From hymns to hip-hop
If you are looking for theologically saturated Christian music that has the greatest potential for widespread appeal, your best option may be Christian hip-hop. Because of its form—a high volume of words with little repetition—hip-hop may provide one of the best modes of music to convey propositional truths and doctrinal content that at the same time connects to a younger generation. Contrast that with Contemporary Christian Music (CCM), which is often criticized for being shallow, theologically light, and generally lacking content that inspires the mind and the heart.
It is important to keep in mind that Christian hip-hop, unlike other contemporary genres, generally is not intended for use during corporate worship, so rejecting its appropriateness for the liturgy is not relevant.
But even with the deep theological content found in much of Christian hip-hop, many evangelicals view it as an inappropriate medium for Christian music. This objection reveals some level of ignorance about the historical development of Christian music.
Dr. David Koyzis, in his book Political Visions and Illusions, highlights this ignorance by noting, “Many conservatives dislike ‘pop’ or ‘rock’ music and prefer, say, the baroque pieces of Bach or Telemann. . . . The very label ‘baroque’ was used in a derogatory fashion by conservatives of that day to describe what they felt to be ugly music.” Today many hail the “ugly” church music set to baroque as the height of Christian music and a form that should be normative today.
What we consider to be “ugly” forms of music often depend on personal preferences and social location. For example, in Christian traditions that sing only the Psalms without instrumental accompaniment, the worst thing for them would be to sing praise to God using lyrics not directly from the Bible and to pollute music offered to God with instruments like a pipe organ. Could Christian hip-hop simply be the “ugly” music of our era?
Let’s take a look at the lyrics from the song “Triune Praise” by hip-hop artist Shai Linne and note the theological depth that is not generally found in CCM music:
Praise God the Father, the Immortal Creator
For Your glory you made us, You’re the Sovereign Orchestrator
All that You decree will most surely come to happen
You’re awesome as can be and Your glory none can fathom
Nothing could ever stain You, the heavens can’t contain You
We thank You for sending Your Son to explain You
Otherwise we would have remained in the dark
but You sent Your Holy Spirit to spark a change in our hearts
According to Your eternal purpose and willYou determined to reveal Yourself to those who deserve to be killed
Those of us whom You foreknew adore You
We praise You that You predestined us to be conformed to
The image of Your Son who’s the radiance of Your glory
When I meditate on it, the weightiness of it floors me
So Father, we’ll praise you over and over again
Because You sent Your only Son to atone for our sins
Boyce College student and rapper/producer Alex Medina even finds similarities between a Christian rapper and a beloved hymn writer in their lives and the content of their music: “[John] Newton’s care for his local church in Olney and the development of ‘Amazing Grace’ reminded me [of] Sho Baraka.” And you’ll see these commonalities with rappers associated with labels like Reach, Cross Movement, and Lamp Mode, to name a few.
Given the international popularity of “ugly” hip-hop in general, and the weak content of much CCM music, Christian rap may emerge as the last bastion of producing theologically driven Christian music for generations to come.
(For more on Christian hip-hop, see “Holy hip-hop,” by Mark Bergin, WORLD, Feb. 3, 2007.)

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top36 Comments to “From hymns to hip-hop”
Anthony, I’ve got to agree with you about lyric content. Some of us were complaining the other day about repetitive choruses in contemporary Christian music. It is refreshing to see these hip-hop musicians layering their music with all the doctrine that Isaac Watts and Charles Wesley put in their hymns.
Report comment to moderator
Sounds like another stride forward toward aesthetic poverty. The light and repetitive contemporary music of the recent past was also such a stride.
So I have no theological objection (unless a specific case warrents it) and no accusation of inappropriate medium (unless a specific case warrents it). But I have seen aesthetic poverty on the increase for decades and have yet to see a creative turn-around.
Report comment to moderator
BTW, Isaac Watts and Charles Wesley were censured by the liturgical conservators of their day. I understand Wesley’s ‘Jesus, Lover of my Soul’, was considered far too personal to be sung in services.
Report comment to moderator
There are thousands of “hymns” that were never worth being handed down to the next generation. The ones that have survived are the exceptional ones. The same is true in contemporary Christian music of which hip-hop is one genre. I enjoy a good hip-hop song as well as a rock song or a hymn. Emphasis on ‘good’ not the genre.
Report comment to moderator
Phos, Handel’s Messiah was scandalous in its day not only for style, but it was sung in theaters!
History and tradition are good, but developing sacred music of our own culture is also very good.
Report comment to moderator
Not sure if Anthony Bradley meant it this way–I see he did refer to the context of the corporate worship service–but Reformed Presbyterians (I am one) would not object to hip-hop music being played or sung in informal settings, at least not on the same basis they would reject it in worship.
I’m not into the CCM scene like I used to be, but of what I have heard lately, hip-hop music has *way* more and better theological content than its contemporary counterparts and even than what I used to listen to in the ’80s. Much of what hip-hop I’ve heard is practically catechetical, although there may be some junk out there, too. Even the form, in some cases, lends itself better to communication of theological truths than contemporary sounds.
Report comment to moderator
It isn’t my “style” rhythmically, but if I were still in inner-city Chicago, I imagine I’d be buying some of their CDs to play when kids were in my home or to give away. For sure it’s better than CCM. I’m a hymn person, as most Christians other than baby boomers seem to be, in my experience. (And I know a lot of baby boomers who are too.)
Report comment to moderator
This is bang-on, thanks to Dr. Bradley for writing it. I posted something similar here: http://tinyurl.com/4vgfu9j Although if you’ve read this, mine’s somewhat redundant!
Report comment to moderator
Thanks for writing this, Dr. Bradley! My family has been blessed by listening to Lecrae, whose lyrics are both theologically rich and catchy. The case he makes against relativism in the song “Truth” is worth the price of his whole album “Rebel.” We also appreciate how his albums follow consistent themes (example: Rebel is about the rejection of the patterns of this world in favor of a holy life in Christ). We also love that he quotes John Piper in some songs–I’m thankful to hear my preschoolers around the house singing “I don’t want to waste my life…life…life.”
Report comment to moderator
Also, to Ian Clary, I appreciated your blog post too.
Report comment to moderator
Joel Mark, as one gets older, it’s normal to dislike the popular music of the day because it sounds less and less like the music that was popular when your own musical tastes were developing as a young adult. Might that be the actual phenomenon behind “I have seen aesthetic poverty on the increase for decades”? Sincere question; no disrespect intended here.
Hip hop songs can reflect a great deal of talent, creativity, and even beauty, though I lacked the capacity to appreciate this until the lyrics of artists like shai linne drew me to the genre and I became more familiar with its forms and conventions.
Report comment to moderator
When the instruments overpower the message, a song has little spiritual/godly use. What I know of rap and hip-hop turns my stomach because the strong beat is not on the background, but overpowers the message. I’ll give a listen to this piece and see of I can hear the message over the “music”.
Report comment to moderator
This is interesting Anthony. I don’t care for hip hop, but you’re spot on regarding the history of Christian music. Being an engineer, I analyzed which music was acceptable in church history (both in and outside of worship). Groups who objected to various forms of music would accept that same music as sacred about 50 years later. This pattern held true for hundreds of years.
At one time musical instruments were considered inappropriate. The term acapella means “chapel style”, where no instruments were allowed. Then some were. At one time only Psalms were allowed, then hymns snuck in. Then Psalms were out and only hymns were allowed. Then Psalms and hymns were out and only contemporary Christians songs were allowed.
Maybe one day only hip-hop Christian songs will be considered appropriate.
Report comment to moderator
PUBLIUS, I could easily tell you meant no disrespect at all. In fact I deeply appreciate your question.
As one gets older, one gains a wider awareness of aesthetic options, styles, variations. I have a wide range of musical taste and it gets wider with age. For example, I have even included honky-tonk (country) music more favorably lately–but still not my favorite. Could be a weak example, but I just don’t think it is a matter of disliking music that sounds less like the music I liked years ago. I have traveled over many landscapes of music and art appreciation (I have taught “Art Appreciation” at the university level)
But maybe there are principles of beauty that apply and can be assessed by people, especially people with more listening, leavening and training experience. Maybe some melodies, harmonies, lyrics and presentations conform better to actual principles of beauty than others. Maybe age and experience (among other factors) actually add to our ability to make evaluations. Maybe musical taste is something that can actually improve with time and skill and seasoning.
* First, I support freedom of expression, so my opinions here are not threats to anyone’s freedom of taste.
* Second, I grew up hearing and learning four-part harmony and I see such learning on a vast decline in our aesthetically impoverished culture.
* Third, the music I hear more and more of these days is less integrated. The beat may dominate so much that other resources and principles for beauty and expression are drummed out. That’s a form of aesthetic poverty, whether the person mesmerized by the drum beat knows it or not. Younger people are far less versatile in their creativity than I recall in earlier eras. And at least my age proves that I am saying this from actual experience, not just theory or immediate inclination.
Report comment to moderator
Okay, so I look around for the piece (Can’t call it a song yet as there is no singing) and all I can find is a 30 second snippet. I still cannot say I like hip-hop, but at least the lyrics come through loud and clear. Why not put a melody to those wonderful lyrics? I suppose it is because 21st Century performers are no longer artists or true musicians. Just a beat and a few chords on keyboard and guitar with some chanted words. Though the words are good, the medium lacks for me. Perhpas the youngsters can get something out of it. And if someone is truly turned from sin to God, than praise His name. I won’t argue with the results. AS Paul wrote in Philipians, “Only that in every way, whether in pretense or in truth, Christ is proclaimed; and in this I rejoice.”
Report comment to moderator
CCM, I suppose that stands for Contemporary Christian Music. I find it monotonous and boring. It has no harmonies or written music I can SEE! It, properly, is all about the words. I also find the words monotonous and boring. I stay away from church until the singing is over.
I taught at a middle school in the heart of the ghetto when rap and it’s outgrowth, hip-hop, were in it’s infancy. Musically it was interesting but I have never been able to be interested in the words to songs. In fact, I often, usually for that matter, can’t understand them.
It is too bad my song leader can’t see the relationship between “Just as I am…” and the repetition of his musical choices.
Report comment to moderator
Peter, 21st century Christians in rap indeed are artists and true musicians. I actually see composing a song that has a beat and some harmony thrown in as harder than one with a melody. Also with virtually every song of each artist at Reach , cross movement , and Lampmode, the lyrics always to take the forefront and frankly the lyrics come out far clearer than all the secular rap I have ever heard.
Xion, I doubt rap will be used for congregational singing in 50 years or ever, the genre does not work for congregational worship in general.
My personal music tastes include rap, hymns, classical, a little classical rock (Keith Green) and Latin. I don’t listen to any other genre, simply because most believing artists in those genres do not qualify as even mediocre in my dictionary. Oh and with classical I really am tired of baroque, it seems to be the main sub-genre they play on the radio.
Report comment to moderator
Here is a link to one of Lecrae’s slower songs for those who are not fans of or can’t stand hard beats.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LHnZRZiCYHE
This one is a harder song by Tedashii, concerning studying the word on a daily basis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hc4LPsyrBfw
Report comment to moderator
Some of the best Christian rap I’ve heard is from Voice Progression. For example, one even gives a history of hip-hop and its connection with the sin nature and how it can be redeemed…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V9ZOx1TezWk&playnext=1&list=PLF0842004D75F655A
…and another addresses the interplay the call to evangelize in the context of the doctrine of quietism (an erroneous interpretation of the reformed doctrine of divine election):
On a different note, I find this autobiographical Kirk Franklin/Toby Mac remix of “Shout” to be compelling:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSmkyLfgnOg
Report comment to moderator
I somehow missed pasting the second Voice Progression link. Here it is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZfxMeU_oJ8&playnext=1&list=PL6D4438C52D7BF520
Report comment to moderator
Christian hip-hop can be subject to the same problems that plague CCM though. It’s the music industry in general and hip hop is no exclusion.
Just like there are good artists in CCM though, you can find good hip-hop as well if you look hard enough.
Lecrae is becoming more and more popular and frankly he is one of the better hip hop/rap composers and productions currently going. Like GRITS, KJ-52, John Rueben, there are a few who are notable (DC Talk back in the day)
However, most of it is dumbed/watered down like the rest of the industry.
Christian music needs to stop worrying about what will sell, and just make honest music from the start. It doesn’t have to follow pop culture, it should be out front setting the tone (no pun intended) even if the rest of the industry doesn’t follow.
Report comment to moderator
I was unaware that praise/worship music had to be theologically heavy. Where in scripture defines right and wrong worship music? In fact, why should we be critical of worship based on aesthetics?
I have been a guitarist for P&W groups at two different churches for the past 7 years. I have performed and recorded for both black and white Christian artists. My only criteria for I had to participate was that the message in the song was scripturally based.
Worship through song is not mandated to have the full gospel message, it is an act of worship. Is all of the Psalms that David and the Holy Spirit wrote had “deep theological content” as Mr. Bradley mentions in his article? The Psalms speaks of many aspects of God, as well as man’s perspective toward God and His attributes(mercy, grace, longsuffering, judgement, etc…) Is the entirity of Psalm 117 theologically “light”?
Praise the LORD, all you nations;
extol him, all you peoples.
For great is his love toward us,
and the faithfulness of the LORD endures forever.
Praise the LORD.
Sounds like one of those simplistic theologically-light P&W songs I hear on KLOVE. Tsk, tsk King David.
All I ask is that fellow brothers and sisters in Christ please keep an open heart and mind regarding worship music. It doesn’t mean you have to like a particular genre, just don’t tear it down because your expectations are different. Being critical of scriptually-based Christian music is akin to the same aesthetic issues the Corinthians had with regard to which teacher they liked best (I Cor 1:10-17). There are many flavors of music as well as His attributes that we can sing songs about. Just Praise the Lord!
Report comment to moderator
Biblically, praise can be doctrinaly heavy as in the first two verses, melodious as in the third and fourth verses, and even loud, rhythmic and percussive as in the final verse. Pick where you fit in, and join in the praise.
Psalm 150
1 Praise the LORD.[a]
Praise God in his sanctuary;
praise him in his mighty heavens.
2 Praise him for his acts of power;
praise him for his surpassing greatness.
3 Praise him with the sounding of the trumpet,
praise him with the harp and lyre,
4 praise him with timbrel and dancing,
praise him with the strings and pipe,
5 praise him with the clash of cymbals,
praise him with resounding cymbals.
6 Let everything that has breath praise the LORD.
Praise the LORD.
Report comment to moderator
LANESMATB asked, “In fact, why should we be critical of worship based on aesthetics?”
LANESMATB, I think we, as Christians, are walking worship services (which is not to say it’s all formal religiosity). So, if there is a place for aesthetic concern in our lives, then fair and honest criticism is fitting. But I would agree that God’s primary concern for our worship is not aesthetic. His higher concerns are more moral & truth based. Still, to seek healthy and positive edification does involve aesthetic integrity, but that does not mean that worship is based on aesthetics alone. Also, great variation of creative taste and styles can flow amid aesthetic integrity.
Also, old-fashioned attitudes, stifling controls, excessive aversions to “entertainment” and rigid legalism have all played a part in creating aesthetic poverty in the past too. But today, the cause for most of this poverty (in my opinion) is a rather a general loss of aesthetic skill, knowledge and versitility.
So, when I offer my opinon regarding aesthetic poverty, I do so as an opinion knowing that my inclinations and perceptions need not dictate the worship of others. But I do think our overall joy and edification has been slowly reduced along with our culture’s slide away from aesthetic integrity.
So LANESMATB, I agree that variations of aesthetic taste should not add strife to our lives and our worship together as Christians. I don’t have to like everything we do together. But that is no reason to clam up with regard to what we do actually like or not. Disagreement (even in areas of taste) is not disrespect.
Report comment to moderator
Anesthesia is used during surgery to numb the pain of the process. The word “aesthetic” is the same basic original word but without the negative prefix “an.”
Thus, one who has an aesthetic mind is one who is still capable of feeling and sentiment!
Report comment to moderator
I am a believer in beauty, and it is MORE than merely something in the eyes of any random behoder. Beauty actually esists in and of itself.
BEAUTY COMES FROM GOD! Exodus 31. Bezalel was “…filled with the Spirit of God, with skill, ability and knowledge in all kinds of crafts–to make artistic designs.”
BEAUTY IS A GIFT: Ezekiel 20:15. The promised land, flowing with milk and honey, was a “most beautiful of all lands.” (20:15). The land was God’s gift to His people.
BEAUTY IS TIMELY! Eccl. 3:11. “He has made all things beautiful in its time.”
BEAUTY IS VAIN! Proverbs 31:30. “Charm is deceitful and beauty is vain, but a woman who fears the Lord shall be praised.” Proverbs 11:22.
BEAUTY IS USEFUL AND PURPOSEFUL: Esther‘s beauty was part of the means God used to put Esther in the right place and the right time to preserve His people.
BEAUTY IS DEEP: 1 Peter 3:5. “…holy women of the past made themselves beautiful by cultivating the inner qualities of modesty and submission.”
BEAUTY IS EXPENSIVE: Matthew 26:10. “she did a beautiful thing.” (the disciples did not behold beauty in her act, but Jesus did and I agree with Jesus regardless of the disciples’ lousy beholding skills).
BEAUTY IS DECEPTIVE: Matthew 23:27. Jesus described Pharisees saying “You are like white-washed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside, but on the inside are full of dead men’s bones.”
BEAUTY IS RATIONAL (or worth thinking about): “Whatsoever things are… lovely… think on such things.” Philippians 4:8.
_____________
Christian aesthetics call us to look for deeper forms of beauty and seek spiritual wisdom to glorify God with beauty. It also calls for patience and toleration of other perspectives and tastes–as long as principles of decency are intact.
Report comment to moderator
Still, a lot of what I hear on ‘Christian radio’ is shallow and insipid. David’s Psalm 117 isn’t.
Report comment to moderator
Thorn, you dont have to look hard at all to find talented believers in hip hop. Granted, it is hard to look for rapping believers with legit talent before they get signed on to one of the “big three,” if that term can be applied, but I found these brothers at UMD:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=462GNf0nl4c
I personally though would not put KJ or Grits as notable, they do not have the talent like any of the guys at reach or half of the guys at cross movement or lampmode. I don’t like how the Christian music scene tends to push people who are only good over those who truly excel. I have always considered music awards to be a joke, but after seeing Toby Mac and KJ keep getting Dove awards for mediocre rap does crawl under one’s skin. Also from every hardcore rap fan, they will tell you of how DC Talk set back Christians succeeding in the genre. Thankfully cross movement came about in ‘97, and the war for redeeming rap begun to carry real talent and real weight. Much has happened in 14 years, and I can’t wait to see what God has planned next.
Report comment to moderator
I second Macrutabaga on #27.
Report comment to moderator
Most of what I hear on secular radio is shallow and insipid.
Report comment to moderator
I was driving home from Mexico yesterday, took about an hour, and was flipping through five different genres on XM. Sometimes the music was pleasant, but mostly the words were an inch deep.
The message in that hour boil down to this: Romantic love is a drug; the drug wears off.
Report comment to moderator
“Thorn, you dont have to look hard at all to find talented believers in hip hop.”
I guess better put, my point is that the industry takes those talents and reduces them.
Yes, there is plenty of talent, but very few are able to maintain that despite the industry.
“I personally though would not put KJ or Grits as notable, they do not have the talent like any of the guys at reach or half of the guys at cross movement or lampmode.”
Anybody who writes a song about Mountain Dew addiction gets a +1 in my book. I just saw KJ in concert too, he does a great job of getting the crowd going. GRITS has some solid stuff as well. Is it top notch theology wise? No, but that’s not my point.
What sets rap back, wasn’t guys like DC Talk. It’s people that take 50 cents “In Da’Club” and rewrite it to “In Da’Church”…
Report comment to moderator
Well, Anthony, I just followed the info and ordered some of this for my favorite Ethiopian. We have been discussing hip hop for a while now but I had not taken the time to listen to it. Thanks.
Probably would have been a good idea to catch up on this thread first and talk with Thorn and Rom and some others before ordering.
Report comment to moderator
Thorn, I am talking about quality, DC Talk were not a plus when it came to evangelism, at least in the hoods I have lived in. Also I never hear fellows who rewrite someone else’s stuff and am glad they never make it. Concerning KJ all he has going for him is his humor, which is quite witty and original. His rapping skills however are mediocre to good, and he is not as good on serious songs as his humorous ones. And for most people I know who listen to reformed rap, they all agree that the Grits are soft-core when it comes to theology. None of these believers who are solid in their faith like almost all of them who are more “successful” in the genre will never get pulled into the industry because their beliefs are diametrically opposed to those of the industry. I am glad that these independent labels like cmr or reach are at the forefront of reformed rap simply because they don’t have the resources to simply put out music that’s mediocre since they will quickly fail if they do so. I can’t say the same about other genres that Christians are in. Many in CCM borrow other peoples’ work and add little originality, but they keep succeeding.
Report comment to moderator
Jesus Freak isn’t good evangelism or well written? And your right, it’s not really a hip hop album. It’s production quality was also way above Nu’ Thang or Free at Last. But they wrote honestly and weren’t afraid to address things like race and sex on those previous albums as well.
I’m not arguing that we lack profound deep theology, or that its necessary on every song, or that that is what makes good writing.
You can write alot about deep theology and it still be poor phrasing. In mainstream you can get away with garbage because the production quality is often high. But what always makes the best lyrics, the best music, the one’s you remember, are the ones that write open and honestly from the heart on what they are going through. That may be deep theology, it may be practical everyday experiences, maybe it’s just sippin some tea.
The problem is that Jars of Clay will write a song about death (The Valley Song) and the music industry will avoid playing it. Why? Because its a “negative” issue.
And I think the rap industry suffers far more in this regard as well. Rap is already seen as “negative” by the christian music industry. Would you agree?
But you make an excellent point about the independent labels. Rock got better in christian music thanks to groups like Tooth and Nail. They were not afraid to put Relient K, Anberlin, MxPx, POD, etc etc out there. They allowed their creative freedom and honesty to excel and Tooth and Nail honestly became a stepping stone. Relient K has some absolutely remarkable stuff, even in their more punk heavy days.
If that is what is occurring in rap now, it would not surprise me, and it is what is needed. I heard Lecrae on the radio the other day, and the first thing I noticed was that it was well produced on the level of mainstream. And they don’t seem to have squashed the honesty.
Couple of my favorite bands these days are Red and Flyleaf. Lyrically they are fantastic, and the music is so well composed. I look back on the earlier days of Petra and just wish they had the same level of production that these bands are getting now.
Report comment to moderator
I appreciate the article as something to cause this new generation of evangelicals to think about what they are listening to and for what reason. The article is correct in exposing the often times shallow theology of CCM and a call to a deeper theological reflection in songs.
My only problem in the article is the assessment of hip hop and in the comparison of previous church periods. First, I am not sure I want to grant that hip hop is not associated with a genre of music that is at least a bit edgy in our culture, if not outright base. For decades now, the contemporary music environment has endeavored to santify certain genres that I am not so sure should or can be “sanctified.” Second, the author’s use of Dr. Koyzis analysis seems to commit a polar options fallacy in the statements about hip hop and the boroque period. Often times in committing this logical fallacy, the author tries to give only two options to emphasize the point, but this analysis is anything but helpful to the overall discussion.
Granted previous generations questioned music genres and debated them. That is exactly where this issue should examined, namely, on the associations of the genre; and should it at this time be utilized by Christians that are called to be seperate?
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!