Following in our footsteps
Some Americans feel guilty going to Wal-Mart and buying cheap products manufactured by children in Asian sweatshops. An economophobic propaganda machine is relentless in its efforts to mislead us to see international trade as a zero-sum game. With numerous Scriptural exhortations against the oppression of the poor, Christians are especially vulnerable to stories of defenseless workers exploited by greedy factory owners in the Third World. How can we, the most affluent consumers in history, save more money and live even better at the expense of the most abused people on earth?
Just before the presidential inauguration of Barack Obama, Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Nicholas Kristof enraged the “progressive” readers of The New York Times with a warning that the new government promise to push for “fair” labor practices in our trade agreements would hurt the poor abroad more than a supersized financial-crisis-and-global-warming combo. The fact is that Third World economies are not going through a development phase of poverty or working conditions never seen before. Today’s economic leaders have gone through their own “sweatshop” stages not that long ago. There is a lesson to be learned from the more recent success stories of Japan and Hong Kong. When it comes to labor standards, there is nothing unheard of in the underdeveloped economies of the 21st century—they are simply trying to close the income gap with the West by replicating some of the steps we took on our way up during the 19th century.
When we relax on the couch after a good meal in our cozy homes and the giant flat-screen TV brings us news about the miserable lives of workers in Third World sweatshops, an emotional reaction of guilt is quite natural. What we need to appreciate is that such reports open up a window back in time that allows us to observe the same backbreaking toil that our forefathers went through so that we could enjoy the comforts of today. We should keep in mind that to force the developing countries to apply our labor and environmental standards is to deny them the same opportunities that we freely utilized in order to become rich.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top45 Comments to “Following in our footsteps”
A couple years ago, Chuck Colson’s Breakfpoint quoted a Christian Chinese worker in a factory that made Christmas lights. The question was, should American Christians be buying product made in such a sweatshop condition.
The answer? Please do. This is the only way we have of making money to support ourselves.
Report comment to moderator
I’ve heard the answer Michelle gave too. Not buying products made by poor people in order to “help” them is a ridiculous answer.
Thank you, Alex, for this perspective.
Report comment to moderator
Well sweatshops are a vast step up from Chinese labor camps. My father hated buying chinese, because theyd toss christians in jail, just for being christians, and make them work for nothing.
The cost of living is quite lower in 3rd world countries. By being able to buy less expensive items at walmart or target or kroger, it frees up more of our money to be spent elsewhere.
Report comment to moderator
I don’t go to Walmart, I’d have to drive too far, and I prefer to buy American. But sometimes you can’t avoid buying things made in those countries.
We had a period in our country where we had child labor, too, so we see the danger of it, but eating is still better than not eating, living better than dying. These purchases give them some income.
Report comment to moderator
Great post, as always.
Report comment to moderator
Translation: Our great grandparents suffered. So why shouldn’t they?
And why shouldn’t our children, who need jobs, have to suffer some more than we deservong folks have.
It’s a dog-eat-dog world and I just ate.
Report comment to moderator
arcadia, do you have a better solution for the poverty of the third world?
Report comment to moderator
As shown by the market developed for such products as Fair Trade Coffee and Chocolate, we the US consumer CAN use the power of our buying decisions to change the conditions for the producers.
Demand that Wal-mart, Target, et al carry all the Fair Trade products possible and then opt to choose for Fair Trade products over those not certified – even if you have to pay a bit more. Do not shop at Wal-mart, et al until they agree to give you the choice.
Report comment to moderator
conan, to pick up the discussion from http://online.worldmag.com/2010/10/12/anti-labor-unions/ in connection to sweatshops…
will these exploited kids benefit from a law that demands that they get paid as much as the American union workers and have their employers provide the same healthcare benefits, paid vacations, safe work environments, etc.?
Report comment to moderator
devo, I can’t change a light bulb and if I get a job assembling computers my skills will probably command a very low wage.
would you demand that Wal-Mart carry it as a fair trade item?
would you buy my lousy computer at 2000$ so you can “the conditions for the producers” when a superior free trade one is available for 500$?
Report comment to moderator
Devo 101, I’ve seen evidence that the fair trade issues actually are not better for the workers; I’m not going to “demand” something that’s unproven and that also costs more.
Report comment to moderator
Reader,
That is a false choice. The demand should be for me as a consumer to be able to choose between two product and decide for myself. I doubt I would opt for an inferior product at four times the cost but I would opt for an equal product at at 20-25% increase. You may not – but you would be able to have the choice which in and of itself would creat a market and better working conditions for some workers.
Report comment to moderator
Cheryl,
I do not know of what evidence you speak so I can not comment. I do know that id you choose to do nothing you will not affect any change. However, it looks like the Christians on this site are satisfied with the status quo.
Report comment to moderator
devo, evidence is that Christians (on this site and outside of it) are among the most charitable people in the world.
instead of subsidizing inferior use of resources (higher cost for equal product), you have a choice to donate the money you save (by shopping at Wal-Mart) to a fund that helps the sweatshops workers get education and training that makes them more productive
Report comment to moderator
“…instead of subsidizing inferior use of resources (higher cost for equal product)”
Actually, reader, the Fair Trade concept came from cutting out the middle man and channeling more of the revenue generated by the product back to the worker – often women. These workers then can use the added income to do as they see fit – maybe put better food on the table for their children. Be aware, there may not be any option for most of these workers. In coffee country it is coffee and that’s it. I wish it were as easy as just paying a non-profit to make thing better because I would do that – it is not that easy. Create a market for fair trade items will benefit the worker and is a good thing to do.
Report comment to moderator
It isn’t the job of the US Government or the American people to make up for the way corrupt and greedy governments of the world exploit their people. That’s not in the Constitution. The Leftys here, of course, will never require that the despots of the world do the right thing for their people.
Report comment to moderator
“In coffee country it is coffee and that’s it.”
which country are you talking about?
Report comment to moderator
Devo, “if I choose to do nothing I will not effect any change.” True enough. But has God called me to address ALL of the world’s issues singlehandledly? No, He has not. I’ve done reasonable things to minister to the poor (I’ve had a Compassion child for years, have given shoeboxes for years, have donated to Habitat for Humanity, have lived among and ministered one on one, etc.), but since I don’t drink any kind of coffee, free-trade coffee isn’t my issue. I also tend to prefer one-on-one ministries to doing something that tells me, “If you pay twice as much money, the worker will get two cents more.”
But honestly, if you have researched this and find it worth your money, go for it. Other people aren’t necessarily called to do the same thing, or, in some cases, don’t have money to throw away for even “cheap” gourmet coffee. . . .
Report comment to moderator
NJLawyer,
Incase you didn’t notice the option I am promoting is a free market, voluntary approach. Sorry you can’t grasp that. And it is not gov’ts so much as corporations that are doing the exploiting. Nothing I suggested in unconstitutional either so go pound sand, rightie.
Report comment to moderator
Reader – much of subSaharian Africa for example.
Report comment to moderator
Cheryl, I was just offering an example of what we can do to better the conditions of these workers. You should be commended for what you do and, no, you do not have to solve all the world woes.
Report comment to moderator
I didn’t say a word against what you said, Devo. I didn’t address you at all. Sorry you didn’t grasp that.
Report comment to moderator
It appears Tokarev is continuing his usual tradition of Whiggish historical methodology. He assumes history follows a linear pre-destined course (very Calvinist) of development yet there is nothing to indicate that history follows a pre-set pattern of development from hunting/gatherer to agriculture to feudal to exploitative industry to the sweet paradise of democratic capitalism. Hmm not too different from a certain German writing in London over a hundred years ago except a different ending. Of course, Marxism is the intellectual heir of Whig history. Similarly the triumphalist spirit of “The End of History” is a echo of Whig history.
On an other note;
Tokarev fails to take into consideration the externalization of cost. The bargain items we receive from China and others are cheap only because certain costs of production are borne outside of the finished product. The health and welfare of cheap labourers are taken care of by a foreign state. The same state absorbs the pollution caused by cheap production and the exploitation of natural resources in a manner that is hot healthy for local residents is also absorb by the local populace. Even the cheap transportation costs are absorb by an unregulated shipping industry staffed by Filipinos and polluting international waters. The dollar I pay for an item at a Dollarama represents only a portion of the true cost.
Report comment to moderator
READER
will these exploited kids benefit from a law that demands that they get paid as much as the American union workers and have their employers provide the same healthcare benefits, paid vacations, safe work environments, etc.?
Only if they produce a better more durable product so that consumers are willing to pay a higher price. Ironically the American union (and non-union) workers have the lowest pay and worst benefit package of most western countries. If Chinese workers manage to attain American worker style benefits, the Europeans could still have cheap consumer goods.
Whats missing from this discussion is the simple fact that the highly paid German worker produces a quality product that consumers around the world are willing to pay extra for. In fact Germany’s exports are at the same level as China’s. You don’t need to work for cheap to be successful.
Report comment to moderator
Fair Trade vs Free Trade
I rarely buy Fair Trade just to feel good but I will pay extra for a better more durable product. In the case of fair trade, the advantage in taste is sometimes lost in the roasting and brewing process. Similar to organic, fair trade is worth the extra if it is better tasting.
Report comment to moderator
Of course there is some value in learning the ropes, the difficult way of getting to the place where others have already arrived. Nothing comes from nothing; skill comes from observation and training. However much that applies to situations in which the immediate or collateral pain is bearable, it does not apply to all situations. When someone sits in a burning house, the fireman does not expect him to leanr how to quench fires first. The drowing person is not given swimming lessons. Workers in sweatshops need our business, but also our moral sentiment that this is no way to employ, pay and house our neighbor.
Development, education, learning the ropes is part of life, but so should be the moral outrage from Christians and other human beings who apply ‘one law to all’ about unacceptable labor conditions. Why did the church not respond to the Triangle Shirtwaist Company fire until Labor Unions alerted us to in the growing exploitation of people moving from the country into the factories of the 19th/20th centuries. The Company in NY was criminally guilty of exploiting the ignorance and dependence of female workers at the time.
Watch the film “The Last Train” and watch what economic insensitivity can do to the life of fellow human beings.
Report comment to moderator
devo, subSaharian Africa is not a country. could you provide data on how much of one of those countries GDP comes from coffee?
Report comment to moderator
HRW: “linear pre-destined course”, “pre-set pattern of development from hunting/gatherer to agriculture to feudal to exploitative industry to the sweet paradise of democratic capitalism”, “triumphalist spirit of “The End of History”???
either I’m missing something in this article or they’ve legalized marijuana in Canada
Report comment to moderator
and how were the health and pollution costs absorbed while were were growing from a subsistence level to a life of comfort when we can afford to care about those things?
Report comment to moderator
“Only if they produce a better more durable product so that consumers are willing to pay a higher price.”
are you saying now that the free market price (determined by consumer demand) is the fair price?
Report comment to moderator
I’m commenting on Tokarev’s view of history — it seems that he believes history follows a pre-set course of economic development. In other words, why must China et al go through a period similar to England in the 18th century and 19th century? Is this the only way? Is it predestined? Of course I was poking fun but its essentially a Whiggish view of history (the intellectual predecessors of Marxists in British historiography). You didn’t get the “The End of History” reference? A celebration of classical liberalism and capitalism, its author was celebrating a little too early. And ironically a very marxist view of history — economic determinism ending in not a worker’s paradise but democratic capitalism.
In southern Ontario marijuana laws are simply ignored but I happened to be on of the 70% of Canadians who don’t partake. (FYI 30% of Cdns do use marijuana at least once a year making Canada the highest users, by far, of marijuana in the OECD. Its a miracle anything ever gets done here)
Report comment to moderator
29
pre-industrial revolution, they simply weren’t present in large enough quantities. During the industrial revolution, external costs were absorbed by the general populace (except for the very wealthy who could move). Are you saying that economic development is only possible with external costs and its only a matter of deciding where and who will absorb these costs?
are you saying now that the free market price (determined by consumer demand) is the fair price?
I have no problem with market prices. What is fair depends on your definition. Mind you, market manipulation makes it difficult to accept price as a fair measure all the time.
Report comment to moderator
“Canada the highest users, by far, of marijuana in the OECD”
now I see why you are so peaceful, m.moore (his documentary spoof Bowling for Columbine) was wrong
Report comment to moderator
HRW, is it possible that you are guilty of whatever you accuse the author – skewed interpretation of reality?
it’s hard for me to see anything “predestined” in the commentary. is it the only way? who knows. the author seems to say that they are trying to “follow in our footsteps” because it worked for us.
if you or arcadia or conan have a better solution for the poverty of the third world, please don’t keep us and those poor sweatshop kids waiting
Report comment to moderator
#32
I’m saying that growth, like everything else, has trade-offs. Tokarev says something like that too: we made our choices in the past and reap the benefits now, others are trying to do the same today. shall we stop them?
Report comment to moderator
Udo, correct me if I’m wrong, but it seems that both you and Tokarev say “keep shopping at “Wal-Mart” only you add “keep feeling guilty about it”?
In other words, is “moral sentiment” enough or do you have a practical suggestion?
Report comment to moderator
“backbreaking toil that our forefathers went through so that we could enjoy the comforts of today”
does anyone disagree that in history toil precedes comfort?
does that make us Whiggish or Marxists
Report comment to moderator
I’m a strong believer in national borders and national sovereignty. I’m a citizen of the US (and that Heavenly kingdom), not a world citizen. Although I have sympathy for those in other countries, I don’t feel a responsibility for their poverty, which I didn’t create, and don’t have the ability or a moral obligation to take control of or cure. I don’t oppose shopping at Walmart, but the best thing I can do for the poor in other nations is to support Christian missionaries who will help educate the people and open the door for them to become citizens of the Heavenly kingdom. That will do more to improve the quality of their lives, and alleviate their poverty, than interfering in their government or trying to enforce oppressive trade arrangements or defending the abuses of foreign private companies.
I’m really more concerned about my own country, the US, which I do have a moral obligation to. I’m concerned that when you open up all borders in the name of trade, it won’t be long before government follows suit, especially when the government is as huge and bureaucratic as ours. It’s already happening with the US courts taking their cue in some cases from the World Court. We seem to be heading in the direction of a one world trade system under a one world government (loosely speaking). And it’s disturbing that there are so few Christian conservative leaders who will speak out against this.
Report comment to moderator
“heading in the direction of a one world trade system under a one world government”
Debra, isn’t that a pre-determined phase before the establishment of the Heavenly kingdom
Report comment to moderator
“when you open up all borders in the name of trade, it won’t be long before government follows suit, especially when the government is as huge and bureaucratic as ours”
perhaps the problem is not the opening of the borders for free movement of goods, capital, and people but the “huge and bureaucratic” government itself?
you can do something about it in 13 days, can’t you
Report comment to moderator
It may be inevitable, Reader, but my understanding of scripture indicates that it’s a negative thing, kind of like the blood up to a horses bridle in Megiddo. And, unlike Ahmadinejad, I don’t think we’re supposed to be actively bringing those things about, are we?
Report comment to moderator
you can do something about it in 13 days, can’t you
I have recently relocated to another state, and did not get here in time to register to vote this time. However, I have been talking to people about the tea-party endorsed candidate for my area. You don’t have to be registered to do that.
Report comment to moderator
41 I agree, unlike Ahmadinejad’s, ours is not salvation by works
Report comment to moderator
Interesting. I never thought of it like that. At first I though you were crazy but then I got your point. Still though, it seems silly to let people repeat mistakes that have already been learned from.
Report comment to moderator
what mistakes are you talking about? is there a short cut?
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!