After the fall
The cynic in me says that Democrats will learn nothing from the midterm election. They not only took a bath, they were effectively water-boarded by voters.
Democrats lost the House by a margin not seen since 1948. They lost 10 governorships while retaining two—New York and California. Both states are insolvent and can be expected to ask for bailouts from the federal government, something a Republican House is unlikely to grant. Republicans will get to redistrict most states in ways favorable to them for at least the next decade. Nancy Pelosi will step down as speaker, though Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid managed to survive a nose-holding election in Nevada.
While Democrats have complained about lack of cooperation from Republicans in enacting President Obama’s agenda, don’t look for them to show the way by cooperating with Republicans. The GOP has swept solidly into the House on a wave of voter anger at the elitism and condescension shown by so many Democrats and their big media allies who think the public is stupid because a majority do not agree with the notion of government as savior. Democrats aren’t in a cooperating mood, as they usually aren’t when they lose. And make no mistake they’ve lost big. By every measuring stick—governorships, legislatures, independents, women—Democrats have lost. Republicans would be crazy to water down what clearly is a mandate to stop the Obama-Reid-Pelosi liberal agenda.
I expect congressional Democrats, in collusion with the White House, to attempt to maneuver Republicans into another government shutdown. It worked before, and since Democrats have not had a new idea in years—or even a good, old idea—all they know is class warfare, entitlement, and grievance.
At his post-election news conference Wednesday, President Obama said many of the things he thought people wanted to hear—common ground, consensus, working together—but he steadfastly and perhaps understandably would not cede any territory on his administration’s core policies, especially national health insurance. Newly empowered Republicans aren’t likely to compromise, since that usually means they are the only ones doing the compromising, which in the past has led to disgust by Republican voters who don’t want watered-down conservatism, but spending reductions and smaller government.
Don’t look for President Obama or the Democrats who survived the carnage to admit their policies were wrong, or that they misjudged the public. After so many in the leadership denigrated voters as being insufficiently enthusiastic about all government was attempting to do for them and questioning the smarts and the sanity of those ingrates who don’t agree with their policies, I wouldn’t expect such people to have a change of heart or mind. That is especially so since the mainstream media can be relied upon to question every Republican effort to reverse the policies and spending initiatives of the last two years.
For Republicans, the challenge is to maintain their “purity” in an environment that is the political equivalent of a brothel. Both Sens.-elect Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Joe Manchin, D-WVa., said in their victory statements that Washington is broken and they are going there to fix it. That reminds me of an old lyric: “It seems to me I’ve heard that song before. It’s from an old familiar score. I know it well, that melody.” A little more than two years ago, outgoing (thankfully) Speaker Nancy Pelosi pledged to “drain the swamp” that is Washington. Instead she built a hot tub. It’s difficult to change Washington. More often, Washington transforms the reformers. It’s the political equivalent of Prohibition. Maybe this bunch will avoid the “speakeasy.” Maybe.
© 2010 Tribune Media Services Inc.
See WORLD’s interactive national map for complete election results from across the country.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top27 Comments to “After the fall”
“It’s difficult to change Washington. More often, Washington transforms the reformers.”
Last July, while waiting for the 4th parade to start, I talked briefly with Jeff Miller who was running for Congress vice Shuler. I said, “When you get to Washington you have to be careful not to get “Potomac Fever”. You get to Washington, get invited to C-Span, then Larry King, then to “Washington Week”, and you start moderating so that you don’t have to explain being so radical.” He said, “I doubt that I’ll be there that long.” I hope they can do the job they were elected to do. Then go home.
Jeff lost, BTW.
Report comment to moderator
None of you remember, but Lindsey Graham was once a congressman from Northwestern, SC. He was a great congressman. Then he was elected to the Senate and became powerful.
It happens to the best of them.
Report comment to moderator
“The cynic in me says that Democrats will learn nothing from the midterm election.”
Agreed. But the cynic me also says that the Republicans will learn nothing from the midterm election.
I also think both sides underestimate the electorate. We knew exactly who to blame this time, and we’ll know who are the real obstructionists the next time around, too. If the Rs have learned something, then they will persist in trying to do what the people want even while they are being vilified by the Dems, and they should make it more public. There will be no more back and forth. They have to fight the MSM, too.
Report comment to moderator
It may be difficult to change Washington, but these idiots better be assured and had better figure it out that The People will change them one way or the other.
Report comment to moderator
#2
Chas he is the man Rush calls Lindsey Grahamnesty.
Report comment to moderator
Democrats didn’t retain the governorship in California–they gained it.
Report comment to moderator
What’s a “nose-holding election?”
Report comment to moderator
They also kept the governorship here in Arkansas
Report comment to moderator
What an innocent Kara is.
Schwarzenegger is a RINO.
Report comment to moderator
Schwartzenegger married a Kennedy.
Report comment to moderator
Cal really hit the nail on the head. Wonderful post. The only point of contention is where he said,
“For Republicans, the challenge is to maintain their “purity” in an environment that is the political equivalent of a brothel.”
Report comment to moderator
NJLawyer: I’m actually serious!
) Does it mean an election that’s a real stinker? Does it mean something else altogether? I’ve just never heard that term before and since I didn’t hear anything about the Reid election results beyond the fact that he won I’m sort of at a loss. What does it mean?
Report comment to moderator
The people who voted Tuesday took the foot off the accelerator and stomped the brakes. The brakes promise to stop, true and sure. God save the king.
The people who vote in 2012 will be tired of sitting in a stopped car and eager to roll. I think they will take the foot off the brake and push down on the gas pedal. Long live the king.
Meanwhile, people don’t expect a gas pedal to stop the car. They believe the brakes should do that all by themselves. The job of stopping government belongs to Republicans. The job of making progress belongs to Democrats.
Report comment to moderator
The job of stopping government belongs to Republicans.
I wish!
Report comment to moderator
Great, great article, Cal!!
Report comment to moderator
Government spending is like unexplained sudden acceleration. It’s got to be in the Washington software. One of yesterday’s first cable news discussion points was whether the Republicans will vote to raise the dept ceiling. Glad to see the lack of Republican triumphalism on this blog. Democrats take notice.
Report comment to moderator
Making PROGRESS would mean cutting spending, and I expect the Rs to do that. Making PROGRESS would mean repealing what needs to be repealed in that healthcare bill.
The Rs don’t have to necessarily succeed — but they do have to try.
Report comment to moderator
I hope that the newly elected Republicans do what the people want. I’m not holding my breath, but I retain a bit of hope. They already lost my confidence, and I expect this could be their last chance for decades to come if they mess up.
Report comment to moderator
I don’t see the people going back to the Dems, though. They’ve had enough. They’ll go so far to the right, Obama will be completely gray.
Report comment to moderator
#19 NJL I don’t think so. I think the next two years will be nastier than in 2007-2008 with the most viscous smear campaigns in history. And Republicans have no viable presidential candidates and no real leaders at the moment.
No politician has the guts to cut spending and so the Republican wave will have accomplished nothing other than to keep Obama locked up. That’s good enough for me, but the press will have a field day.
Report comment to moderator
If the Republicans (or anyone else) actually had some guts they would tackle energy, security and would revise the draconian and chaotic tax code. Hopefully they can pry our health care out of the jaws of the IRS. It’s a long shot.
Report comment to moderator
Good article Mr. Thomas. I agree.
I just hope we didn’t vote for any RINOs.
And I can’t believe Murkowski won after losing in the Primary election. The people who ran independent after losing the Primary showed their true colors. Will she change to Dem. now that she has won?
Report comment to moderator
Xion, the Dems certainly have followers in my town. Those people and the other blue area of NJ (see House map) are wealthy, and I mean wealthy! In my town, there is no comprehension that those who don’t have are losing everything they did have. They don’t have to worry about the cost of anything, so they have no problem with higher taxes. What they don’t realize is that the property taxes will be sending the people they want farther out. We have a lot of old houses here, and we rely on the train to bring in the NY commuters, but that won’t always be so. They are killing this town and they don’t know it.
Report comment to moderator
Kara, a “nose-holding” election means you are choosing the lesser of how many evils. You don’t really want to vote for a candidate, but you have to vote for someone to stop the crazy other side, so you hold your nose (because what you are doing smells bad) and cast your vote.
Report comment to moderator
NJL: See, here’s your logical gap.
If the Rs have learned something, then they will persist in trying to do what the people want even while they are being vilified by the Dems, and they should make it more public.
Those Dems were also sent to Congress by THE PEOPLE, and represent constituencies who do not want what you want. The power balance in Congress can shift with each election cycle, and at various points in time one party or other may be in the majority, but it’s narcissistic for anyone to conflate their personal political leanings with “the people.”
“The people” did not en masse reject Obama/Democrats and send Republicans to Congress to put a stop to it. SOME people in some electoral districts did, and some people in other electoral districts sent Democrats back.
“The people” are not a monolithic bloc with one will. That’s why we have a Congress and not a King, so that the wills, plural, of the people can be acted upon with no one side gaining too much power.
I actually think it’s better to have a Congress and a White House of opposing parties, so that the checks and balances remain in place. Even when one party dominates both branches, the opposing party should have a strong enough minority to curb excesses.
The will of the people is almost never as neat and uniform as you pretend here.
Report comment to moderator
Now is the time for a ‘re-education’ camp first for Republicans, and, well, all of Congress… .
I do suggest that the text needs to be Princeton President Samuel Stanhope Smith’s ‘Lectures on Moral and Politcal Philosophy, Vol. 2′. (1812)
Some choice quotes:
“Another, and important mean, for the prevention of crimes in a community, consists in the protection and encouragement given to religion.…….”The christian religion adds principle to ceremony…Pp.226-228.
On the Judiciary:
“As they have no power to frame, they have no privilege to modify the law. This restriction is a necessary result of the separation of the judicial from the legislative power.Pp. 232-233.
On Trade imbalance:
“In the interaction between nations, there will generally arise in the settlement of their accounts at the close of each year, a balance due from one to another.
An unfavorable balance due to one nation must be compensated by a favorable one received from some other; otherwise the specie, which supplies the channels of its trade, would, in time, be drained from the country, and a stagnation in business ensue.” Pp. 345-346.
Does this last one sound familiar?
Any thoughts?
Report comment to moderator
Gee, is Musing back?
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!