Being TOO good a parent?
Several experts interviewed by The Atlantic say, yes, it is possible to be too good of a parent. And this “too good” parenting is apparently driving 20- and 30-somethings to the therapist’s couch in droves.
One of the author’s clients, “Lizzie,” was an enigma. Her family relationships were intact. She had good friends, a good education, good health, and a good apartment. Why, then, was she so indecisive? Why couldn’t she trust her instincts? The article’s writer wondered, “Why did she feel ‘less amazing’ than her parents had always told her she was?”
Lizzie and her unhappy counterparts have this in common: Attuned parents. Loving parents. Parents who found tutors for the struggling. Parents who bought musical instruments for the aspiring. Parents who had, in short, “done it all.”
Paul Bohn, a psychiatrist at UCLA, blames parents who “will do anything to avoid having their kids experience even mild discomfort, anxiety, or disappointment—anything less than pleasant.” Child psychologist Dan Kindlon calls this our “discomfort with discomfort.” We don’t want our kids to hurt, fail, or lose, so we go to Herculean efforts to shield them from pain of any kind, an action that is creating college freshmen so fragile deans are calling them “teacups,” says Wendy Mogul, author of The Blessing of the Skinned Knee. Jeff Blume, an L.A. psychologist says we hold tightly to our kids because we need them to fill some emotional hole in our own lives: “We’re confusing our own needs with our kids’ needs and calling it good parenting. . . . If a therapist is telling you to pay less attention to your kid’s feelings, you know something has gotten way out of whack.”
Mogul and Kindlon agree: “[W]hatever form it takes—whether the fixation is happiness or success—parental overinvestment is contributing to a burgeoning generational narcissism that’s hurting our kids.”
It seems our attempts to praise our kids out of poor self-esteem are doing nothing but creating just that. Jean Twenge, co-author of The Narcissism Epidemic, says, “Narcissists are happy when they’re younger because they’re the center of the universe. Their parents act like their servants, shuttling them to any activity they choose and catering to their every desire. Parents are constantly telling their children how special and talented they are. This gives them an inflated view of their specialness compared to other human beings. Instead of feeling good about themselves, they feel better than everyone else.”
Competition, what naturally kicks the narcissism in kids down a notch or two, is now as outdated as the smallpox vaccine, with most kids’ sports teams negating score keeping and instead giving out awards like the “Spirit” award for the most obnoxious player on the team. Mogul begs parents, “Please let them be devastated at age 6 and not have their first devastation be in college!” She goes on to say, “[P]arents who protect their kids from accurate feedback teach them that they deserve special treatment.” Parental lies that “you can be all you want to be” aren’t fooling anyone, not even the kids.
Turns out that parents who soft pedal around their child’s weaknesses, cover his failures, and Band-Aid every kick in the teeth are raising what Mogul calls a “handicapped royalty.” And these kids—given so many choices growing up, given so much say in their lives, given so much false rah-rahing, cushioned from every blow—cannot and do not build up any immunity against even the teensiest failure. So when, as adults, struggles come, as they inevitably will, they have no idea how to cope. Yet parents keep parenting this way despite studies showing that giving a child too much choice makes him feel “depressed and out of control.”
Hmm. Depressed and out of control. Sounds like something that might make a person seek therapy.
Maybe we ought to do our kids a favor and be worse parents.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top31 Comments to “Being TOO good a parent?”
I disagree (of course) that this is “better” parenting.
I remember when I was in my mid-twenties spending time in a household with a first granddaughter, then just about a year and taking her first steps. Every time the child did anything “noteworthy” (took a step, for example), five adults (parents, grandparents, and aunt) all clapped and said “Yay!” I couldn’t blame them on one level, but on another, I thought it can’t exactly be healthy for a child to be that much the “center of the universe.” Now we have parents following children everywhere with video cameras, and the child can see instant playback and see how cute she is. Everything they do is cute, even if it’s getting mad and hitting Daddy.
I think generations of having just one or two children per family has contributed to this. An extended family needs more than one child, or that one child will be over-doted on.
Report comment to moderator
One thing I learned from Dr. Leman is that sometimes you have to let a child experience the negative consequence of their actions. Let them be late for school and have to go the office, let them go to school without their homework, let them get detention. Prodding and pushing and telling them “if you don’t don’t this, this will happen” has no effect on some kids. Sometimes they have to see first hand.
Report comment to moderator
Kbells is right, of course. I love Leman and other parenting teachers who advise us to allow the law of natural consequences to fall on our kids. It’s a lot cheaper lesson to learn before 10 than afterwards.
I had lunch with a Navy wife pal the other day who has a couple brilliant children, one in two grad schools at the same time and one loafing his way through another fine institution on full scholarship because he’s so smart.
The boys are 24 and 20 and she still manages their money, “because even though they can handle it, I want them to concentrate on their studies and not be bothered.”
I held my face steady.
“I realize not everyone agrees with me.”
I’ve known her a long time. I said nothing.
“But this works for the best.”
I smiled politely.
“I remember you talking about the law of natural consequences and tell stories about you.” She relayed one I didn’t remember saying, but you know what? She didn’t get it.
Princes indeed. It’s a good thing my family raised servants . . . I’d be crazy otherwise!
Report comment to moderator
Also, if your kid is into sports, please root for the team, not just your kid.
Report comment to moderator
I’ve attended the school of hard knocks and come out wiser. Had I followed God’s way and stayed in a Bible believing Church a major heartache would have been avoided.
Knowing how far to let them go in learning from the hard knocks can be tricky. God’s word is the best guide I know of. His Love is perfect.
Report comment to moderator
This is one of the best articles I’ve read about what’s happening to our children! As a therapist and a teacher for preschoolers thru college students, I can verify that the college students are completely unprepared for real life. They were worse than the preschoolers at accepting natural or logical consequences. I’ve seen other expamples among friends overdoing for their children. I think Cheryl D. is right that the (unBiblical) attitude of severely limiting family size is a primary contributor to the belief of a child that the universe revolves around them!
Report comment to moderator
Good comments. I agree with Cheryl, that this is not too good parenting. Good parenting does what is best for the child; not what feels good, gets the parent an award etc.
Michelle’s example is of someone who wants her boys to still rely on her. She is still “needed”. She must know that her boys, no doubt, do all kinds of things that take their concentration off their studies. She is making excuses for them, because it is important for them to succeed as much for herself as for them. It is a badge of good parenting for her. She is getting a reward, but it is probably at the expense of those she loves.
Having said that, there are no perfect parents anyway. We all make mistakes, just as our parents did.
Report comment to moderator
This is a superb World day! Parenting … advising friends … Ann Voskamp. Not that gay marriage and politics are unimportant, but these topics and posts are foundational, so much so that if we worked more in these arenas our responses to the cultural turmoil around us might be much more effective. Thanks to all for much encouragement!
Report comment to moderator
My younger son came home from an all-school 5th grade track meet (in other words, everyone his age participated, regardless of ability) with a 3rd place ribbon and some 4th place ribbons. He said people told him he did well because he wasn’t the slowest, he beat Ethan (which surprised me, as I know Ethan is chubby but I don’t think he toe-runs like my son). He didn’t think that was much to feel proud of, and he thought it was silly to get the ribbons (I’m guessing there were only four in each race, so 4th = last place).
I know how much trouble he had when he didn’t win the Pinewood Derby race in Cub Scouts, but I guess there he thought he had a chance, and with track he knows he’s too slow to win. But in either case, he thinks it’s silly to get a ribbon just for participating. We talked about how some adults think it’s important to make everyone feel like a winner. I threw out the ribbons when he obviously had no interest in them.
And my older son seems to be dealing fine with no longer having a 4.0 average in college.
(He got one A-, and his GPA is about 3.98 now.)
Report comment to moderator
I don’t think smaller families are the problem, in and of themselves. It has more to do with the attitudes of the parents. It’s those attitudes that cause the problems, and tend to cause the smaller family size also, because the parents are so obsessed with giving their kids a “perfect” childhood.
Report comment to moderator
By the way – totally off subject -
My second sentence in #10 starts “It’s those attitudes that…” – is that grammatically correct? I have a co-worker at work who was asking about the Bible verse that says “It is not the healthy who need a doctor…” He speaks English pretty well (he is from Brazil and speaks Spanish and Portuguese), but that sentence doesn’t make sense to him. “It” is singular, but “the healthy” is plural (as shown by using the verb for “need” rather than “needs”). He asked why, and I couldn’t come up with a reason except that it sounds right.
Report comment to moderator
Pauline, I think smaller families are PART of the problem simply because there are fewer kids, and they get too much focus. I know one child, for example, who for four years was the only child in her family; she was an only child, and her parents’ siblings weren’t married. So at family gatherings, everyone was an adult but her. Parents, aunts and uncles, grandparents, great-grandparents . . . and one center-of-attention child who was even bossing her own great-grandfather around, because it simply never occurred to anyone that she was the cutest person in the room but not the center of the universe. If there had been ten children and six teenagers in that room as well, children would have seemed less of a novelty. Plus, if she had had siblings she would have learned some things about sharing and negotiating; she wouldn’t have had full access to toys and attention.
Report comment to moderator
I remember my oldest son, who had GQ taste in clothes, spent his own money on a great sweater he really liked, but (since the kids laundered their own clothes) he didn’t take care in washing it as the label told him to. He shrunk it needless to say and he asked me a few days later if I would give him the money he spent on the sweater and see if I could wear it. I wanted in the worst way to give him the money and give him a do-over because, honestly, I wanted to be his hero. But I knew it wasn’t in his best interest. He needed to hurt, even in this small, stupid instance, in order to pay attention in the future. I’ll never forget that, I guess because it created an intense feeling inside me…as insignificant as it sounds now.
Report comment to moderator
Cheryl,
Maybe in our case it’s because my husband is a pastor, but our kids have always had to share our attention with others, whether siblings or not. Large families may force parents not to give too much attention to one child, but small families don’t force the opposite.
Report comment to moderator
My mother used to “warn” us — tell us consequences or give us an idea to resolve an issue. Several times even. And then she let us fall on our face with a “fine. suffer. do it your way.” And you know that worked.
Report comment to moderator
I have to say, however, that you have to recognize the consequences and lessons you want your child to learn may not quite fall that way.
Years ago when my husband was out to sea, of course, I had a lot of trouble getting my 3 and 5 year old to church on time. One Sunday in frustration, I said, “Fine. If you’re not dressed on time, you’re going in your pajamas.”
They went in their pajamas.
Several parents congratulated me on having the nerve to do that.
But the lesson sort of backfired.
My children loved going to church in their pajamas . . .
Report comment to moderator
That’ll sink you Michelle. Probably would only work on peer conscious kids. But I appreciate your effort.
Report comment to moderator
I agree, Michelle. I used to warn my children if they missed the bus, they would have to stay home. My daughter would have never dared try that with her oldest son. He would have missed it every day!
I agree with both Pauline and Cheryl. Parents can certainly fight the affects of having a small family. They do have to realize there are affects and do it, though. That is also true of large families—just different affects.
I remember one person lamenting at a parent teacher organization that the teacher blamed everything on her child being an only. Someone else complained that the same teacher also told her, the problems with her child were because the family was so large. If it wasn’t those two things, perhaps it was a middle child problem. We all laughed. Perhaps it is human nature and the tendency towards all kinds of not so nice things?
I have a grandson who was an only for 5 years. He also had six grandparents for whom he was the only grandchild. We had to make sure he wasn’t totally spoiled. There are a lot of children in this position today and yes, it can cause spoiling.
Report comment to moderator
Well, Michelle, not that I’m criticizing, but you ain’t Mama. That was one in control German lady. You have to tailor your response to the situation.
Now, at the age of three, I thought it would be amusing to lock Mama outside while she hung out the laundry on the line. I had the audacity to laugh out loud when she tried to come in the kitchen door.
She sternly convinced me to open that door, I suspect a shellacking ensued, but I lived to tell the tale. Never did that again.
Report comment to moderator
I hate that we blame this and that on why children behave the way they do. No offense Cheryl, but your line about small families being why children are so rotten and the plague of the “only child” really nettles me sometime. My mother was an only and my dad was one of twelve. I was an only and spent most of my life wanting a big brother to protect me and ended up marrying one. Against my wishes my child is an only child. Trust me, the grass is no greener on this side of the fence. I did not grow up close to ANY of my cousins. My driver’s license has my ex-mother-in-law’s address on it so if I am killed in a auto accident at least they can find someone to notify. Do you think these things don’t plague an only??? I was hardly doted on. I do my best not to dote on the Baby Girl
Report comment to moderator
The blame needs to lie with the adults in the situation. They need to act like parents and not friends and from my own personal experience, grandparents do not need to over ride what parents say in the presence of the child. If the child spends the night with Grandpa and Grandma and the grandparents want to feed them ice cream for breakfast, but if the parent comes in and says OK Little One you had ice cream for breakfast, you need to eat your vegetables for lunch, Grandpa and Grandma need to bite their tongues.
On the other hand I read a book called The Slacker Mom years ago and have done my best to follow the advice found there. Generations turned out quite well before all the How To parenting books hit the shelves.
Report comment to moderator
Kim, you wanted a big brother? I wanted a little brother to collude and conspire with. And then mother told me we couldn’t afford one.
I have a friend who could not have children, she miscarried, tried surgery, but was able to adopt. She and her husband became grandparents almost two years ago. Their son was an only child. He suffered no want and is now a lawyer in Texas. He is the most well-adjusted, polite young man I’ve met in a long time. Never gave his parents one bit of trouble. They were balanced, decent people and raised him well.
I don’t think it matters how many children there are at all. That’s not the “problem.” Kim is right. It’s not the children, it’s the adults.
Report comment to moderator
Kim, notice I said smaller families are PART of the problem. I’m certainly not saying anyone who can only have one child (or, in my case, none at all) is damning all the children in their extended family. But choosing to have only one or two children for the purpose of giving them the best of everything is often quite harmful–and when most of the siblings in a family don’t have any at all, and one has only one or two, that child is quite likely to grow up thinking he hung the moon, in an egotistical, unrealistic way. There are multiple issues involved; I do think this is one of them, in some cases.
Report comment to moderator
There are always (always) exceptions to every generalization…that is why it is a generalization.
As a teacher of many years (before homeschooling), I think that Cheryl’s generalization does hold water, and I’ve seen it in friend’s only children as well.
Still, Kim and NJLawyer are also right that the parents have a lot to say about whether their child will fit that generalization or not.
Report comment to moderator
It parenting practices consistently yield negative results, how can that by any stretch of the imagination be called “good” parenting? The “too good” parenting mentioned here is better called “over parenting” which will, most of the time, have negative results. I’m trying not to generalize here because I know people who had poor parenting and they turned out fine and others who had great parenting who went off-track. The truth is parents have the responsibility to help their children be prepared for life. Once they reach a certain point, the parents have very little say in the matter and the children made their own decisions.
I know some people who are still blaming themselves for bad choices their 30 + year old children are making. That’s ridiculous. God’s first children (Adam, Eve, Cain etc) went badly wrong. Was that God’s fault?? Of course not, God gave them the freedom to choose, but then they were forced to accept the consequences of their actions. God ultimately rescued them from sin’s penalty, but He didn’t give them a do-over.
Report comment to moderator
I’m agreeing with Cheryl here, who observed the motives of some parents in “choosing to have only one or two children for the purpose of giving them the best of everything”, except that I would go further and say for many of these parents the motivation to limit family size is also to spare themselves a lot of inconvenience and deprivation and suffering as well.
And this attitude is passed on in their parenting, where trophy children are protected from any terrible feelings that would blight their experience, and thus their performance.
It is the crudest form of idolatry.
Report comment to moderator
I think Cheryl and Karen have it. A friend of mine is Chinese-born, reared in USA. She’s been back to China a couple of times, including a 9-month stint several years ago, with her family of four, for her husband’s employer (he is also Chinese-born, reared here).
She noted that since the Chinese are only allowed a single child, their whole lives are poured into that child. It is idolatry. All the adults’ hopes and dreams literally live and die by that child. The child is terribly protected and spoiled because there is only one child and because of the Chinese (Asian?) culture that the family supercedes the individual.
One of her examples of the twistedness of limiting family size for selfish reasons is that Chinese amusement parks don’t have the safety features and oversight of US parks, and even housing codes are dangerously lax. People die, and no one cares, because as she put it, all their love and compassion is given to only their only child and there’s nothing left over for anyone else. she attibutes American compassion to our Christian heritage, that we still have a sense of responsibility to care for people outside ourselves and families.
I have white aquaintances in OH who have criticized our family size (now 5 kids) and proudly state that they want to give their two sons everything and take vacations, etc., and more children would force them to live a more restrained life.
Another friend, the mother of an only, insinuates that I don’t care as much for my children as she does for hers because I have so many and she only has one, she thinks I wouldn’t miss one of them if something terrible happened. How stupid, as if children were just extra “things” instead of the incredible unique beings created in God’s image that they are, different from birth from one another and each parent.
Report comment to moderator
DWM,
There were seven children in my family. My sister said once that sometimes people give the argument that they can only afford to send two kids to college, and therefore that’s their family limit. Well, we all had to put ourselves through college if we went; five out of seven of us have graduated (better than the national average) and the other two (including her) have had a year or so of college.
My sister put it bluntly: “There isn’t one of my siblings I’d trade for a college education.” And of course all the statistics of how much it costs to raise a child are absurd: It “costs” whatever you spend on it. I know families who have several children who only earn what the statistics say it “costs” each year for only one child. It costs them less because they have less to spend, and yet still they manage to meet their children’s needs on only one income.
Report comment to moderator
I fear that Christian people are committing this “over-parenting” mistake far too much. I don’t call the kind of parenting outlined in this article good parenting: It’s called spoiling your children rotten and never telling them ‘no.’ Being a good parent means loving your children abundantly while setting definite boundaries with firm discipline (and yes, this means you will have to say ‘no’ sometimes). *smile*
Cheryl D: I think you make a very good point about family size and I very much appreciate your comment; however, there are times when a family’s size is limited by things beyond their control. My husband and I, who are in our mid- and late thirties, have not yet been able to conceive, although we have been SO blessed by a precious adopted daughter. She MIGHT be our only child (we don’t know), although we would love to have more. We have struggled with wondering how to keep her from being spoiled because she is so loved and we waited so long for her. I think the answer is for us to be Biblically guided parents: We must love her with Christ’s love, and we must discipline her and make sure she knows that the universe is not her playground, nor does it revolve around her (cute as she is). *smile*
I think large families are wonderful, and I wish we could have one, but it might not be possible for us, and I wonder why. If one has many children, the dangers of “over-parenting” (or spoiling, as I like to call it) are still there. With one child, I like to think we are not doomed to have a brat. We just need to be extra careful she learns, early on, that she is not causing the sun to rise.
Report comment to moderator
World Reader, I fully agree. I was deliberate about not including people who cannot have more than one or two children (infertility, marrying too late, etc.) I was speaking of those who do it on purpose, especially extended families in which many have made that decision. At 44 and not married I myself will never bear children and have sympathy for that issue.
Report comment to moderator
I agree with several commentors – this so-called “good parenting” isn’t good at all. It’s simply spoiling described in such a way as to make the parents feel good about what they are doing.
I do know families who have only had 2 children because they want to be able to go to Disney World every year and have fully funded college saving accounts. But you can’t put all small families in that box – I was raised as an only child (my younger brother died shortly after birth, and my parents decided not to try again) but I wasn’t spoiled. I paid my own way through college and paid for my own wedding.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!