Scorched earth vs. status quo
With the creation of StudentsFirst, former Washington, D.C., public schools chancellor Michelle Rhee is back in the news again. And her new education advocacy group’s reform plan has drawn fire from an old adversary, Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers union.
Rhee, a dynamic education reformer, first burst onto the national scene when then-Washington Mayor Adrian Fenty hired her to head up the district’s public schools in 2007. In December 2008, Time magazine featured her on the cover standing sternly in a classroom and holding a broom. The message was clear: Rhee was dead set on cleaning up the D.C. public schools by sweeping out underperforming teachers and staff. She did so in a hurry, sacking 241 teachers, putting another 737 on notice, and shuttering 21 schools. In the Time article, Weingarten criticized Rhee by saying, “Michelle Rhee believes in scorched earth.”
Rhee didn’t have patience for underperforming teachers because she knew that a poor teacher can set a student’s development back several years to the point where he or she may never recover. When it came to choosing between teachers and students, Rhee chose students first. It cost the mayor and his chancellor their jobs when Fenty lost his reelection bid due largely to his support for Rhee’s policies.
Last week Rhee’s StudentsFirst organization released a national education reform plan that called for evaluating teacher performance, giving teachers incentive-based pay, ending tenure, offering parental choice, and requiring fiscal accountability. Weingarten responded, “Michelle Rhee’s agenda presents a false choice: support students or support teachers. The fact is that neither can succeed unless both are supported. Making schools better places for children to learn also makes them better places for teachers to work.”
Rhee, on the other hand, would say that schools become better places by getting rid of poor teachers and rewarding effective ones. When she was in Washington, Rhee wanted to give teachers the opportunity to nearly double their average salaries to $130,000 with incentive pay. The hitch: Give up tenure.
Weingarten was in the news last week too. The Wall Street Journal reported that she collected $600,000 last year in compensation, including $194,188 in unused vacation and sick days in her former role as head of New York City’s United Federation of Teachers.
Any wonder why Rhee believes in students first . . . and dumping the status quo?

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top10 Comments to “Scorched earth vs. status quo”
Follow the money.
Report comment to moderator
Creating a better environment for teachers would also be beneficial. My mother-in-law is a public school teacher in North Dakota, and all of the hoops that she has to jump through, and the ridiculous testing programs make things pretty difficult. She also is trained in working with special-needs students, so she’s got a very interesting classroom of students and many aids, and the No Child Left Behind act and other requirements and standards just make actual teaching difficult.
I’m all for tenure being unavailable, and making sure that bad teachers are no longer teaching, but the system needs to be freed up so that good teachers can actually teach instead of being caught up in a bunch of regulation.
Another thing that will help is encouraging families and parents to actually care about taking part in helping their children be good students. It doesn’t matter how great a teacher is if the parents are not there 100% of the way making sure their children are excited about learning and have a good support system at home. Parents are the ones primarily responsible for educating their children, so they need to help their children and not rely on the teachers for everything.
But then again, problems with anything most likely begin at home.
Report comment to moderator
kidsarentcars dot com
Pretty much sez it all.
Report comment to moderator
BeckyF writes (#2):
“Parents are the ones primarily responsible for educating their children.”
Amen to that!
The best way to do that is to return every school system to local control—to the parents. The Federal government should be banned from the educational system altogether. The Department of Education should be exterminated for the blood sucking parasite that it is. This nation’s educational system functioned far better in the days before Jimmy Carter who spawned another Federal leech on the body politic as a payoff to the teachers unions—typical Democrat politics. The politics of teacher tenure falls into the same putrid bucket of self-interest that should be dumped as well.
What Ms Rhee wants is not destructive “scorched earth” at all. On the contrary, what is desperately needed is antiseptic cleansing before the parasites kill the system altogether.
Report comment to moderator
Stasis is never good for any system as the tendency to disorder in man-made systems isn’t much different than natural systems. That being said, there are different ways of maintaining a dynamic system.
My local school board has divided the district into 12 sub-districts and every year reviews and changes one district in terms of number of schools, merging schools, changing high schools, changing boundaries, etc. Its a set process which everyone knows is coming and everyone knows the process and everyone is invited to participate. Too often there is the temptation to give one dynamic person the power just to shake things up.
Closing schools only works if you close it because of a declining population or deteriorating facilities. You then need a plan to accommodate the affected students. To close a school for poor test results is a knee jerk reaction which just moves the problem.
Tenure is often a distracting target for many. In many jurisdictions, even without tenure, its almost impossible to just fire someone — you need just cause and dismissal can be appealed. Tenure then isn’t relevant but it does give teachers less of an incentive to avoid poorly performing schools. If my job depended on test scores, I and many others would be applying to certain schools we know will do well on tests, especially if there was incentive based pay. The thing is I prefer my slightly below average school because the kids and parents are more appreciative and more enjoyable to work with but if test scores were the measuring stick ….
Wishing seems to think a poor teacher can set a student back several years — I really don’t think I’m that influential. I will say a series of poor teachers combined with poor parenting will set children back without hope. Some have little hope before they even arrive in kindergarten.
The union head is right about one thing – its a false choice – schools have to be a place that both the students and the teachers will succeed. Killing teachers’ morale does have a chilling effect on the students’ learning environment.
Report comment to moderator
Weingarten’s salary is far too high for a union leader. The head of the Elementary Teacher’s Federation of Ontario makes about the maxium teacher’s salary plus a top up of approx. 15% (since he works year round) and traveling expenses. American workers are far too complacent not only with their bosses but with their unions.
In Ontario, CEO salaries of publicly traded companies must be publicized as well as the salaries of union leaders on a yearly basis. About a decade ago, the salaries were published just as GM was negotiating with the Canadian Auto Workers. The head of GM was making about $20 million while the national president of the CAW was making $250,000. GM noticed it and immediately offered the CAW president a million dollars to change sides stating that he paid millions to people in GM to do similar work. From this perspective, union leaders are not over paid.
Report comment to moderator
Just curious what exactly does the Federal Dept of Education. In Canada, the federal gov’t has a ministry of education but it does nothing more than allocate funds to the provinces and ensures that each province’s education system is compatible with the rest allowing students to change seamlessly when their parents move across provincial boundaries. There has been a push to national standards in science but even that gets little traction since constitutional its the provincial responsibility and there’s no way Quebec will ever let anyone infringe on its rights.
In the US, is the US Dept of Education somewhat similar or is it far more active. If so, I would agree it needs to be scaled back. Too many cooks ruins a soup and there’s enough “interested” parties in the education system as it is.
Report comment to moderator
Rhee followed Mother’s favorite order: Clean It Up! We need more of her.
Report comment to moderator
“There has been a push to national standards in science but even that gets little traction since constitutional its the provincial responsibility and there’s no way Quebec will ever let anyone infringe on its rights.”
Yeah, we had a war over that sort of thing…
“In the US, is the US Dept of Education somewhat similar or is it far more active.”
More I would say, easily. In the least they add alot of red tape and admin cost.
Report comment to moderator
I don’t think it is a matter of students or teachers. Anyone who has ever worked with a bad co-worker who can’t be fired because of connections or political correctness knows what a drain they can be on fellow employees, especially when you are are often expected to cover for them. Getting rid of bad teachers of good for the good teachers.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!