Tweeting a shibboleth gospel
I need a Twitter-gospel break.
The new trend of provocatively restating “the gospel” on Twitter may be inadvertently keeping Christians on spiritual milk. Social media is a wonderful tool of communicating and has multiple good uses, but like anything else it has its limits and needs them. Twitter is the new roadside church sign where corny quips go viral. I speak for many who are worn out on the Twitter-gospel.
The Twitter-gospel attempts to reduce the Good News to a 140-character “tweet” that will make readers think it is good enough to be endlessly retweeted, because each retweet builds up the sought-after coolness affirmation for some. It’s the “slam dunking” the Bible. I am even beginning to wonder if a few of these Twitter-gospelers are trying to tweet their way to fame.
Something so important seems hardly reducible to a clever one-liner. The gospel seems clear. The Dictionary for Theological Interpretation of the Bible defines is as “the good news of salvation in Jesus Christ.” The New International Dictionary of the Bible defines it as “the Good News that God has provided a way of redemption through his son Jesus Christ.” But the Twitter-gospel can frustrate the simplicity of the message, as examples found by Jake Belder provide:
“Legalism says achievement leads to approval, the gospel says that approval leads to achievement.”
“The gospel obliterates, annihilates, and disembowels any notion of wage earning as a basis for our acceptance with God.”
“The Gospel makes us stop asking: What have I done for God? And makes us ask: What’s the Lord done through/in/despite me?”
I fully understand that many of these tweets are intended to encourage the faithful to persevere, because for those of us who struggle with idolatry and sin (Romans 7) we need to hear the gospel daily. We get it. So tell us, then, what the gospel actually is instead of collaborating with weak attempts at imaginativeness to reformulate something people have actually died to communicate. Unlike the Bible, the Twitter-gospel has no context, and unless you’re a Christian you might not get the point without some sort of theological background.
While it gives the appearance of sophistication, much Twitter-gospel is gospel milk. It reminds me of a couple passages from Hebrews: “Anyone who lives on milk, being still an infant, is not acquainted with the teaching about righteousness. But solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil” (5:13-14), and “Therefore let us leave the elementary teachings about Christ and go on to maturity, not laying again the foundation of repentance from acts that lead to death, and of faith in God, instruction about baptisms, the laying on of hands, the resurrection of the dead, and eternal judgment” (6:1-2).
The Twitter-gospel is for über-church Christians who retweet the “elementary teachings” repeatedly, and thanks to that, “the gospel” may be on its way to becoming a shibboleth. Moreover, the individualistic nature of the Twitter-gospel cannot be all that the Good News implies for the Christian life, right? So for all of us who want to uphold the meaningfulness and sanctity of the message of the Good News of salvation in Jesus Christ, will the Twitter-gospelers please give “the gospel” a Twitter Sabbath?

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top20 Comments to “Tweeting a shibboleth gospel”
I hadn’t heard of this. I’m sure for those partaking, they are attempting to evangelize (in addition to seeing how creative they can get with that 140 character limit).
Report comment to moderator
Anthony,
I think I understand your position. Certainly, if twitter tweets (I don’t twitter …) are all a person, who is a believer, is receiving/studying/meditating on for their spiritual nourishment…there is a bigger problem than you have described.
But, if folks are twittering, who don’t know Jesus, perhaps it is what God would use to nourish seeds. Another thought, if I were twittering, I think I’d rather see something of the Word, than an update on what someone is having for lunch, or how bored they are, or other updates as such.
So, in the ‘age of twitter’, perhaps God would use such. I have a question for you – this AM I put this on my FB page, taken from my morning study/devotion of 1 Corinthians:
Wisdom from God is needed in applying Love to our walking in our freedom in Christ. Love is more important than our freedom… (1 Corinthians 8, does this fall under the same category as the tweets of focus in your commentary?
Report comment to moderator
Not being a twitterer (although I have an account), I find this article itself quite without context. Are you saying that one cannot compress the gospel into 140 characters, so don’t try? What about Facebook’s 420 characters, as Rejoice… (#2) asked? Is that sufficient? Or Anthony’s own 541 words? Is there ANY medium that is capable of communicating the infinite love of God to finite people?
I’m really not clear what is your objection, Anthony.
Report comment to moderator
I’m not sure what the point is either. In the third full paragraph you seem basically to say that the gospel is too deep and complex for Twitter which tends to be too simple, only to turn right around and say that the gospel is much simpler than Twitter users seem to imply. Which is it?
Report comment to moderator
I think the tweets or whatever they are called may “mislead” an unbeliever in that short phrases may have meaning for those who can connect the thought to more Scripture and a broader concept.
Report comment to moderator
I’m perplexed by your article too, Anthony. Your third-to-last paragraph identifies the purpose of these tweets, namely, to encourage Christians who struggle with idolatry and sin (which is all of us). With that fact in view, several of your objections fade away immediately:
> Because the audience for these tweets is the already-born-again, they’re not meant to be a comprehensive communication of the Gospel or even a reformulation of it. They’re meant to draw out its implications and apply them to our lives and thought.
> It’s debatable whether the wonderful quotes from Jake Belder illustrate the simplicity of the Gospel, but they do illustrate its profundity, which is appropriate if he’s addressing Christians.
> No context is needed, because it already exists in the minds of the intended readers.
> We’re called to assume the best about other believers, so I think it’s wrong for you to speculate on the motives of these tweeters. Maybe they want attention; maybe they just found an insight helpful or worship-inspiring and wanted to share the experience with the rest of us.
You also don’t like the 140-character limit Twitter imposes, but even this might actually be a good thing: stating a deep truth concisely but accurately requires a greater degree of understanding than does explaining that truth at length. Maybe fewer words can mean more reflection.
Most importantly, your interpretation of the verses from Hebrews is whack. Gospel meditations like Jake’s above are exactly the kind of “solid food” the text is talking about. Pre-evangelistic truths constitute the “milk” here (see this John Piper sermon manuscript for explanation).
The Gospel isn’t just for unbelievers or baby Christians, it’s for the mature too. Especially for them. You seem to get this (unlike the first two commenters), and that’s why I’m perplexed.
Given all this, are you open to the possibility that your reaction to these Gospel tweets is the exact opposite of what it should be?
Report comment to moderator
God’s Word will not return void. He used so many signs along the road to lead me to Himself, it was amazing. Almost everywhere I turned I couldn’t get away from something like; “Follow Jesus” or “Jesus Saves” or “Trust Jesus.” I was a commuter back then, and could even find these “one liners” painted on bridge overpasses! The “Twitter is the new roadside church sign where corny quips go viral” comment you made is interesting. The church I got saved in ten years ago had a sign outside that read: No Jesus No Peace, Know Jesus Know Peace…I thought “hey that’s me no peace and at the time no Jesus either. About a month later the Lord reminded me of that sign and lead me into a church I’d never been in before, where I told the pastor I needed to repent and didn’t know how to do that, he said; “I’ll get my bible.” Fifteen minutes later I passed from death to life. Little signs, yes, He uses them, even Twitter.
Report comment to moderator
@Publius, those are not my tweets. You won’t find any gospel tweets in my Twitter feed. I’m with Anthony on this one.
Report comment to moderator
@Jake, I should have clicked the link instead of reading past it too quickly. Apologies – I take back the nice things I said about you.
I’ll add one, though. Your post is more coherent than Anthony’s.
Report comment to moderator
A related thing that’s been bugging me lately: people “liking” Facebook groups with names like “I bet Jesus can break the record for most fans on Facebook” or “Let’s join forces as Christians and start a Jesus Christ revival! Press like if Jesus is your Savior!!!”
Report comment to moderator
I am with Buddyglass on the whole facebook group thing. Buddy and I indeed respectfully disagree on a lot of things, but I agree with him on this.
Report comment to moderator
I love this.
Report comment to moderator
Stephanie, sure “Gospel-tweeting” has to make the list of “Stuff Christians Like.” Look at what has been stirred up on the internet by begging people to chill with corny ones. Haha! (some call it, “hitting a nerve.”)
Report comment to moderator
I meant, “surely”
Report comment to moderator
Stephanie, to further make my case that “gospel tweets” makes the “Stuff Christians Like” list just pay attention to the nerves struck by the post around the blogosphere. People are actually arguing back and forth about “gospel tweets.” Admittedly, it’s kind’a funny. Google it! You’ll see.
Report comment to moderator
Thanks! My blog is actually Stuff Christian Culture Likes. There is a blog called Stuff Christians Like that’s completely separate.
Report comment to moderator
I wrote a post a couple days ago on gospel tweets called “Theological Masturbation.”
Report comment to moderator
Oh, ok Stephanie thanks for the clarification. Wow, the pro the gospel tweet guys aren’t going to like your post very much either I’m afraid. BTW, some website is selling “What would Jesus tweet” t-shirts.
Here’s the link your post about gospel tweets
You make get a lot comments about this. I think it hit a nerve. It’s really interesting how several of us are talking about this at the same time.
Report comment to moderator
I’ve challenged myself to summarize, make a conclusion, or teach within 140 characters one Bible verse a day through Matthew. Call it a mini-commentary, if you will. http://twitter.com/#!/ThruTheBible 534 tweets through Matthew 19!
Report comment to moderator
Link should have been http://twitter.com/ThruTheBible
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!