Are Christians humans, too?
President Obama, on those rare occasions when he defends his Libya policy at all, focuses on Col. Muammar Qaddafi’s threats of “no mercy” to the rebels in his strife-torn North African satrapy. It’s a “humanitarian” imperative. America, the president says, has a moral duty to intervene when millions are threatened with extermination.
In the Sudan, some 5 million Africans have died for decades at the hands of the Islamist government in Khartoum. So brutal has been the rule of Omar al-Bashir that when the majority of Christians and followers of traditional African religions in South Sudan recently had the chance to vote on separation, most regions registered near unanimous votes to break away.
Yet there have been no calls from the Obama administration, or previous administrations, for the United States to intervene militarily in the Sudan.
Which leads us to ask: Are Christians humans, too? How is it that when U.S. administrations have been willing to spend blood and treasure for endangered peoples in the post-Communist era, it has been the case that we will intervene when Muslims are threatened, not when it is Christians who are being slaughtered?
Take Iraq, for example. When Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction were not found, we were told that at least we had stopped his mass murder of Kurds and Shiites. Well, that should promise a better future for Iraqis.
Except that we now learn that two-thirds of Iraq’s Assyrian Christians have been forced to flee the country of their birth since the United States took down Saddam.
Iraqi Christians have lived, often precariously, in the Fertile Crescent since biblical times. But only now is this ancient Christian community facing extinction. All the while, U.S. taxpayers shell out millions in foreign military assistance to a Baghdad government that cannot, or will not, protect its Christian minority.
In Afghanistan, Gen. David Petraeus assures us that the U.S. military presence is helping to establish a stable foundation for democracy. Only 500,000 Afghan children attended school under the Taliban, and none were girls. Since 2001, the general says, there are now 5 million Afghan children being educated.
We might feel a lot better about that fact if we could also be assured that they are not being taught in madrassa schools where they learn to murder their neighbors who are Christian.
Pakistan has recently seen its only Christian Cabinet member assassinated. He was the lone voice for the Christian minority in that country. Also assassinated there was a Muslim provincial governor who had taken a Christian woman under his protection. That late governor had called for a repeal of the country’s blasphemy law, which makes it a hanging offense to say there is a Father, Son, and Holy Spirit.
Five hundred Pakistani lawyers and professors applauded the governor’s assassination—by his own security guard. Yet, we are told that Pakistan is a democracy. Are we surprised that Pakistan has not been able to locate the hiding place of Osama bin Laden?
Lebanon was once a rare candidate for status as an Arab democracy. But decades of political violence have targeted such figures as President-elect Bashir Gemayel, a Maronite Christian, who was assassinated in 1982, and President Rene Moawad, also a Maronite, who was killed by a car bomb in 1989. More recently, the great hopes of a “Cedar Revolution” for democracy have faded as Lebanon has fallen under the rule of Hezbollah, the terrorist “Party of God” dominated by Iran.
Fearless Dr. Patrick Sookhdeo, a former Muslim, heads Barnabas Aid, a U.K.-based Christian advocacy group. Barnabas informs us that Coptic Christians are being murdered in Egypt. Sporadic attacks occurred under Hosni Mubarak, whom the United States financially supported for 30 years. Christian persecution of the Copts is intensifying in Egypt since Mubarak’s ouster. There, some 6 to 9 million Christians of the country’s 80 million people. In neighboring Ethiopia, a country with a Christian tradition going back to the Book of Acts, Barnabas reports some 100,000 Christians are fleeing new attacks by emboldened Islamists.
We Americans are moved by humanitarian concerns. Just look at the outpouring of prayers and financial aid to Haitians, the Japanese, Indonesians, and other victims of natural disasters. It should be noted that the Arab League and the Organization of the Islamic Conference—both groups whose members possess vast oil wealth—have done virtually nothing to help afflicted peoples.
The time is fast approaching for a searching reappraisal of a foreign policy that seems willing to rescue those being led to slaughter provided only that they are not Christians.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top19 Comments to “Are Christians humans, too?”
Absolutely great article (and question), Ken!
Thank you for everything that you have said here!!!!
Report comment to moderator
Reasonable? Obama. Hah!
My President seems to care nothing for what I find important. I use the following word judiciously, EVIL.
Report comment to moderator
The Audacity of Hypocrisy.
Report comment to moderator
Had Dubya done Libya, liberals would have approved or disapproved as now, depending on whether they’re humanitarian interventionalists or pacifists, but he couldn’t have, because he was Dubya. He would have screwed it up at the inception with his obnoxious cowboy strut all over Al-Jazeera. The coalition of the willing would have consisted of Cheney and Blair, the Arch-Fiend and Beelzebub.
Report comment to moderator
The more oil your country has, the more human you are.
Report comment to moderator
Seems, Ken? nay, say it is; we know not “seems!”
If you can’t say “is”, you’ll just have to suck up seems, Ken. It’s really and truly OK for things to seem bad.
Face it, Evangelicals hate Muslims, so we can’t expect y’all to approve of the rescue of Muslims by an alien Muslim President.
Obama does good, ye call it evil.
Whiney, shrill, Ken Blackwell is not serious. If he was, he would propose a plan to rescue Christians instead of souring the good that we did for the dead ducks in at least one Libyan town, according to current reporting.
Evangelicals are practicing a form of extortion — threatening to withhold support for one good unless they get their way over some other, undefined good.
Report comment to moderator
“The meeting made one thing clear, we need a 4/k person. Nancy thinks we need a person for 1st through 3rd also. She thinks the Pod leaders can do some but not all. She has good reasons for all this.”
That’s a bit of a stretch.
“Face it, Evangelicals hate Muslims . . .”
That is also a streeeeeeeeeeeeetch.
Report comment to moderator
Southern Sudan’s greatest crime is not being Christian but not possessing anything to interest western gov’ts.
Leabanese politics are hardly a good example to use for the persecution of Christians. Although religion does form part of the identity politics in the country its only one facet and assassinations are carried out on all political leaders regardless of religions affliations — Shia, Sunni, Druze, Maronite, Orthodox, Armenian, Alawite, pro-Syrian, anti Syrian, Palestinians, Socialist,etc — all willing to kill each other.
The central core of Ethopia is Christian wheras the border regions are Muslim or animist. In most cases this is because Europeans drew borders to favour the Christians over the Muslims. The secession of mostly Muslim Eriteria reflects this problem as well as the constant border clashes near Somalia where Somalian tribes want to secede from Ethopia.
I mention all this because to dispel the notion that there is a general hate-on throughout the world of Christians. The use of religion to incite one group over an other group is an age old tactic.
We Americans are moved by humanitarian concerns. Just look at the outpouring of prayers and financial aid to Haitians, the Japanese, Indonesians, and other victims of natural disasters. It should be noted that the Arab League and the Organization of the Islamic Conference—both groups whose members possess vast oil wealth—have done virtually nothing to help afflicted peoples.
I would really like numbers to back up these statements.
for a searching reappraisal of a foreign policy that seems willing to rescue those being led to slaughter provided only that they are not Christians.
Perhaps the persecuted Christians might what to acquire oil wells and the problem might be solved. Really, western foreign policies are not directed by religious affiliation rather economics.
Report comment to moderator
Well, pardon me all to . . . By definition, Evangelicals love. They may deplore, dislike, deride, spurn, and certainly pray for Muslims on the way to . . . the afore-unmentioned place.
Unbecoming emotions like hate may only be attributed to the unsaved. Sorry for always getting this screwed up.
Speaking of unbecoming emotions, I’d be curious about which if any visitors to this blog would be among the sick 13% of American males who raised their approval of Obama when he started shooting missiles.
Admit your spurt of admiration.
Report comment to moderator
missiles at Gaddafi . .
Report comment to moderator
Since he should have done it sooner – back when the rebels held most of the country, rather than waiting till they were about to collapse – it hasn’t raised my approval of him.
Report comment to moderator
That was Rwanda’s crime, too. Not having anything the US needs.
That said, we are NOT the policeman to the world, Ghadafy has NOT attacked us, we have NO constitutional reason for being there, not that the Constitution ever got in the way of the Left.
Report comment to moderator
I also note that Scroopy has forgotten Obama’s campaign statements that what he is now engaging in is unconstitutional. Obama is a liar. Plain and simple. Scroopy won’t admit that.
Report comment to moderator
Obama pre-calculated the benefits of dithering and may now collect his share of the glory for the re-capture of Eastern Lybian cities and the retreat of Gaddafi’s forces.
Who can see all ends? What Matt Y takes for evil (the rebel’s loss to Gaddafi of Ajdabiya), others take for good, for that saved the rebels from imminent defeat. The initial loss of Ajdabiya is what mobilized the Arab world to support military commitment by France and Britain, without which US intervention would have been problematic if not counter-productive.
This situation is delicate, and explosive, with Libyan society teetering on the edges of reaction and recrimination. But now, instead of a hated Dubya-style occupation of another oil-rich Arab state, Arabs are celebrating an Arab victory. This is truly an Obama triumph in the face of Republican nay-saying, nit-picking, and naval-gazing.
Report comment to moderator
Congratulations to Obama! If his aim was to further arm Al Qaeda and increase the probability of destabilizing Europe, the Mediterranean, and the rest of Africa, then ‘Mission Accomplished’. Besides, the unions are getting too much publicity in that regard, at least in Europe. Best let others take the heat for awhile. Good job, Mr. President.
Report comment to moderator
Obama is a liar. What he claimed was wrong before, he now indulges in. And he has no idea who he is helping.
Report comment to moderator
Obama doesn’t have to see the “end.” He has to honor the oath he took to uphold the Constitution. He is a liar.
Report comment to moderator
#8 HRW “Perhaps the persecuted Christians might what to acquire oil wells and the problem might be solved. Really, western foreign policies are not directed by religious affiliation rather economics.”
This is the same point Adios made in #5. You are both correct. American presidents love to go to war during re-election campaigns and when oil is threatened since votes are driven more by the economy than any other factor.
The humanitarian ruse is a red herring meant to throw the media dogs off the scent rather than to focus on the politician. Who are we protecting anyway? Al Qaeda?
The media obediently repeats that we are not at war but are engaged in a kinetic military action, that lobbing hundreds of cruise missiles is not meant to hurt anyone, that there will be no boots on the ground as American servicemen conduct rescue operations and that we aren’t after Ghaddafi even though two cruise missiles landed on his house.
The whole thing is a pack of lies from start to finish and the media lapdogs obediently recite the propaganda.
Report comment to moderator
A popular radio voice made me laugh the other day when he talked about people saying that we are going into Libya for the oil. He said “Heck, we don’t even want our own oil. Why do they keep saying we are going for Libyan oil?”. People keep repeating that, and I’m sure the oil issue has something to do with where we police and where we don’t, but we haven’t benefited from Iraq oil that I can tell. Maybe we just want to keep the markets open.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!