What do you want America to look like?
With a budget crisis that won’t go away even though a debt-ceiling deal has been reached, Americans are intuitively asking, “What do we want America to look like in the future?” It appears Aug. 2 will pass without triggering financial Armageddon, but we still will have a financial mess to address . . . and an opportunity to remake America. So, I ask you, “What do you want America to look like?”
I believe America can return to her former glory and remain the world’s most dynamic economy. The country is far from lost—there are a number of things we can do to restore our country’s economic vitality. In a recent podcast, Harvard professor Niall Ferguson offered two solutions to America’s debt crisis. I’ll write about one of those solutions this week—education—and the other—federal asset sales—in next week’s column.
Ferguson thinks Americans do a lousy job of teaching history. “Right now, the textbook is a dying form,” he said. ‘The future belongs to whoever comes up with the educational equivalent of Facebook. The company that comes up with something that’s as compelling as Facebook but actually delivers educational content, that’s the company I want to earn [invest in].”
Yes, Ferguson believes creative modes of education delivery are important, but he’s also concerned about content. “It’s impossible, I think, to understand the rise of the United States separately, as a story on its own of American exceptionalism,” he said. “You have to understand it as part of the extraordinary explosion of dynamism from Western Europe, not just across the Atlantic, but all around the world.”
Any legitimate study of this dynamism would have to include the individual freedom unleashed by the Reformation as well as discussions about relationships among man, God, church, state, property, and sin and power. In other words, to really know America we need to understand the struggles of our religious history that led to the foundational principles of our country’s religious, political, and economic liberty.
As we come to grips with our country’s debt problem, we have an opportunity to ask ourselves what we want America to look like in the future. If we want to get far beyond bitter budget politics, we need to learn and embrace the lessons of our religious history.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top13 Comments to “What do you want America to look like?”
Remember, the “debt-ceiling” deal, as usual, removes the ceiling.
Report comment to moderator
LEE WISHING wrote; “The country is far from lost—there are a number of things we can do to restore our country’s economic vitality.”
1. The loss of America goes far far far far far far beyond mere economics, bad as it is. That is just a symptom.
2. While I appreciate the opimism here, I’m afraid that WISHING is wishing! I hate to disagree with points I also wish were true.
Report comment to moderator
We’ve been down this road before, but we had a frontier. When the manufacturing jobs were lost in the 1893 Panic, when the banks and the railroads failed, people walked away from their mortgages then, too. But they could still go West, and when they did, they brought fences. But there was progress going on, too, and a great change from one type of society to another. We need to rediscover self-reliance as individuals, as a nation. That doesn’t mean we become heartless. It means we have expectations of others.
The thing that doesn’t change over time is the heart of man. There will always be people who are intensely greedy who give no thought to others when they scheme.
Report comment to moderator
“The thing that doesn’t change over time is the heart of man.”
And those who ignore that, do so at their (and our) peril. This is the main, all consuming reason behind the checks and balances built into our government. Those who now seek to undo those checks and balances, are blindly and ignorantly trusting in political power of fallen men to solve the current problems.
They will continue to dig a hole that will swallow up the country.
Report comment to moderator
I agree with Joel Mark #2. The economy is an symptom. It is a symptom of the moral decline and Godlessness of the people of America. As biblical history teaches us, there are repercussions when we forget God has blessed this nation and its people:
Deuteronomy 8:11-20
“Take care lest you forget the Lord your God by not keeping his commandments and his rules and his statutes, which I command you today, lest, when you have eaten and are full and have built good houses and live in them, and when your herds and flocks multiply and your silver and gold is multiplied and all that you have is multiplied, then your heart be lifted up, and you forget the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery, who led you through the great and terrifying wilderness, with its fiery serpents and scorpions and thirsty ground where there was no water, who brought you water out of the flinty rock, who fed you in the wilderness with manna that your fathers did not know, that he might humble you and test you, to do you good in the end.
Beware lest you say in your heart, ‘My power and the might of my hand have gotten me this wealth.’ You shall remember the Lord your God, for it is he who gives you power to get wealth, that he may confirm his covenant that he swore to your fathers, as it is this day. And if you forget the Lord your God and go after other gods and serve them and worship them, I solemnly warn you today that you shall surely perish. Like the nations that the Lord makes to perish before you, so shall you perish, because you would not obey the voice of the Lord your God.”
Report comment to moderator
I’ll gladly read what Ferguson has to say about education and federal asset sales.
But I’d really like to see him address the Federal Reserve and our fiat monetary system.
Now that, my friends, is the true third rail of American politics.
Report comment to moderator
I’d like to see POSTUM return to the grocery store shelves.
Report comment to moderator
Niall Ferguson is an old school British historian. He used to lean slighly left and now leans slightly to the right. He’s famous for once saying, if there has to be an Empire, and there usually does, than living under the British or American Empire is probably the best. In other words, he’s a pessimist — the great power will always be there so we might as well pick the nicest empire to live under.
I don’t think Wishing and Fergusson are on the same page though. For Fergusson, modern history has to be understood and appreciated as the expansion of Europe and its ideas. We could summarize this intial impetus as God, Gold and Glory but we need to understand that this political order also include rule of law, human rights, humanism, Enlightenment, etc. From my own readings of Niall Fergusson — I’m quite sure Wishing and him have different ideas about the origin of European dynamism
Report comment to moderator
Lee is right that the real issue is a philosophical one. We are engaged in a clash of philosophies, between Freedom and Utopia, but we have no leader who can articulate it.
Americans have forgotten the meaning of Freedom, just as the church has forgotten the meaning of Grace. Americans need to be educated about history and philosophy all right, but a leftist political education system has a strangle hold on children just as John Dewey promoted. Europe openly and actively indoctrinates children in socialism without apology. It happens in America too, but American leftists do it under a different label, namely making the world a better place.
The problem with Freedom and the problem of Grace is that they are both risky. If you give people Freedom things may get worse. If you teach people Grace they may choose to sin.
Utopianism seems much safer because it actively tries to control the outcome. Striving to make the world a better place is an easy to sell. Who doesn’t want Paradise? And who better to give us a perfect world and take care of everything than government. What they never tell you is that they cannot deliver. What we get instead is economic collapse and shooting people in the back while trying to escape.
Lee’s paragraph about involving the church in the reformation of America scares me, because the modern church is also full of Utopianists who want to use the power of government to create heaven on earth. This wayward philosophy is no different than what leftists are trying to accomplish, but with more emphasis on morals. Either way we get tyranny.
Report comment to moderator
Xion (9): We are engaged in a clash of philosophies, between Freedom and Utopia, but we have no leader who can articulate it.
Frank: Really? No leader at all?
Read any good books lately?
Report comment to moderator
#10 True, Frank. Ron Paul is right, but that isn’t enough. To turn the country one needs to persuade. If you are married, then you know what I mean.
I like the title of this topic. If one could imagine Ron Paul’s America vs. Obama’s America, how would the pictures differ?
I suppose that under Ron Paul, America would somewhat resemble the Internet. It would be a free for all, but with tremendous innovation and competition. America would advance by leaps and bounds, but there would also be disparity. Perhaps the churches would regain their rightful roles.
America under Obama and other left wing extremists (if they had their way) would be a nanny state like the world has never seen. It would resemble Orwell’s 1984. Every aspect of life would be heavily regulated. Neighbors would turn in neighbors. Just to buy bread, if there is any, would require filling out lengthy forms.
Everyone would be under surveillance. All emails and online transactions would be scrutinized. Our children would become wards of the “village” and would be handed meager jobs in a public works program. All children would be part of Obama’s citizen army.
Report comment to moderator
America under Obama’s czars, if they all could have their way would preside over a country with essentially no energy except for the well connected to the state. People would subsist on victory gardens and would heat with firewood. The few windmills and solar farms would be owned by the state and used only by state cronies and leftist brown nosers.
Obama’s science czar would poison the water supply with a forced sterilization drug to curb overpopulation. His health czar would ration health care to those under 15 and over 40. The elderly would be given a pill as Obama said. His regulatory czar would allow pets to sue their owners in court. The FCC would arrest anyone who communicated illegally or said anything that wasn’t politically correct. The EPA would charge people for air and water.
Allowing Americans to be free may not bring about Utopia, but we probably wouldn’t be shot in the back while trying to eek out an existence in the gulag.
Report comment to moderator
It is a true shame. I had really high hopes for obama at the very start of his bid for office until he made five promises in a row (lies) that NO person could accomplish. I would list them but it’s simple o find many more than five without my help. His speaches are on youtube. obama could have went down in history as one of the greats, Martin Luther King, Kennedy, Reagan. Instead he’ll go down with his name associated with the likes of Hitler and Hugo Chavez………………………people won’t even spray the pigeon crap off any statue erected of him. He doesn’t even have the brains to do the one simple thing that could save him, give him back a little bit of face….take reponsibility for just ONE of his many mistakes. I can’t bring myself to even capitalize his name yet that would go a LONG way with me. That simple gesture.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!