A Tea Partier’s dream
Visiting AEI scholar and Washington Post columnist Marc Thiessen writes that the emergency budget proposed by Britain’s new coalition government should be “the envy of Tea Partyers here in the former colonies.” According to today’s op-ed, it includes 25 percent spending cuts on average in all nearly departments and represents the steepest cutbacks in 80 years—and notably includes a two-year wage freeze for many government employees and downsizing expected to eliminate over 600,000 public sector jobs.
There is a not-so-subtle word of caution for taxpayers on this side of the Atlantic. First, tax increases—of about 23 percent—are also part of the deal. Second, what two areas of spending are now considered politically off limits in Whitehall? Not defense, and not education (they do face lower cuts) but foreign aid and healthcare. As Theissen says, “note to GOP: repeal Obamacare fast—once created, national health care is a one-way ratchet.”

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top11 Comments to “A Tea Partier’s dream”
Repeal Obamacare fast and block Cap & Tax (or whatever it’s clone may be).
Obama’s goal is to destroy the dollar to make way for a world currency.
Report comment to moderator
So, Britain is actually freezing government wages? Never happen here as long as Congressmen get to decide their own salary, and Unions line the pockets of politicians such that even government employees get unionized with all of the perqs and problems.
Report comment to moderator
Given that the UK probably hasn’t had a substantial tax cut since the Thatcher regime its hardly a decent comparison. Given that there has been no serious attempts to deal with the US deficit since Clinton left Bush with a surplus, tax cuts are going to have to wait until the mess has been cleaned up. Essentially you can’t look at your neighbour with envy if there is a decade long mess to clean up.
Report comment to moderator
Clinton didn’t leave Bush 41 with a surplus, a Republican Congress did.
But this doesn’t go far enough for true Tea Partiers who want drastic across the board cuts. (See Ron Paul’s agenda or that of the Constitution Party)
Report comment to moderator
I actually think the only really fair way to deal with the deficits is to take an across the board cut–how else can you determine who is more deserving or not?
Schwarzenegger out here is amusing some of us in California. Until the ridiculous fools who claim to be legislators here in the state come up with a budget (months over due), he’s cut every government employee’s paycheck to FEDERAL minimum wage (it’s higher in CA) and doctors and others on the government payroll will be paid nothing. (The governor himself takes no pay ).
Howling–surely you heard it all over the country? Judge determined it was legal, but the controller is complaining his software is too antiquated to cut all the checks . . .
If only the governor had developed a backbone years ago.
Of course it’s not fair, and I would be unhappy if it was our paycheck, but something has to force these alleged legislators to do their job.
Report comment to moderator
I wish every governor in the US would do that.
Heck, I wish the president would do that to the congress – not that any of THEM have any backbone whatsoever…
Report comment to moderator
It’s a Tea Parties dream come true that there will now be 600,000 more unemployed people in the UK? Well good luck with that. The combo shot of lay-offs, cutbacks, and tax hikes…we’re going to have to air lift food into England by the end of the year!
Report comment to moderator
From Hot Air
“The paranoid answer…
Get out the tinfoil hats, folks, and let us delve into the realm of raving paranoia. Is there a different way to read the news lately?
The sane answer: they’re blithering incompetents. The paranoid answer: they’re doing it on purpose.”
http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/05/the-paranoid-answer/
There is more, of course, but the end result is the same; Obama and the Democrats must be stopped.
Report comment to moderator
This seems a very odd argument.
National health care (which Obamacare is not, by the way) is so popular that cutting it is politically untenable. So…
…repeal it before people realize how much they like it???
Report comment to moderator
No. Repeal it before those taxes hit.
Report comment to moderator
What’s down the pike? As I’ve said from day 1 of Pres. O., new and better ways to tax everyone.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!