GOP, Obama struggle to find common ground
Barely an hour after President Barack Obama invited congressional Republicans to post-election talks to work together on major issues, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell on Thursday expressed his commitment to stand firm on repealing or replacing Obama’s healthcare law, cutting spending, and shrinking government.
“The only way to do all these things is to put someone in the White House who won’t veto any of these things,” McConnell said in a speech to The Heritage Foundation.
After Tuesday’s elections resulted in a new GOP-controlled House and Republican gains in the Senate, Obama proposed a meeting with congressional leaders of both parties on Nov. 18 about how to make Washington work better.
But McConnell indicated that “if the administrations wants cooperation, it will have to begin to move in our direction.”
McConnell called for GOP senators and representatives to work to repeal Obama’s healthcare law by denying funds for implementation and voting against its most egregious provisions.
He was unapologetic for the unified resistance of the Republican Party to Obama initiatives over the past two years, saying that the party was opposing policies they believed were harmful and “gave voters a real choice on Election Day.”
Obama and Republican leaders did signal they might reach accords on a few issues, such as energy. Obama has abandoned his proposed cap-and-trade system for trying to reduce greenhouse gases, which Republicans sharply opposed. But he said the two parties might reach compromises on other fronts, such as promoting electric cars, nuclear power, energy efficiency, and “energy independence.”
Obama said there should be bipartisan agreement on a plan to give businesses a tax break by letting them accelerate the depreciation of some equipment.
But the array of Republican and Democratic post-election news conferences Wednesday gave virtually no hint about how Obama and the next Congress might tackle major issues such as immigration or Medicare’s long-term viability.
Leaders in both parties talked about cutting spending. But there was barely a word about cutting big programs that consume so much of the federal budget, such as Social Security, Medicare, and the military.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top24 Comments to “GOP, Obama struggle to find common ground”
The Rs should take a hard look at everything and make proposals whether the WH or the Dems in the Senate go along with it or not. And if they don’t, then they just aren’t serious about listening to the people.
When I read this: “The only way to do all these things is to put someone in the White House who won’t veto any of these things,”
I am convinced that the Rs haven’t learned a thing. We don’t have two years, and if they do nothing, they won’t get an R president. Introduce the bills — even if they fail, introduce them — or I won’t take them seriously.
Report comment to moderator
NJLawyer – I saw it different, I saw they were saying what every we pass will face a veto. So the American People should be ready for that.
Report comment to moderator
I don’t care if Obama vetoes a bill. At least it was presented. And if he vetoes a bill The People want, it’s on HIM, not the Rs.
If the Rs want the WH in two years, they’d better earn it NOW. Try and fail — that’s fine. But not try? — that’s not fine.
As far as I am concerned, all of them are on trial. They have two years to present their case, and then they get a verdict.
Report comment to moderator
the House can do two things:
Pass a bill.
Defund operations.
That’s all we expect them to do.
Report comment to moderator
“But McConnell indicated that “if the administration wants cooperation, it will have to begin to move in our direction.”
That sounds like “Do it our way or else.” In actuality what McConnell was saying is “Do what the American people want or else:
Chas — you’re right, but I would add “and be public about it.” Make sure the people know what’s being done and don’t let the Dems and Obama have the upper hand through the media.
Report comment to moderator
I fear you may be right NJLawyer, but I hope he meant that if the Dems don’t come to some compromise, nothing can happen until the white house and senate change. You are right, they need to promote and pass good ideas in the house and make the Dems give them something substantial before compromise. And no passing things without reading them.
Report comment to moderator
“The people” elected Obama too, and I think it’s pretty darn arrogant of you all to pretend conservatives speak for “the people” and Democrats don’t. Every Democrat in office, including the president, was elected by the people as much as every Republican.
Report comment to moderator
Xion quoting McConnell: ““When the administration agrees with the American people, we will agree with the administration. When it disagrees with the American people, we won’t. This has been our posture from the beginning of this administration.”
I’m one of the American people, Xion. I don’t agree with McConnell. Where do you get off thinking you and your side are “the American people?” What are the rest of us, Martians?
Report comment to moderator
True Conan, but what I hear now is that many who voted for Obama didn’t get what they expected.
Report comment to moderator
That’s true FuzzyFace, but it’s because he’s not as done as much as we’d like, not because we like the conservative agenda better. If Obama voters had wanted a more conservative president they’d have voted for McCain.
Dissatisfaction with Obama, even when it’s severe enough to cause someone to not vote for a Democrat this time, doesn’t equal support for Republicans.
It’s funny how the same people who have been complaining about Obama’s unwillingness to compromise are now demanding that the Republicans refuse to compromise.
Report comment to moderator
But you should at least concede that it means that they think that Obama is going in the wrong direction, otherwise they would have voted more Democratic.
Report comment to moderator
Fuzzyface answered the point well Conan. McConnell isn’t saying who is or isn’t American but what their message is to Washington. The American majority spoke in 2008 and in 2010.
In 2008 they voted for hope and change. In 2010 they rejected the kind of change they were getting, namely change for the worse.
Report comment to moderator
Certainly it means some think Obama is going in the wrong direction. But many don’t. How many of the races that Republicans won were in places that usually vote for Republicans? A good number. The number of actual Republican defeats of Democratic incumbents was smaller, and the vote margins were generally pretty slim.
You won a lot of local races, but there’s nothing about it that suggests the whole country has turned against the Democratic agenda.
Report comment to moderator
“…promoting electric cars, nuclear power, energy efficiency, and “energy independence.”
That just means higher taxes and more spending.
People can’t afford ELECTRIC CARS.
It’s the economy! People need jobs!
Just because a bunch of RICH kids want Obama to fix the planet NOW. They don’t have a clue about money because their parents have always paid their way.
ONLY the RICH KIDS can afford to buy electric cars.
Pretty soon there will be plenty of jobs but no one will be able to afford to get there.
Here they raised the rates on mass transit and cut back on available routes.
Report comment to moderator
I find it interesting that Republicans who crossed over to vote with the Dems were called MAVERICKS or BiPartisan. When what they really were were RINOs.
Now when they get caught crossing over they have to change their party affiliation.
And what’s with the Independents who vote with Dems. Why aren’t they just Dems?
We are NOW finding out that when we vote we don’t necessarily get who we vote for. It could be a win-win for the Dems when your choices are a RINO or a Dem.
It’s going to be an interesting two years to 2012.
Especially since Obama’s moves here on out are him running for his 2012 election. Expect a LOT of cuts to the Republicans–more of the same. “I am trying to do stuff for the “middle class”, the Reps are the party of no.”
Report comment to moderator
I don’t know how to tell you this, Conan, but The People just UNELECTED him. They expect him to do their bidding, and they are unhappy. So, no, his view of business as usual should not prevail.
Report comment to moderator
There will be ZERO progress on the economy and employment between now and the next Presidential election. The GOP has made it abundantly clear that they are more interested in political points than anything that actually might create jobs or improve the economy. From Day One of the Obama Administration the GOP has made it clear that their #1 priority is to make sure he FAILS, and Mitch McConnell’s recent remarks indicate that this is not going to change for the next two years. Get used to it.
Report comment to moderator
Let see the Nation did not want Obama Care, but did he listen? No
The Nation did not want Obama Bail Out of Union’s and Stimulus Monet did he listen? No
The Nation does not want Obama cap and trade will that stop him? No
Etc. Why? Obama does not care about the Nation, He only cares about the Union’s that funnel money into his election action, He only care about the Abortions Companies that funnel money into his election action, etc.
Report comment to moderator
Let see has Obama and the Dem Leadership the last two years even try to work with the Republicans? The answer is no, they made sure every Major Bill that was brought up for a vote in the House, was done in such a way that Republicans could not offer any amendments. Why should it change now? Obama and the Dem Leadership will not look to work with the Republicans, they will demand the Republicans to pass what they want.
The State Run Media will present it as the Republican being the ones who do not want to work of Obama and the Dem Leadership. When it is the other way around.
Report comment to moderator
NJLawyer: I don’t know how to tell you this, Conan, but The People just UNELECTED him.
I know this bit of fantasy is appealing to you, but it doesn’t fly. In some House districts, majorities of varying margins elected Republicans to oppose him. In other House districts, and in many Senate elections, they voted for Democrats.
Obama himself wasn’t on the ballot. Whether he will survive his next election is a question for the future. But do not mistake this as a widespread rejection of Obama or Democrats — it was not.
Report comment to moderator
I believe the Republican Leadership will present strong ideas that will help the economy and employment between now and the next Presidential election. Obama and the Dem Leadership will present strong ideas that will help the Unions and Special Interested and weaken the economy and employment between now and the next Presidential election.
The reason so Obama and the Dem Leadership can blame the Republican Leadership for all the economy and employment issues. The State Run Media will follow Obama and the Dem Leadership lead an blame the Republican Leadership.
Report comment to moderator
PA – went Republican
OH – Went Republican
Wis – Went Republican
Mich – Went Republican
+ 25 other Governor Offices are Republicans
So yeah we know the Nation did not shift to the Republicans but still want the Obama and the Dem to push their ideas.
Report comment to moderator
Conan,
Many businesses, when they saw the huge spending by the Dems, were afraid to hire, so many believe that the ’stimulus’ bill actually caused employment to decrease. If the Feds quit the horrendous spending the economy will probably quickly pick up. (unless they put a boatload of new regulations on like they did to the drillers in the gulf. The problem in the gulf was not the need for more regulation, it was the feds not enforcing the existing ones.)
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!