Abortion and the church
Abby Johnson’s new book unPlanned is the powerful story of the woman who made headlines a little over a year ago when she abruptly resigned her post as director of a Planned Parenthood center in Texas and joined a pro-life organization headquartered down the street.
Johnson ran a business that performed abortions, and had had two of her own. But when she assisted in one, she watched the ultrasound monitor in horror as a 13-week-old unborn child kicked and squirmed as though trying to get away from the cannula. After the abortionist lightheartedly directed one of his assistants to turn on the suction with the words, “Beam me up, Scotty,” the last thing Johnson remembers seeing was the “perfectly formed backbone sucked into the tube.”
In that moment, Johnson saw abortion for what it is: the taking of human life. Within days, she quit her job and joined the pro-life forces who had been praying long and hard for her outside the fence of the Planned Parenthood location. She would soon learn that they had never given up on her. They had treated her with kindness, prayerfully hoping for her change of heart.
Which brings me to the question of how churches should deal with someone who is “pro-choice.”
Johnson and her husband (a stalwart pro-lifer) were denied membership at a church they had long attended because of her job at Planned Parenthood. They were told they could continue to worship there, but that was it. The Johnsons left and eventually began to attend an Episcopal church that was openly pro-abortion. After her very public change of heart about abortion, that church rejected her, too, albeit more subtly with disapproving looks and unpleasant emails.
Here’s Johnson’s take on the churches’ response to her:
“When the first church bluntly and somewhat awkwardly told me I could not become a member, the church lost any opportunity to influence my outlook. I wish they had offered to dialogue with me about why they were so committed to their pro-life position and why they found my work at the clinic such an obstacle to my becoming a member. Or at the very least, I wish they would have expressed care for me apart from my pro-choice position. Now some members in the second church were making me feel as if I wasn’t even welcome in the building. . . . In both instances, I felt rejected. That’s why I appreciate the fence-prayers’ approach and encourage churches and other organizations to consider their example.”
Sinners fill every seat in every pew in every church. How to lovingly respond to those who disagree about what’s sinful and what’s not is a difficult question.
Editor’s Note: Give a WORLD Magazine gift subscription and receive a free copy of Abby Johnson’s book unPlanned.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top35 Comments to “Abortion and the church”
This is hard, how to treat people who have different views on a theological position than does your church. How do we try to bring them over to our side?
It seems to me that kindness is the first thing that needs to be used. The next thing is that there should be few things that are so important that fellowship should be broken. Open and unrepentant sin may be something that requires being removed from a church’s membership. Does this also mean that person should be barred from attending church?
I am very overweight. Should I be barred from membership? I can’t hide my obesity, it is in plan view for all to see. Open and unrepentant sin…
Report comment to moderator
I was glad the first church didn’t allow her to join, but I too wish they could have set up an appointment to talk with her, and not just casually tell her on Sunday morning and then walk away.
I read the book last week, and was up till nearly 3:00 in the morning finishing it–it’s a powerful book. Very sad at times, very joyful at times, but good insights into the mindset of Planned Parenthood and their volunteers and an excellent look of how God is working through the pro-life movement. Highly recommended. I took my copy to church Sunday to loan it to a friend.
Report comment to moderator
Those who come over from the ProAbort side call to mind a quote from Whittaker Chambers about his decision to renounce/abandon communism. My last reading on Norma McCorvey (Jane Roe of Roe v Wade) is that she is now proLife, though she’s not quite the ideal poster girl for churches since she is a lesbian.
This lady joins Carol Everett in the pantheon of those who’ve seen the horrors for what they are.
As for proLifers who become “proChoice”? That seems to be mainly politicians who aspire to higher office and are willing to walk across a stack of tiny corpses to get political plaudits, funding etc.
Report comment to moderator
I agree with Dr Laura Schlessinger. We should call the organization Planned UnParenthood since that pretty much sums up their plan.
As for the Episcopal church.. could dwindling membership be linked to its much-ballyhooed celebration of homosexuality and abortion?
Report comment to moderator
Did she want membership in the first church while working for Planne Parenthood? If that were so, then I would have thought the church would have said “choose.” But if it was after she quit and repented, etc., I don’t understand why they wouldn’t want her.
The second church, however, didn’t want to be confronted with its own sin, so that’s all I’m going to say there. Get out while the getting is good.
Report comment to moderator
I wish they had offered to dialogue with me about why they were so committed to their pro-life position and why they found my work at the clinic such an obstacle to my becoming a member.
The church should have offered to dialogue, but could there really have been any mystery as to why they found her work an obstacle to membership? Didn’t she read the papers?
Report comment to moderator
NJL, the first church said she couldn’t join when she was working for PP. She’d expressed interest in joining, and after church one Sunday one of the leaders came up to her in the pew and said with discomfort that she wouldn’t be allowed to join, but they hoped she and her husband would continue to attend. They never went back. Later in the book she says it would have been wiser for them to set up an appointment to talk with her, and actually explain their reasoning. That would have been a better chance to confront her with the truth, honestly, and I agree it would have been wiser. Should she have been able to join, no.
In the book, a big part of her reasoning was that she was working for PP because she bought their lie that they were working to cut down on the number of abortions. Basically she was justifying herself, but she never considered herself pro-abortion, just pro-there-oughta-be-options, and she accepted their line that offering birth control will cut down on abortions.
Report comment to moderator
This is a good example of how we can miss how much someone with a different viewpoint sees things…really differently. You would think she would know why church membership was denied, but that is from our viewpoint. The fact that she did not understand that is a good reminder to us not to make those assumptions.
Report comment to moderator
I think the church is right not to let her be a member, but yet I understand that they DID allow her to continue to attend. So, had I not read Cheryl’s contribution to the thread (having read the book) then I would have no complaints about them.
If they did tell her on a Sunday morning without a good long chat and explanation, then that is what they should repent of. They should have made her feel as welcome as any other sinner, but helped her to understand that she could not be a MEMBER with her sin still intact and unrepented of.
Report comment to moderator
I should clarify: The church WAS right not to let her be a member. Naturally, that path should be open to her now that she lives in repentance.
Report comment to moderator
I wonder if the first church would have had ethical quandary accepting a tithe donation from this woman and her hubby. Methinks not!
Report comment to moderator
Membership in many churches consists of a sit down interview. You give your testimony. You explain who you understand and believe Jesus to be. I’m sure some basic donctrinal questions are or should be asked.
The genius of this is it gives the church reps an opportunity to say “Sorry, we dont believe that. But if you do, then you should seek membership in the XYZ church about 3 blocks down from us”
I like this way more than the traditional “walk the aisle” method where you come by xfer of letter of membership.
The Baptists at one time were proud of their decentralized churches; they lacked and didnt want any type of Vatican spelling out permissible or mandatory beliefs.
Report comment to moderator
11. You have not proof of that and that is an unfair assumption.
Report comment to moderator
#13 You are correct. I lack and do not claim to have proof. Pure speculation on my part.
Report comment to moderator
Presumably, they did donate until they were told they couldn’t join. The church should have given its reasoning.
Report comment to moderator
The director of our PCC and I talked about this story this morning. I pointed out that when Abby Johnson realized she had to get out of PP, she looked out the window and saw two women standing on the sidewalk praying. She knew they would help her, and apparently they came from the PCC right next door.
She called the PCC and asked if they had a back door, since she obviously couldn’t come in the front. They told her yes, she got in her car, drove around the block I guess and came back, entering the PCC through the back door.
This morning we tried to imagine what we would have said, “Good morning. What can we do for you?”
What was interesting to me about this story–which I heard her tell on Focus on the Family yesterday, was, she knew where to go. That says volumes to me about that PCC.
I ordered the book yesterday. And I’m so thankful for the legions of dedicated prayer warriors who listened to the Holy Spirit and reached out to even those miserable abortion-providers: who are just sinners like you and me.
Report comment to moderator
The church needs to exercise discernment. Certainly, many conservative denominations have acknowledged that some pro-choice positions are not inconsistent with being an orthodox Christian. See, for example, Dr. Woolley’s minority report to the Orthodox Presbyterian Church’s study committee on abortion. One cannot simply say that all pro-choice views are inconsistent with Christianity, just as one cannot say that all antiabortion views are consistent with Christianity.
Report comment to moderator
RSD, what kind of pro-choice view is consistent with Christianity? To put it more accurately, what pro-choice view is consistent with sound biblical doctrine?
There are many types of “Christianity” but only one Word of God.
Report comment to moderator
I agree with the first church in their denial of Mrs. Johnson as a member. Christians should receive a sinner into their church in the hope of repentance, but cannot accept them as a member.
To do so would be an acceptance of an unrepentant sinner; something quite different.
Report comment to moderator
Those of you who argue that someone has to be fully repentant of every sin in order to be worthy to join a church had better examine your own lives very carefully to make sure you have done so yourselves.
I’m not saying the first church wasn’t entitled to judge her, but Jesus is pretty clear that the more grace and mercy you show to others, the more grace and mercy you receive.
Report comment to moderator
Conan, did Jesus ever say anything about restricting membership or excommunicating members?
Report comment to moderator
20. Conan, should the church accept a member who is a proud, open member of the KKK who has no intention of quiting? I have a feeling you would be scandalized if they did.
Report comment to moderator
Conan, I really don’t think you understand the passage you’re citing. First off it is written to individuals (not the church leadership, which is specifically given the duty to judge); second, it is telling people not to judge others for sins they themselves commit. Third, recognizing something as a sin isn’t the same as “judging” someone to be my inferior, or considering myself sin-free. Fourth, it isn’t “grace and mercy” to overlook sin, but to forgive it. And finally, all of us are sinners, and I don’t think any of us is denying that, but church discipline (excommunication, or in this instance not even taking her into memmbership in the first place) is not done for “being a sinner” but for living in unrepentant sin. The fact that most churches don’t practice it enough isn’t an argument for not practicing it at all; it’s an argument for taking it more seriously.
Report comment to moderator
Conan, should the church accept a member who is a proud, open member of the KKK who has no intention of quiting? I have a feeling you would be scandalized if they did.
I do think they should, and I wouldn’t. Churches exist to build up the Christian faith, which you can’t do by turning people away. Jesus welcomed all who came to him and while he did exhort them to change their ways when needed, he did not expel them from the camp if they did not. Only by keeping them close can you hope to change anyone.
Conan, I really don’t think you understand the passage you’re citing.
Of course not.
Report comment to moderator
24. They didn’t turn anyone away. They told her she was free to worship with them. She just couldn’t become a member.
Report comment to moderator
Had the Church that rejected membership first spoke the truth in love and explained Gods love in calling some things sin and sin’s damage to relationships the outcome may or may not have been different. Rejection can move us for good or bad depending on the foundation we choose for our lives. The Holy Spirit’s work, from prayers in all our lives is to choose the right foundation. She heard the Holy Spirit and is now helping others to hear, Praise God.
Years ago, I heard from the pulpit a pastor say, “Right To Life called and wanted me to have us participate in a Life Chain. I told them NO and that they could do more by prayer than what they are doing”. This pastor didn’t understand that prayer is what caused the people to join the Life Chain in the first place. He was a very powerful person in that denomination and, I know influenced a shallow stance on abortion.
Prayer changes things, because it changes people. It changed me.
Report comment to moderator
A little premature with the eyeroll, Conan. I no longer believe your claim that you put 40 years of study into the Christian faith. If you had, you wouldn’t make gaffes like this. Friendly advice: don’t rely on skeptics.org for scriptural exegesis.
Report comment to moderator
When did she attend that first church? Before or after her change to pro-life?
The article didnt make that clear to me.
“Churches exist to build up the Christian faith, which you can’t do by turning people away.”
Yeah I dont think you get the distinction. Jesus did not turn people away; however, he did not make everyone an apostle.
Membership in a church allows you to vote and attain leadership positions. That is not something that should be given to anyone who is diametrically opposed to what is largely a core belief amo churches that abortion is murder.
Report comment to moderator
Thorn, before. She was still working at Planned Parenthood, still justifying her involvement there.
Report comment to moderator
Kyle,
Go read Dr. Woolley’s minority report. It’s available online. That’s an example of a pro-choice view that is not outside of Christian orthodoxy.
Report comment to moderator
RSD, Being pro-choice is a little different than actually participating in an abortion, which is what this woman was doing.
Report comment to moderator
RSD,
I think you could summarize. I do not believe that there is any pro-choice view that can be within Scripture.
Report comment to moderator
Cheryl (#23) and Thorn (#28):
Excellent answers. Absolutely excellent. I hope Conan reads them.
Report comment to moderator
RSD, being “pro-choice” in the sense of believing it acceptable to kill an unborn child (with the possible exception of sparing the mother’s life) isn’t a position compatible with orthodoxy, actually. One might quibble over details (should the mother be subject to prosecution?), but believing it is OK to deliberately take a human life in the womb, and acting on that belief, simply must be grounds for excommunication.
Report comment to moderator
Jesus did turn people away.
He gave conditions for following Him. He said that people had to put him before their family. He said that people needed to deny themselves and take up their own cross. He said that they must not put their hand to the plow and then look back. He told one man that He had to sell all he had and give it to the poor. He told a woman that she must go and sin no more.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!