Feds oppose California’s Prop 19 to legalize marijuana
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder says the federal government will enforce its marijuana laws in California even if the state’s voters approve a ballot measure to legalize the drug.
Holder says the Justice Department strongly opposes California’s Proposition 19 and remains firmly committed to enforcing the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA) in all states.
He made the comments in a letter to former chiefs of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. The letter was dated Wednesday.
“We will vigorously enforce the CSA against those individuals and organizations that possess, manufacture, or distribute marijuana for recreational use, even if such activities are permitted under state law,” Holder wrote.
He also said that legalizing recreational marijuana in California would be a “significant impediment” to the government’s joint efforts with state and local law enforcement to target drug traffickers, who often distribute marijuana alongside cocaine and other drugs. Holder said approval of the ballot measure would “significantly undermine” efforts to keep California communities safe.
If Proposition 19 passes in November, California would become the first state to legalize and regulate recreational pot use. Adults could possess up to an ounce of the drug.
California, like 13 other states and the District of Columbia, has legalized medical marijuana. In that realm, federal agents have focused on busting dispensaries they said were using medical marijuana as a front for traditional drug-dealing.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top26 Comments to “Feds oppose California’s Prop 19 to legalize marijuana”
I was listening to the News on the radio while driving down the 5 fwy in L.A. regarding this. The L.A. law enforcement has stated that they will enforce the federal law in this and not the California law if passed. I think that’s great. I’m just wondering why they are not called out on the hypocrisy of chooding to enforce this federal law and not the federal immigration laws.
Once again, political correctness is harming our nation’s law enforcement.
Report comment to moderator
“choosing”
Report comment to moderator
Bottom line is that Holder will sue any state that doesn’t do what he wants. It has nothing to do with actual Federal or State laws. Here is proof:
1. Arizona wants to enforce Federal law, but Obama does not. So Holder sues.
2. California wants to ignore Federal law, but Obama does not. So Holder will sue.
3. With Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, a Federal judge rules in favor of Obama’s position, but he opposes it because he didn’t rule on it.
And so on … Obama (and Holder) wants all power and glory for himself ever. Amen.
Report comment to moderator
• Where does the Constitution grant the federal government the authority to criminalize substance abuse?
• At least with Prohibition, they went through the niceties of amending the constitution, then amending it once again to repeal the Prohibition amendment. No need to bother wit that process anymore.
• The 9th and 10th Amendments aren’t worth the parchment they’re written on.
• Genuine federalism died when Lincoln won his war against the south.
• The states begat the national government, and the child ate the parent.
Report comment to moderator
Frank,
Is it just the idea of the federal government being involved that bothers you or do you object to state laws against marijuana too? Would you vote to legalize it?
Report comment to moderator
Ree,
1. Both, but mainly the first.
2. Yes.
For additional perspective on my position: I threw my eldest son out of the house — twice — because of his refusal to repent of the sin of substance abuse (including pot). And if he got in legal trouble over the matter, I seriously doubt I would lift a finger to help him fight it. As a covenant child (the church has disciplined and ultimately excommunicated him), he knows it’s sinful and illegal. So if his activities put him in the sights of the civil magistrate, he’s just reaping what he has sown.
Report comment to moderator
I agree with Frank. The national government was never granted the power to criminalize what people smoke, eat, or drink. Why have we collectively allowed them to assume those powers? When are we going to take them to task for doing so?
Report comment to moderator
I also agree with Frank. The Federal government has too much power, so much as a matter of fact, that they now pick and choose which laws they want to enforce. Through selective enforcement, the Justice Department is essentially operating not according to the law, but according to the whims of Holder and Obama.
Report comment to moderator
Is the court able to hold Obama to anything?
Obama said moratorium on drilling.
Court said NO moratorium on drilling.
He over-ruled the court and said moratorium.
No votes. No laws.
Now he says it’s ok. Elections coming in Nov.
But drillers say they don’t know what the regulations are so they can’t drill. Pretty clever.
Report comment to moderator
They have criminalized drivers who kill people in auto accidents.
But NOT ALL drivers.
Not sure why some are in prison and some not–even when NO substance abuse is involved.
Report comment to moderator
Frank and Xion,
I get what you’re saying, and in most areas I agree, but I just have a really hard time with the idea of legalizing recreational drugs. I see the inconsistency in my position, but I just have a huge block against it.
Also, Frank, thanks for sharing how you dealt with the issue personally in your family. It does give me a broader perspective. I was pretty sure that you wouldn’t approving of marijuana use, but your answer was informative.
If you’re willing to share a little more, was he bothered by the excommunication, or was he at the point where he didn’t care?
Report comment to moderator
Mrs.News,
Wouldn’t the difference between those who go to prison have to do with the degree of criminal negligence? I mean, it does seem more “criminal” to be driving 40 miles over the speed limit and weaving through lanes of traffic than it does to be momentarily distracted while changing the radio station, for example. Both involve negligence and irresponsibility, but certainly there’s a huge difference between the two.
Report comment to moderator
REE (11): If you’re willing to share a little more, was he bothered by the excommunication, or was he at the point where he didn’t care?
Frank: He seemed to view it differently at different times over the 4+ years that we’ve dealt with this.
The discipline was generally progressive, and was lifted/reversed once or twice along the way when he expressed repentance. But at the end — and where he is, currently — he seemed not to care. I even took him to Union Gospel Mission, a free, long-term, Christian residence and accountability reconciliation ministry here in Spokane. Not interested. Too many “rules.” (I.e., you have to want to stop, and UGM would do all they could to help you attain it.)
We pray for him (and a few other prodigal children) publicly in church every Sunday. (His name is Frank, also … )
Report comment to moderator
#11 Ree “Frank and Xion, I get what you’re saying, and in most areas I agree, but I just have a really hard time with the idea of legalizing recreational drugs. I see the inconsistency in my position, but I just have a huge block against it.”
Yes, I understand. A few years ago I would have said the same thing, but I have become much more a libertarian in the past few years, much like John Stossel.
There is precious little that the government does well. Dramatically reducing the reach of government increases both liberty and responsibility. But people can manage themselves better than government can.
Would you say that Prohibition was a good thing for America or are we better off now?
Report comment to moderator
Frank,
Thanks for being open about that. I’ll pray for him. My 19-year-old son has been a huge challenge for my husband and me for many years now, and marijuana use is just one small part of it. But my husband is an unbeliever, so I don’t even know how to think about the issues we have with our kids in the same terms you do because we’ve never been a covenant-breaking family from the beginning, and, as a woman, I don’t have any ability to change that. In any case, though, whether your situation or ours, it’s heartbreaking.
Report comment to moderator
Xion,
Definitely I’d say that we’re better off without Prohibition, but one major difference is that alcohol, although it certainly has its temptations for many, it isn’t inherently sinful. It can be consumed to the glory of God.
But I don’t think that translates into “anything goes” and we all just have to take personal responsibility. I mean, if my next door neighbors decide to turn their home into a meth lab, I’m glad that the government can step in and stop them.
Of course, I wouldn’t say that marijuana is equal to meth in its potential for harm, but if we’re talking about a principle here about non-interference from government in regard to harmful substances, then my example is valid. Or do you differentiate based on the degree of danger and harm? And if you do, then the example of marijuana is not as clear cut as you guys seem to make it.
Report comment to moderator
Frank,
I meant to say that we’ve never been a covenant-keeping family or that we’ve always been a covenant-breaking family. I wavered on how I wanted to say it, and I ended up saying the opposite of what I meant.
Report comment to moderator
Ree, I’m curious, You wrote in #16 regarding alcohol “It can be consumed to the glory of God.”
How so?
Also, how do you understand that alcohol could be consumed to the glory of God but marijuana could not.
Unless I’m missing something really obvious I cannot see the difference between the two.
Report comment to moderator
Conor,
Alcohol was consumed by Jesus and by others with his approval. It was part of the Passover and it’s part of the Lord’s Supper. The abuse of alcohol, drunkenness, is condemned in Scripture.
I don’t any indication of the approval of any other potentially mind altering substances in Scripture, and altering the mind through substances, as a principle, is condemned.
Report comment to moderator
Ree, Conor, Xion, et al.,
For a biblical treatment of drug use, pot vs. alcohol, etc., I would recommend “One Toke Over the Line” by pastor Doug Wilson. Not necessarily the final word on the matter, but lots of wisdom there for Christians to ponder and discuss.
Interestingly, when I searched for that piece, I also found another piece by Joel Miller, a Christian writer I read fairly often back when I read WorldNetDaily. I recall enjoying his pieces and generally agreeing with his Reformed and libertarian approach to things. This piece is entitled, “One toke over the line, sweet Jesus?” (I may have read it before — it’s ten years old — but I don’t recall, and am going to print it off and give it a look now.)
Report comment to moderator
#16 Ree. I think if you start saying that alcohol or other drugs can be used or not used for God’s glory you will run into problems, like the question Conor raises in #18. For some, alcohol may or may not be sinful. It is between an individual and God.
I have taken a markedly different stance these days. Having a Socialist in the White House has brought a lot of clarity in terms of how we should view government.
Every increase of government reach and power encroaches on the rights and conscience of the individual. The collectivist philosophy of the current administration desires to control what you can and cannot say or eat or do.
Some Christians desire to use government to impose Christian morals on non-Christians. Where has that gotten us? In the end, Christians have less liberty than ever before. As CS Lewis points out
And so, the government which governs least truly governs best.
Report comment to moderator
Thanks, Frank. I hadn’t read that, but that was pretty much the idea I had in mind in my short answer to Conor.
Xion,
Sure, alcohol can be sinful for some people, but used as intended, it’s not. I don’t believe the same can be said for marijuana. Of course, I’d agree that the issue of whether or not it shold be legal is not necessarily the same, but I’m just not at the point where I’m comfortable saying that I’m willing to change the law that way.
What’s your perspective on my meth example? Should the production, sale, and use of methamphetamines also be legal in your view? If not how do you differentiate according to the libertarian principles you’re espousing?
Report comment to moderator
Also Frank, you can answer my question to Xion.
Report comment to moderator
Thanks for your answer Ree.
My take on the issue is that both marijuana and alcohol are relatively mild intoxicants and as such both have mood altering effects.
When used in moderation I don’t believe either are inherently sinful however if used to excess both of them tend to lower inhibitions which can and does frequently lead to sinful behavior.
I realize that wine was used by Jesus as a beverage and as an emblem at the last supper which is why it is used sacramentally in communion throughout history.
However water, juice,or even gatorade if used with reverence can suffice making alcohol unnecessary as an emblem.
Outside of wines use in communion as an emblem I cannot see how alcohol or any other intoxicant can be consumed to the glory of God.
Personally I choose to use neither substance because were I to do so it would be for the intoxicating effects which in my case would not be honoring God.
The example of meth is a different story altogether. Methedrine unlike marijuana is a highly addictive substance which leads far too many users to ever increasing consumption sometimes leading to amphetemine psychosis sometimes with tragic results.
In fact one of my co-workers who was a heavy meth user in the grip of a meth fueled paranoia, shot his wife in the face in front of his children and then shot himself.
Both of them died on the spot leaving two very emotionally disturbed little boys to be raised by their grandparents.
Personally, because of its dangerous potential I’m more than a little hesitant on the subject of methedrine legalisation.
Report comment to moderator
#22 Ree. A proper role for government is public safety. That’s why we have police and fire departments. I agree with Conor that because of the danger especially to children the government should regulate drugs. Regulation is a proper role for government. However, the government goes way over the line becoming a nanny state in the name of safety.
I am not of the opinion that alcohol or marijuana are harmless. I was a heavy marijuana user decades ago (in high school) and it basically killed my motivation at the time. Pot heads have so much more potential rather than becoming unmotivated deadbeats living in their parent’s basements.
Plus it is possible to drink wine without becoming intoxicated, but intoxication is the express purpose of smoking pot. So I oppose the smoking of pot, but I would rather have the government regulate it than make it illegal. Just because something is legal does not mean Christians should partake of it. Our dysfunctional government is barely capable of enforcing the drug war and is a huge waste of resources.
A better way to fight pot smoking is the way we fought cigarette smoking, through awareness and common sense not the strong arm of the law.
Report comment to moderator
I like that here Obama is taking the “conservative” position (i.e. continuing prohibition) and is still getting hammered on WMB.
Note to BrotherDan on immigration:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/25/AR2010072501790.html
The Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency expects to deport about 400,000 people this fiscal year, nearly 10 percent above the Bush administration’s 2008 total and 25 percent more than were deported in 2007. The pace of company audits has roughly quadrupled since President George W. Bush’s final year in office.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!