890;
&9891; &9892; &9893; &9894; &9895; 9095 &9896; &9897; &9898; &9899; &9800;
Report comment to moderator
♉ ♊ ♋ ♌ ♍ 9005 ♎ ♏ ♐ ♑ ♒
♓ ♔ ♕ ♖ ♗ 9015 ♘ ♙ ♚ ♛ ♜
♝ ♞ ♟ ♠ ♡ 9025 ♢ ♣ ♤ ♥ ♦
♧ ♨ ♩ ♪ ♫ 9035 ♬ ♭ ♮ ♯ ♰
♱ ♲ ♳ ♴ ♵ 9045 ♶ ♷ ♸ ♹ ♺
♻ ♼ ♽ ♾ ♿ 9055 ⚀ ⚁ ⚂ ⚃ ⚄
⚅ ⚆ ⚇ ⚈ ⚉ 9065 ⚊ ⚋ ⚌ ⚍ ⚎
⚏ ⚐ ⚑ ⚒ ⚓ 9075 ⚔ ⚕ ⚖ ⚗ ⚘
⚙ ⚚ ⚛ ⚜ ⚝ 9085 ⚞ ⚟ ⚠ ⚡ ⚢
⚣ ⚤ ⚥ ⚦ ⚧ 9095 ⚨ ⚩ ⚪ ⚫ ♈
Report comment to moderator
above the 98 series….
the following is the 9000 series
〈 〉 ⌫ ⌬ ⌭ 9005 ⌮ ⌯ ⌰ ⌱ ⌲
⌳ ⌴ ⌵ ⌶ ⌷ 9015 ⌸ ⌹ ⌺ ⌻ ⌼
⌽ ⌾ ⌿ ⍀ ⍁ 9025 ⍂ ⍃ ⍄ ⍅ ⍆
⍇ ⍈ ⍉ ⍊ ⍋ 9035 ⍌ ⍍ ⍎ ⍏ ⍐
⍑ ⍒ ⍓ ⍔ ⍕ 9045 ⍖ ⍗ ⍘ ⍙ ⍚
⍛ ⍜ ⍝ ⍞ ⍟ 9055 ⍠ ⍡ ⍢ ⍣ ⍤
⍥ ⍦ ⍧ ⍨ ⍩ 9065 ⍪ ⍫ ⍬ ⍭ ⍮
⍯ ⍰ ⍱ ⍲ ⍳ 9075 ⍴ ⍵ ⍶ ⍷ ⍸
⍹ ⍺ ⍻ ⍼ ⍽ 9085 ⍾ ⍿ ⎀ ⎁ ⎂
⎃ ⎄ ⎅ ⎆ ⎇ 9095 ⎈ ⎉ ⎊ ⎋ ⌨
Report comment to moderator
◥ ◦ ◧ ◨ ◩ 9005 ◪ ◫ ◬ ◭ ◮
◯ ◰ ◱ ◲ ◳ 9015 ◴ ◵ ◶ ◷ ◸
◹ ◺ ◻ ◼ ◽ 9025 ◾ ◿ ☀ ☁ ☂
☃ ☄ ★ ☆ ☇ 9035 ☈ ☉ ☊ ☋ ☌
☍ ☎ ☏ ☐ ☑ 9045 ☒ ☓ ☔ ☕ ☖
☗ ☘ ☙ ☚ ☛ 9055 ☜ ☝ ☞ ☟ ☠
☡ ☢ ☣ ☤ ☥ 9065 ☦ ☧ ☨ ☩ ☪
☫ ☬ ☭ ☮ ☯ 9075 ☰ ☱ ☲ ☳ ☴
☵ ☶ ☷ ☸ ☹ 9085 ☺ ☻ ☼ ☽ ☾
☿ ♀ ♁ ♂ ♃ 9095 ♄ ♅ ♆ ♇ ◤
9700 series
Report comment to moderator
▁ ▂ ▃ ▄ ▅ 9005 ▆ ▇ █ ▉ ▊
▋ ▌ ▍ ▎ ▏ 9015 ▐ ░ ▒ ▓ ▔
▕ ▖ ▗ ▘ ▙ 9025 ▚ ▛ ▜ ▝ ▞
▟ ■ □ ▢ ▣ 9035 ▤ ▥ ▦ ▧ ▨
▩ ▪ ▫ ▬ ▭ 9045 ▮ ▯ ▰ ▱ ▲
△ ▴ ▵ ▶ ▷ 9055 ▸ ▹ ► ▻ ▼
▽ ▾ ▿ ◀ ◁ 9065 ◂ ◃ ◄ ◅ ◆
◇ ◈ ◉ ◊ ○ 9075 ◌ ◍ ◎ ● ◐
◑ ◒ ◓ ◔ ◕ 9085 ◖ ◗ ◘ ◙ ◚
◛ ◜ ◝ ◞ ◟ 9095 ◠ ◡ ◢ ◣ ▀
9600 series
Report comment to moderator
9500 series
┝ ┞ ┟ ┠ ┡ 9005 ┢ ┣ ┤ ┥ ┦
┧ ┨ ┩ ┪ ┫ 9015 ┬ ┭ ┮ ┯ ┰
┱ ┲ ┳ ┴ ┵ 9025 ┶ ┷ ┸ ┹ ┺
┻ ┼ ┽ ┾ ┿ 9035 ╀ ╁ ╂ ╃ ╄
╅ ╆ ╇ ╈ ╉ 9045 ╊ ╋ ╌ ╍ ╎
╏ ═ ║ ╒ ╓ 9055 ╔ ╕ ╖ ╗ ╘
╙ ╚ ╛ ╜ ╝ 9065 ╞ ╟ ╠ ╡ ╢
╣ ╤ ╥ ╦ ╧ 9075 ╨ ╩ ╪ ╫ ╬
╭ ╮ ╯ ╰ ╱ 9085 ╲ ╳ ╴ ╵ ╶
╷ ╸ ╹ ╺ ╻ 9095 ╼ ╽ ╾ ╿ ├
Report comment to moderator
9400 series
Ⓓ Ⓔ Ⓕ Ⓖ Ⓗ 9005 Ⓘ Ⓙ Ⓚ Ⓛ Ⓜ
Ⓝ Ⓞ Ⓟ Ⓠ Ⓡ 9015 Ⓢ Ⓣ Ⓤ Ⓥ Ⓦ
Ⓧ Ⓨ Ⓩ ⓐ ⓑ 9025 ⓒ ⓓ ⓔ ⓕ ⓖ
ⓗ ⓘ ⓙ ⓚ ⓛ 9035 ⓜ ⓝ ⓞ ⓟ ⓠ
ⓡ ⓢ ⓣ ⓤ ⓥ 9045 ⓦ ⓧ ⓨ ⓩ ⓪
⓫ ⓬ ⓭ ⓮ ⓯ 9055 ⓰ ⓱ ⓲ ⓳ ⓴
⓵ ⓶ ⓷ ⓸ ⓹ 9065 ⓺ ⓻ ⓼ ⓽ ⓾
⓿ ─ ━ │ ┃ 9075 ┄ ┅ ┆ ┇ ┈
┉ ┊ ┋ ┌ ┍ 9085 ┎ ┏ ┐ ┑ ┒
┓ └ ┕ ┖ ┗ 9095 ┘ ┙ ┚ ┛ Ⓒ
Report comment to moderator
9005
① ② ③ ④ 9015 ⑤ ⑥ ⑦ ⑧ ⑨
⑩ ⑪ ⑫ ⑬ ⑭ 9025 ⑮ ⑯ ⑰ ⑱ ⑲
⑳ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ 9035 ⑸ ⑹ ⑺ ⑻ ⑼
⑽ ⑾ ⑿ ⒀ ⒁ 9045 ⒂ ⒃ ⒄ ⒅ ⒆
⒇ ⒈ ⒉ ⒊ ⒋ 9055 ⒌ ⒍ ⒎ ⒏ ⒐
⒑ ⒒ ⒓ ⒔ ⒕ 9065 ⒖ ⒗ ⒘ ⒙ ⒚
⒛ ⒜ ⒝ ⒞ ⒟ 9075 ⒠ ⒡ ⒢ ⒣ ⒤
⒥ ⒦ ⒧ ⒨ ⒩ 9085 ⒪ ⒫ ⒬ ⒭ ⒮
⒯ ⒰ ⒱ ⒲ ⒳ 9095 ⒴ ⒵ Ⓐ Ⓑ
9300 series
Report comment to moderator
⏱ ⏲ ⏳ ⏴ ⏵ 9005 ⏶ ⏷ ⏸ ⏹ ⏺
⏻ ⏼ ⏽ ⏾ ⏿ 9015 ␀ ␁ ␂ ␃ ␄
␅ ␆ ␇ ␈ ␉ 9025 ␊ ␋ ␌ ␍ ␎
␏ ␐ ␑ ␒ ␓ 9035 ␔ ␕ ␖ ␗ ␘
␙ ␚ ␛ ␜ ␝ 9045 ␞ ␟ ␠ ␡ ␢
␣  ␥ ␦ 9055
9065
9075 ⑀
⑁ ⑂ ⑃ ⑄ ⑅ 9085 ⑆ ⑇ ⑈ ⑉ ⑊
9095 ⏰
9200 series
Report comment to moderator
⎍ ⎎ ⎏ ⎐ ⎑ 9005 ⎒ ⎓ ⎔ ⎕ ⎖
⎗ ⎘ ⎙ ⎚ ⎛ 9015 ⎜ ⎝ ⎞ ⎟ ⎠
⎡ ⎢ ⎣ ⎤ ⎥ 9025 ⎦ ⎧ ⎨ ⎩ ⎪
⎫ ⎬ ⎭ ⎮ ⎯ 9035 ⎰ ⎱ ⎲ ⎳ ⎴
⎵ ⎶ ⎷ ⎸ ⎹ 9045 ⎺ ⎻ ⎼ ⎽ ⎾
⎿ ⏀ ⏁ ⏂ ⏃ 9055 ⏄ ⏅ ⏆ ⏇ ⏈
⏉ ⏊ ⏋ ⏌ ⏍ 9065 ⏎ ⏏ ⏐ ⏑ ⏒
⏓ ⏔ ⏕ ⏖ ⏗ 9075 ⏘ ⏙ ⏚ ⏛ ⏜
⏝ ⏞ ⏟ ⏠ ⏡ 9085 ⏢ ⏣ ⏤ ⏥ ⏦
⏧ ⏨ ⏩ ⏪ ⏫ 9095 ⏬ ⏭ ⏮ ⏯ ⎌
9100 series
Report comment to moderator
9216; ␀ ␁ ␂ ␃ ␄ 9220; ␅ ␆ ␇ ␈ ␉ ␊ ␋ ␌ ␍ ␎ 9230; ␏ ␐ ␑ ␒ ␓ ␔ ␕ ␖ ␗ ␘ 9240; ␙ ␚ ␛ ␜ ␝ ␞ ␟ ␠ ␡ ␢ 9250; ␣  ///
9312; ① ② ③ ④ ⑤ ⑥ ⑦ ⑧ ⑨ 9320; ⑩ ⑪ ⑫ ⑬ ⑭ ⑮ ⑯ ⑰ ⑱ ⑲ 9330; ⑳ ⑴ ⑵ ⑶ ⑷ ⑸ ⑹ ⑺ ⑻ ⑼ 9340; ⑽ ⑾ ⑿ ⒀ ⒁ ⒂ ⒃ ⒄ ⒅ ⒆ 9350; ⒇ ⒈ ⒉ ⒊ ⒋ ⒌ ⒍ ⒎ ⒏ ⒐ 9360; ⒑ ⒒ ⒓ ⒔ ⒕ ⒖ ⒗ ⒘ ⒙ ⒚ 9370; ⒛ ⒜ ⒝ ⒞ ⒟ ⒠ ⒡ ⒢ ⒣ ⒤ 9380; ⒥ ⒦ ⒧ ⒨ ⒩ ⒪ ⒫ ⒬ ⒭ ⒮ 9390; ⒯ ⒰ ⒱ ⒲ ⒳ ⒴ ⒵ Ⓐ Ⓑ 9399; Ⓒ 9400
; Ⓓ Ⓔ Ⓕ Ⓖ Ⓗ Ⓘ Ⓙ Ⓚ Ⓛ Ⓜ 9410; Ⓝ Ⓞ Ⓟ Ⓠ Ⓡ Ⓢ Ⓣ Ⓤ Ⓥ Ⓦ 9420; Ⓧ Ⓨ Ⓩ ⓐ ⓑ ⓒ ⓓ ⓔ ⓕ ⓖ 9430; ⓗ ⓘ ⓙ ⓚ ⓛ ⓜ ⓝ ⓞ ⓟ ⓠ 9440; ⓡ ⓢ ⓣ ⓤ ⓥ ⓦ ⓧ ⓨ ⓩ ⓪ 9450; ⓫ ⓬ ⓭ ⓮ ⓯ ⓰ ⓱ ⓲ ⓳ ⓴ 9460; ⓵ ⓶ ⓷ ⓸ ⓹ ⓺ ⓻ ⓼ ⓽ ⓾ 9470; ⓿ ─ ━ │ ┃ ┄ ┅ ┆ ┇ ┈ 9480; ┉ ┊ ┋ ┌ ┍ ┎ ┏ ┐ ┑ ┒ 9490; ┓ └ ┕ ┖ ┗ ┘ ┙ ┚ ┛ 9499; ├ 9500
; ┝ ┞ ┟ ┠ ┡ ┢ ┣ ┤ ┥ ┦ 9510; ┧ ┨ ┩ ┪ ┫ ┬ ┭ ┮ ┯ ┰ 9520; ┱ ┲ ┳ ┴ ┵ ┶ ┷ ┸ ┹ ┺ 9530; ┻ ┼ ┽ ┾ ┿ ╀ ╁ ╂ ╃ ╄ 9540; ╅ ╆ ╇ ╈ ╉ ╊ ╋ ╌ ╍ ╎ 9550; ╏ ═ ║ ╒ ╓ ╔ ╕ ╖ ╗ ╘ 9560; ╙ ╚ ╛ ╜ ╝ ╞ ╟ ╠ ╡ ╢ 9570; ╣ ╤ ╥ ╦ ╧ ╨ ╩ ╪ ╫ ╬ 9580; ╭ ╮ ╯ ╰ ╱ ╲ ╳ ╴ ╵ ╶ 9590; ╷ ╸ ╹ ╺ ╻ ╼ ╽ ╾ ╿ 9599
Report comment to moderator
; ▁ ▂ ▃ ▄ ▅ ▆ ▇ █ ▉ ▊ 9610; ▋ ▌ ▍ ▎ ▏ ▐ ░ ▒ ▓ ▔ 9620; ▕ ▖ ▗ ▘ ▙ ▚ ▛ ▜ ▝ ▞ 9630; ▟ ■ □ ▢ ▣ ▤ ▥ ▦ ▧ ▨ 9640; ▩ ▪ ▫ ▬ ▭ ▮ ▯ ▰ ▱ ▲ 9650; △ ▴ ▵ ▶ ▷ ▸ ▹ ► ▻ ▼ 9660; ▽ ▾ ▿ ◀ ◁ ◂ ◃ ◄ ◅ ◆ 9670; ◇ ◈ ◉ ◊ ○ ◌ ◍ ◎ ● ◐ 9680; ◑ ◒ ◓ ◔ ◕ ◖ ◗ ◘ ◙ ◚ 9690; ◛ ◜ ◝ ◞ ◟ ◠ ◡ ◢ ◣ 9699; ◤ 9700
; ◥ ◦ ◧ ◨ ◩ ◪ ◫ ◬ ◭ ◮ 9710; ◯ ◰ ◱ ◲ ◳ ◴ ◵ ◶ ◷ ◸ 9720; ◹ ◺ ◻ ◼ ◽ ◾ ◿ ☀ ☁ ☂ 9730; ☃ ☄ ★ ☆ ☇ ☈ ☉ ☊ ☋ ☌ 9740; ☍ ☎ ☏ ☐ ☑ ☒ ☓ ☔ ☕ ☖ 9750; ☗ ☘ ☙ ☚ ☛ ☜ ☝ ☞ ☟ ☠ 9760; ☡ ☢ ☣ ☤ ☥ ☦ ☧ ☨ ☩ ☪ 9770; ☫ ☬ ☭ ☮ ☯ ☰ ☱ ☲ ☳ ☴ 9780; ☵ ☶ ☷ ☸ ☹ ☺ ☻ ☼ ☽ ☾ 9790; ☿ ♀ ♁ ♂ ♃ ♄ ♅ ♆ ♇ 9799; ♈ 9800; ♉ ♊ ♋ ♌ ♍ ♎ ♏ ♐ ♑ ♒ 9810; ♓ ♔ ♕ ♖ ♗ ♘ ♙ ♚ ♛ ♜ 9820; ♝ ♞ ♟ ♠ ♡ ♢ ♣ ♤ ♥ ♦ 9830; ♧ ♨ ♩ ♪ ♫ ♬ ♭ ♮ ♯ ♰ 9840; ♱ ♲ ♳ ♴ ♵ ♶ ♷ ♸ ♹ ♺ 9850; ♻ ♼ ♽ ♾ ♿ ⚀ ⚁ ⚂ ⚃ ⚄ 9860; ⚅ ⚆ ⚇ ⚈ ⚉ ⚊ ⚋ ⚌ ⚍ ⚎ 9870; ⚏ ⚐ ⚑ ⚒ ⚓ ⚔ ⚕ ⚖ ⚗ ⚘ 9880; ⚙ ⚚ ⚛ ⚜ ⚝ ⚞ ⚟ ⚠ ⚡ ⚢ 9890; ⚣ ⚤ ⚥ ⚦ ⚧ ⚨ ⚩ ⚪ ⚫ 9899; ⚬ 9900
; ⚭ ⚮ ⚯ ⚰ ⚱ ⚲ ⚳ ⚴ ⚵ ⚶ 9910; ⚷ ⚸ ⚹ ⚺ ⚻ ⚼ ⚽ ⚾ ⚿ ⛀ 9920; ⛁ ⛂ ⛃ ⛄ ⛅ ⛆ ⛇ ⛈ ⛉ ⛊ 9930; ⛋ ⛌ ⛍ ⛎ ⛏ ⛐ ⛑ ⛒ ⛓ ⛔ 9940; ⛕ ⛖ ⛗ ⛘ ⛙ ⛚ ⛛ ⛜ ⛝ ⛞ 9950; ⛟ ⛠ ⛡ ⛢ ⛣ ⛤ ⛥ ⛦ ⛧ ⛨ 9960; ⛩ ⛪ ⛫ ⛬ ⛭ ⛮ ⛯ ⛰ ⛱ ⛲ 9970; ⛳ ⛴ ⛵ ⛶ ⛷ ⛸ ⛹ ⛺ ⛻ ⛼ 9980; ⛽ ⛾ ⛿ ✀ ✁ ✂ ✃ ✄ ✅ ✆ 9990; ✇ ✈ ✉ ✊ ✋ ✌ ✍ ✎ ✏ 9999;
Report comment to moderator
It would be interesting to see what the results would be if they adjusted for church attendance level and parents political persuasion. Basically to attempt to determine whether it is those things, rather than spanking per se, that yielded the better results.
Report comment to moderator
Kevin & Elizabeth Schatz are being held in jail in California, accused of beating their 7 year old adopted daughter so severely that she died, and of putting her 11 year old sister in the hospital with terrible internal injuries from beatings. The Schatzes are, by all accounts, devout, homeschooling parents, who reportedly followed the advice given in To Train Up a Child by Michael & Debi Pearl. That book was found in their home, their remaining children testified to regular administrations of the “training” recommended in the book, and the 1/4″ plumbing supply line recommended for use by parents on the Pearls’ ministry website was found in their home and is thought to be the instrument in their adopted daughter’s murder.
As an evangelical Christian and parent, I’m tired of verses in Proverbs being twisted and misinterpreted to justify the very modern practice of spanking. The alternative to spanking is not wildly permissive parenting, nor verbally abusive parenting, as this blog post implies. Rather, authoritative biblical parenting leads by example and through relationship. Instead of skirmishing to assert ourselves in an adversarial relationship with our children, we can rest assured that our developmentally and spiritually appropriate discipline will bear good fruit. I recommend Tim Kimmel’s Grace Based Parenting or Clay Clarkson’s Heartfelt Discipline for thorough and practical guidelines.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!