Obama sets bipartisan talks
President Barack Obama sought Thursday to retake the political initiative after a bruising election, inviting Republican and Democratic congressional leaders for talks and challenging his Cabinet to make Washington work better.
The Nov. 18 meeting will be closely watched, in particular, for any signs of elusive progress between Obama and his two frequent Republican antagonists, incoming House Speaker-in-Waiting John Boehner and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell. They will be joined by the top Democrats in Congress, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.
Four other lawmakers will join the meeting: Republicans Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia and Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl, and Democrats Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland and Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin.
White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said he expects the meeting to be the first of many.
Tuesday’s elections amounted to a national political reset, shifting control of the House to Republicans when the new Congress convenes early next year.
The president said he wants the bipartisan meeting with congressional leaders to be a substantive discussion on the economy, tax cuts, and unemployment insurance. He wants to focus on the busy legislative agenda that awaits Congress when lawmakers return for a lame-duck session. Among the top front-burner issues: renewing Bush-era tax cuts due to expire at year’s end.
Aware that he’s been pegged as antibusiness, Obama said he wants to provide both businesses and middle class families with some certainty about what their tax landscape will look like.
Gibbs said Thursday that while extending tax cuts permanently for upper income earners “is something the president does not believe is a good idea,” Obama would be open to the possibility of extending the cuts for one or two years.
Obama also said the work that needs to be done during this month’s legislative session extends to foreign policy. Specifically, he said, the Senate should ratify a new arms control treaty with Russia to cut both countries’ nuclear arsenals by one-fourth.
The Associated Press contributed to this report.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top19 Comments to “Obama sets bipartisan talks”
to the Republican party do not trust him. Learn from your past mistakes… He is a Far left Dem, which means you can not trust him..
I remind the republican leadership go back an watch the meeting that took place on Obama Care… An look hoow you were treated,
This man has not changed, he is going to act the same way.
Report comment to moderator
Then McConnell and Boehner have to come out of that meeting and say just that and not pussyfoot around. Politely but firmly say the people sent message X and Obama and Co. wants to do Y.
Report comment to moderator
“Aware that he’s been pegged as antibusiness, Obama said he wants to provide both businesses and middle class families with some certainty about what their tax landscape will look like.”
That’s good! Finally! That is exactly what the country needs is a little bit of certainty that the government won’t drastically change the economy.
However, he has not been mischaracterized, as he says. He views corporations as the bad guy as most liberals do. Profit is the stuff of greed and wealth is considered ill gotten. His agenda is to achieve “fairness” by redistributed wealth according to skin color and union membership. That is Obama’s world.
To Obama, the word “bipartisan” means his way or the highway. Compromise means Republicans giving in. Otherwise he will continue his campaign of demagoguery and ridicule. He only has one operating mode.
The president should always be given the benefit of the doubt. We’ll give hope a chance, even though it is probably a ruse.
Report comment to moderator
Any wagers on whether or not he will bow to the Republicans and apologize for his treatment of them before the election?
Report comment to moderator
AAAAAAaaaaaahhh……. So the President is willing to extend a political “olive branch” to his enemies huh? Well, in the words of Michelle Malkin, he can take his disengenuous hand in friendship and SHOVE IT!
Sound familiar, Mr. President?
Report comment to moderator
Here’s to hoping for the best, but preparing for the worst.
Our nation sure is in a pickle. It seems to me that we have two parties that are more interested in power than in people. Everything is couched in how it will effect their standing with their base, and if it will gain Independant’s. I would love to see these people REALLY put ideology aside, agree that 2 plus 2 equals 4, and make America proud.
Hoping for the best, but…
Report comment to moderator
“ Politely but firmly say the people sent message X and Obama and Co. wants to do Y.” – NJLawyer
Or…Boehner could just say to the President, “We just had an election. We won.”
Report comment to moderator
When the steamroller operator hits a roadblock, he just stops and says “I’m willing to listen to the newly-Republican house majority”.
Yeah, sure; when pigs fly.
Report comment to moderator
Here is how the meeting will go.
Obama – welcome everyone. I want to say to the Republicans, you won a the House. But lets be clear, I have the Senate and the White House. You will do as I tell you, or I will let the State Run Media lose on you. If you even thing about repealing healthcare, I will let my people lose on you, If you think about extending Bush’s tax’s credit, I will let my people lose on you.
Now lets talk about where we can find common ground. The common ground is this you won the house and I I have the Senate and the White House. You will do as I tell you.
Is that clear?
Report comment to moderator
Republicans – but, but, but
Obama – I did not give you permission to speak, all I want to hear from you is, yes sir, I will listen.
Republicans – but, but, but
Obama gets up an walks out, goes to the press room an tell the American People, “I will work with the Republicans as long as they are willing, but I fear that big money, oil, health care, has a louder voice to them, then I do. It will be a hard 2 years, fight back the evil of the past.”
Report comment to moderator
The left and the State Run Media, will sing Obama praises. An talks about what a strong leader he is to stand up against those people.
Report comment to moderator
With these guys, talk is very expensive.
Report comment to moderator
Or…Boehner could just say to the President, “We just had an election. We won.”
Funny thing though … we had an election in 2008 too. Obama won. And the Party of No promptly responded with two years of obstructionism, character assassination and distorted claims.
Now the Republicans have taken majority in the House (though not the Senate) and because some Republicans won some local elections, you expect Obama to bow before them and do their bidding.
That is the Republican idea of compromise all right.
Report comment to moderator
Conan,
With the people of America so dissatisfied with what the Dems got past the ‘Republican obstructionism’, think how livid they would have been if the Republicans hadn’t slowed them down at least a little.
Report comment to moderator
FuzzyFace: No sir. SOME of the people of America oppose the Democratic agenda. A lot of us support it.
Republicans won some local elections, enough to take the majority in one house of Congress. That does not signal that “the people of America” en masse reject Democrats. Republicans, although they use the phrase incessantly, do not speak for “the American people” … just for some of them.
The right has been yammering for two years about Obama allegedly refusing to compromise, and as soon as the public mood shows the tiniest shift, the right starts demanding that Obama and Democrats in Congress darn well better do what the Republicans want.
Report comment to moderator
Right Conan, thats why his approval ratings are so good.
Report comment to moderator
This is a good opportunity. The D’s the presidency and the R’s have just won a big victory. Both can now do what is best for the country because if things get better both can take the credit.
Report comment to moderator
Regarding approval ratings: Obama is doing much better than Ronald Reagan was at this point in his presidency and slightly better than Bill Clinton. Reagan and Clinton both went on to be successful and popular two-term presidents.
Meanwhile, Obama is doing worse at this point than George H.W. Bush and Jimmy Carter were, and then went on to become failed one-termers.
So it really doesn’t mean a lot. Approval ratings are just a snapshot in time and can change quickly.
http://people-press.org/report/668/
Report comment to moderator
OBAMA wants to keep Republicans talking so they won’t do anything he doesn’t want them to do.
Obama always has a plan, and it isn’t to do ANYTHING the Republicans want to do. He will keep REP. from doing anything and then say they did nothing.
“I vetoed it because it wasn’t good for the country.”
His plan from this day forward has to do with his 2012 election.
Republicans want to give money to the rich says Obama. (While Obama gives money to Muslim countries and plenty of rich people.)
People who vote DEM don’t seem to realize that Dems are rich and have LOTS of rich friends.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!