The black marriage crisis
In the black community, the institution of marriage is essentially dead. While marriage in Western developed nations is declining in general, the black community and black women are being disproportionately affected. Unless marriage and family issues receive a higher priority, tackling other major problems, like declining high school graduation rates, will be like treading water in the Mississippi River 10 feet above a strong undercurrent.
ABC News recently cited a Yale University study reporting that 42 percent of African-American women have yet to be married, compared to only 23 percent of white women. By their early 40s, 31 percent of black women have never been wives compared to 9 percent of white women. An alarming 70 percent of professional black women are single. ABC also reported, citing the Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, that at least 60 percent of black students who receive college degrees are women. Black women also make up 71 percent of black graduate students. According to the most recent data, only 43.3 percent of black adult men are married compared to around 60 percent for white males.
How the marriage and family crisis reached this current level is complicated. There is no one single culprit, because different social trends have affected different social classes within the black community separately. For example, while it is easy to point to the government welfare programs of the 1970s and ’80s as nuclear bombs to marriage and family within the black underclass, this does not explain the declining marriage trend among the black middle class. The one institution that spans all social classes within the black community is the church. Since the end of the civil-rights movement, the black church has disappeared as the social, political, economic, and spiritual glue of the black community. The hip-hop generation—who Bakari Kitwana, a former editor at The Source, identifies as blacks born between 1965 and 1984—is the first generation of blacks to be significantly unchurched since the 18th century. The cocktail of undermining government policies, political distractions with issues like affirmative action, challenges associated with black male incarceration rates, radical independence of black women introduced by black feminism, changing social norms, and eroded faith commitments have proven to be noxious. As such, the family, as the most important institution for forming and shaping character, spirituality, morals, manners, etc., began to die (Deuteronomy 6).
By 2002 the black marriage rate was 35 percent compared to 63 percent in 1950. By 2007 only 25 percent of black children were born within the context of marriage compared to 80 percent in 1960. There is no government program that can reorient the black community toward those numbers. There is no one-week summer VBS program by suburban teenagers that can come close to addressing the complexities of restoring families and promoting marriage. These problems are essentially moral and systemic requiring more than government intervention or evangelistic programs disconnected from local churches that can provide long-term spiritual nurture. Addressing this requires nothing less than long-term permanent spiritual care and discipleship. But this is costly because it demands more of our time than our money.
American Christians have been duped into accepting the insanity that short-term programs will solve multi-generational complex problems. The marriage and family crisis in the black community is a worldview crisis at its core. Until we are willing to follow Jesus’ command and spend time loving people and teaching them to obey everything Jesus taught, do not expect much progress or change in the black community or anywhere else in America (Matthew 28:18-20). Quick-fix government programs and short-term church projects in this area are worse than attempts to plug holes in the Hoover Dam with superglue.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top45 Comments to “The black marriage crisis”
Anthony wrote; “These problems are essentially moral and systemic requiring more than government intervention or evangelistic programs disconnected from local churches that can provide long-term spiritual nurture.”
Anthony well understands what our Founders also understood.
* “We cannot expect national morality to prevail in exclusion of religious principle.” ~ George Washington, Farewell Address.
* “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people.” John Adams (John R. Howe, Jr., The Changing Political Thought of John Adams, Princeton University Press, 1966, p. 185)
Report comment to moderator
Quite tragic, Anthony.
I got married late in life. Learned soooo much about marriage and being a husband at a Family Life Marriage Conference. FLMC is great but as I told my then and still current wife at the time, “It’s sad that I had to wait until I was married to learn so much of this.”
I wonder how many sermons or Sunday School lessons teens get (when they’re at church) deal with the Idea of Christian Marriage?
I hear political Christians talk about being pro-marriage. Goody for them. Are they teaching about it at their congregation?
Is it any wonder if young folks today are indifferent to the whole same sex marriage hullabaloo if we havent instilled in them a reverence and desire for ordinary straight marriage??
It’s all about health insurance benefits, right??
Report comment to moderator
It is called sin and lack of moarl understand of God’s Word. Many in the black community call themselves Christian but support anti-people. Aka Obama and his people.
Report comment to moderator
I have known several happily married black men and women. They have chosen to marry nonblacks. Is that a bad thing? I think not.
We’ve gotten past seeing a need for a black only baseball league. Pigment exclusive organizations: United Negro College Fund, KKK or NAACP seem to be quaint relics from the last century. I think anyone who today deems it a “societal good” that whites marry only whites, blacks marry only blacks etc should stop listening to his inner Malcolm X or George Wallace.
Judge folks by the content of their character.
Man looks at the outside but God looks at the outside.
Try to be like God. As hard as we know that is.
Report comment to moderator
Oddly enough the one organization which you’d think would be tracking this matter Anthony alluded to, doesnt even seem to have it on their radar screen.
See SCLC dot org
Report comment to moderator
Pastor Roy,
On the big ticket moral issues black church folks are quite biblically conservative.
They do however all too frequently tend to hold their noses and vote for proAbort proHomomarriage black liberals. Why the disconnect? Who knows?
Report comment to moderator
Another related quote from John Adams (as a statesman and before he was president or vice president):
* “Statesmen, my dear Sir, may plan and speculate for liberty, but it is religion and morality alone, which can establish the principles upon which freedom can securely stand. The only foundation of a free constitution is pure virtue.” John Adams (June 21, 1776)
Report comment to moderator
Why the disconnect? Who knows? — Sawgunner – I have a friends who are black, an I asked them that very question,
I was told it was called lack of moral strength.. They preach one thing in the church but live a different way out side the church.
An if you challenge them about it, when regard to voting, you are told that you are not black enough, or you have lost your blackness.
Report comment to moderator
In the American South the authors and enforcers of Jim Crow were all white Democrats. Given the oppression bequeathed to them by D party men for all those years, you woulda thought that once given the franchise perhaps black voters in the 60s woulda flocked to the R party.
But in 1964 Mississippi’s victims of Jim Crow instead flocked to the Mississippi Freedom Democratic party.
Unbelievable.
Talk about a disconnect
Report comment to moderator
It seems to me that the subject of this thread is more interesting than why black people vote for Democrats in large numbers.
Good post, Anthony. And thanks for ignoring the “party line” of “not airing dirty laundry” in front of white people. It’s ALL of our problem, particularly if we are Christians.
A few weeks ago I had a conversation with a black Christian friend who was updating me on her daughter, who’s nearing (past?) 30 and not yet married. She told me that when her daughter was about to go to college she (the mother) spoke to the young man who was interested in her, and asked him please not to interfere with her getting her education, but wait to marry her. So he waited. And she got her B.A. and then went on to get her master’s (in the stereotypical “social services” that often ends with black people continuing to push the government-as-savior mentality to others). He is still “waiting.” And now she really doesn’t know if she wants to get married at all, or have children.
I was of two minds. First, the young man sounds like he may not be “motivated” enough for her (someone needed to shake him and tell him, “While she’s in college, you need to get an education yourself, or get going on a career, and be ready to ask for her hand when she graduates”). But second, what I told her mother, is that I cannot imagine in a subculture in which only 30 percent of women are married, any woman turning down a man who is dedicated to her, willing to wait for her, and desires to marry her. Academic success and career success just aren’t what “fulfills” a woman’s heart–it’s foolish to turn down marriage for them. Of course, the other issue is whether he’s the right quality of man, but that’s where someone speaking into HIS life and not just letting him “drift” and passively wait for her would have been a very good idea.
Seeing this young woman choose academic and career success instead of marriage and family breaks my heart. Singleness can be a good thing, and if one doesn’t have a good chance at marriage then settling for a bad marriage isn’t a good idea–but to decide on principle against marriage and mothering, unless specifically for ministry reasons (as Nancy Leigh DeMoss has done, honorably) is choosing second best. And in a day when black communities need strong marriages, it makes me doubly sad. (I’m sad when a young white woman makes that choice, also. I myself was always OK with singleness, but didn’t deliberately choose it–but if I could live my twenties over again, I think I’d be more inclined not to be “neutral,” but to want to get married.)
Report comment to moderator
#10 Cheryl… wow! I was aware of the preponderance of blacks in the “social services” career fields. Why that might be is another thread entirely. Most of the LMSW I know are black folks and deeply Christian. They tell me they dont use a counseling encounter to do any type of witness/ministry. They do however pray regularly about their various clients. It could be they enjoy the work and the guaranteed pension of a govt job must appeal to those who in childhood witnessed layoffs and insecurity with their parents’ work.
I’m with you. There’s no rule that says the young man could not have married the woman. Sounds to me more as if he or someone is concerned about the education debt he’d gain from marrying this gal. Any man willing to be strung along like that is NOT going to be there fighting for his marriage, making whatever sacrifices it requires etc. I’ve seen women do all types of work to earn the PHT (”Put him Through”) diploma which they get or should get when hubby picks up his JD, MD PhD etc.
I think there is a disparity in the way men and women view the academic accomplishmt “grand canyon”. A man doesnt have as big a problem with a gal less educated than he is. But I think for women it is often a source of embarassmt. Even if as with a couple we know the wife is an oncology Dr and hub is a CPA. If black gals are getting advanced post baccalaureat ed while black guys are content with whatever they can get with only a high school diploma and perhaps a vocational certificate, it might be a “class” thing. What would folks think about an up and coming gal in the top of her field who “settled” for a guy doing a “menial” job?
No one really slams the young man with a pink or blue collar wife. I know gals who have kept on in such jobs even after marrying. Coworkers point out the couple obviously doesnt need her income. But isnt part of the problem the perception educated women might have that they are “marrying down” or somehow “settling” for a low achieving man? So instead of marrying Bill the bricklayer the gals postpone marriage indefinitely. And more often than not they marry someone with ed commensurate with their own ed level with race largely irrelevant.
Report comment to moderator
Pastor Roy #3, what does this mean?
“Many in the black community call themselves Christian but support anti-people. Aka Obama and his people.”
Mr. Bradley is talking about a problem of long standing, not an “Obama” problem.
Report comment to moderator
Pastor Roy #3, what does this mean?
“Many in the black community call themselves Christian but support anti-people. Aka Obama and his people.”
Mr. Bradley is talking about a problem of long standing, not an “Obama” problem.
Report comment to moderator
Pastor Roy #3, what does this mean?
“Many in the black community call themselves Christian but support anti-people. Aka Obama and his people.”
Mr. Bradley is talking about a problem of long standing, not an “Obama” problem.
Report comment to moderator
Oh my goodness! I apologize for the triple post.
Report comment to moderator
I hate to bring this up, but one of the problems is the disproportionate numbers of black men in prison. That means educated black women seeking to marry educated black men are going to have a smaller percentage of “available” candidates.
I don’t have a problem with inter-racial marriage either and given the numbers, that’s probably the best situation for educated black women seeking a suitable husband.
One of the other problems might be that young black men lack role models for successful marriages, the lack of jobs that can support a family, the feminization of school and the dead-end life in the ghetto.
Perhaps the greatest tragedy is Senator Moynihan called attention to all this in 1964 and despite all, things are worse now.
Report comment to moderator
Why are some of you presuming that going to a modern American university and getting an education are the same thing?
Report comment to moderator
I think prison may almost do less harm to men than colleges do to women.
Report comment to moderator
#18 Joel Mark,
The wrong type of college can be harmful to anyone. And I think for many young men it is a good idea to do some maturing before embarking on any post high school education.
If you’re saying colleges in general give gals a distorted view of how the world works, then I agree 100%
Report comment to moderator
hopesprings 08.04.10 AT 3:31 PM
Pastor Roy #3, what does this mean?
“Many in the black community call themselves Christian but support anti-people. Aka Obama and his people.”
Mr. Bradley is talking about a problem of long standing, not an “Obama” problem.
—
Obama was an example, you can look at the real Black Prest in Bill Clinton
Report comment to moderator
Wow, Joel Mark, you have stepped in it now (post 18)! Worth a discussion on WV, perhaps. (My alma mater graduates women who go on to have five or six children apiece, so I don’t think it’s actually “typical” in the women it produces.) But the fact that by and large black women are “stronger” than black men is not at all a good thing.
Report comment to moderator
The issue is moral standing transforming over to every day life action.
Report comment to moderator
I’m sorry to hear you feel that way, Joel Mark. I disagree.
Report comment to moderator
Michelle, it matters more to that people are being harmfuly deceived by academia and academic institutions today in the name of a college education in America today. I care about the people and te truth too much to be silent.
And it is women who are being most hurt at colleges today, and not just in the classroom.
I refer you to the book: “Unprotected:
A Campus Psychiatrist Reveals How Political Correctness in Her Profession Endangers Every Student” Author: Miriam Grossman, M.D. Sentinel (Published by the Penguin Group), 2007
Report comment to moderator
I did not follow your point at #21, Cheryl.
Report comment to moderator
There are lies, damned lies, and statistics. Consider the following:
“ABC News recently cited a Yale University study reporting that 42 percent of African-American women have yet to be married, compared to only 23 percent of white women.”
Two things here. First, the African American community has a higher birth rate than the white community. Higher birth rate means the age distribution will differ between the two groups, with African American skewing younger. That means a higher percentage of African American women will be younger than the age at which women typically marry.
Second thing: gender disparity. When African American men are scarce it stands to reason African American women will have a harder time finding husbands, since (right or wrong) people tend to prefer partners who share their same ethnicity.
People also tend to prefer partners who share their socioeconomic status. So if you’re an African American woman who’s also a successful professional, and you’re looking for an African American man who’s a successful professional, you’re dealing with a relatively small pool of potential mates.
None of these possible factors means the institution of marriage is “dead” within the African American community. Members of this community may still desire marriage as much as their white counterparts. There may just be barriers that prevent them fulfilling that desire.
Report comment to moderator
Joel, my point was twofold: that this is a Whirled Views subject more than one for this thread (well worth discussing, but “derailing” here), and also that it depends on the college. In my case, I went to a Bible college that (mostly) didn’t graduate brainwashed feminists, but actually graduated students who were more conservative than most adults today. My sister thinks that college is bad for women, and is glad she herself didn’t graduate (she went for just a year to the same college I attended), but in my opinion it depends on the college–one could argue that marriage is bad for women if one looks only at abusive husbands, and one can argue that college is bad for women if one looks only at bad colleges. But again, want to take the discussion to Whirled Views instead? (I’m on my way out the door myself, however.)
Report comment to moderator
Here is the latest book by Miriam Grossman, M.D.. “You’re Teaching My Child What?” (this relates more to pre-college schooling and the sex ed dogma and dishonesty that is destroying our moral fabric.
But with regard to colleges, I choose not to be passive in the face of the intellectual atrocities that take place daily on the American college campus today in the name of academia. Too many colleges serve to give pretige to intellectual dishonesty and cheap PC partisan activism. They are doing more long term damage than any institution I can think of in America today, and we pay them big time to do it. There are some good and some great colleges to this day, but they are getting few and far between.
Others can disagree or be silent if they please.
Report comment to moderator
Thank you Cheryl. That’s fine. I have taught at two colleges and both experiences were rather good. I am speaking more broadly. But I have made my point and I will just say again that Anthony’s post is very needed and he did a good job. I’m not sure what I could add to it so I took a related but different angle.
Report comment to moderator
Okay, I found a comment from Anthony’s excellent post that I can quibble with:
“American Christians have been duped into accepting the insanity that short-term programs will solve multi-generational complex problems.”
I’m not sure the “American Christians” have bought this at all. And the fact that some participate in “short-term programs” does not necessarily mean they are thinking they “will solve multi-generational complex problems.” I often do constructive short-term things that I realize will barely scratch the surface of the real problem. But I do them anyway hoping that God can use my feeble efforts for good.
Report comment to moderator
Where did you teach?
Report comment to moderator
To Post # 4, I say Amen and Amen!
Anthony Bradley is right to point out how systemic and terrible the undermining of marriage is. My younger siblings don’t even think of marriage, they just shack up with whoever makes them feel good at the moment. They say they’ve never seen a good marriage, and so have no hope they could have one. The first good marriages I saw were the people I boarded with when I went to University. I am so thankful to those couples. They let me live with them, and they also shared the things that made their marriages strong.
How do you recover any nation with this problem? I don’t think there is a way, I have no hope this society will recover.
Report comment to moderator
Until we are willing to follow Jesus’ command and spend time loving people and teaching them to obey everything Jesus taught, do not expect much progress or change in the black community or anywhere else in America (Matthew 28:18-20).
Very good! Now, given the racial tensions that exist, both actual and potential, how do we go about this?
Report comment to moderator
This is very interesting and an argument I have never even considered. It’s crazy the cause and effect relationship between the smallest and biggest decisions for things that wouldn’t seem related.
http://www.femmefatalemagazine.com/home
Report comment to moderator
#33
“Very good! Now, given the racial tensions that exist, both actual and potential, how do we go about this? “
A good first step would be a punch in the face of any person who yelled “RACISM” at every real/perceived problem where a black and white are involved!!!
Report comment to moderator
This trend of folks promoting their own website is quite novel.
We have femme fatale.
We have red letter believers
and of course the Lawn Mower safety guy whose name I’ve lost.
Report comment to moderator
Yes, there is a crisis in the black community concerning marriage. But is it not an indicator of the attitude towards marriage among the general population? When I was young “shacking up” was a disgrace, and few admitted to doing it. Now, it is so common that when two of my students found out that a certain male they knew had a male roommate, they assumed the two men were homosexual. They only knew of male/female roommate situations, so a male/male combination had to be homosexual in their eyes.
i know, this is a little off topic, but I do have to wonder if my generation did not spoil it for the younger ones.
Report comment to moderator
I find this post very informative.
I will pass this along to some of my online friends,
as I find it will relate to them as well.
Thank You for the interesting information.
Report comment to moderator
Wow, Peter L. How far we have fallen. Yesterday I saw the statistic that 70-something percent of women in their late thirties have cohabited. I assumed they meant single women, but it didn’t say, so perhaps they are saying even if she is now married she probably cohabited at some point in the past. Either way, how tragic!
I have even wondered, renting out a bedroom, if any of my neighbors say to themselves, Hmm. She only takes in women–wonder if she’s that way . . . when of course, a few years ago, the problem would have been with the “slut” down the street with a man living with her. And it has occurred to me that I as a woman have it easier than single men do–a man taking in one male housemate would be under more suspicion than a woman, I think, whether he had them live with him a short time and then someone else moved in (as normally happens with roommates, unfortunately) or had a “long-term relationship” with one. I sort of indirectly gave a guy friend who was considering renting out a bedroom the hint that having more than one might be better than having just one–but then, homosexual men don’t always limit themselves to one pair, so maybe even having a house full of men doesn’t offer protection from such speculation. I suppose at some point we simply can’t worry what other people think if we’re doing the right thing. (I recently had someone driving by stop to watch when my dog went poop in someone else’s yard. I was fairly sure she was watching to make sure I picked it up. The problem was, I took my dog out on leash for two minutes just to have her empty her bladder before we went to the vet–she can hold it for 24-36 hours if I simply let her out into the backyard occasionally, but she always urinates if I put her on a leash and walk her–and I wasn’t prepared for poop too. So I had to walk back across the street to my house for a bag–and I did so, but the woman in a car observing me probably didn’t know that, and leaped to her own assumptions about me. I had to shrug it off–I can’t let others’ false ideas run my life.)
What a sad, sad time we live in in some ways.
Report comment to moderator
Freedom Nut, I’m not sure how helpful that would be.
Peter L, that’s crazy! Most of the people I knew growing up would have expected for roommates to be same sex.
Report comment to moderator
I think people in order for people to get married there needs to be a mindset towards planning for a future. You won’t solve the “problem” of black children born out of wedlock, if you don’t do something to address black unemployment. And there is one big dilemma, your conservative cohorts are going to call you a racist if you do anything (public or private) to benefit the financial conditions of exclusively black people.
Report comment to moderator
You won’t solve the problem of unemployment or poverty in any community, (black or otherwise) until you do something about children being born out of wedlock.
And there is one big dilemma, liberal cohorts are going to call you a racist if you do anything (public or private) to benefit the moral standards or conditions of people in any particular race.
Report comment to moderator
That’s true Joel, but at some point people have to be willing to just shrug it off. Homophobic, racist, islamophobic? If your not a confirmed liberal, you’ve got a social disease as far as these guys are concerned. I think they’re getting more attention than they deserve.
Report comment to moderator
I am a Christian counselor. Everyone who comes to me for counseling agrees to accept that I counsel from a biblical world view. I see both black people and white people, and the truth is that as often as not, whether the person is black or white, they have had, and often still have, sex w/o marriage.
Report comment to moderator
41 “And there is one big dilemma, your conservative cohorts are going to call you a racist if you do anything (public or private) to benefit the financial conditions of exclusively black people.”
Oh, I dunno ’bout that!
Ever seen a response from those “conservative cohorts” when anything except a handout, like a job, was offered??
OOPS! How silly of me! That WOULD be racist would it not? After all the liberal mindset is that the blacks are unable to function without nanny Washington!
I guess that’s why Clarence Thomas, Walter Williams et al aren’t considered “BLACK” – yes, I actually heard a black (at least he said he was black) on a talk show make the claim that “–blacks do not consider C.T. a black!>/b>”
Using this criteria – any black that succeeds w/o the help of nanny – I guess they can’t succeed w/o the left’s gracious beneficent aide.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!