Joe’s business advice
As we split a piece of tiramisu that served as his birthday cake, I asked my 83-year-old entrepreneur friend Joe what type of business he would recommend going into today. Joe is an optimist. He left high school without earning a diploma to volunteer for World War II. After suffering an injury, he was discharged from the Army and succeeded in starting a business in a WASP-Republican town that didn’t think highly of Italian-Catholic-Democrats like him. And he’s done very well in real estate and the stock market too. When this overachiever responded, “I wouldn’t go into business today,” my jaw almost landed in my plate.
“You just don’t know what government is going to do tomorrow,” said Joe, who reflects the image of God in that he is a rational planner. In essence, he pointed out that it’s difficult for business owners to make plans when the government is meddling so much in the economy.
Our conversation took place just a few days before the 2,300-page financial reform bill passed Congress—2,300 pages! According to The Wall Street Journal, “It will affect everything from debit cards to Wall Street traders.” And who will make sure this bill is faithfully executed? Will it be President Obama as provided for in Article II of the Constitution? Not really. The largely unaccountable Federal Reserve, which fueled the current financial mess, will control the reins. And what about the 2,000-page healthcare bill? Who gets to determine how to implement it? Most of the administrative power resides with the unelected secretary of Health and Human Services and her 64,750 bureaucrats.
As with so many of today’s usurpations of constitutional authority, our modern “administrative state” had its genesis in the early progressive movement and President Woodrow Wilson’s administration. The 28th president believed the Founders’ vision of constitutional government couldn’t keep up with modern times, and that the country would be better served by a professional class of administrators sheltered from the political process—and the accountability it provides. Today, Congress and the president write and pass laws, and bureaucrats write and enforce regulations to determine congressional intent.
There are significant constitutional, worldview, and economic problems associated with the administrative state. It makes a mess of the Constitution’s separation of powers by combining executive, legislative, and judicial authority within insulated government agencies. There’s a worldview problem, too: Wilson believed that bureaucrats had evolved to a higher moral plane than politicians and that they would leave their political biases and personal interests in the parking lot. The Founders, on the other hand, understood man’s sinful nature and installed a system of checks and balances as a restraint. Finally, the administrative state creates chaos for the economy. For example, entrepreneurs will be affected by the thousands of pages of new regulations associated with the new healthcare and financial reform laws. Having confidence that business laws will remain stable is an important part of the risk-taking calculus. It makes sense that my friend Joe advises against going into business today. He thinks it’s best to wait five years to let the economy stabilize.
Man is a rational actor who reflects the image of God. Our federal government, however, is frustrating man’s natural desire to make sound economic plans. I’m hoping the economy will be much better by the time Joe and I share a piece of tiramisu on his 88th birthday.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top10 Comments to “Joe’s business advice”
You can’t move forward with the otimism a small business owner requires to succeed, if you have to defend what you already have. You can’t risk money on employees and innovation if you have to position yourself for a series of “what ifs?”
It’s difficult to take on new employees if you can’t be reasonably assured they will make you money, rather than drain even more from your capital–and most small businesses are undercapitalized these days (as usual).
When your banking system is roiling and credit is extremely tight, small businesses have to crimp and save wherever they can–and that doesn’t allow for expansion and risk taking either.
And here in California where they expressed desires is to wring every penny possible from business and none from anyone else, the costs–which all businessmen should be counting–are simply too much. Manufacturing is fleeing–because they can’t stay in business if they don’t leave.
The problem with well meaning academics and government professionals tends to be they’ve never had to earn their living trying to make sense of the rules they blithely foist on others. Former senator George McGovern, who retired and then ran a B&B, famously noted he never would have voted for half the things he approved of if he had realized how much it would affect him as a businessman.
And that was 20 years ago.
Slavery to the state, anyone?
Report comment to moderator
Congressional intent? How can you have intent when you vote on something you don’t read.
Report comment to moderator
optimism . . . it’s difficult to spell when you’re agitated . . .
California, expressed state house desire . . .
Report comment to moderator
“The problem with well meaning academics…”
That’s what was wrong with Woodrow Wilson. He was a professor. People who don’t own businesses — and that includes our basnk of lawyers in Congress — shouldn’t be making decisions like that.
Report comment to moderator
I said before, we’re under tha dictatorship of the agencies.
As long ago as the 1960’s, Barry Goldwater said, “It isn’t the Congress, nor President that runs Washington. It’s the agencies.” It has become much worse since then.
Agencies don’t believe they are doing their jobs unless they are making rules. Those rules only obstruct progress, no matter how you define progress. Some agency rule stands in the way.
It can’t be done, but Congress needs to abolish:
The EPA, Dept. of Education, Dept. of Energy, and reduce the Dept of Transportation by half.
You can think of others.
Report comment to moderator
Giving the regulatory power to the Federal Reserve was a compromise demanded by conservatives. If you object to that you should vote for progressives like Sherod Brown, who wanted to create an independent agency with tighter accountability. The GOP and conserva-dems railroaded accountability, not liberals.
It’s ridiculous to call the HHS secrety “unelected” as if that is significant. Which of you wants to actually take responsibilities away from the Secretary of Defense and give them directly to the White House? HHS secretary is an executive branch position requiring Senate confirmation. Republicans have a chance to take the Senate and block HHS appointments that they don’t like. Drawing a bright line between the HHS Secretary and the President seems to imply that if HHS messed something up, the GOP and WMG would give the president a pass. Would you? Okay then, how about being a little more honest?
On to Lee’s actual commentary, so what? Some ancient old man wouldn’t start a business in the middle of the worst recession in 70 years? Shocker! Yeah, I would also want to know if the economy was going to stabilize before taking out a business loan. But the problem isn’t regulations, it’s knowing that a demand would actually exist for what I was selling. And demand to be there we need to resecure people’s 401K’s by regulating Wall Street, or they will never spend. We need to reform healthcare so they have disposable income, rather than just giant medical bills. And we need to spend on infrastructure and job creation so they have jobs. Then They can go buy (and pay sales tax on) what ever I’m selling!
Report comment to moderator
MyNock,
The idiots in power should have STARTED with job creation. As it is, it is too little too late, and never will amount to much anyway. What they propose now is a joke. And what they did with the bailouts and healthcare was totally irresponsible, and put us so far under it’ll take scores of years to get out from under… Unless the R’s repeal this crap immediately, and lower taxes on business, I don’t see an end to this downturn any time soon.
Report comment to moderator
God is a rational planner?
#1. Isn’t it some kind of sin to claim you know the mind of that god?
#2. If not: Please explain the “rational plan” behind making your “greatest creation”, causing them to immediately displease you violently (nobody else made that snake talk), later on exterminating every last one of them, except a couple, regularly encouraging them to kill each other, and then finally sending some kind of last ditch interpreter to essentially say “ignore my previous orders”?
Or perhaps you can explain how an Omnipotent Rational Planner has not yet succeeded even in getting his “Message” to every human?
At the very best this is an experiment gone very, very wrong, and at the worst, an exercise in sadism.
Report comment to moderator
#8 Declaring someone else’ sin seems to be the job of a superior being. We all use logic to function in real life (of course there are always exceptions in the fallen world). And a rational planner gives us the rules and ability to reason unless you assume these things are self-existent, which in essence is the attributes of god.
Report comment to moderator
I think this proves Arcadia knows little of the Bible after saying “then finally sending some kind of last ditch interpreter to essentially say “ignore my previous orders”?” I don’t think I shall bother responding, it would be pointless.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!