Our puzzling race problem
The issue of race preoccupies Americans. Of course, it comes from the continuing burden of the injustice that predates our founding. This preoccupation was evident once again in the constitutionally mandated 2010 census, the results of which the U.S. Census Bureau reported just before Christmas. When the results are fully published, we will know how many of us are white, how many are black, how many are white non-Hispanic as opposed to Hispanic, who is up and who is down.
The 1790 census distinguished only among free whites, other free persons, and slaves. The first recognition in the census of a race other than “white” and “black” was in 1870 when “Chinese,” by which the bureau meant Asians in general, and American Indians could identify themselves in these ways. The first time the word “race” appeared was in 1890. The 1930 census instructed persons of complex racial background to identify themselves by their predominant non-white lineage. The 2000 census allowed people for the first time to indicate multiple categories for racial identity, though I did not notice that option on the 2010 version. Surprisingly few people made use of the “two or more races” choice, designating themselves as “White,” “Black or African American,” or other such broad visible differences.
But what we call “race” is a vague and thus questionable basis for identifying people. A race is, after all, only an extended family that reaches far beyond one’s immediate family, community, or clan. As descendents of Adam, we are all part of the same universal family, and thus one “human race.” The census calls me “white,” but for the Census Bureau that category includes everyone from Swedes to Southern Italians, and even Arabs. But I am a Scot, so I am racially Celtic (as are the Irish, the Welsh, and the Bretons of northern France). We are racially distinct from the English, the French, and the Germans. The same significant distinctions exist among Africans, Asians, and people of other regions.
Not only are racial groups much narrower and more numerous than people often think, they are also increasingly hard to identify in people. In an ethnic melting pot like the United States, most people are of mixed ancestry. Golfer Tiger Woods is Chinese, Thai, African, and Dutch. So what is he? He’s Tiger! In my church, we have families that combine Caribbean and Italian, Jewish and Italian, Jewish and Chinese, Chinese and Korean. But this has always been the way of the world. Because of migration over the centuries and the conquest of one people by another, we are all a Heinz 57 of one kind or another. Look at me. I’m almost all Scot, but that makes me a mixture of Pict, Irish, Viking, and who knows what else. Even so, most people in the United States, regardless of their racial mix, just think of themselves as Americans or, say, Iowans, Michiganders, Vermonters, or Texans.
But this question of race on the census, like our general obsession with the matter, has always been political, not biological. But unlike this merely human society, the Kingdom of God brings a new kind of politics, or at least it should.
The apostle Paul, speaking of how Christ had united Jews and Gentiles in His church, wrote:
“His purpose was to create in himself one new humanity out of the two, thus making peace, and in one body to reconcile both of them to God through the cross, by which he put to death their hostility” (Ephesians 2:15-16 NIV).
A Christian’s identity is primarily in Christ, not race. God calls Christians of every race to love one another. This means, among other things, recognizing each other as brothers and sisters who are “born again” into a family that will last for eternity. Even in our natural families, one child may be darker-skinned than the others. One child may have straight hair whereas the others have curls. But the children are happy to be what they are without ever scornfully dividing the family over those differences. God calls His church to live in this way. Paul told the mixed church in Galatia:
“. . . you are all sons of God, through faith. For as many of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ. There is neither Jew nor Greek . . . for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:26-28).
And he calls all people—every nation, race, tribe, and language group—to unite in Christ’s church.
People think they can end racism through dialogue, legal mandates, or by just getting to know each other better. But the tensions and even the overt injustices remain with us because the problem is not fundamentally political. It grows out of the sinful human heart. Only sin could make such a big deal out of such nonsense. Only Christ can break the power of sin. Ultimately, the problem will recede only as the knowledge of God in Christ comes to cover the earth as the waters cover the sea (Habakkuk 2:14), and as the church of Christ comes to resemble her Lord in the beauty of His holiness.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top52 Comments to “Our puzzling race problem”
When a people lose the vantage point of faith and have little to no spiritual rootage, then the superficial and physical aspects of our fellow organisms begin to define us and take on obsessive proportions in our minds.
Report comment to moderator
I hoped that by not filling in the “race” question on the last two Census questionnaires, perhaps the govt would get beyond classifying us according to skin color. But it’s still extremely important to someone in charge somewhere to determine where to send money based on a predominance of one “race” or another in a certain zip code. When a Census worker called to try to coax out of me what “race” I was, I would only answer, “human.”
When will we as a nation and individuals get beyond caring what skin color or eye shape someone has? I’ve never cared and thus am continually surprised when I see that others do. Certainly as the followers of Christ, we should believe that God created Adam and Eve and we are all his descendants (just as He said He did). If you believe in evolution, then you can pretend that there are differences between us.
It’s just an excuse for demagoguery as even scientifically we’ve proven to be of one race.
Report comment to moderator
Deconstruct the category of “race” all you want, Mr. Innes, it’s the X-factor that still correlates with the most significant points of identification in American society and politics.
It’s all the Samaritan’s fault, of course, due to their inferior culture. They suffer no discrimination, just the self-inflicted privations and damages that result from their poor values.
Why these people created a culture that sucks so bad while Israel promulgated a model of righteousness, well that’s the mystery of evil. We’re absolutely certain that the relative social inferiority isn’t the result of racism. As for the only other obvious alternative explanation, we’re too clever to conclude they’re inferior. They picked a lousy culture, not because they’re inferior, but because the Democratic party foisted it on them.
Oops, so why were they too stupid not to fall for it?
No, gentle readers, this is not an argument for racism. It’s an accusation against our not so puzzling racism.
Report comment to moderator
Actually, we really won’t know how many are of any specific “race”; some people didn’t answer the question, and some of us listed our “race” as “human“.
Report comment to moderator
And gentle readers, evidence that Scroop Moth’s reading of the NT is anti-semitic.
Report comment to moderator
Had I died without Christ my race wouldnt matter. I and other lost people would be burnt to a black crispy critter in the enternal flames of hellish torment.
Now that I’m saved race doesnt matter.
If I see an attractive gal she is just that, an attractive gal. Her skin pigment is not a priority.
If Ive got to hire someone do do X, I want the most qualified person with extensive experience at X, graduated at the top of his/her class.
Race does not matter.
I refuse to let it matter.
The only way to achieve a culture where race doesnt matter is to go about your daily routines with a conscious decision for race not to matter.
Report comment to moderator
As Dr King and others of the old civil rights era demanded back then, I try to judge and be judged by the content of my character.
If you’re unwilling to have me in your house to play Texas Holdem I cannot reveal my bad character (ie until you sit down to play with me you wont know I cheat at the game).
Fellowship is fraught with risk and potential reward.
Report comment to moderator
If I see an attractive gal she is just that, an attractive gal. Her skin pigment is not a priority.
Spoken like a Southern planter in a brothel.
Report comment to moderator
Scroop, seriously?! Is that the only filter you use?
Report comment to moderator
“The issue of race preoccupies Americans.”
Sorry, but it doesn’t preoccupy me. It is a problem only for people who let it preoccupy them. The last paragraph of the essay I agree with.
Report comment to moderator
The issue of race preoccupies the left and the media.
This liberal pre-occumation is one of the aspects that Jonah Goldberg identified in his excellent well-documented book, “Liberal Fascism.”
Report comment to moderator
One poster in this thread thinks you, gentle evangelical reader, are sub-human.
Report comment to moderator
If I see an attractive gal she is just that, an attractive gal. Her skin pigment is not a priority.
Spoken like a Southern planter in a brothel.
Scroop- How long you gonna ride that train. That litany is getting real old real fast. As a southerner I know what race relations are like in the south and they are a whole heck of lot better than reported.
The Civil War ended over 150 years ago. Give it a rest.
Report comment to moderator
If that’s the case, KIM, stop the perverse racism of low expectations. You can’t give the writer a pass because he happens to be African American.
I agree with you that race relations in the South are not as some think. From my perspective, the people who have the least skin in the game of racial preoccupation are African Americans. Generally they simply don’t care what color you are. They would never make a point of telling you, either. SAWGUNNER, on the other hand, is the most race-invested African American I’ve encountered outside an Amerian Studies Department. Tis conservativism makes him so, obviously.
Report comment to moderator
I didn’t set the topic of this thread, either.
Report comment to moderator
#12 – Huh? But the Lord save me from secret sin.
Report comment to moderator
14. Scroop, my son football team (in the heart of Dixie) was about 50/50 black and white and the only people I heard mention race were black. I heard one black kid call another the “n” word and I heard a black mom threaten white coach’s “white A–” for making her son run a lap. However, for the most part we all got along great.
Report comment to moderator
Our family is German, English, Irish, Scot, Norwegian, Native American, Ethiopian, Mexican, a South American country I don’t choose to identify, and some other places. But we are just a family. What in the world. Who cares about this stuff?
Report comment to moderator
DC, that was perfect! Will you speak to Anthony for us?
Like many others here I put down the biblical answer on the census. There is only one race, the human race.
Report comment to moderator
Irish, Scandinavian, Spanish, Scottish, Inca, not sure if I want to take the time to find out where all my origins lie, it would take a lifetime to find out. I think I will stick with a second and fourth generation American who is considering to emigrate back to the “motherland.” Sadly this land of opportunity is losing the opportunity my ancestors came for.
Report comment to moderator
Scroop Moth, it was also spoken like President Obama’s father, apparently.
Report comment to moderator
True, KYLE A. He’s also a sorry example of a disappointing person.
And yes, racism isn’t the whole story, in either case. There’s a note in the language of compulsive and ostentatious sexism, too, doncha think?
Report comment to moderator
Regardless, KBELLS, with respect I don ‘t think these things set aside my theory. One can call a teammate the n word and threaten the coach’s white-a without caring much about color, I think, and one can care an awful lot about color without ever mentioning it. Nevertheless, I have to concede that absent a set of experiments at the U. Michigan Institute for Social Research, these are matters of impression.
Report comment to moderator
The Bible certainly doesn’t ignore the concept of “breed” which is what many people mean when they refer to the construct of “race.” You could even argue that it goes out of its way to stand by diversity, inclusion, and exclusion, rather than use neutrality of language. Chihuahuas and Bull Mastiffs are members of the same species, of course, but nobody gets all righteous against the American Kennel Club for issuing paper.
Perceptions are no less significant for being culturally determined, even if they are biologically arbitrary.
If family is important to conservatives, wherefore the belittlement of “only an extended family”?
Also onservatives violate their notion of “family” when they insist someone of mixed ancestry can’t choose an identity as African American, German American, Native American, etc. It’s disgusting how they denied Obama is cultural self-identity on grounds that he was “half” one and “half” another. That scornful meddling should have been called out for the racism that it is.
Report comment to moderator
Remove the concept of, AND the word, RACISM, and the liberals would be sorely lacking for any argument against those of differing political persuasion.
Also just consider how much the un-employment would rise if the “professional” race-baiters were to be deprived of their hellish craft!?
Report comment to moderator
I don’t think there’s anything ‘puzzling’ about the race problem in America at all. It’s primarily a scam perpetrated by those who want to use the power of government to gain power and/or enrich themselves by creating a virtue out of minority racism. Starving the Federal government would go a long way toward solving the problem.
Report comment to moderator
A “race problem” only exists in the minds of those who believe that humanity was once a big, happy family, and will be again when Jesus physically returns to Planet Earth.
But sure, let’s blame the government. For people who claim to represent ‘the salt of the earth’, you are very naive in regards to how they actually think.
You realize slavery existed in America less than a generation ago, right? The way some talk, you’d think it happened in the Triassic era.
Fresh wounds aren’t puzzling.
Report comment to moderator
All wounds stay fresh when you fund those who make a living picking at them.
Report comment to moderator
All this discussion over a matter that the Federal Government has no authority to pursue/rectify using the census!
The constitutional purpose of the Census is a head count for 1) the determining congressional representation, and 2) apportionment of direct taxes.
These issues have nothing whatsoever to do with
And it certainly has nothing whatsoever to do with the race of household members.
The only question the census has the Constitutional authority to ask us is, “How may people live here?”
Until informed citizens refuse to play the census “game” as it is currently presented to us, our federal masters will continue to exploit the issue of race in order to better lord it over us.
Report comment to moderator
Debra (28): All wounds stay fresh when you fund those who make a living picking at them.
Frank: Precisely.
Can you imagine what the feddle gubmint would do if, say, half of American households submitted Census forms that only reflected the number of people living there?
Norman Vincent Peale once noted, “Americans used to roar like lions for liberty. Now they bleat like sheep for security.”
For security, or their fair share of tax dollars, as facilitated by their participation in the US Census.
Report comment to moderator
If there’s no race but the human race, then there is no race problem, right?
Report comment to moderator
BOB DYLAN DOESNT BELIEVE YOU (27): You realize slavery existed in America less than a generation ago, right?
Frank: !!!
How long is “a generation” on your planet?!
Report comment to moderator
Frank,
We didn’t get a census form, so 2 census workers came knocking at my house with the long form. I wasn’t combative, but I plainly told them they didn’t need to know all that other information, and that there were only 2 in our household. They hemmed and hawed for 10 minutes or so trying to get more info–including race. I told them they could put down that there were 2 people of the ‘human’ race living here.
I despise this obsession with collecting information about race. It’s not productive and it’s unseemly for the government to be engaged in that kind of behavior. No good will come of it, I think.
Report comment to moderator
Speaking of slavery, it is not dead. Just a couple days ago, a friend and I were discussing a fellow who had come to our church a couple of years ago. He is a citizen of another country. One of his fellow countrymen lives up here and finds jobs for people. When the people come and take on the jobs, the employer often takes their papers. When that happens, the worker is without recourse when the employer stops giving the promised compensation. They cannot go elsewhere for work, they are fearful of going to the police. They are held in slavery. Partially self imposed. Our mutual friend had copies of his papers but it was still a long haul getting back to his homeland and family. This happens all over this country. Legal workers put into virtual slavery.
Report comment to moderator
FiS:
Whoops, I’ll admit my mistake. Spoken in the heat of the moment. But my point still stands.
Report comment to moderator
Bianca (31),
In theory. But the human heart is wicked above all things, and the Bible tells us that one of our sinful tendencies is to treat poorly those who don’t look, sound, worship, eat, dress (etc.) like us.
So in a manner of speaking, yes, there is a “race problem.”
But at root, the “race problem” is a sin problem.
And the sword of the civil magistrate is incompetent to deal generally with sin problems — apart from issues of fraud, theft or physical assault, of course.
So if I defraud this person or steal from that person or assault another, the civil magistrate is quite competent to try and punish me for those crimes.
They are not competent, OTOH, to coerce me to serve, hire or otherwise associate with minorities. My refusal to do so may very well be sinful, but it is not criminal.
In discussing the proper role of the civil magistrate, one thing we must do is clearly distinguish crimes from sins.
Report comment to moderator
#31 Bianca “If there’s no race but the human race, then there is no race problem, right?”
The problem is that many people don’t realize this, especially those whose politics revolves around the classification of humans into victim classes in order to incite class warfare and purchase votes by pretending to rectify their supposed disparities.
Report comment to moderator
BDDBY (35),
With all due respect, no, I don’t think your point still stands.
First off, he public state of race relations in the US is arguably the best it’s ever been. By “public,” I mean re. the legal protection of minorities’ rights. If I interview applicants for a job opening, I cannot legally tell a black man, “Sorry, I don’t hire blacks.”
As you’ve probably realized, I don’t think it ought to be illegal to do so, because not all sins are crimes. But it is illegal. And it may very well be that non-discrimination laws have helped in that regard. But the purpose of laws should be to punish genuine crimes — theft, fraud and assault — not to change people’s sinful attitudes (or their personal safety habits).
That said, it seems the point of your post at (27) is that there have been racial injustices in the past (slavery over a century ago; institutional racism a generation ago), and that government bears no blame in this at all, they only deserve plaudits for the “good” they have done.
To which I say, “Phooey.”
A couple of things that governments are really good at: 1) Dividing the citizenry into various classes, then keeping them busy bickering with each other; and 2) ceaselessly looking for reasons to justify their existence (i.e., why current programs must be maintained if not expanded, but never done away with; and why even more, newer programs must be launched).
The endless obsession of governments (not just in the US) with race perpetuates both those ends.
Report comment to moderator
“Not all sins are crimes” is correct only because we cannot legislate issues of the heart. All sins lead to crimes, which are the observed manifestations of sins of the heart. Our extensive legal code is thus collection of behavioral definitions: This is what failure to love God and failure to love each other looks like in this particular instance.
For example, if I am breaking traffic laws, I am failing to love my neighbor. If I fail to hold my neighbor responsible for caring for his/her own family to the extent they are able, I am also failing to love my neighbor. Depending on who my neighbor happens to be at that time, either behavior could look racist, but they are not inherently so.
If we could manage to behave with each other’s best interests at heart, we would not need all the laws, lawyers, judges, or prisons.
Report comment to moderator
MAR (39): All sins lead to crimes, which are the observed manifestations of sins of the heart.
Frank: Biblically speaking, crimes are not “the observed manifestations of sins of the heart.” (And I say “Biblically speaking,” so as to distinguish between genuine crimes and the “crimes” that are invented and enforced by the busybody Nanny State, such as drug abuse or driving a motorcycle without wearing a helmet.)
Rather, crimes are sins which are punishable by the sword of the civil magistrate — i.e., various kinds of theft, fraud or assault.
Biblically speaking, all crime are also sins, but not all sins are also crimes.
There are also “observed manifestations of sins of the heart” which are not crimes. E.g., lust or gluttony.
Lastly, all sins do not lead to crimes. People can sin in the heart all their lives and never commit a crime.
Report comment to moderator
Frank, I stand with my first comment. You assumed some “always” and “onlys.” All sins do lead to crimes. Maybe not each and every time, but they are the source. What crime does not begin with sin?
Report comment to moderator
FiS-
I can’t tell you how much I respect your point of view. Your genuine distrust of government is a breath of fresh air.
However, my point was that slavery is not a thing of the distant past in America, no matter how many people wish it was.
That’s it.
Report comment to moderator
Your genuine distrust of government is a breath of fresh air.
But bring on Obamacare!!!
Report comment to moderator
“What crime does not begin with sin?”
You didn’t say all crime begins with sin you said “All sins lead to crimes”. I have personally committed many sins that did not lead to crime.
Report comment to moderator
OK, let me rephrase it: All types of sin lead to crimes. You are aking my “all” to mean “each and every time.” Rather, I mean that every sin you can mention, whether against God or against your fellow man, leads to crime.
Report comment to moderator
Back to the main point: Love your neighbor as/and yourself…that is what all the laws attempt to enforce.
Happy new year!
Report comment to moderator
Mar,
If you meant something more along the lines of, “All crimes [i.e., public acts punishable by the civil magistrate] begin with sin [private, "heart" offenses against God],” I’d agree wholeheartedly.
I hope I didn’t come across as pouncing on a debate about angels dancing on pinheads. It’s just that for some reason, over the past 10-15 years, one of my areas of theological interest has been developing/pursuing a Biblical understanding of how the various spheres of government — self, family, church and civil — should interact and cooperate with one another as God’s plan for history progresses. And it seems to me that one of the fundamentals Christians need to understand in that regard is the Biblical distinction between sins and crimes.
FWIW, I agree with your comments at (45).
As re. (46), I would simply point out that the only way laws can “enforce” loving our neighbors as oneself is to punish misdeeds (such as fraud or theft), not to coercively enforce good deeds (such as charity or going the extra mile).
Report comment to moderator
The real shame is there is only one human race that is extremely related across every ethnicity. We are so closely related to each other that an African-American’s closest relative could be a blonde haired, blue eyed German living in Berlin or a Korean living in Seoul.
Remember, 3/4th’s of everyone’s family history is African. In other words, regardless of your skin color or whether your ethnic group comes from Europe, Asia, Africa or Native America, 3/4ths of your ancestors were “black” African.
And, because of our shared ancestry, a German woman and a Chinese man may be more related to each other than anyone else in his or her ethnic group. Every scientist in the world knows this is true as they’ve traced the DNA of our ancestors.
DON’T BE FOOLED BY HOW SOMEONE LOOKS (OR BY THEIR SKIN COLOR OR HEIGHT OR LANGUAGE or where we all went after leaving Africa).
YOUR closest living relative may from Tibet!
Report comment to moderator
There is only one “race” of homo today, but let’s not forget that we Homo sapiens are only one of many human species who have lived. Some of the others were:
Homo gautengensis
Homo habilis
Homo erectus
Homo antecessor
Homo ergaster
Homo heidelbergensis
Homo neanderthalensis
Homo floresiensis
It’s likely that Homo sapiens killed off some of these humans. If we encountered examples today, we might put them in a zoo. But whether or not Evangelicals would consider them to be persons, all of the above creatures were human.
Report comment to moderator
Scroop Moth, because you have seen them and have had conversations with them?
Report comment to moderator
Nearest I can tell, the definition of racism that Evangelicals foist upon our beleaguered nation forbids schools and other institutions of social improvement from giving any particular notice or consideration to the formatively differentiating backgrounds and experiences for which being Black or Mexican is a strong indicator.
Evangelical geniuses of impartiality would rather treat everyone generically, requiring as much from those to whom little has been given as from those to whom much has been given, and of course idolizing the eternal Platonic forms of standardized tests and highschool GPA’s, and refusing to make any adjustments or interpolations on behalf of the hypothesis that God manufactures Blacks and Mexicans to just as high a native specification as Whites.
How fortuitously expedient for White people, of course. Let us praise their impartiality and make no attention whatsoever of their demographic anxiety. What hutzpah!
Report comment to moderator
The MOTH (scroop) keeps at it.
He eats away at your mind until you think it is ALL the fault of Christians.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!