Morally inconsistent currency
I want to ask you a question of worldwide moral consequence. First, please grab your purse or wallet. Take out a one dollar bill and look at it while you read this column. On the front, look at the seal on the left that bears a capital letter. Now, read the fine print above it. Did you know that those words have the power to inflict great harm on people here in the United States and around the world? Do you know that you and I as United States citizens bear moral responsibility for those words?
“This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private,” is the language I’m referring to. If you knew you had the power to remove those words, what would you do? What should you do?
Still holding that dollar bill? Good. Turn it over. Read the four words above the word “ONE” in the center. Occasionally some radical group calls for the removal of “In God We Trust” from our currency. We should do it or come clean as a nation because “legal tender” and “In God We Trust” are morally inconsistent.
What does legal tender mean and why is it so morally reprehensible? Economist Dr. Hans Sennholz defined legal tender in his 1985 book Money and Freedom as follows: “According to most dictionaries, legal tender is any kind of money which by law must be accepted when offered in payment of a debt (‘tendered’) expressed in the country’s monetary unit.” In other words, if you receive a paycheck every two weeks, your employer owes you a debt of two weeks’ pay. You must, by law, accept payment in dollars for this private debt owed by your employer. Moreover, if someone, or some entity, or a foreign country purchases U.S. government bonds as an investment, dollars must be accepted as payment for interest and principal. And finally, keep in mind that the entire world’s monetary system is built on U.S. dollars.
So what?
As the debate over the debt ceiling reveals, the United States of America can’t pay its bills. We don’t have enough tax revenue or investors and other nations loaning us enough money to meet the shortfall. In other words, there’s a big gap between what we owe and what we can pay with tax revenue plus borrowed money. To make up the difference, we create more dollars by printing them and by making electronic accounting entries to our national banking system. It’s an ancient practice: Pay people less by devaluing the currency. And the people have no choice to accept it because, by law, it’s “legal tender.” Bottom line: Thanks to our Federal Reserve banking system we cheat and steal as a nation. The United States government is plundering its own citizens and the citizens of the world and we’ve been doing it for nearly a century.
Moreover, because the world’s financial system is based on the U.S. dollar, we are contributing to worldwide financial problems that impoverish people – problems like inflation and currency debasement. We have a moral obligation to demand that the U.S. Congress remove the legal tender status of our currency, return to a gold standard, and truly trust that God’s way of finance—living by the Golden Rule, paying our debts with an honest currency—is the only moral way to conduct the nation’s business. For now, “In Legal Tender We Trust” is our true currency motto. “In God We Trust” is a sham.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top26 Comments to “Morally inconsistent currency”
We need someone to be in charge of the office of Faith-based currency. Cuz that is really all we have now.
And you dont have to have the last name Paul to accept that.
If the ChiComms lose faith in our currency our paper money will revert back to its intrinsic value folks.
Be afraid. Be very afraid.
Report comment to moderator
Agreed.
Report comment to moderator
Lee,
Thanks for writing this. Can you send it to every person in this congress and administration?
I think we’re in this current mess, because so many people in and out of government have been dishonest in their financial dealings, and fudge their paperwork as a matter of course.
This is just one more instance…
Report comment to moderator
Well, what do you think of this? I think it stinks because there’s no incentive for a government to ever face up to the problem:
http://www.moneynews.com/Headline/Moodys-Suggests-Eliminates-Debt/2011/07/18/id/403920?s=al&promo_code=C9F3-1
Report comment to moderator
We don’t have enough tax revenue or investors and other nations loaning us enough money to meet the shortfall.
This isn’t true. Plenty of folks are willing to lend us money.
Moreover, because the world’s financial system is based on the U.S. dollar, we are contributing to worldwide financial problems that impoverish people
Devaluing the dollar only impoverishes people whose assets are denominated in dollars. It benefits those whose debt is denominated in dollars. It benefits U.S. exporters. To the extent it harms dollar holders it may benefit those whose assets are not denominated in dollars.
Report comment to moderator
They are willing to lend so they can own us. That’s stupidity on our part.
And there is a movement afoot to change the world system from using the dollar.
Stupid is as stupid does and our leaders have been and are stupid.
Report comment to moderator
Lee: For now, “In Legal Tender We Trust” is our true currency motto.
Frank: I was gonna suggest “In Mammon We Trust.”
Has a more … prophetic ring to it, dontcha think?
They are willing to lend so they can own us.
They lend to us because they think they stand to earn a profit and there is very little risk.
Report comment to moderator
As re. the nature of honest money, read Gary North’s brief and excellent book, Honest Money: The Biblical Blueprint for Money and Banking (free PDF, 110 pages).
Indeed Lee, you should interview the man for World. Let’s get this long-overdue conversation front-and-center, where it belongs.
Report comment to moderator
“Devaluing the dollar only impoverishes people whose assets are denominated in dollars.”
Well since the Dollar is the world standard of currency, isn’t that just about everybody?
Report comment to moderator
“This isn’t true. Plenty of folks are willing to lend us money.”
Oh yeah… indefinitely, right up to the point where they dump the dollar as the standard of currency, and the dollar experiences hyper-inflation…
Report comment to moderator
Insanity is doing the same things over and over and over again, and still expecting things to “Change”.
I consider our administration and the FED to be insane.
Report comment to moderator
NJLawyer (6): They are willing to lend so they can own us. That’s stupidity on our part.
Frank: “The rich rules over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender.” ~ Proverbs 22:7
I have often taken issue on these pages (most recently at the Michelle Bachmann thread) with the false notion that, as long as we stand by Israel, God will continue to bless us.
Our nation has numerous moral problems, to be sure. But I find it ironic that one of God’s indictments against OT Israel was their theft by debasement of the money.
Fiat money is a violation of the Eighth Commandment, “Thou shalt not steal.” Even when that fiat money is “backed by the full faith and credit of the United States of America.”
So what makes anyone think God will somehow bless us for supporting contemporary Israel, when we’re committing some of the same sins (including debasement of the currency) for which God punished ancient Israel?
Report comment to moderator
And finally, a little piece of advice:
Get out of the dollar.
Like it’s a burning house.
(And here’s one way I have done just that.)
Report comment to moderator
I was thinking China, Frank…
Report comment to moderator
Am I reading that right? Gold is $1600/ounce?
Report comment to moderator
Get out of the dollar. Like it’s a burning house.
Schiff makes his living being Chicken Little. He’s been predicting Weimar-style hyper-inflation for years now. Where is it? Does it not cause you to lose some faith in Schiff given he consistently predicted something that has consistently failed to happen?
I mean, it might eventually happen. And I’m sure when it does Schiff will take credit for predicting it. But how can you view this as anything but a case of “even a stopped clock is right twice a day”?
Gold experienced a spike not unlike its current spike around 1980. If you’d bought gold at its peak ($800/oz, not knowing it was a peak of course) you’d have waited until 2008 for it to hit that price again. Of course that fails to take into account inflation. Taking into account the changing value of the dollar you’d still be underwater on your $800/oz investment using today’s price of $1600/oz. In contrast, the S&P 500 went from $114 to $1316 over this same period.
Of course that’s a cherry-picked example to represent the worst possible case for gold. If you’d bought gold in 2002 prior to the current run-up you’d be sitting pretty. But that’s the point: investing in gold is hardly risk-free.
In fact, Frank, if you think the dollar is due to hyper-inflate in the near future, what you should do is take out massive amounts of debt, denominated in dollars, then leverage it to purchase assets whose value won’t change as an result of that inflation.
Alternately you could invest in one of a couple ETFs designed to short the value of the dollar vs. a basket of other currencies. UDN perhaps. Or UDNT if you’re as confident as Schiff usually seems to be.
Report comment to moderator
Peter Schiff, a man the Keynesians and the left, love to hate and deride…
I figure he must be doing something right if that’s the case.
Report comment to moderator
You’re confusing “think is a hack” with “hate and deride”.
Report comment to moderator
Oh there’s a difference? It’s hard to tell the hate from the derision…
Report comment to moderator
I mean, every time someone has spoken of Peter Schiff here, there’s always been a knee-jerk reaction from the left….
Report comment to moderator
Here’s honest American money. It says “In God We Trust”, but does not need the “legal tender” verbiage. I’ve heard it said that “In God We Trust” was a cynical addition to our money when the Fed Reserve was established, but this coin proves otherwise.
Report comment to moderator
Where are the bond market vigilantes and why are people with lots of money still willing to lend to the US — in its own currency — at practically no interest.
We issue debt in our own currency and the market loves it. There is no debt “crisis” apart from the danger of unforced, willing, misconceived default.
Report comment to moderator
Frank,
Frank: I was gonna suggest “In Mammon We Trust.”
The problem is we don’t trust in the mammon the feds are printing and the BS our politicos are feeding us.
God is the only one to trust, but it definitely doesn’t belong on our dollar.
BG:
What do you make of this?
Did you see the rot on the Net Security Purchases by foreigners (TIC’s Flows) that printed yesterday? Of course you didn’t, because no one wants to have to explain this data on TV. they get 20-second sound bites! Well. Net Long-term flows were only $23.6 Billion. (the forecast was for $40 Billion!) That’s awful folks! The U.S. during the month of May, was only able to attract a net of $23.6 Billion in security purchases by foreigners.
I saw a report that said that China has increased their holdings of Treasuries during May to $1.16 Trillion. Well, the Chinese had a HUGE Trade Surplus in May, so that makes some sense. but, the thing you won’t see anyone report on because it doesn’t make people feel good, is that China has been backing away slowly from the Auction table here in the U.S. For instance, yes, they increased their holdings, but the pace of their buying is slowing.
Therefore, QE1,2,3,4,5,6, etc are necessary and the legal plundering by govt keeps on going as long as the sheeple don’t riot.
Report comment to moderator
The great harm of the monetary issue is indicated at the center top of the dollar: Federal Reserve Note. Our currency is a debt-based, interest bearing monetary unit. In other words, its an IOU to the Federal Reserve…a PRIVATE bank, NOT a government agency.
The related condition of the fractional reserve banking system combined with the control afforded to the Fed produce the fully debt-based currency we have. Rather than an expression of value, our currency is created by generating loans issued by banks; loans which are created out of nothing and require repayment with interest.
Check out these resources for explanations:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXt1cayx0hs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swkq2E8mswI
http://abolishthefederalreserve.org/
http://www.themoneymasters.com/the-money-masters/milton-friedman-end-the-fed/
These resources generally advocate the replacement of the debt-based currency with new, fiat, “sovereign” currency issued by the U.S. government because of the power to “coin money” afforded to the Congress in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution. This currency would be something like Lincoln’s “Greenbacks” issued during the Civil War or the colonial script in use before the Revolutionary War. I don’t know if that’s better than a precious metal-backed currency but its clear that our current monetary system is a fraud which is damaging our country.
Report comment to moderator
PBNC,
Here’s another resource, the 47-min. video “Money As Debt.”
It’s the one that clarified it all for me.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!