An Anglican resurgence in North America
Anglicanism has begun a global and North American reformation, according to Archbishop Robert Duncan of the Anglican Church in North America (ACNA), who recently delivered his annual state of the church address, describing the growth and challenges faced by orthodox Anglicans. Duncan serves as both head of the ACNA and bishop of the Anglican Diocese of Pittsburgh.
The worldwide Anglican Church has 39 provinces, and historically the Anglican province in the United States has been the Episcopal Church. But because of the theological and numerical decline of the Episcopal Church, American Anglicans hope the ACNA soon will be recognized as an alternative province.
As a province-in-formation within the worldwide Anglican Communion, the ACNA unites 100,000 Anglicans in nearly 1,000 congregations across the United States and Canada and represents four former Episcopal dioceses.
Deep disagreements have strained the international Anglican Communion, which represents 77 million Anglicans worldwide.
“The North American Anglican Church, chiefly represented by the Episcopal Church, was in a drift away from classic Christian orthodoxy for nearly five decades,” Duncan told me. As a result, Anglicans have split into more than 40 different groups since the 1960s. “Around the year 2000,” he explained, “Anglicans began to determine that it was time to bring these fragments together.”
When many distressed congregations started leaving the Episcopal Church and the Anglican Church of Canada, they aligned themselves with provinces in what’s known as the global south, including Rwanda, Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda, and South America. The Anglican Church of Rwanda, for example, commissioned the Anglican Mission in the Americas in 2000, while the 20 million-member Anglican Church of Nigeria sponsors the Convocation of Anglicans in North America.
Because the provinces in the global south have faced persecution, “the Churches in Africa and Asia know what they stand for,” Duncan said. “They have been clear about what constitutes the Christian faith.”
In 2008, five primates from Rwanda, Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda, and South America met with the archbishop of Canterbury to formally propose that the ACNA become the 39th province in the Anglican Communion. Although having two provinces in the same geographic region upsets the Communion’s traditional governing structure, North Americans desired to add a province rather than break away from the church entirely.
Duncan hopes that the ACNA will serve as a bastion for orthodoxy in North America, and provided some indicators he found encouraging. For example, in spite of property lawsuits, the ACNA grew from 706 to 952 congregations during its first 18 months, and of the nearly 250 new churches, at least 130 were new church plants.
But within the emerging ACNA province there has been debate over women’s ordination. “We agreed when we came together that North American Anglicans would reflect global Anglicanism, which is disagreed on this matter,” Duncan said.
While Anglicans agree that women can serve as deacons, they differ on the question of women’s ordination to the presbyterate (priesthood). Anglicans do not believe that women should ascend to the episcopate (bishop).
“I personally have ordained women to the diaconate and priesthood,” said Duncan. “The issue is not first order in doctrinal import.”

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top17 Comments to “An Anglican resurgence in North America”
This is the church I recently joined. I was a lifelong Episcopalina but have found a home here. I like it. Our new bishop spoke recently at our church. He said in South Africa, they want to hear your testimony so they know you KNOW Christ. For any of you not liking the direction your church is headed, you may want to try this one.
Report comment to moderator
It may be like our neighbors across the street. When we came here, they were Episcopalians. Then they were nothing, they had a house church. Then they became Anglicans.
Report comment to moderator
How soon before the Episcopal Church get removed from the Anglican Communion and the ACNA take their place. The reason I do not see those two being involved with in the same Communion without more fights breaken out.
Report comment to moderator
There are a couple Anglican churches renting spaces in our area of Southern California.
Report comment to moderator
I didn’t realize that the Anglican Church was different from the Episcopalian Church. However, in the end, weren’t they both founded by Henry VIII who wanted either male offspring or the death of his wives?
Is this really something to build a church around? How bizarre! What is even more bizarre is how many people actually join.
Report comment to moderator
Xion, I am sure you didn’t mean to offend.
Report comment to moderator
Xion, I am sure you didn’t mean to offend.
Report comment to moderator
Xion,
While it’s true that Henry’s situation was the breaking point, he only wished a separation from the Pope, not a new church. Protestantism was already making headway among church scholars. Thomas Cranmer had more to do with Anglicanism’s founding than did Henry. Cranmer wrote the vast majority of the original version of the Book of Common Prayer which laid out the worship of the Church. The Ten Articles were published in 1536 by Cranmer. They later developed into the Thirty-nine Articles which (although increasingly ignored) defines Anglicanism.
I was an Episcopalian for nearly 40 years but as it increasingly rejected orthodoxy, I felt the need to leave it. We (my husband and I) did not join the ACNA in part because We didn’t wish to become part of a splinter of a splinter of a splinter. After a number of years of study and prayer we decided to go to the church with the longest roots. That is why we became members of the Eastern Orthodox Christian Church.
Report comment to moderator
Who knew that Garrison Kiellor was an Anglican minister?
Report comment to moderator
Xion – when it adheres to orthodox beliefs, Anglican worship is as valid as any other Protestant denomination’s, and it is exceedingly beautiful, in liturgy, music, sacraments, and Word.
Report comment to moderator
As an Anglican from the cradle, who, when no Anglican church was at hand, has belonged to other protestant denominations, but have been “back in the fold” now for years, I am strong on the Anglican traditions, with the exception of women’s ordination to the episcopate. I live in a diocese that had one of the first women diocesan bishops in the Anglican Communion. After 10 years, she moved to a far distant part of the world, where she is again a diocesan bishop. Ou Synod elected her replacement, another woman bishop! I am so proud and happy to be a member of a parish in the first Anglican diocese in the world to have a woman bishop succeded by another woman bishop. Last I heard, 45 percent of our clergy in the diocese are women! We have a male rector, and his wife is an honourary assistant. They make a great team!
Report comment to moderator
Thank you Kathy.
Report comment to moderator
As an Anglican, I am distressed at the ACNA’s willingness to ordain women as priests. Totally unbiblical, and driven by the a stale zeitgeist of 70s feminism. The seeds of the denomination’s destruction are right there–this is the path the Episcopalians pioneered before them.
There is no logical reason not to ordain women as bishops if they’re priests already. And on the same reasoning, no logical argument against homosexual priests and bishops or homosexual marriage, because you’ve granted the argument that sex has no real meaning.
That the identity of the priesthood is “not first order in doctrinal import” is both naive and disobedient. The reason diocese with women priests are included is that they just don’t want to deal with it and alienate folks right now.
The same stance was taken by the Founding Fathers when they didn’t apply their ideals of liberty to the slave states and insist on abolition then and there–they didn’t want a fuss. It took four score and seven years later to deal with slavery in a very bloody and appalling way.
Report comment to moderator
I was an active, cradle Episcopalian until I left the Episcopal Church for an ACNA-affiliated church a few years ago. It seems to me that the exodus from ECUSA in the late 1970s & early 1980s was mostly of older disaffected churchmen. This time, the migration seems different: most of the people who switched at the same time I moved my family are my age (I am under 50). I consider a more-or-less younger crowd to be one of the factors in ACNA’s success so far.
And, FWIW, I’m pretty certain Garrison Kiellor is not an Anglican minister. He switched from the Lutheran to the Episcopal church several years ago, though.
Report comment to moderator
Xion: I didn’t realize that the Anglican Church was different from the Episcopalian Church. However, in the end, weren’t they both founded by Henry VIII who wanted either male offspring or the death of his wives?
Not quite. The Anglican Church already existed, as part of the Church or Rome. Henry broke it away from Rome and made it the official church of England.
A good history is here: http://anglican.org/church/ChurchHistory.html
Report comment to moderator
Bode — Frank was being cute, because the man in the picture looks a little bit like GK.
Report comment to moderator
Also, I am a Cradle. Sadly, spent some time in TEC until I realized that TEC is the splinter Church. ACNA is the Traditional Church which was hijacked by TEC. May God be praised, I am back Home Again!
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!