Miss Politically Correct 2011
Who cares what Miss USA thinks about controversial political or social issues? In recent years, pageant judges have penalized contestants who have given the “wrong answers.”
Last Sunday, a judge at the Miss USA pageant asked Miss Tennessee, Ashley Durham, whether the First Amendment protects the burning of religious articles, as it does the burning of the American flag. Durham replied, “Absolutely not. I know that some people view it as a freedom of speech. However, burning the American flag is not patriotic at all. . . . You should also respect other religions. I am a Christian. I’m a faithful person. I would not appreciate someone burning the Bible.”
That answer angered pageant judge Penn Jillette, a libertarian atheist. He said Durham should not have advocated taking away freedoms. He went on to post of Twitter, “She negated the whole First Amendment. . . . Glad to help her lose.”
The moment was reminiscent of the 2009 Miss USA pageant, when gay gossip blogger Perez Hilton criticized Miss California, Carrie Prejean, for saying that marriage should be between a man and a woman. Hilton said, “She gave the worst answer in pageant history. . . . Miss California lost because she’s a dumb [expletive].”
Both women said their opinions about politically loaded questions hurt them. Prejean said her answer “cost me my crown. I wouldn’t have had it any other way. I said what I feel. I stated an opinion that was true to myself and that’s all I can do.”
Durham fired back in a statement issued yesterday, saying Jillette should not delight in shooting down her dreams: “I understand and am grateful for the protections we enjoy under the U.S. Constitution. . . . Due to my strong Christian beliefs, and my respect for the convictions of others, I personally feel that burning sacred texts goes too far.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top49 Comments to “Miss Politically Correct 2011”
I’d be glad to see this trend kill beauty pageants.
Report comment to moderator
That answer angered pageant judge Penn Jillette, a libertarian atheist. He said Durham should not have advocated taking away freedoms. He went on to post of Twitter, “She negated the whole First Amendment. . . . Glad to help her lose
—
This is the problem people like Penn Jillette and Perez Hilton can not seperate their deep hate towards the Christian Faith in order to be a judge in such a pageant.
Report comment to moderator
Agreed.
Report comment to moderator
My agreed was to Redwal’s No. 1.
Report comment to moderator
BRITTANY SMITH, thanks for a thoughful article intelligently asking fair questions regarding our culture. But I still like the picture better.
Report comment to moderator
I’m not surprised by the reactionof the judges, their world is very narcissitic and out of touch with reality.
But I look at the picture of Miss Tennessee and I wonder again how Christian women can justify their involvement iin such pageants. To quote I Tim. 2:9, “that the women adorn themselves in modest apparel, with propriety and moderation, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or costly clothing .”
It isn’t judging, those pageants, sophisticated as they seem, are based on the very primitive idea that sex appeal is power. The Bible says a women’s power comes from a gracious manner and a quiet spirit (I Peter 3:4, Proverbs 11:16).
Report comment to moderator
Carrie Prejean’s reply was down the line the same as the position Barack Obama took and articulated during his campaign.
Hypocrite gossip blogger Perez Hilton said, “She gave the worst answer in pageant history. . . . Miss California lost because she’s a dumb [expletive].”
Yet, Obama won big and Hilton did not make a similar stink about Obama’s position on this. Actually, hypocrite Hilton knew that candidate Obama was also a hypocrite so he did not worry about Obama’s campaign words as much as he worried about the words of a sincere pageant participant.
Report comment to moderator
Ah, so the eyesight is improving?
Report comment to moderator
As pretty as this woman is, I am more impressed by her statements and convictions. At my age, there is actually a healthy measure of honesty in that claim. I hope her parents are proud.
Her statements are almost as beautiful as a lot of convictions shared by the women on this blog. I do sincerely appreciate reading the wisdom I often read on this blog from women, who usually come across more kindly than some guys, including myself I confess.
Report comment to moderator
NJLAWYER, you reduced me to tears of laughter. The tear ducts still work too. Thanks for your prayers too.
__________
Seriously, my left eye is no worse. One of the tough things is adjusting to it when one eye changes and the other does not.
Blessings.
Report comment to moderator
Report comment to moderator
“The Bible says a women’s power comes from a gracious manner and a quiet spirit”
Have you been to the mall lately? That dress is rather modest in comparison
Report comment to moderator
I laughed, too, NJL.
Thanks for your comments, JM, on behalf of all us beautiful women on WorldMagblog!
Report comment to moderator
Michelle is right. The dress is pretty, but not revealing. Pretty modest for a beauty contestant dress. I’m sure she had to model a bikini to reach that point.
Report comment to moderator
Thorn’s comment is the one I was answering. I was looking at Michelle’s while writing. I am got good at multi-tasking.
Report comment to moderator
Thanks Chas. Although I agree, but it seems many christian girls don’t find a bikini to be immodest these days.
Maybe that’s a weaker brother issue? I dunno.
Report comment to moderator
The dress looks okay but I guess she did not realize that it was torn like that, right up the leg. Probably she was doing calisthenics or something (as part of the competition) and it ripped.
I know the feeling; my overalls are always busting their stitches, usually on the backside, every time I lean way over forward to see if I still actually have feet.
Report comment to moderator
It’s a beauty contest. Just as the judges may have subjective criteria for evaluating physical beauty they also have subjective criteria for evaluating “ideological beauty”. I’m all for contestants being “true to themselves”, but they have to realize that ideas have consequences. If you voice an opinion that you’re fairly sure is going to be repugnant to one of the judges then you do so with the expectation it will hurt your chances of winning.
Report comment to moderator
I think modest one piece suits on the right gal is not a bad thing. The women’s Olympic swim team members were all quite attractive if you’re into physique evaluation. There is still a sizable gap though perhaps it has lessened over the years between Pageant contestants and Playboy bunnies or Hooters girls.
I tire of these ideologically filtered questions.
Why not stuff like:
If you had to live in one of the two places would you pick the mountains or the beach?
Are you a dog or cat person? Whyso?
What was the most recent fiction book you read?
What entertainer would would you most like to meet?
Report comment to moderator
18. So how do you know what is repugnant to each judge? Do you look up all their idealogical positions before the pageant? What if you have two judges with opposing views?
Report comment to moderator
“If you voice an opinion that you’re fairly sure is going to be repugnant to one of the judges then you do so with the expectation it will hurt your chances of winning.”
And so she did.
But I fail to see how respecting the flag and respecting religious texts is a repugnant idea…
And she seemed to state it eloquently enough that it’s certainly not some dumb blonde making an airhead statement.
Report comment to moderator
And are you saying that winning should mean catering to the judges? Where is the beauty in that?
Report comment to moderator
“But I fail to see how respecting the flag and respecting religious texts is a repugnant idea…”
No Thorn, you got it all wrong…
She should saw the heads off of all unbelievers to be more attractive to the judges…
Report comment to moderator
Ideological beauty? Are you serious?
Report comment to moderator
It’s all very awful. The whole thing is a C-list TV event that has to pull in D-list celebrities as judges to try and draw ratings. And those D-list celebrities have to in turn do SOMETHING to garner news coverage for their appearance or all they get out of it a crappy appearance fee.
And the whole thing is just to find some girl with a nice rack who doesn’t sound embarrassingly stupid to turn into another D-list celebrity. I’m not sure what money monster keeps this thing going, but I wish people would stop feeding it.
Miss Tennessee’s didn’t do herself any favors though. She doesn’t sound smart. What’s constitutionally protected under the first amendment and what’s patriotic are quite rightly not the same thing! It’s not that I have a huge problem with opposition to burning flag & Bibles, but I do think their is a problem when people say “I don’t appreciate X because of my believes and ergo I don’t think it should be constitutionally protected.” That’s not insightful. What she uttered is actually the exact opposite of that old cliche, “I disagree with what you’re saying but I’ll fight to the death to protect your right to say it.”
If Penn Jillette wants to say in his capacity as a judge that’s not what Miss America is about…he’s the D-list celebrity sitting the judges chair isn’t he? At least until we all stop paying to this swill anyway!
Report comment to moderator
I would like to volunteer my services as an expert judge.
Report comment to moderator
I’m not a fan of the maxim, “Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.” Sometimes beauty just is (as in a flower, a sunset, and baby’s smile, and more).
Jesus encountered a beautiful woman and said so, sort of. The woman at Bethany anointed Jesus with expensive perfume and Jesus said, “she did a beautiful thing.” (Matt. 26:10). A Christ-like person learns to look for beauty in ACTION as well as on the surface.
However, the beauty of her deed was not in the beholding “eyes” of the disciples. Though the beauty was not in the eyes of the beholders, it was still there and Jesus saw it. The disciples’ “beholders” were closed to it.
Report comment to moderator
I find the whole idea of beauty contests stupid, so I pretty much ignore them.
As to the opinion Ashley Durham expressed, there’s nothing wrong with the opinion in and of itself but it doesn’t do a good job of answering the question that was asked, at least based on the post above (I’m not going to go read further on the matter).
If the question were, should burning religious articles be protected behavior, she can say whatever she thinks and why. But the question of whether the First Amendment does protect that behavior has nothing to do with whether she thinks we should respect other religions or what she would or would not appreciate someone doing.
In other words, I pretty much agree with Redwal’s third paragraph in #25.
Report comment to moderator
Yes, me too, Pauline. While I don’t often agree with Redwal, I do agree here.
It is protected behavior, and it should remain protected behavior. She could have said that she did not personally think it a good thing to do, but I certainly would have hoped that she would have clarified that they still had the right to do it.
And, as for beauty contests? I don’t think much of them, and would be happy to see them go away too.
Report comment to moderator
My Miss Tennessee would like to have seen Miss Tennessee win. When a different Miss Tennessee won the Miss USA contest a few years ago, Misten sent her a congratulatory note, complete with two photos of herself. She didn’t get a reply.
Report comment to moderator
P.S. I’ve only seen parts of a few Miss America pageants. I saw part of Miss USA last year (at a neighbor’s house) and was horrified at how sexual it was (more than Miss America, or at least more than any Miss America pageants I’ve seen).
Report comment to moderator
So how do you know what is repugnant to each judge? Do you look up all their idealogical positions before the pageant?
One tactic would be to assume that the judges’ views reflect the prevailing societal view and tailor your responses accordingly. Of course if they don’t mirror the prevailing societal views and you adopt this tactic then you could inadvertently give an answer that ticks a judge (or judges) off.
Or you could do what you said: research each individual judge and try to get a handle on his or her ideology.
What if you have two judges with opposing views?
Then, if your goal is to win, you give the answer that is most acceptable to the other judges, since you already know you’re going to tick off one of the two with opposing views. Assuming every contestant is asked the same question, the answer to which is guaranteed to alienate one judge, you’re not placed at any sort of disadvantage. If the question is only asked of you then you may be screwed.
But I fail to see how respecting the flag and respecting religious texts is a repugnant idea…
It isn’t, but that’s not exactly what she said. She said burning holy books isn’t constitutionally protected free speech because it happens to be offensive to some people.
And are you saying that winning should mean catering to the judges? Where is the beauty in that?
It’s not beautiful at all. Of course, no judge would know whether the contestant is answering truthfully or is catering his preferences.
Ideological beauty? Are you serious?
Yes. Or do you not agree that some ideologies are “hideous”?
Report comment to moderator
Some ideologies are indeed hideous, like those that drive people to behead innocent people or intentionally redefine marriage to deprives some children of a mother and father in the home. But different ideologies regarding the lefitimate extent of our liberties can lead to conclusions that are equally honorable. It’s a judgment call. There was NOTHING hideous bout this girl’s position, even if you might disagree with it. Hideous ideologies certainly exists but hideous is NOT necessrily anything that differs from your point of view.
Report comment to moderator
I only saw the last few minutes of the pagean, but Miss Ten. was the only one that answered her question. The others just talked in circles and didn’t really say anything.
Just my opinion, she was the prettest
Report comment to moderator
Ideological beauty in a pageant? Really? You get an ideology out of a stupid question in pageant? Unbelievable.
Report comment to moderator
It was a disgusting thing to do to this young woman.
Report comment to moderator
Beauty pageants are stupid. I am sorry that some young ladies think that it is their only way to succeed in life. I would rather see them do something intellectual or creative with their minds.
I have never watched one, and never will. For one thing, I think it is a sin for a Christian man to gawk at these women. For another thing, I don’t want to support or legitimize the stupidity.
The contestant’s answer was wrong. If a person wants to burn a Bible, they do have a Constitutional right to do so. I don’t know if that means that she should lose the competition, and I don’t actually care.
It probably isn’t fair to ask a beauty contestant a serious political or legal question.
Report comment to moderator
But different ideologies regarding the lefitimate extent of our liberties can lead to conclusions that are equally honorable.
That’s your opinion. Others might think supporting the prohibition of speech simply by virtue of it being “offensive” to be a “hideous” view. Others might consider support for same-sex marriage to not be a hideous view. Each judge has his or her own hangups, and that’s something a Miss America contestant has to be aware of.
Ideological beauty in a pageant? Really? You get an ideology out of a stupid question in pageant? Unbelievable.
So if a contestant was asked whether the first amendment protects religious articles and responded, “Well of course not; religion is inherently barbaric and has no place in modern society. It deserves no such protection,” you wouldn’t discern any sort of (potentially repugnant) ideology?
Report comment to moderator
Phos #6: “…I wonder again how Christian women can justify their involvement iin such pageants.”
I wonder as well.
Report comment to moderator
It’s an inane beauty pageant, Buddyglass! Which means it doesn’t warrant 40 posts.
Report comment to moderator
I agree the pageant is inane. I also think it’s silly to think that you can’t express an ideology in an answer to a pageant question, or that contestants can reasonably expect to express whatever opinion they want and not have it impact their chances of winning.
Report comment to moderator
I’m with PHOS in wondering how Christian women can justify their competing in beauty contests and sell their sex. And since this one doesn’t understand the First Amendment I wonder what else she thinks she knows but doesn’t. She’s an embarrassment.
Report comment to moderator
I fail to see how it was a poor answer, simply because she disagrees with how we’ve come to define “freedom of speech”
She does not negate the 1st Amendment. She is negating the association that burning the flag or religious materials is an expression or definition of “speech”.
If it is not, then it should not be protected.
We don’t protect the ability to say “Fire” in a crowded room that incites panic.
The 1st Amendment is not “freedom of behavior”…
Report comment to moderator
Thorn,
I consider it a poor answer, in part because she doesn’t address of whether burning materials can be considered speech or not. When courts have come to accept that it is “speech,” to effectively express one’s disagreement with that view, one should at least bring up the question, and explain why it should not be considered speech. Bringing it up would show she understood the issues involved.
As it is, she sounds as though the issue is not one of the right to free speech but rather whether it is right to do something offensive to other people. I’d be interested in whether she thinks the First Amendment protects one’s right to say offensive things about someone else’s religion.
If it does – and I am pretty sure it does – then what relevance is there to the fact that burning religious materials does not show respect, or that she wouldn’t appreciate a Bible being burned?
One could make an argument that burning certain objects – such as a Koran – could incite a riot, and therefore it should not be protected. I don’t see that she made such an arguement, however (though as I said above, I didn’t read anything else about this and don’t find the matter worth looking for more articles about it).
And if she had, the counterargument would be, what if standing up and giving a speech about a religion – Islam, for example – incites a riot? Unlike yelling “fire” in a crowded room, that kind of speech should be protected.
Report comment to moderator
It’s obvious that washed up fata** magicians like Penn Jillette need to do or say something stupid to keep their name in the spotlight. He’s not a Criss Angel so he has to rely on stupid comments to boost his notoriety versus using natural talent. I think Miss Tennessee was very concise in pointing out that she was against the burning of any religious documents or the flag. Her comments were a perfect example of what the first amendment gives us all. Fat Boy needs to practice what he preaches and pick on someone besides a 21 year old beauty queen. This issue has nothing to do with the first amendment; it’s all about respecting another person and their opinion. Go Tennessee!!
Report comment to moderator
“I consider it a poor answer, in part because she doesn’t address of whether burning materials can be considered speech or not.”
What part of “Absolutely not.” is not well stated?
“I don’t see that she made such an arguement,”
Her argument was the golden rule practically. She wouldn’t want her religious texts burned either, so we shouldn’t be burning anyones religious books.
“And if she had, the counterargument would be, what if standing up and giving a speech about a religion – Islam, for example – incites a riot? Unlike yelling “fire” in a crowded room, that kind of speech should be protected.”
Which wasn’t the question, nor does she have to rebuttal herself on stage.
Did you see the winner’s question? It was on legalizing marijuana. And she answered with a “I don’t know”…
Report comment to moderator
Thorn,
Her “absolutely not” was followed by the statement that some people see it as free speech, but that burning the American flag is not patriotic. What does whether it’s patriotic have to do with whether it’s free speech?
The golden rule is great. But what does it have to do with legal rights? The First Amendment isn’t about what people should do, morally, but with what they can or can’t be legally prosecuted for doing.
Her answer would be a great response to the question, how should we as a society view the burning of religious materials? But that wasn’t the question.
I really don’t care what the winner’s question – or answer – was. I don’t expect great wisdom from people who are selected, first and foremost, for their physical looks. Presumably, these kinds of questions are to show that the winner has more than just good looks.
Keen insight can certainly co-exist with physical beauty. But if you start the selection process with a focus on looks, you can’t expect to get the same caliber of responses to questions like this as if you first selected people on based on their ability to answer the questions, and then refined the selection based on looks.
Report comment to moderator
Thorn, she did a couple of things in her answer, but delving into the metaphysical aspects of speech and persuasively arguing that burning things in public doesn’t have a communicative function was NOT one of them. You’re giving her credit for an argument she didn’t make (and one that has also been dismissed by the Supreme Court as untrue).
“Her answer would be a great response to the question, how should we as a society view the burning of religious materials? But that wasn’t the question.”
Agreed. That would have also been a much better question since it doesn’t ask her for legal opinions that actually have factual components.
I’m usually not into speculating on ways to improve beauty pageants, but it seems like they would be better off using questions written by Miss USA staff rather than letting the judges as whatever they want.
Report comment to moderator
If the question was “Should religious texts like the Koran be afforded the same constitutional protections as burning the flag?” And she says “Absolutely not.” She’s clearly answered the question.
She doesn’t need to be asked your version of the question. Why should she have to answer for society? She’s being asked HER view, not society’s. The question wasn’t “Do you find disdain in religious book burning?”
“What does whether it’s patriotic have to do with whether it’s free speech?”
Flag burning wasn’t “legal” till ‘89. We almost sent an Amendment around the states regarding it in 2005 to make it illegal. Failed the Senate by a vote.
It’s not like it’s an old settled issue with 200 years of precedent. Many people do not find flag burning to be an expression of speech worth protecting. For Miss Tenn. it’s because its unpatriotic. She’s fully entitled to that opinion.
She’s not being criticized by Penn for how eloquent she presented it, but for the view in the first place because it would remove his concept of “free speech”…which apparently has no concern for responsibility or others.
I’m not saying she couldn’t have answered it more eloquently. But she clearly says that burning religious texts crosses the line. Thus it should not be protected by the constitution.
“And if she had, the counterargument would be, what if standing up and giving a speech about a religion – Islam, for example – incites a riot? Unlike yelling “fire” in a crowded room, that kind of speech should be protected.”
Why? You have the right to peacefully assemble, not to incite a riot. You can be arrested for starting a riot.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!