Treating Africans as friends, not dependents
Many African countries lag behind the rest of the world economically in ways that perpetuate cycles of poverty and dysfunction. These cycles can give the wrong impression that more developed countries are superior to these African nations.
In Dead Aid, Dambisa Moyo argues that Western nations have undermined African economies by giving cash to countries that are often corrupt and by providing aid to some nations trying to get off the ground. This is the result of unintended paternalism. The West needs a new of thinking. What would it look like for Western nations to treat struggling African countries as friends instead of just recipients of their help?
This may seem like mere semantics, but for many African leaders it’s important. For example, on a recent trip to Cameroon, journalist John Allen asked Bishop John Onaiyekan of Abuja, Nigeria, how the West could help Africa. Here’s what Allen reported about that exchange:
“‘The problem is the way you phrased the question,’ [Onaiyekan] said. ‘You asked how the West can “help” Africa. We’re not interested in “help” in that sense, meaning that we are exclusively the receivers of your generosity. We’re interested in a new kind of relationship, in which all of us, as equals, work out the right way forward.’
“The most important thing the West can do, Onaiyekan stressed, is not giving increased development aid or more trade, but what he called a ‘change of mentality’—including, he said, a change of mentality within the church.”
What really struck me about this conversation was Onaiyekan’s challenging the perspective that many African nations are simply standing around with downtrodden faces and outstretches hands waiting on the West to help. Perhaps part of the blame for this mentality on my part has been the years and years of seeing images of Africans depicted as helpless in TV commercials for relief organizations. In the past I may have thought of Africans as needing our “help” rather than thinking about what it means to partner with them as friends so that they can help themselves and find solutions to their own problems.
It seems that the East may view Africa differently than the West. In fact, the Chinese are sending strong signals that they do not see Africans as inferior dependents. For example, Chinese businessmen are marrying African women and are seeking out new business opportunities on the continent. Jennifer Brea explains:
“While Americans are pestering their leaders to Save Darfur—an unlikely prospect absent full-scale military intervention—the Chinese are busy building roads and hydroelectric power dams. China believes Africa is a huge economic opportunity and deals with Africa like a business partner. The Chinese see Africans the way many would like to see themselves.”
Building infrastructure instead of sending over things like clothes is the type of initiative that helps Africans help themselves in the long run.
Not seeing Africans as equals has become such a tense issue that some Africans are even telling U2’s Bono to change his mentality. After he delivered a standard development speech about the need to give Africa more cash, an African man in the audience asked Bono, “Where do you place the African person as a thinker, a creator of wealth?”
Maybe we’ve been going about this all wrong. Maybe the best way to help Africans is not to see them as recipients of our “help” but potential thinkers and wealth creators who need friends to provide the support that moves countries off the path of dependency and onto the path of freedom and prosperity.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top27 Comments to “Treating Africans as friends, not dependents”
I agree with the point of this article in spirit, but then I think of places like this. Some folks don’t need dams and roads; they need food and medicine.
Report comment to moderator
There’s nothing wrong with Africa which could not be fixed if we:
(1) Encouraged respect for private property and the rule of Law
(2) Dropped our tariffs so that African produce could come here and US dollars could flow directly back to the producers
(3) Demanded an end to various one-party President for Life dictatorships.
Report comment to moderator
How do you “encourage respect for private property and the rule of Law” in foreign sovereign nations?
On what basis does the U.S. “demand an end to various one-party President for Life dictatorships”? At gun point?
Report comment to moderator
Our present Administration treats Africa the same as it does American state governments. What more could they want?
Report comment to moderator
That’s a great article, Anthony.
I lived in Africa for seven years. I kept wondering why liberal people want to keep sending “aid” to Africa when so much of it ends up in the hands of oppressive dictators.
If people want to “help” Africa, and I agree that that is the wrong mentality, then they should stop wishing that the United States and other devloped countries keep pouring money in. Liberal do-gooders would probably have a stroke, if they realized how many guns the aid money has bought.
One way to partner with Africans is through missions. Missionaries, at least the best among them, make friends on the ground and partner with Africans to help themselves. They also channel resources to where they are actually needed.
Report comment to moderator
BuddyGlass, good questions. Thanks for posing them.
Report comment to moderator
Honestly, my opinion is that the only way Africa is going to get better is through foreign economic investment and development. Essentially what China is doing. Only, I will be stunned if the Chinese aren’t doing so in such a way as to rip off African countries and leave them holding the bag.
In the mean time, people are starving and dying. Those people don’t need roads and bridges, they need food and medicine. To the extent it’s possible to deliver those necessities (as opposed to enriching corrupt governments) it should be done.
Report comment to moderator
You take care of the immediate need of food and medicine, of course, but you don’t stop there. You don’t build the road — you help them build it. You build it with them, teach them skills.
Report comment to moderator
Very wise observations Anthony.
But the problem is not just with Africa. We (I) tend to view the solutions to my neighbors needs in much the same way. The American Indian reservation system is a classic illustration of the shortsightedness of the “give them stuff” mentality; as is our US welfare system. But is goes even deeper than a welfare mentality. It goes to the level of how we think about people who are different from ourselves. This is a huge challenge for me, and I believe for ever Christian and local church in America.
Report comment to moderator
They weren’t treated all that well on the Reservation in the beginning. No one was “giving them stuff” back in the day.
Report comment to moderator
Realistic points made to encourage partnerships instead of paternalism. My church (OPC) supports a few missionaries who establish clinics, encourage better farming methods and work on Bible translations into the local languages.
I knew the Chinese have been taking advantage of the economic opportunities, but I hadn’t fast-forwarded to Chinese-African marriages and babies. Interesting to think about.
Report comment to moderator
The book When Helping Hurts deals with this issue wisely and in depth. WORLD has profiled it.
Report comment to moderator
They are extremely poor people, but Buddyglass has a point — do you want this done at the end of a gun barrel? Investment is the way to go. People don’t want, don’t care about what they don’t earn. They just want more of it. We see that here.
Report comment to moderator
A church here in town that I attended for a few years has a close relationship with a church in Liberia (and a number of Liberian immigrants who live here and attend the church). The leaders of both churches have met a number of times and discussed the Liberian church’s needs and ways the church here can partner with them. I don’t attend there now so I’m not up-to-date on what they’re doing, but I’m sure the projects they work on are ones the Liberians have said will do the most good.
One big push was to get sponsors for children at a school there, as well as yearly donations for things the school particularly needs. (For instance, the first year, one of the needs was to buy each child his own drinking cup so they wouldn’t share germs so much. Plus a second set of clothes for each child so they could dress nicely for church, which is very important to them.)
One way people can definitely help is through an organization called charity:water, which funds work to construct wells (using partnerships with trusted organizations on location) so people can have safe, clean water. No matter what the people in many African villages want to be able to do to better their own lives, they can’t do it when they’re sick, or spending a large part of every day just fetching the only water they can find (dirty and unsafe). A lot of things that are sent to Africa can end up in the hands of the wrong people, but it’s pretty hard to steal a well.
Report comment to moderator
We’ve ruined Haiti with our help.
Report comment to moderator
Pauline, actually one can “steal” a well. A coworker went to Africa for a few weeks to help repair wells with a group. First though, they had to work with the village leaders to protect the wells. The local strongmen would force villagers to pay them for water from the well. This group wouldn’t repair the well unless the village leaders would agree the water would be free for all.
Report comment to moderator
Bradley is more or less correct but I think he’s a bit naive when it comes to the Chinese. The Chinese and many western private investment funds are currently buying up vast tracts of African farmland mainly through corrupt chiefs who claim ownership of what is essentially communal land. The Chinese (and western businesses) are essentially repeating the same process in a more modern business like manner by which Canada and the US gained control of native land — purchasing vast tracts of land for minimal payments by bribing corrupt chiefs. As for marrying African women, many American and Canadian men did the same while exploiting native land. In fact, the majority of the French-Canadian fur trade was a cooperative enterprise between native women and French men. The Chinese aren’t treating the Africans as equals rather they are treating them as an exploitable market whereas the western gov’ts treat Africans as children. No one is treating them as equals.
As for aid programs that work — Pauline is essentially correct.
#15 What ruined Haiti was French, American and other European countries who refused to recognize a country born out of a slave revolt as a real country. France demanded and received compensation for the plantation owners losses. In essence, Haiti had to pay France for the right to be independent — these payments were enforced not only by France but by America and other countries who felt threatened by a slave revolt.
Report comment to moderator
Who were the corrupt American Indian chiefs?
Report comment to moderator
Wow! Good points Anthony, I think. I am a bit surprised that you would desire to have blacks and whites treat each others as equals since I have never heard that from you before. Generally the theme of your posts is that everything wrong with black culture is the fault of whites. Perhaps that is what you are saying here too, but I’m always pulling for you.
This is exactly right. Blacks need to get past the victim mentality and the inferiority complex and whites need to stop playing the role of white savior.
The Christian point of view is that all men are created equal. We are all brothers, sons of Adam. There is only one race, the human race. Blacks are just as capable as whites. Whites need to see this, but it is more important for blacks to see it.
The victim mentality of the black culture is a detrimental and devastating mindset which prevents them from stepping up and being all God would have them to be. Leaders in the black culture who blame whites for everything aren’t helping. Blacks need to step up. They could use some guidance and America can help.
Report comment to moderator
NJL — I always thought the idea of a “noble savage” was a leftist cliche and thus im surprised you objected to my generalization. To think each native chief was pure in thought when negotiating with the Europeans is quite naive even today corruption on the reserves is quite rampant. In many cases native chiefs thought to use Europeans to further their own leadership ambitions or to expand their tribes power/territory. The Iroquois Confederacy leader were quite successful in manipulating the European powers both for their own benefit and occasionally for their nation’s benefit.
Report comment to moderator
Sonny, the US is not a European power and never was. Give me the name of an American Indian Chief who worked a deal with the US Army and/or govt.
Report comment to moderator
I want to investigate that.
Report comment to moderator
Interesting that this subject comes up. I was just reading the Mar 7th, 2011 issue of New Yorker magazine, and the article about Mo Ibrahim, and his foundation to encourage and reward excellent leadership in Africa…
Some say that the governance is poor because Africa is poor. Ibrahim says that Africa is poor because the governance is poor. Africa is RICH in resources, it just doesn’t have the means to utilize them efficiently…
Virtually everyone says the situation needs to improve. In my opinion, the West needs to stop pouring money indiscriminately into Africa, and do things that are effective in ending poverty instead of enriching dictatorships.
I think this means that we should enourage investment in business ventures, research and development, and education.
At the very least, we should stop helping any dictators line their pockets with money meant to help the poor.
Report comment to moderator
“How do you “encourage respect for private property and the rule of Law” in foreign sovereign nations?”
You reason with them.
Good points by Bradley.
Giving them food and medicine is good, but a friend goes beyond that to show them how to live. Just giving things isn’t going the extra mile. Going the extra mile is entirely about building relationships.
This is what the Indians did when the Pilgrims arrived. They didn’t just give the Pilgrims food, they taught them, walked with them on how to farm here, not to become dependents but self sufficient in this land.
Report comment to moderator
NJL 18, some would say that the NezPerce Chief Lawyer would qualify. He was just one of many chiefs: you may have heard of Chief Joseph, Chief Looking Glass, and Chief White Bird. Anyway, the Nez Perce people consisted of several groups headed by these and other individuals. The chiefs would not agree to work with the US Army. Eventually, the American representatives found Chief Lawyer willing to work with them. He sold the land though the others did not acknowledge his treaty. That is why there were treaty and nontreaty Indians here. The nontreaty Indians joined Chief Joseph in his not quite successful flight to Canada when the Americans insisted on taking Chief Lawyers words as speaking for all when he was just one of many.
Report comment to moderator
Thorn, you’re speaking the truth. I moved to Lusaka, Zambia 3 1/2 years ago at age 55 to train pastors and empower churches to minister to their communities. The key thing is not throwing money at their problems, as Dambisa Moyo, a Zambian, points out in her well written book, Dead Aid. Her book is written from an economist’s point of view. From a Christian missionary point of view the key to ministering grace to the African church is listening carefully to understand their culture and problems, developing genuine relationships, and empowering them through training and development that strengthens them to address their challenges in a way that can be sustained over the long haul.
Report comment to moderator
So the Chinese worked this out fine, but somehow business folks from the West, for years never got the message?
Why didn’t the West take this approach?
They planned not to?
Automobile cos. planned not to?
Food industries planned not to?
Why the doors flying open to the Chinese to build and bring in all the goodies?
:-O
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!