Victory and idolatry
It is tempting during election seasons to think that politics is much more than it is. Especially when one party is poised to trounce the other, one side may feel the world is coming to an end while the other believes that good times will never end and could not get any better.
But elections are never that good or that bad. Politics is good because God gave us government for our good. But He did not give it for our sufficient good, or to provide for every good. Christians, more than anyone else, should tailor their hopes accordingly.
Excessive and misplaced hope takes two forms in times like these. One is almost millenarian in what it expects to enjoy on the other side of Election Day. We saw this in 2008. Many got so whipped up with enthusiasm for the unique candidacy of Barack Obama that when the poetry of the campaign turned into the prose of government, disillusionment set in like barium in the belly. Some of these true believers turned face, joined the Tea Party, and pursued a different kind of pure politics.
But there is also a kind of despair in politics that is the same excessive and misplaced hope, only jilted and embittered. I see it among Republicans who are migrating toward third parties. They have good reason to be down. They remember the thrill of promise when Ronald Reagan was elected president in 1980. That brought great accomplishments. Tax cuts have become the political default and the Soviet Union disappeared in a cloud of dust. But the culture war has been a colossal failure. (Cal Thomas and Ed Dobson observe this in Blinded By Might.) The battle line against abortion has become a fight against partial-birth abortion. Whereas in the 1970s we were fighting the toleration of homosexuality, we are now holding the fort against same-sex marriage. The struggle to restore recognition of a Christian consensus in America has become a rear guard action against creeping Sharia law. What have we gained from enormous expenditures of political energy?
A second hope emerged in 1994, when Newt Gingrich led 73 Republican freshmen into the House of Representatives glowing hot with zeal for limited government and citizen liberty. With that kind of patriot energy and brilliant leadership, surely we would see at least a generation of “American politics as it ought to be.” But in a short few years, the energy was spent and the warriors seduced by power.
Some take these experiences as an argument for third parties, but in the American political system they are a waste of time. Political parties are not churches. Parties are outcome based. They are for mobilizing and coordinating people for the sake of winning elections and, as best as possible, shaping the laws the way you would like to see them. In America, third parties are ill-suited to that.
Others draw from these experiences a justification for getting out of politics entirely and committing themselves exclusively to the life and work of the church: worshiping God in spirit and truth, instructing God’s people in biblical truth, calling them away from idols, turning their hearts toward Christ, and setting them loose on a world in need of redemption and love.
But though we should be actively involved in our churches, the political calling is nonetheless legitimate. The city of man is not the city of God, as Augustine teaches us, but the two cities are intermixed at every level until the Judgment Day. Citizens of the heavenly city serve alongside those of the earthly city not only at the fire hall, the bank, and the school, but also in government. Daniel served righteously in the king of Babylon’s court. Babylon was better for it, and would have been better still with two Daniels rather than one. But the godly would have been wrong to expect Babylon to become a New Jerusalem because of his position there.
When people allow themselves to get carried away by millenarian political fantasies, it is easy to become discouraged. Now we will recover our republican constitution! Now we will be a land of social justice! Now America will be free! American will be fair! But in a world of sages and fools and a relatively confused massive middle, politics is about incremental improvements and setbacks. Ed Feulner of The Heritage Foundation is fond of reminding political warriors that in Washington there are no permanent victories and there are no permanent defeats. Yet he works hard for what he believes is right, and he inspires others to do the same.
If your party is heading for crashing defeats this November, it is an occasion for critical self-assessment and appropriate course adjustments, not despair. If your party is riding a wave of popular support, enjoy your victory party, but don’t let it go to your head. Serve the Lord by serving the people and hold the new government accountable for the same.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top13 Comments to “Victory and idolatry”
As you say, political parties are not churches. Therefore, it is not a sin to switch.
After feeling like I have been used by the Republican Party for most of my adult life, I have become a Libertarian.
I have not seen any of my objectives met by supporting Republican candidates; I have seen the opposite, as you point out.
One reason that third parties are “a waste of time” is that everyone says that. We discourage each other from switching parties, but what if everyone who was tempted to join a third party did so? What if we all stopped voting for the lesser of two evils and sent a strong message of dissatisfaction to the two major parties?
Report comment to moderator
“But elections are never that good or that bad.”
They are when socialists like Obama and the present rot called the democrat party are put in power – it is “that bad”. It just plain is.
Report comment to moderator
I think I hear you saying that we tend to feel like things are the extreme when in fact they rarely are as final as we expect or assume them to be. God does in fact work all things together for His glory and our good. And, He uses His people, sometimes working on opposite sides, to accomplish it. Thus our solid hopes should never be in our earthly circumstances. After all, what is the worst thing that can happen? We all die and go to heaven? How could it be best that we create a moral, just, society if everyone is taken care of and no one feels like they need God? I’m not saying we shouldn’t work in that direction, but that we should not put our primary hope there.
Though some can’t see it, some deny it, some fight it, some ignore it, God never has and never will leave His Throne.
Report comment to moderator
Thoughtful post, but this sticks out:
Many got so whipped up with enthusiasm for the unique candidacy of Barack Obama that when the poetry of the campaign turned into the prose of government, disillusionment set in like barium in the belly. Some of these true believers turned face, joined the Tea Party, and pursued a different kind of pure politics.
Obama true believers became Tea Partiers? Name three.
Report comment to moderator
20-30 percent of Tea Party supporters voted for Barack Obama in 2008. See Rasmussen and Schoen, Mad As Hell: How the Tea Party Movement is Fundamentally Remaking our Two-Party System; p.28. They give slightly different figures on pages 8 and 11, but that’s the ballpark. I’m assuming that there were some “true believers” among them.
Report comment to moderator
Wow. Perhaps “true believer” needs some clarification in the Obama context. I see Obama as a liberal first, so true believers would be those favoring big government. Recent events may have demonstrated the “bankruptcy” of those ideas (get it?), but socialists have always been willfully ignorant of human nature, so I doubt many tea partiers started as “true believers” in this sense.
Maybe the true-believer-cum-tea-partiers were more racially sensitive. They said, “McCain’s a liberal. Obama’s a liberal. It would be really cool to elect a black President and, really, how bad can he be?” Christopher Buckley said essentially this.
Report comment to moderator
“But the culture war has been a colossal failure.”
And herein lies why the Republican and Conservatives can not hold onto the reins of power. Already the high water mark is passed. Why? You can not help but show your true intent. Had this Tea Party movement been simply about fiscal conservativism you would have what you need to really take and hold power – Independents – the Middle. But it has become apparent that this is a culture war add-on to your movement. Understandably, you can not hide who you really are for long. The culture is and has been a losing argument for you for decades but you keep trying to sneak it back in. The middle thinks of themselves as fiscally conservative but socially liberal. Sorry. This is a fact. If you could keep your church out of our government, our schools, and our bedrooms you might get somewhere long term. Enjoy the House, btw, it will be a great eyeopener for the middle that is for sure. Congratulations ahead of time.
Report comment to moderator
KYLE A (1): After feeling like I have been used by the Republican Party for most of my adult life, I have become a Libertarian.
Frank: 1. Have you read any of (the recently deceased) Joseph Sobran? At the forefront of my mind currently is his essay “The Reluctant Anarchist” from Dec. 2002.
2. How about theonomist/reconstructionist theologian Greg Bahnsen? A genuinely gifted mind. He popularized (in a manner of speaking) the “transcendental argument for God,” most notably in his 1985 debate with atheist Gordon Stein re. the existence of God. People still talk about it today.
But the reason I mention Bahnsen is to share one of my favorite observations from him, re. the necessity for a Christian libertarianism:
… /link FAIL!
Report comment to moderator
Devo,
I agree. The electoral center is right-leaning on fiscal issues and left-leaning on social issues. Obama lost the center because of his economic policies. But if the resurgent GOP wants to hold onto the center, they’d better not start pandering again to the Religious Right on issues like abortion, gay rights, and creationism.
Report comment to moderator
Amongst truth seeking peoples, I think there has been a small, but significant distinction overlooked: the difference between republican students, and republican families.
The republican family has a clear and ordered form of liberty; but for the christian student who no longer lives at home, nor has their own family, (as trivial as this may sound) it can be difficult to know where to begin.
Should the student seeking to live a life of integrity reguard sucess and/or individual performance as that which is most important in the fight for American liberty? If not, then what is the best and right way to love and serve God by serving others?
Report comment to moderator
Eliza may not look at this again, since it’s been 4 days, but I think one of the ways Christian singles can fight for American liberty is to be successful, as you said, and then use that success to supplant the entitlement system of our HUGE government by being charitable with your income and time as you see fit. Let people in your circle, which usually isn’t the social circle of Christian (you said Republican and I’m not sure that’s what you really mean)families see how justice and charity can be done without monthly checks to people who have gamed the system. You decide who and how you want to help people. That drives the BIG government people crazy.
Report comment to moderator
My point of view on the campaign and switching is not bad. I mean everyone has there own opinion and they will have different opinions each time. It doesn’t matter what party you are in. God works his glory in every way. Not everyone is going to be on the same side, ones will be on either side and that’s ok because God made everyone different.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!