Understanding the Tea Party movement
You cannot understand American politics today without understanding the Tea Party movement. Especially after last Tuesday’s Republican primaries, everyone from the president and the speaker of the House down to the voting citizen should get a handle on it. Get it wrong, and you get everything wrong. It is a truly American movement. It is popular in origin, protective of property, rooted in the Founding, and morally serious.
The movement began as a protest against exponentially more-than-usual runaway government spending. The Washington Post’s David Montgomery traces it back to Mary Rakovich, an unemployed middle-aged automotive engineer, standing outside a Fort Myers stadium in Florida on February 10, 2009, protesting the president’s $787 billion stimulus bill that he was promoting at a “town hall meeting.” It was just Mary and her husband, a handful of co-belligerents, and a cooler full of water. The sun was cruel, but providence was smiling. Fox News called to invite her to be interviewed on Neil Cavuto’s show. Similar protests began budding in other cities.
About a week later, CNBC’s Rick Santelli accidentally provided the movement with a name in a rant from the floor of the Chicago Board of Trade:
“I have an idea. The new administration’s big on computers and technology. How about this, president and new administration? Why don’t you put up a website to have people vote on the internet as a referendum to see if we really want to subsidize the losers’ mortgages or would we like to, at least, buy cars and buy houses in foreclosure and give them to people that might have the chance to actually prosper down the road, and reward people than could carry the water instead of drink the water.”
At the end of this clip, notice that Santelli refers to our nation’s founders: “If you read our Founding Fathers, people like Benjamin Franklin and Jefferson, what we’re doing in this country now is making them roll over in their graves.” He claims that what the government is doing in its attempt to solve the current economic crisis is not only economically foolish, but also politically a betrayal of our founding principles.
In the middle of all this, Santelli mentions offhandedly, “We’re thinking of having a Chicago Tea Party in July.” From all that he says, it is clear that he has in mind a protest against not only the high levels of government spending by the new Obama administration, but also the counter-productivity, political infidelity, and moral injustice of it. Then it took off.
Twenty-seven percent of the country supports the Tea Party movement, according to a May Washington Post/ABC poll. Anyone like Paul Krugman who dismisses Tea Party activists as “crazy” and as an “AstroTurf” movement, i.e., a fake grassroots movement, is arguing away an incoming electoral missile, and will likely soon be doing the same with his demise in the political hereafter.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top31 Comments to “Understanding the Tea Party movement”
“It is a truly American movement. It is popular in origin, protective of property, rooted in the Founding, and morally serious.”
Truer words were never written. I don’t think the Republicans nor the Democrats understand what’s going on. Neither group wants to really listen to what the people are saying. And it isn’t just anger. People learned things in school about the Constitution, simple things they remember. And what they get from Congress is people like Kerry saying that they’re idiots who should just shut up because they don’t understand. I think they understand a lot more than Congress or the President does.
Report comment to moderator
WorldMagBlog MUST STOP ignoring the most important news of the week!
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/entertainment/post/2010/06/artist-thomas-kinkade-arrested-for-drunken-driving/1
There should really be quotation marks around the word “artist” in that headline.
And now back to your regularly scheduled programing.
Report comment to moderator
I think the two major parties are partners in crime when you look at runaway govt spending. Tax cuts? Whatever else we can say about them we must acknowledge that THEY DO NOT halt or slow down the spending. (I think the entire “Starve the Beast” idea of Reagan and Stockman was quaint, but it assumed pols would be rational: “We have only X million in tax revenue; therefore our spending must be decreased below X for the next fiscal yr”)
Santelli I think had the foresight to jump out in front of the marching band to create the appearance of “leading it”. I thought the Tea party concept was hatched by Beck or some other FOX guy.
Is it ethical for journalists to create the news instead of merely reporting it?
Dan Rather must be envious of Santelli.
Report comment to moderator
Bob, has the Enquirer confirmed this newsbit? Do you view the USA Today McNewspaper as a credible source?
Report comment to moderator
Oh no! You really want to insinuate that Thomas Kinkade is NOT a complete wreck of a human being? Sawgunner, I expect more from you.
Report comment to moderator
” Anyone like Paul Krugman who dismisses Tea Party activists as “crazy” and as an “AstroTurf” movement…”
And he also said that Europe’s austerity measures to control their spending is “utter folly posing as wisdom”.
I thought that statement highly ironic, given his penchance to champion government spending until it overcomes the Gross Domestic Product…
What’s Paul Krugman’s IQ anyway? About a three?
Report comment to moderator
And didn’t Thomas Kinkade cheat on his wife a while back? And your point is what?
Report comment to moderator
I believe Kinkade has Massachusetts as his Home of Record. Up there DWI is no big deal. Not like Kinkade is a prominent elected official with substantial wealth.
Report comment to moderator
I believe Anthony Anderson grew up in Compton. Over there, rape is no big deal. Interesting. Anyway, I merely thought it was funny. Let’s get back to arguing about the Tea Partiers.
Report comment to moderator
But it didn’t seem as if you wanted to do that, Bobby.
Report comment to moderator
An other fluff piece on the tea party and not a word about Dick Armey, Freedom Works and other corporate sources of funding.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Tea_Party_movement_funding
And not a word about the following ad which advocates rebellion against the gov’t;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6iQ7ZDUutU4
Considering Washington once squashed a tax rebellion on his own (the Whiskey Rebellion) I doubt he would be calling for a revolt.
Report comment to moderator
I watched your YouTub link, and if you think that is calling for a revolution — well, all I can say is I understand why you often don’t make sense. Grow up, HRW. It’s an ad seeking votes and it doesn’t call for armed rebellion. It an ad seeking voters calling them the army.
Typical liberal nonsense.
Report comment to moderator
We need not a revo but a total paradigm shift. You hear folks recall fondly the “Reagan Revolution” but alas I dont see much evidence that anything permanently changed. Tax rates have moved right back up to where they were in 1980; and both parties have helped do it. And I say that as an admirer of Ronald Reagan
Report comment to moderator
Couple thoughts:
“Twenty-seven percent of the country supports the Tea Party movement…”
I’ve actually seen the number hover around 35% in other polls:
http://pollingreport.com/politics.htm
That said, the very poll Innes quotes also notes that 2% of respondents consider themselves “participants” in the TPM. Other polls arrive at 7% for the set of people who’ve done anything whatsoever to support the TPM. So we’re looking at about 15% of Republicans who’ve done “something” TPM related, and about another 10% of Republicans who consider themselves “part of the TPM” but haven’t contributed or attended a rally.
This is a big deal if you’re a republican, mainly with respect to the primary. If you can win your primary then you’re generally golden, unless your TPM opposition is willing to run as a third-party.
If you’re a Democrat you can mostly ignore the TPM, except maybe to root for your Republican competition’s TPM opposition since they’ll be easier to beat in a general election.
> “AstroTurf” movement, i.e., a fake grassroots movement
I’m not sure Krugman’s accusation is without legs. Rakovich was an activist working with FreedomWorks. The Fort Myers protest was advertised on the FW website as a FW event. The other early protest by Keli Carender in Seattle (2-16-2009) was hyped by Michelle Malkin. Dave Ramsey went on “Fox and Friends” (2-11-2009) and said “It’s time for a tea party”.
My feeling is that the early protests were mostly grass roots, but that without hype from Fox and organizational (and financial) assistance from FreedomWorks the movement wouldn’t have grown to national prominence.
Report comment to moderator
Many people have said “it’s time for a tea party.” I’ve said it, long before the groups formed. If you don’t take the TP seriously, then you truly do not understand the undercurrent and frustration and anger in this nation.
Report comment to moderator
HRW, I think it is amusing that you think that ad is calling for armed rebellion, when it is calling for those who are angry at this current administration to vote for a candidate.
Report comment to moderator
Since LEFTIST people come to this sight and DEMAND certain items be reported, do the same people go to LEFTIST web sites and DEMAND they report on leftist/OBAMA things the LEFTIST MEDIA just happens to “overlook”?
Report comment to moderator
I’m ARMED with my voting rights.
I’m NOT VOTING for the status quo–especially NOT McCain.
He is a nice guy, but he NEEDS to retire.
Report comment to moderator
Mrs. News2Me:
With all due respect, I was joking; I think it was obvious.
Report comment to moderator
And how does this editorial assist in helping anyone “understand” the TP movement? Like a typical Innes piece, it’s long on conclusions and short on supporting facts. Also, a good editorial piece should give credence to the strongest counter-arguments. As usual, that’s missing too.
So, in the end, I only “understand” one thing: that Innes is wiling to embrace this movement uncritically because he doesn’t like the President.
If you want to understand the movement, I’d suggest that one read Hofstadter’s book, “The Paranoid Style in American Politics”. For some reason, every time we have a Democratic president, we have to endure the emergence of another so-called patriot movement that’s ready to save us from the Jews, the blacks, and people with full sets of teeth. In the 90s, it was the militia movement and Operation Rescue. Now it’s the TP movement. Yawn.
Report comment to moderator
Sorry Mr. Dylan,
Sometimes I just get SO tired of people coming and saying WORLD should talk about what the latest slam on whatever Christians have done or are doing. My bad.
Report comment to moderator
RSD
So…NO ONE on the left is EVER paranoid when a “conservative” president is in office?
As I recall there were PLENTY of LEFTISTs saying they were going to leave the country. (Which seems easy for them to do as their relatives probably left during the Vietnam war.) They said BUSH blew up the towers so we could go to war with IRAQ. Who is paranoid?
People voted for OBAMA because he is a black man who looks cool. They interviewed one young white girl on TV and she did not have a clue why she was voting for Obama. With many it was VERY OBVIOUS why they were voting for Obama. Some have found out that you don’t just vote for a cool black guy because he is well spoken (it’s called Doublespeak) and think “what BAD could HE possibly do?”
Thing is MOST Christians are NOT AFRAID of Mr. OBAMA. We rant about him just like we do the price of bread, but some people just don’t get it. Get it?
Report comment to moderator
Odd how TP folks are vilified. The ones vilifying them today a few years back celebrated Cindy Sheehan and all the antiwar protesters. Even Hillary said there was nothing disloyal about speaking out against govt policy with which you disagree.
She musta forgot that remark.
The Tea Party folks have been abandoned. I liken them to all the anti War protesters from the 60s. Only the antiwar folks eventually took over the D party, right?
Report comment to moderator
Good article today at the WSJ about how both the GOP and the Democratic party are both affected by the Tea Party movement.
Report comment to moderator
The Tea partiers are a product of Fox News. They actually believe Fox News is “fair and balanced” and that they can learn history from listening to the twisted incoherent rants of Glenn Beck. In the context of Fox News, conservative talk radio, and their corporate sponsored front groups, the Tea Party is really quite simple to understand. Fox News is 24/7 propaganda, and the Tea Partiers are their dupes.
At least they have finally have developed the good sense to chase away the neo-Nazis that are attracted to their rallies.
Report comment to moderator
Is it ethical for journalists to create the news instead of merely reporting it?
Dan Rather must be envious of Santelli.
The point is, it’s ok for conservatives because liberals have been said to do it, and conservatives are so ethically sensitive.
Report comment to moderator
The tea party is the anger-stage reaction to the loss of Republican Power, the collapse of Republican theories of government, national security, and economy, and the loss of the delusion that middle class whites are any less dependent on society and government than Reagan’s welfare queens. By “founders” the tea party means a war of all against all, each armed to the teeth: Nihilism.
Report comment to moderator
“The Tea partiers are a product of Fox News.”
Keep telling yourself that….
Report comment to moderator
News,
Both parties benefit pretty evenly from our ignorant electorate. The same ignorant liberals who voted for Obama likely voted for Kerry four years earlier. After all, the GOP wasn’t exactly trying to attract educated professionals when it pushed for Palin as VP.
Obama’s win was primarily a combination of (1) social moderates abandoning the GOP because of the excessive influence of the Religious Right, (2) educated professionals abandoning the GOP because of the excessive influence of right-wing populists, and (3) conservatives staying home because of a lack of enthusiasm for McCain.
In general, I think that the GOP can only rebuild itself by focusing on fiscal conservatism (and ignoring so-called social conservatism). But much of the TP rhetoric owes itself to Jacksonian populism and not to sound economic reasoning. So, they’ve got a way to go. On the other hand, it’s nice to see some right-wing activists who aren’t asking the government to intrude into folks’ sexual and reproductive practices.
Report comment to moderator
Bump. (H.H. down … )
Report comment to moderator
If the Tea Party were comparable to the anti-war movement of the 60’s and 70’s, then Republican politicians would spend the next 30 years punching Tea Partiers in the face. Fewer, rather: Most of the Tea Party are old boomers. This is their last hurrah. They represent the great, reactionary majority of their generation — those who may have been libertines, but rejected liberation. The Tea Party is their belated and pathetic attempt to salvage some phony self-righteousness and compensate for the ethical disaster that these boomers made of their time on earth. Before tea, they had tail gate parties, pajama parties, beer busts, office parties, stag parties, super bowl parties, and Sam’s Club parties. The Tea Party is the culmination of their screwed-up identity. Willingly, they helped LBJ and Nixon kill babies, day after day, for more than a decade. Now they claim to care about babies.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!