Texas lawmakers send family planning money to pro-life centers
Texas lawmakers passed a series of amendments to the biennial state budget that would move nearly $70 million in funding for family planning to organizations that provide alternatives to abortion and other health services.
The 2012-13 budget passed 98-49, largely along party lines, in the Texas House late Sunday night, and Democrats were seen voting “present” instead of rejecting amendments providing extra funding for mental health services for children, trauma care, and funding for the deaf and the blind, according to the Texas Tribune.
In a 100-44 vote Friday, the House passed an amendment by Republican Rep. Randy Weber that transfers almost $7.4 million from family planning funding to crisis pregnancy centers, which provide alternatives to abortions.
Abortion giant Planned Parenthood responded on Twitter, saying, “Outrageous! TX House just voted to take $8.3 million from family planning to give to unregulated crisis pregnancy centers for the next 2 yrs.”
House GOP then started diverting family planning funding to other health services, causing Democratic Rep. Sylvester Turner to claim the amendments were causing the lawmakers to choose between funding “child one or child two.” He then urged Democrats to to abstain from voting on the amendments, which as many as 44 members did.
Democrats shied away from talking about the abortions provided by family planning services, but instead focused on how the cuts would affect the screenings for diabetes, breast and cervical cancer testings, and other medical screenings provided by the services.
But Holly Whitehead, executive director of Pregnancy Resources of Abilene, Texas, said that there are a number of non-profit organizations, including Alliance for Women and Children and the local health department, that also provide medical examinations for women at a low cost without providing abortions. She also stressed that these organizations do not have the profit component of Planned Parenthood and other family planning organizations.
“I think that putting money into human services that are helpful to women and families is a good thing,” she said, noting that with the extra money, those organizations will be able to expand their services.
House Republicans also passed amendments that diverted family planning funding to other health services, causing Democratic Rep. Sylvester Turner to claim the amendments were causing the lawmakers to choose between funding “child one or child two.” He then urged Democrats to to abstain from voting on the amendments, which as many as 44 members did.
One amendment would add $6.6 million to pay for services for children with autism, while another moved $1 million to mental health services for children. Also in the bill were amendments to move money to trauma care, early childhood intervention and the Department of Aging and Disability Services, and care for the deaf and the blind. All of the amendments were adopted.
Republican Rep. Wayne Christian, who proposed the amendment moving money from family planning to autism said, “We don’t choose between good and bad, we choose between necessary and necessary,” according to the Texas Tribune.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top9 Comments to “Texas lawmakers send family planning money to pro-life centers”
Lets see should we fund baby killing companies or fund companies that are supporting life, hmmm hard decission…. Life or death, life or death.. Life wins out.
Report comment to moderator
Editor: Paragraphs 5 & 9 are repeats.
Great work Texas lawmakers!!!
Report comment to moderator
“family planning money”?
Abortion is murder, but this kind of funding–to either ’side’–shouldn’t be done by the state. It would be worse if this were a federal thing, but still…
Report comment to moderator
Ha!
Report comment to moderator
Democrats were seen voting “present” instead of rejecting amendments…
We’ve seen a lot of that lately.
Abortion giant Planned Parenthood responded saying, “Outrageous!”
In other words, giving money to people who want to save lives rather than killing them is an outrage!
What a sick upside down world we live in.
Report comment to moderator
Laura Schlessinger for many years has referred to PPFA as Planned Un-parenthood.
The funding of PPFA with tax dollars while would-be adoptive parents have been denied all manner of financial assistance to actually start their own families has always irked me.
I agree that there’s really no solid constitutional footing for underwriting abortions or proLife agencies.
But perhaps if you fund one you’re obligated by “neutrality” to support the other?
To call an abortuary a “family planning clinic” is Orwellian. Abortions happen too frequently because a woman who never planned to be anyone’s wife or mother was inseminated by a man with no plan to ever be anyone’s husband or father. And the feckless pair wind up with an innocent child whom one or both elect to “punish” with en utero extermination.
We need to disincentivize abortion and perhaps make them pro bono services instead of the govt subsidized for profit charnel houses they in fact are.
Report comment to moderator
Right about now someone needs to trot out the line about how PPFA provides mammograms for free.
Report comment to moderator
I bet this is driving the liberal culture of death completely insane!
Report comment to moderator
Maybe they all fainted.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!