Paying for the State Department’s liquor
An investigation by the Washington Times reveals that the State Department spent nearly $300,000 of taxpayers dollars on alcoholic beverages in 2009.
Although this accounts for a small amount of the department’s budget, it raises questions about the State Department’s stewardship of federal tax dollars as the spending doubled in comparison with the previous year.
The Times believes that while the rise in alcohol spending may be linked to an increasing number of overseas post-election parties, dozens of other purchases were written off as gratuities. Last year, more than $7,000 was spent on alcoholic beverages for gratuities in the U.S. Embassies in India and Russia, while more than $20,000 was spent on “representational liquors for Christmas gratuities” in the U.S. Embassy in Greece.
While the State Department says the expenditures are permitted under law “to enable the Department of State and foreign service to provide for the proper representation of the United States and its interest,” others disagree.
David Williams, vice president of policy at the nonpartisan Citizens Against Government Waste told the Times this spending is concerning especially at a time when Americans are struggling to find jobs and pay off mortgages.
“It’s indicative of the disconnect that bureaucrats have when they spend our money,” he said.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top33 Comments to “Paying for the State Department’s liquor”
Was all this a Obama party’s?
Report comment to moderator
I don’t see the big deal. Of all of the areas where the government wastes money, this one is nothing.
I’m not going to pretend to know about the State Department’s budget, but if money is there to fund parties and social events, then of course alcohol is going to be part of it.
Report comment to moderator
How does this compare to previous administration?
Report comment to moderator
I’m conflicted on this.
If keeping the State Department soused means that they cause less harm than if they were (mainly) sober, I say triple the budget for liquor; keep them passed out and snoring under their desks.
Report comment to moderator
drill – they may be drink to forget who they are working for.
Report comment to moderator
Drill’s scenario isn’t too bad, but I’m not sure I understand what the WT article describes as “alcoholic gratuities.”
Report comment to moderator
I like Drill’s scenario and suggest tripling the White House budget on alcohol. If we can keep them passed out then they can’t write more bogus bills that benefit nobody but themselves and their donors.
Report comment to moderator
Is this the combination of what all of our embassies spend on liquor in a year? Seems like not that much. I don’t think they cracking open case after case of Krug on that budget.
Report comment to moderator
This is just of how many percs that those in government abuse. I’m sorry, but I don’t believe that there should be any right offs for alcohol. PERIOD. To me, governing is more dangerous than driving. I want my elected representatives SOBER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Governing while under the influance should be a prosacutable offense. We have MADD. Perhaps we should form CADP, Citizens Against Drunk Politicians.
I’m not kidding. We have a president that admitted to doing drugs, hard drugs. And he drinks. His doctor told him he needed to moderate his drinking. Let me tell you, as a recovering alcoholic and drug addict, YOU CANNOT CHOOSE TO QUIT ONE AND DO ANOTHER. YOU MUST QUIT THEM ALL! It is not the singular substance that is the problem. It is inability to moderate. The addict/alcoholic has a mindset of “If one is good, two is better, etc.”. I was very concerned to hear that Obama still drinks after hearing his memoir where he recalls his drug abuse. I don’t hold his drug abuse against him. But I seriously doubt his sobriety.
I havn’t been to A.A. in years, but I wonder what the majority of them think.
Report comment to moderator
Yeah if you read the story it looks like embassies give out wine and spirits as presents to vendors and dignitaries. And it all looks pretty reasonable. Bottles of Jack in Solvenia (I guess we don’t pring for good Whiskey in Solvenia) and the U.S. Mission at the U.N. serves $40 dollar bottles of wine generally.
Report comment to moderator
Is the question whether serving alcohol is unjustified, or whether $300,000 is an inordinate expense? Or is there a serious question here at all? Maybe this is just another thread to grouse aimlessly about government.
I do not think it unreasonable for the State Department to serve wine at state dinners or meetings, or to give bottles of liquor as gifts, etc. This is all part of being a good host. I know nothing about budgets for institutions as large as the State Department, but $300,000 does not seem extravagant.
Why, that could have paid for 150 topless lesbian bondage parties for RNC donors. Or 3 twenty minute pep talks by Sarah Palin.
Report comment to moderator
Well said, JJF.
Report comment to moderator
Gestures friendship give others an opportunity to reciprocate. Our foreign service people need to feel appreciated by foreigners, and the US needs the world to witness our people being treated with respect and gratitude. Some countries are able to do little more for us than not cause trouble and show their style of hospitality. Therefore, let’s do all we can to promote such displays.
As JJF observes, Wash Times is trying to infect readers with uninformed resentment. World Mag can put this disease in a wheel chair and push it to the rehabilitation clinic, but will never get it to walk around. Too bad. We liberals might want to reciprocate some day, (though we’ll pick an issue with some legs).
Report comment to moderator
The issue is Obama ran on cutting wasteful spending and $300,000 of taxpayers dollars on alcoholic beverages in 2009, could be called wasteful spending.
Report comment to moderator
Well, sure, 300G of taxpayer money is practically nothing to Statists like JJF, Graceland, and Scroop Moth.
In the murky, befogged brain of the Statist, boozed up government bureaucrats are sort of an honorable and hoary tradition, stretching back to the vodka-swilling Soviet functionaries, lording it over the peasants.
So they sort of pine away for the good old days of yore and gnash their teeth at all this unnecessary information being given the serfs.
Still, to this peasant, 300G is a lot of dough.
300,000 dollars could have paid for 50 top quality call girl sessions for Democrat Governor Spitzer.
Or Democrat Congressman William Jefferson could have even fit 300G into his freezer, if he threw out the rancid Chinese takeout and moved the original stash to his microwave.
Or Barney Frank, Democrat congressman, could always use 300G to upgrade his home-grown male prostitution business; upgrade the decor in the den and pay for a few nip and tucks for the more decaying, sagging, jaundiced members of his workforce and he could be looking at breathing new life into the old business right quick.
Keep in mind, Scroop Moth, that you are not liberal. The last liberal died in 2003, sort of like the last passenger pigeon died in 1905. You are a leftist.
A liberal is to a leftist like an elf is to an orc.
Report comment to moderator
Barney Frank, Democrat congressman – do not forget it could be use to pay for his lovers drug lawyer
Report comment to moderator
If could also pay for the first lady new shoes
Report comment to moderator
The issue is Obama ran on cutting wasteful spending and $300,000 of taxpayers dollars on alcoholic beverages in 2009, could be called wasteful spending.
Very information, Roy. The issue here is not, “Does this expediture advance the American mission in a meaningful way?” It’s COULD this be called a violation of a campaign promise?
Report comment to moderator
$300, 000 — for a whole year?? My the US is stingy. I’m surprised the Russians stuck around to negotiate new nuclear reductions — $300,000 would barely cover a weekend with the Russian diplomatic team.
Report comment to moderator
Would I rather that tax dollars not be spent on alcoholic beverages for big whigs? Absolutely. But of all the stupid government programs and expenses that I’d like to see cut, this one is small potatoes.
Report comment to moderator
Big Whigs?
The Whigs, big and little, died out around 1856 when Fillmore packed his bags and scurried out of the White House.
Liberals, big and little, died out in 2003, when Patrick Moynihan gave up the ghost in a Washington D.C. hospital and went to wherever liberals end up.
Passenger Pigeons, big and little, died out in 1912 (not 1905), when the last passenger pigeon died in captivity in Cincinnati, Ohio.
Species and parties come and go.
Conversely, mildew and leftists, are always with us.
Report comment to moderator
#11 Brother Dan,
Stay away from Drudge today since this bothers you. He’s got a picture of a Hillary appearing to be half-lit on what I’d bet isn’t melted ice diluted tea in a highball glass—which is just great. A bagged, or still drying out from the night before Secretary of State must be a really adroit negotiator.
Report comment to moderator
Oops – that should be #9 Brother Dan
Report comment to moderator
The operative question here is why the spending on booze doubled since Obama took office.
A scientific answer is that Democrats drink twice as much as Republicans and hence have twice as many dead brain cells as Republicans. This actually explains a good bit.
However another possibility is that people drink more in order to keep from getting depressed at the sight of Hillary Clinton in a pantsuit, stolidly thumping up and down the corridors of Foggy Bottom, staring all pop-eyed and unblinking at a chart of Obama’s approval rating.
Lately she has been getting progressively more cheerful, as his ratings tank.
So maybe the booze bill for the Department of State will drop a bit between now and 2012.
Report comment to moderator
The operative question here is why the spending on booze doubled since Obama took office.
That’s answered in the article, which is that thing the blog post links to that some people like to READ…some people.
Embassies were not having inaugural parties in 2008, since in 2008 we had not just elected a new president. The more fair comparison would be 2009 to 2005.
Report comment to moderator
The Times believes that while the rise in alcohol spending may be linked to an increasing number of overseas post-election parties…
Yup, that’s pretty definitively “answered in the article” as Mynock said. No ambiguity there, it’s straight verifiable fact, no speculation or conjecture. But hey, I thought the election was in 2008? I guess people went into two months of suspended animation before being awakened to have their “post-election parties.”
Report comment to moderator
I have mixed opinions on this. I don’t really have a problem with with modest expenses for celebrations, nor with those expenses including alcohol. (I don’t have enough information to judge weather $300k is modest, but it doesn’t immediately strike me as immodest). But I work for the federal government and even though we frequently host meetings and celebrations we are strictly prohibited from purchasing alcohol. We can rarely even get permission to purchase food and usually have charge guests a few dollars each. I understand from friends in other governmental agencies that this is the norm. So why does State get special treatment?
Report comment to moderator
#27 DDL
“So why does State get special treatment?”
They’re better than the rest of us…
Report comment to moderator
I’m sure all you deficit hawks know the dollars and cents Karen Hughes spent to get Arabs to love GWB, including alcohol expense. I’m sure a single ad buy on Al-Jazeera for George and Laura’s Christmas greeting was at least $300k. Look at the “bangs” we got from them bucks.
Report comment to moderator
The operative question here is why the spending on booze doubled since Obama took office.
Obama has a better diplomatic relationship with the Russians?
Report comment to moderator
Obama may be winning vassels with the Skky . . if he’s pouring it into empty Grey Goose bottles. I’ve heard Russians won’t drink Stoli.
Report comment to moderator
Well, even between 2005 and 2009 (Bush to Obama inauguration years), the spending for booze went up about 100G.
Now, it is true that this might not be due to increased consumption. It could be that it is higher quality booze that Obama and company are buying and imbibing, all on the taxpayers dime.
Why according to the Distilled Spirits Council (not a religious organization dedicated to purifying souls, so our resident leftists can trust the numbers), average Americans are having to buy sub-standard booze these days, what with the Democrats raping the country and what not.
This would go along with Obama and his ‘Americans clinging to their Bibles and guns’ mentality. He probably just forgot to add ‘drinking their cheap sub-standard booze’.
But one thing is certain – cold, hard, clinical, scientific certain.
Either Obama and company are boozing more OR they’re boozing better.
And that whilst we down here in the slave quarters of the Global Plantation are stuck with the rot-gut stuff – while the nabobs and commissars sip the clear smooth stuff, with no fuzz and bugs floating on top.
Why this thought stings this grizzled old boy real hard, sharper even than a serpent’s tooth.
Report comment to moderator
Well, here’s and obvious observation. If this report were done when Bush was in office, the Left here would be critical and the Right would defend.
Myself, in this one instance, would hope to be consistant. Government officials should not be allowed to drink while on duty in any capacity.
You know, I remember when Bush was a candidate and the big bruhaha over his DUI. That was when INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING was active, in an effort to derail his election. What happened to investigative reporting concerning my accusations at my post @ #9.
You KNOW that if that were Bush that there would be speculation everywhere! Please don’t try to deny it.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!