White in-flight hipster vs. white flight suburban evangelicals
Young evangelicals have made their initial descent into urban areas all over America, bringing their hipster culture and paternalism toward minorities along with them. Brett McCraken’s upcoming book Hipster Christianity: When Church and Cool Collide (to be released in August) presents an overview of these baby-boomer hipster children and their vision for Christianity (see Susan Olasky’s short review here). Writers like McCracken and Soong-Chan Rah remind us that the hipster Christian movement may not be as cutting-edge and progressive as it sounds. Instead of avoiding minorities—as suburbanites are often charged with doing—hipster Christians are simply colonizing them.
There seems to be much celebration about new church plants in “the city,” but it doesn’t really seem like much is actually changing in terms of how these new churches look demographically. For example, suburban church parishioners are said to have fled the city to get away from minorities, i.e., “white flight.” Hipster Christians talk about wanting to live among minorities but are gentrifying the neighborhoods in the process and really don’t care. Both groups mainly worship with other whites just like them. White “in-flight” is purging the city of minorities and driving the underclass to the suburbs. These white in-flight Christians often have paternalistic visions bringing redemption to the poor little brown natives who currently inhabit neighborhoods with houses needing renovation. And their inflated hipster egos portray the city as a place that needs them desperately.
White flight church pastors may be clean-cut white males wearing khakis pants and sweater vests. White in-flight hipster pastors are also white males who might have piercings (or at least had them at some point) and maybe even a tattoo. They drink high-end alcoholic beverages and occasionally smoke cloves or imported cigars. They still may be surfers or skateboarders and at one time played in an indie band before a growing appreciation for folk and international music developed.
White-flight suburban churches may sing hymns exclusively or appreciate Nashville’s contemporary Christian music scene. The suburban worship leader is a soft-spoken white guy playing music that seems to be nothing more than love ballads to Jesus, asking Him to “hold us close” or confessing Jesus’ beauty. White in-flight worship leaders are also soft-spoken white guys (or gals) with slightly unkempt hair and tight jeans of various colors, and are all about “liturgy.” Horned-rimmed glasses, scruffy beards, and plaid shirts abound, while they lead the congregation in Christian songs to an indie-rock cadence.
White flight churches served as a refuge for the middle class. White in-flight churches are destinations for formerly suburban young evangelicals fleeing Wal-Mart and Target country only to bring Trader Joe’s, Whole Foods, organic coffee shops, and organic grocery stores to “da hood.” They are also middle class. White in-flight Christians move into black and Latino neighbors, and instead of joining churches that are already there, hipsters plant churches—for “theological” reasons—for people who are just as cool as they are. Suburban churches are built around the family. Hipsters are too into birth-control for family, so children are traded-off for “justice,” “the arts,” and “serving the poor.”
I could go on, but suffice it to say that suburban Christians should not accept the finger-pointing by the cool, hipster Christians who are, in fact, living out the same sociology but just in a different ZIP code. Hipster churches are just as culturally homogenous as their parents’ churches but with a twist of “cool.” Protestants are skillful fad chasers. We need a vision of remaining in neighborhoods regardless of who moves in or out. Jesus come quickly.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top43 Comments to “White in-flight hipster vs. white flight suburban evangelicals”
Anthony, I don’t know how to tell you this, but as people become richer, whatever their color, they move to better neighborhoods. Economics plays a large role in people moving out of cities, not just race.
Report comment to moderator
Good article.
Report comment to moderator
I thought stereotyping was a bad thing.
Report comment to moderator
I’d say cool had only a minor fender-bender with our church, which is more a suburban/poor-neighborhood anomaly. I guess I’m in a white-flight church according to the “Church and Cool” book’s definition, though a considerable number of minority members in the congregation have apparently also fled something to be there.
White-flight, white in-flight, off-white, urban or rural black – call it what you may, I don’t like attending any church where the Word of God and the presence of the Holy Spirit are not of utmost importance. When God is truly in our churches, all the hipster trappings or traditional inhibitions in the world will be seen as they actually are: baggage.
Report comment to moderator
These white in-flight Christians often have paternalistic visions bringing redemption to the poor little brown natives who currently inhabit neighborhoods with houses needing renovation. And their inflated hipster egos portray the city as a place that needs them desperately.
The ‘poor little brown natives’ in the cities around here are in bad shape. Too often, the coping skills rise no higher than 1) work the system and 2) blame others for their problems. Hipsters may be wasting much of their time trying to be cool, but I don’t fault them for trying to evangelize the cities—and there is no need for them to leave their own culture behind to do so. At least they are THERE. That’s a beginning.
NJL, is correct. Ignorance, poverty and violence drive families out of the cities, and these conditions are not constrained by race. Even minorities in the Hartford area view it as a sign of success when they are finally able to move out to the suburbs. The fact that whites (as a group) have preceded them is an indicator of financial ability, not racism.
Debra (formerly DJ)
Report comment to moderator
“I could go on, but suffice it to say…”
Anthony, yes you could go on and on and enlarge the shoe you are sticking in your mouth in front of so many believers. Your robust stereotyping is so shallow. I’m not sure why World has you drivel on this site. Maybe they need a champion of the Orthodox church to tear down evangelicals. No matter what whitey does to benefit minorities, you would call it paternalistic and colonialistic. I am no fan of the institutionalized evangelical variety of church, but it is because of scripture, not sociological type-casting . You offer nothing substantive in your shallow talk-teaser. If there were believers in your audience who are hearing God’s voice call them to move out of their comfort zone into minority ministry, they would get nothing beneficial out of your message. Maybe you think it’s cool and hip, just the way you wrote it, I don’t know. You can do better.
Report comment to moderator
instead of joining churches that are already there, hipsters plant churches—for “theological” reasons
Anthony, why is “theological” in quotes? Do you know of faithful, Christ-centered churches in the black or latino communities? Specifically Nashville. What do the white city hipsters do if there the minority churches in the area theologically compromised?
Report comment to moderator
“These white in-flight Christians often have paternalistic visions bringing redemption to the poor little brown natives who currently inhabit neighborhoods with houses needing renovation.”
I think a better justification for this attitudinal stereotype should be offered. As for me, I think “brown natives” need redemption as much as anyone. Why the weird need to criticize people who are doing the Lord’s work to some or in ways that we may not feel particularly called?
I think I see where Anthony is coming from and see partial validity at points. However, this is just to ridden with stereotypes to make good sense. I do see some trends among a certain set of Christians who are focused on “justice,” “the arts,” and “serving the poor” at the expense of family values. It is better to specifically cite those instances and offer constructive criticism rather than coin a cute “hipster” category and then paint them broadly with critical brushes.
The vision we need has little to do with staying or leaving certain “neighborhoods.” It is that we need to listen for God’s call on our lives and respect those who follow it even if they follow it differently than you would (as long as they preach the gospel faithfully).
Report comment to moderator
Wow, any more cheap stereotypes, generalizations and head in the sand behaviour? And I’m talking about both the column and the commentators.
Report comment to moderator
I think maybe some people worry to much about race. They’re not racists per-se, but they can’t seem to get out of stereotyping people based on apperience.
There may be some people who try to set up charities because they are racists; but it’s unjust to assume everyone is. It’s self-defeating too, because, if everyone who tries to help inner-city or minority groups is lambasted for presumed racism, it won’t be long before nobody helps these people. I don’t know about you, but I would rather get a bowl of soup for someone who thought me inferior than starve because everyone with soup “respects” me to much to give it away.
Remember “Man looks at the outside apperance, but God looks at the heart”.
Report comment to moderator
Stereotypes have their place. People on this blog throw out liberal, conservative, progressive, polling data, etc. all the time. Stereotypes are simply meant to capture some of the more significant behaviors and attitudes of various people groups. They can be misused, but they are useful.
I don’t often agree with Anthony, but I liked his blog today.
Question for you: Does the Bible ever stereotype people in an approving fashion?
Report comment to moderator
Here in Minneapolis, it’s predicted that about 1/3 of our churches will close their doors in the next 10-15 years. Those old buildings are empty of young people. The old parishners haven’t effectively passed the baton faith to another generation or to the changing culture of the inner city.
Attempting to reach another generation, another culture, is difficult. Only Hudson Taylor made inroads into China, by “becoming” Chinese. Others tried and failed, because it’s painfully difficult to abandon your own culture, likes, dislikes, comforts, etc.
For those true believers who are actually trying to reach out to others with gospel truth, but who aren’t doing it so well–hey, Anthony: can you give some helpful advice? Other than “go away”? People are dying without Jesus. How do you suggest that sincere Christians take the message of the gospel to people of any color or language or culture–right here in the USA–without being accused of some “ism”?
My church desperately wants to reverse the trend of dying churches, dead people going to hell without Jesus, and dying painfully along the way (the wages of sin is death, evidenced daily in societal decay). Anthony, you have described some of my pastors: tattoos, piercings, etc. I’m not thrilled at their mutilations. But I think that my church’s way of recognizing men of humility, integrity and character as pastors apart from merely academic seminary degrees has resulted in some men with strange haircuts and markings. Some of our pastors lived a lifetime without the Lord before they became believers, and their bodies show it. Some of them do have tatoos and piercings to be cool–to do what they can to look like the people God has placed on their hearts.
And that’s how Hudson Taylor won Chinese to Jesus. He cut his hair and dressed like them. He gave up English picket fences to look like those he loved enough to change externals to win them.
Anthony, I take your criticism seriously. I agree in part with what you’re saying. I know of a few ultra-cool white guy Christians. But I also know that’s not the whole story. I have to hope that the majority of those churches and ministries who are in the cities truly want to bring the real healing that only the gospel of Jesus can give.
How can they (we) do a better job? If you don’t want whiltes evangelizing, well, are you doing it? Similarly, I’ve read that if one family in every black church adopted one black child, all the black children currently in foster care would be in families. Whites are sometimes prevented from adopting these children, putting race above the human need for affection and belonging. Is it better that whites not evangelize (or adopt) than risk a white person leading a black person to Christ or adopting a black child?
Is doing it poorly worse than not doing it at all? (Evangelizing, adopting, etc.).
I’d like a follow up article. More instruction than criticism next time.
Report comment to moderator
Norm, there is a difference between trends and stereotypes.
Both have their place, in context, but what many of us are saying is that Anthony pushed the envelope too hard without justification. How about citing particular instances fairly and responsibly and letting the read draw her own generalizations. Why bring in categorical “group think” to an excess to make these points?
Report comment to moderator
Daughterwifemother,
I live in the Twin Cities area and I am interested in your points. I share your concerns too and I like your request for more instruction than criticism.
DWF, who is predicting that about 1/3 of our churches will close their doors in the next 10-15 years? On what basis? I’m curious. I don’t seriously doubt it either.
The changing culture is a relevant point, both in and out of the inner city. The culture is increasingly aggressively antagonistic to evangelism in my view, especially among the young.
Report comment to moderator
Joel,
Maybe you could read the book.
It is interesting that you ask for particular instances. I have no doubt that Anthony could produce them. However, if he did produce them he would likely be criticized for criticizing particular persons.
Report comment to moderator
Anthony,
as usual, filled with technical analysis, your article lacks love, discernment and wisdom but it is filled with arrogance, pride and self-righteousness. What I always come away with reading your articles is that you have not been born-again. You may have graduated from seminary and can discuss theology but YOU ARE NOT BORN FROM ABOVE. Repent. Confess your sins and acknowledge that you need a savior. You probably already understand from your seminary training why Jesus is the only one who can save you. Ask Him to come in into your heart. He will give you a new life. You will find peace, contentment and purpose. Your pride is going to get in the way but I urge you, it is worth it.
Report comment to moderator
Steve A, after reading your post I find myself wanting to repeat some of your words: Your pride is going to get in the way. Only I would address them to the writer of #16 (and probably #17).
Report comment to moderator
It does seem like white people are in a “Darn if you do and darn if you don’t” position. If we don’t help we’re racist, if we do help but don’t do it in just the right way we are racist. As far as church are concerned, just preach the word in love and welcome everybody.
Report comment to moderator
Nopm,
I am responding to what was written. After reading your comment, my points and sincere questions stand. I am talking about a different approach, not just a few examples added to support the excessive stereotypes. Why create vague categories to criticize? I am asking for an approach that targets the objects of our/your criticism more fairly, responsibly and specifically.
Report comment to moderator
Nopm,
I am responding to what was written. After reading your comment, my points and sincere questions stand. I am talking about a different approach, not just a few examples added to support the excessive stereotypes. Why create vague categories to criticize? I am asking for an approach that targets the objects of our/your criticism more fairly, responsibly and specifically.
Report comment to moderator
It seems like Anthony, McCracken, and Rah are arguing against a straw man. It’s not clear that any of these guys have spent any significant amount of time hanging out with 20- and 30-something urban professionals.
Report comment to moderator
All right, to play devil’s advocate: Why is it only white people who can be paternalistic? And if black people are so endangered by contact with white people, isn’t it perhaps wise for the white people to be a little cautious, even a little paternalistic? One has to be careful in dealing with something one might break.
Isn’t it paternalistic to continually be lecturing people in other groups about how they are allowed to minister? Can’t we just be one family of God, on the same team? We’re brothers and sisters. I’m heartily sick of this black people against white people dynamic. Heartily sick of it. Paul was pretty sick of an earlier incarnation, the Jew and Gentile one, two thousand years ago.
Next week I get to host my Chicago mama for several days. She’s coming to Nashville specifically to see me. She knows I’m white; I know she’s black. But it isn’t very important in our relationship. We’re sisters in Christ before anything else. After that, we were fellow church members for 13 1/2 years, neighbors (next door for a couple of years, walking distance for several more), friends, and for a year fellow volunteers at a local ministry. I taught several of her grandkids in the church club program. I helped her fix Thanksgiving dinner one year while her biological daughters all went shopping. She signed one letter to me, “Your mother, sister, friend,” and that about sums it up. I call her for advice; she calls me for prayer. She saved my answering machine greeting “Just calling to say hello and that I love you” to replay again and again. This is what the church looks like–not artificial laws of who may or may not live where, move when, or minister to whom.
The church is the bride of Christ. He loves her, and so must we, warts and all.
Report comment to moderator
BTW, my initial reaction was not to post on this thread at all. I’m too sick of the “white people are the devil” argument and variations of it to respond rationally–that isn’t the world I live in.
Report comment to moderator
I get really tired of it too, Cheryl.
We’re “darned” if we do, and “darned” if we don’t.
Or, as my father used to say, “We can’t win for losing.”
Report comment to moderator
Our family, Native American, has been inside both situations. I have to say our family feels much more comfortable in huge suburban churches than in paternalistic inner city ones. Paternalism – Subtle, demeaning perceptions of my children being ‘victims’ forever – is a much more dehabilitating form of racism than the other. In the first place, we’ve never met a KKK member and only met a white supremist once. On the other hand, we run into paternalistic liberals all the time. Have you thought how it feels to visit a small church & have someone stand up, start crying, & ask your ‘forgiveness’ for something white people did 200 yrs ago? My husband has hated it – every time it has happened. All he wanted to do was go to church, not be a side show. Not pretend that he could absolve thousands of dead people for the sake of his ancestors. (we’re Christians – we don’t believe in ancestor worship, remember? Further – all is under the blood. Let’s move on…)
Yes – we have been looked at as the brown skinned Indian family. We haven’t liked it.
So no, we don’t want someone cool on a skateboard. Give us a 70-yr-old Bible thumping elder to pray with. COLOR DOESN’T MATTER. My HUSBAND HAS LOVED ALL his mentors -all color, shape and sizes.
(Yup, those are stereotypes. So now let’s all just set the stereotypes aside – ones about Indians as well…and play nice.) (But I do prefer a 70-yr-old elder)
Report comment to moderator
Well, I don’t like “paternalism.” I don’t like it as a woman. So, I think I can understand a bit when others don’t like it due to their race or their color or some such.
I even got it a bit growing up, because I used to be pretty, and I’m still a blond! (I hated being treated like I was stupid just because I was a cute blond…as if I didn’t have a brain in my head. Bleh! I tested out as gifted in school, and was in the honors classes, and I would still have teachers, counselors, and other people treat me like I was dumber than a doorknob.)
Paternalism is most definitely the province of the Liberal mind-set. My sister and her husband virtually DEFINE it. (I love them. But, they are Liberals through and through.)
But, I still really get tired of being lectured as a White person. As if I am responsible for every little thing that some white person did to someone of color whenever that may have been, and no matter how long ago it was.
And, I do read some of the “darned if you do and darned if you don’t” in Anthony’s posts sometimes, even though I often enjoy other of his posts quite a lot.
Report comment to moderator
“I’d like a follow up article. More instruction than criticism next time.” Exactly
You want stereotype? Anthony’s article is precisely what most people don’t like about Christians. It is the type of smug, holier than thou, kind of thing Random sometimes rightly accuses us of when he lumps us all together.
Anthony, like many of us Christians who aren’t paying attention to the Spirit of Christ, are quick to judge, expert at pointing out the problem, but very short on solutions. And I think we are very wearing on the true believers who have rolled up their sleeves and are doing the hard things.
Report comment to moderator
ADIOS, I agree except for one thing. Anthony is NOT a Christian (1 John) for the same reason David Jeremiah is NOT a Christian. Using the same techniques practiced by the Judaizers in the first century, Anthony is a false teacher who needs to repent and come to saving knowledge of Christ (my prayer) and not just fill his head with information. Using the Social Gospel to confuse the Church and distract from the Person of Christ is the work of Satan. AND BTW, I am not white.
Report comment to moderator
Joel Mark: John Mayer, of City Vision (cityvisiontc.org), is the source of the statistic.
NativePress: I like my “elder” elders, too. (Thank you, Bill Brown.) A lifetime of faithfulness is humbling and inspiring. Our youngest pastors just don’t have the miles of experience that is so precious.
Cheryl D: I was in a Chinese church in Detroit. True Church is family.
Report comment to moderator
A few thoughts:
Hasn’t it always been the quest of the young to carve out their own paths? Rather than parking in an established church, they are trying to do “church” their way. They can hardly be faulted for this.
And, yes, I have been to one of these city “hipster” churches that is just packed with young people (and not just white ones). I see enthusiasm and I hear truth.
However, I do kind of wonder if the leaders of these churches are actually living close to the church and sending their young kids to the local elementary school.
If these young people are supposed to attend an already established black or latino church, would they be accepted?
While I see some good points in Anthony’s article, I can’t see that constantly dredging up the fact that there are racial problems in the church is going to fix anything. Racism is only one of the “warts” that Cheryl mentions in #22. However, I agree, the Church is His, beloved though not perfect.
Report comment to moderator
Thanks Daughterwifemother,
Blessings!
Report comment to moderator
Yes, I do long for the day that Jesus returns and restores us back to what He intended.
However, Anthony, as a young teacher in a “hip” city where God IS working in all kinds of neighborhoods using all kinds of imperfect messengers, I find your tone (and content, in some cases) unhelpful and condescending. Your article seems like one big stereotype that assumes heart motives of people I know to be young, passionate followers of Jesus based on outward appearances and styles (and perhaps some immaturity, but can we challenge that gently while extending grace?) I am sure that there are those who fit your description. It may even be something worth questioning. In my opinion, however, the way you have gone about it in some of your articles will only cause discouragement, defensiveness, and division within the body of Christ.
Report comment to moderator
“These white in-flight Christians often have paternalistic visions bringing redemption to the poor little brown natives who currently inhabit neighborhoods with houses needing renovation. And their inflated hipster egos portray the city as a place that needs them desperately.”
If the target audience of this blog post is “white in-flight Christians”, I doubt that the above statement will win them. But, then, perhaps winning is not the goal.
Report comment to moderator
“When we are out of sympathy with the young, then I think our work in this world is over.”
~ George Macdonald
Report comment to moderator
Comment deleted by moderator.
Report comment to moderator
Anthony,
You may like to know that your belligerent and condecending bigotry and racism has cost WorldMag at least one subscription. I have just received an email from WorldMag customer service confirming my cancellation. I strongly urge all “true” Christians to do the same. The consistent hate exhibited in your article demonstrates the lack of the Holy Spirit in your life which according to 1 John makes a lair and non-believer. I thought WorldMag was a Christian publication. Sadly, your articles are like a little bit of garbage inside a Chocolate cake, you still can’t eat it. The Editors of WorldMag demonstrate lack of good judgment by allowing your “hate” to appear here. I sincerely hope that God changes your heart before you change WorldMag into the Huffington Post of Christian publications.
Report comment to moderator
Steve A is funny.
Report comment to moderator
Joel Mark: “I am predicting that out of a total of 3,238 current churches in the Twin Cities, that about 1,000 churches will die out in the next 15 years. This number actually may increase depending on how long the current economic crisis lasts and other factors.” –John Mayer
I think there are two related reasons for this prediction. One, the faith has not been transmitted to the younger generations and the oldsters are literally dying, resulting in fewer and fewer people in the pews. These churches have fewer and fewer people to DO ministry, and less and less financial support to simply pay the utilities and pastors’ salaries. Therefore, they are forced to close their doors.
My church is interested in buying/leasing these buildings of dying churches (they are already tax exempt–no loss to the city) and restarting Christian ministry and outreach in those neighborhoods–one building at a time! We’re not that big or monied to do more, except as God provides. But we are willing to go where God sends us.
Now if Anthony will give some advice in HOW we do ministry, I’d love to hear it. People of every stripe need Jesus. There is no other name given under heaven by which we MUST be saved. Get the gospel to the healthy and wealthy, the sick and the poor, all languages, all education levels.
Report comment to moderator
Bible translation began because of people lke William Tyndale who realized that since God holds us individually responsible for what we do with Jesus, each individual needs to be equipped–literate and with access to the Scriptures–to make a responsible, sober decision regarding eternal matters. Tyndale was martyred for translating the Bible to get it into the hands of common people, and we need to be as committed to intercultural ministry, despite the suspicians and accusations of people like Anthony that would “murder” our efforts to present the gospel.
What people DO with the gospel is between each individual and God. My “job” is to present, accurately, completely, honestly, with words and my life’s conduct, God’s Word, Jesus’ Holy Spirit living in me. Lord, please make it so, especially in my family where I’m most given to be selfish. Ministry in our multicultural community might even be easier in this sense.
Report comment to moderator
I don’t agree with everything Mr. Bradley has said in this article but some of you are really a little over-the-top with your criticism.
Report comment to moderator
So if the minority in the city, choose to attend the “hipster” church, maybe they’re smarter than you think, and found out that many of the, “..churches that are already there..” went to sleep a long time ago.
As far as the critic, perhaps irritation, via a root of jealousy, has bubbled forth.
:-O
Report comment to moderator
This article makes me sad. I am part of one of these so-called hipster churches, and I joined it because I truly sensed in my heart that I was not being vulnerable in the church community that I was previously involved with. It was too large, and I allowed myself to be anonymous. In other words, I believed that God was leading me toward this new church so that I would have a stronger relationship with Him. That is exactly what has happened.
My first impulse at reading this article is to become angry and defensive; but that does no good. When it comes down to my motives for being in community with my church, my conscience is clean. I sought a group of Christians that I wanted to begin to live in authentic community with, so that together we would allow the Spirit to tear down the walls of isolation and sin that tend to build up via individualistic living. With this foundation laid, and being continually reinforced through deepening relationship with God and other believers (hipster or otherwise), I am beginning to love others around me who are not part of my “hipster church”. I am beginning to love them without fear because it is an outpouring of the love that God has for me; and it draws them in to trust Jesus with their lives too.
If Anthony Bradley wants to make judgments about my motives for being involved in a church that fits the stereotype he describes, then that is his business, and there may even be some truth to what he says (Christians are certainly not immuned to sin). As I said though, it makes me sad to see people causing division among Christians, especially when many of these churches are spreading the gospel of Jesus Christ in their local communities.
Report comment to moderator
Steve A, your comments are much worse than the original post. Who are you to decide whether someone is a Christian or not? And, as for a lack of love… people who live in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!