Back to school
Two years before 9/11 came a gruesome homegrown terrorist incident at Columbine High School in Colorado: Two seniors murdered 12 of their fellow students and one teacher, and then committed suicide. The conservative response to that was “zero tolerance.” No guns and knives allowed in school, of course, but also no punching, no bullying, no threats, no hate or dislike messages, no bad behavior, period.
Nevertheless, threatening actions continued. A 2007 national survey of public high school students showed that 6 percent had carried a weapon onto school property during the previous month, and 8 percent were threatened by or injured with a weapon on school property during the previous year. Meanwhile, “zero tolerance” in Colorado means that students there face ticketing or criminal charges for scrawling doodles on a desk, accidentally hitting a teacher with a beanbag chair, or taking a stick of gum from a teacher’s purse.
Does “zero tolerance” go too far? Probably, since kids will be kids, and they shouldn’t be treated like killers when they act like goofballs. A Texas study showed that one-third of middle and high school students had been suspended or expelled at least once, and the average was four times each. That shows how deep the problems of public schools are, but also how hard it is to be a public school teacher.
Late last month a study funded by leftist libertarian George Soros broadly attacked the school security policies of the past 10 years. The New York Times, The Washington Post, NPR, the Associated Press, and dozens of other organs gave it wide, positive publicity. In the absence of new school terrorist incidents, schools will face pressure to ease up, and maybe they should. But our society’s tendency, especially when adept PR folks develop a campaign, is to go to extremes—so watch to see whether some school districts swing from “zero tolerance” to “anything goes.”
It’s easy to go too far one way or the other. If we over-protect our children, we create fearful adults. If we react to online immorality by banning internet use, we foster ignorance. If we over-react to bad movies and music by forbidding most watching and listening, we create rebellion. But if we’re too loose, children lose.
Psalm 23’s walk through the valley of death makes me think of treading a narrow footpath across a gorge, with falling off one side or the other a likelihood—apart from God’s protection. In combating school terrorism or the adult kind, we can err through laxness that invites attack or over-tightness that creates a police state. Pray for wisdom.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top9 Comments to “Back to school”
It’s hard to believe it’s bee 12 years since Columbine.
Report comment to moderator
Just like other things. We do swing from one extreme to another.
Education: one season you teach the see and say way–not all kids learn that way, so the next season you teach with phonics. And, surprise, not all kids learn that way. So back to the other way, or another way–whole language.
Sex ed: one season you have abstinence and kids still get pregnant, so the next season you have teachers that tell them how to have safe sex–going so far as to demonstrate. I’m sure the gov’t evidence points to fewer students getting pregnant in the 2nd season. And if kids still get pregnant you can still blame it on abstinence.
Report comment to moderator
The world seems to be running amuck these days.
Whether you have guns or not, it doesn’t matter–just look at the Muslim countries.
Report comment to moderator
When our kids were in grade school, you couldn’t even say the word “gun”. And yet there was a Civil War demonstration with soldiers lopping off melon “heads” with sabers.
Report comment to moderator
We had a shooting and knifing in my last year of high school–1968. I’m from Miami, Florida. We were not in the best neighborhood–many people had moved. We couldn’t afford to move. I think our school was mostly black at the time. But the gov’t decided to bus Seniors from a rival school. Maybe we didn’t have anyone being bussed. The Seniors went thru the halls of our school chanting their old school name. CLASH!!!
What a year!!! Thankfully I was attending only half-days, while working the other half thru a school program.
In case you think I was against black folks, I wasn’t. But I WAS against Cubans. It was the Cubans who treated Americans VERY BADLY. Even black people didn’t like them. What percentage of the school was Cuban at the time? Don’t know. Cubans and Haitians did eventually take over the area.
I returned in the last 5 years. The area isn’t even recognizable–lots of junk cluttering up business windows, bars on the windows and doors. Everyone fenced the front yards of their mostly pink and turquoise homes and businesses–mostly paid for by our taxes.
Report comment to moderator
Just a slight correction, a leftist and a libertarian are two different things. Describing a person as being somehow both is liking saying someone is a conservative liberal or a conservative communist.
Report comment to moderator
Also Ms. News, me thinks you need to meet more Cubans. Wonderful people.
Report comment to moderator
Couple quibbles:
1. Columbine wasn’t really a “terrorist” incident. Harris and Klebold were not trying to create an atmosphere of terror within a population in order to further demands or achieve ends that they were committed to, which is what terrorism is. (Somehow the definition of “Terrorism” has morphed into “scary things that kill or try to a lot of people,” but that’s not what it means.) Their motivation was revenge or some other kind of twisted thing — it wasn’t about the future *effect* of their actions, it was about the actions themselves. They wanted the people they shot and themselves to be dead; they weren’t seeking some sort of political or policy changed and using terror as a bargaining chip.
2. Zero-tolerance wasn’t primarily a conservative response. It was a panic response across the ideological spectrum. In fact, conservatives were more likely to have a problem with ZT because it endangered the freedom and education of kids who left rifles in the cars after a weekend of hunting, limited self-defense, and substituted law enforcement concerns for personal liberties. None of those things is terribly “conservative,” though panicked conservatives participated in promoting ZT to about the same degree as panicked liberals.
Report comment to moderator
Pentamom (#8), thank you.
Rom116 (#6), thank you.
I’ll add another quibble.
Harris and Kliebold were not “homegrown” terrorists. It makes it sound like they were raised by jihadist parents and trained to be terrorists in an American madrassa or some such thing. They were warped boys who needed help that they did not get.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!