Forgiveness
Last Wednesday night two men were executed in the United States: Troy Davis in Georgia and Lawrence Brewer in Texas. While many focused on Davis’ fate, as the U.S. Supreme Court considered a last-minute request by his lawyers, Brewer, an unrepentant bigot, was quietly put to death. Hardly a word was spoken about Brewer’s execution, but it offers lessons.
Self-proclaimed white supremacist Lawrence Brewer and two of his friends offered a ride to James Byrd Jr., a black man, in Jasper, Texas. But rather than taking him home, Brewer and his buddies beat Byrd mercilessly, chained him by his ankles to the back of a truck, and dragged him to his death, scattering parts of his body along the way. This was no crime of passion, but a cold-blooded, calculated killing of a black man by white men.
Brewer and one of his accomplices, John William King, were sentenced to death. The third accused man, Shawn Berry, received a life sentence.
After reading the account of Byrd’s death once or twice, it becomes harder and harder even to glance at the printed page. Words like “beating,” “urination,” “dragging,” and “decapitation” instantly evoke horrific images even as the mind struggles to push them out. To begin to understand what it must mean to visualize this killing over and over again every day, as members of James Byrd’s family must have done, defies imagination.
Brewer was not just unrepentant, he was vilely so. He would brag to anyone who would listen of the murder he committed. He was prideful. The day before his execution he told a television reporter, “As far as any regrets, no, I have no regrets. No, I’d do it all over again, to tell you the truth.” He appeared to all a man with no hope of redemption.
But a door was opened to his redemption, and the family of James Byrd Jr. opened it. “I have forgiven Lawrence Brewer because in order for me to hate him, that’s exactly what happened to my dad,” Byrd’s daughter Renee Mullins said. Byrd’s sister, Betty Byrd-Boatner said, “My parents taught us how to forgive, and so we forgave him. I feel sorry for Brewer because he has so much hate inside of him and didn’t understand how to get it out of him.”
Speaking of their mother, Stella, who passed away last year, Byrd-Boatner said, “She had every right to be angry, but her words were that ‘I forgive them,’ and that was deep. Even when we found out that the death was more violent, she still stood and said ‘I forgive them and we want peace.’”
As his execution neared, Byrd’s sister lamented, “[Brewer] has no remorse and I feel sorry for him, but forgiveness brings about healing. We had begun to heal a long time ago. We’re praying for his family as well as our family, and for the citizens of Jasper. We already made peace with it a long time ago.”
The Byrd family fought to stop the execution of the man who has caused each of them more grief than most people will suffer in a hundred lifetimes. The Byrds had learned that those who find it in their hearts to forgive even those who least deserve forgiveness gain deeper and more lasting peace.
Elizabeth Bernard Higgs is an adjunct fellow at The Independent Institute in Oakland, Calif.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top23 Comments to “Forgiveness”
Forgiveness is never about having to like what someone did to us. It’s loving them despite what they did to us. It’s wanting what’s best for them, despite how they’ve treated us.
We never have to like or excuse sin and evil. But we can forgive those who trespass against us.
Report comment to moderator
…Whereas the family of the other victim in Georgia did everything it could to see that the man convicted was executed. I found it just a bit unseemly.
But my point is that the law should, most especially in murder cases, pay absolutely no heed to the victim or the victim’s family’s desires. Under the rubric “victim impact statements” victims are now putting their hands on the scale.
I think the law should be in business of judging actions, not effects. That is easier, quicker and fairer. The title of any case is “The State vs….”. Not “Victim vs….”. There are other venues for that.
And under my theory of criminal justice,a criminal’s punishment should not depend on the personal characteristics, sensitivities, religious beliefs or other characteristics of the victim or the survivors. Our goal in the law is always consistency and giving the victim a significant role makes consistency and fairness much more difficult to obtain.
Report comment to moderator
EQUAL JUSTICE?
Under the law in these United States most white collar persons will be put in jail for stealing money.
Under DC law, the SAME CRIME is no big deal as leaders continue to steal.
Don’t pay your TAXES? – get put in jail and property taken away.
DC leaders don’t pay their TAXES? – they continue to lead. No big deal. Yesterday’s news.
Don’t contribute to OBAMA campaign? – business confiscated.
I will feel safer when OBAMA retires from being LEAD THUG.
Report comment to moderator
Powerful story of forgiveness!
Report comment to moderator
Brewer needed to be killed, that’s for sure
Report comment to moderator
#2 Arcadia
“I think the law should be in business of judging actions, not effects.”
What do you think bout “Hate Crimes?”
Report comment to moderator
I think I agree with Arcadia.
?
Report comment to moderator
This is not a story about forgiveness, it’s a story about the refusal of our democracy to value forgiveness.
The Byrd family forgave without being asked, because of who they are. The Byrd family is better than God, who forgives or not electively or only in exchange for repentance. The Byrd family is definitely better than Texas. As an example of forgiveness, the Byrd family are the exception the proves the rule.
God is said to love mercy and justice. Our Christian democracy loves merciless justice. The reason we give the power of commutation to governors and clemency boards is for them to refuse mercy. Voters get a deep gloat of satisfaction from denials. Teavangelicals applaud their execution champions.
(Teavangelicals certainly aren’t helping, but America’s vindictiveness probably has more to do with the fact that we don’t have a monarchy.)
Some states will honor the request of a victim’s family not to kill the murderer. Prosecutors in Alabama, for example, have acceded to the request of a Black family not to seek the death penalty for a racist who lynched one of their members.
Texas is a different state of being, however. It’s our most brilliantly Christian state. The citizens of Texas are so bloody that an appeal for mercy is too embarrassing to be considered. If Texas had respected the wishes of the Byrd family, African Americans could rightly say, “A condemned person in Texas will be executed despite factual innocence or the obvious need for a new trial, but an admitted lyncher of Negroes will be commuted.” Texas is entrapped in retribution.
Many readers of this blog will sympathize with Texas. It’s no country for people like the Byrds.
Report comment to moderator
I think I should have said Mississippi above rather than Alabama. (Surprisingly, Mississippi had the least virulent history of lynching and less juridical homicide than other states in the region.)
Report comment to moderator
I am greatly challenged to be the kind of example this family showed. It would take God’s Spirit inside of me to deep down truly forgive these men. On my own I could not have done that.
Report comment to moderator
“The Byrd family forgave without being asked, because of who they are. The Byrd family is better than God, who forgives or not electively or only in exchange for repentance. The Byrd family is definitely better than Texas. As an example of forgiveness, the Byrd family are the exception the proves the rule.”
So, where along the way did we ask for God to send his Son?? ?
God gave without being asked.
As you already declared the Byrd family better irregardless of reception by the offender, our reception or not of God’s Son does not make God less forgiving than the Byrds.
“God is said to love mercy and justice.”
God is not dependent on man. If mercy were a requirement, it would not be mercy.
Report comment to moderator
Someone in the family of James Byrd Jr. said, “I have forgiven Lawrence Brewer because in order for me to hate him, that’s exactly what happened to my dad.”
Actually, there is no moral comparison. Byrd was, by all accounts, an innocent victim and no one refutes this. Brewer was, by all accounts, as far from innocent as one could be. That constitutes a profound moral difference. Be honest. Whatever anyone wants to do in the name of forgiveness is one thing, but to morally equate what happened to Byrd and the feelings surrounding it with what happened to Brewer and the feelings surrounding that just does not wash.
Report comment to moderator
Some quotes (if or how they apply is up to you):
* “There is always hope for the man who is capable of being ashamed.” — Talmud.
* “The judge is condemned when the guilty party is aquitted.” (Index damnatur ubi nocens absolvitur). Publilius, Syrus (1st century B.C.), Maxims.
* “He who is merciful when he should be cruel will in the end be cruel when he should be merciful.” — Midrash Shmuel.
Report comment to moderator
Whatever stance the family of James Byrd took to cope with their pain is one thing, but I am glad no judge entertained the notion that Brewer should be officially forgiven or acquitted or let back on to the streets.
Report comment to moderator
So, Scroop Moth, if the family said, “We forgive, and we ask the state to forgive this man and let him go free,” would you say it should be done? If not, why not?
I think I can answer that: It is because this man’s crime, this man’s sin, demands that he be punished and that other potential victims be kept safe. Murder is a sin against God and against the man killed and his family, but it is also a sin against the community. Justice demanded that he be killed; allowing him to stay alive and continue to smirk about his crime is allowing him to continue to flaunt God’s laws and mock men made in His image. It’s good that the family is able to forgive, but that says nothing at all about what punishment is appropriate in this case. (Also, what’s to keep other people from bribing or even threatening a famiy to push for acquittal or a lower sentence, if families of the victim have that kind of say?)
Report comment to moderator
The Byrd family didn’t ask Texas to let the man go, they asked Texas not to kill him. Is this confusing?
Maybe this qualification means the Byrd familly didn’t “fully” forgive the malefactor. The Byrds did not ask Texas to vacate the conviction. But God doesn’t let mankind off the hook completely, either, when He forgives people, right? Christians don’t return to Eden, they work by the sweat of their brows, they suffer pain in giving birth, they cover their nakedness, and they die. Plus, God won’t/can’t/doesn’t forgive everyone. Jesus forgave only one of the malefators on the cross. The Byrds killed the whole posse.
Report comment to moderator
Sorry, the Byrds forgave them, of course.
Report comment to moderator
“Maybe this qualification means the Byrd familly didn’t “fully” forgive the malefactor. The Byrds did not ask Texas to vacate the conviction. But God doesn’t let mankind off the hook completely, either, when He forgives people, right?”
Your still creating a double standard.
If forgiveness is not an excuse of conviction, then God is most certainly not at fault either for not excusing us. Forgiveness does not remove the cost. It can’t bring the man back to life or unalter the past, forgiveness is not enough to restore what was broken. It continues on, despite what was broken.
Christ still pays the penalty for us. Entirely takes our place.
The Byrds don’t have to offer one of themselves to take the offender’s place in jail or execution. That would be true mercy. It is not a requirement that they give it, nor is it an inefficiency of forgiveness.
“Christians don’t return to Eden, they work by the sweat of their brows, they suffer pain in giving birth, they cover their nakedness, and they die. Plus, God won’t/can’t/doesn’t forgive everyone. Jesus forgave only one of the malefators on the cross. The Byrds killed the whole posse.”
Christians do not die. Adam was given work, before the fall. Pain is a result of the fall.
God can save whoever he wants. He can choose Esau, Jacob, none, or both. All it requires of any of us though, is repentance and an acceptance of Christ.
If the Byrds offered to take the offenders place, they can’t force him too. He must accept it. It is not their fault, if he did not.
Report comment to moderator
Scroop Moth, no, they didn’t ask for him to be released, but what if they had? What difference does their request make to the right punishment? If he shouldn’t be released to society just because they ask it, why should he be kept in jail instead of executed just because they ask it? Their request doesn’t change the fact that justice and not mercy is needed in the case of unrepentant, cruel murder.
Report comment to moderator
Justice in a court room is a completely different issue than forgiveness from the family of the one who was murdered, and God’s mercy on sinners is a different issue from what an unrepentant murderer deserves, as well. Yes, I would still think execution would be the right thing to do, even if he repented. But his execution is all the more necessary when he is still a menace to society (including any black prisoners or guards he might encounter).
Report comment to moderator
We should pay heed to the victim’s family victim’s family while remembering that there are far more victims than just the family. The impact such horrific crimes have on us all cannot be over-estemated. There is sometimes no way to fairly or justly judge an action without a view to the effects. Both big and small picture aspects must be considered. I wish justice could be more swift but it is even more inportant to take the time to fairly consider the many levels of impact, evidence and evil that such cases require, as well as making sure the conviction is beyond all doubt before justly putting the vicious murderer to death lawfully.
Report comment to moderator
The statement quoted in comment #12 was made by the victim’s daughter. She did not wish to carry in her heart the same sort of hatred that the killer carried in his. That is the apt comparison, not their actions.
With God all things are possible, even the redemption of the worst person who ever walked the face of the earth. I thank God, that HE is the one who decides the fate of our souls because His justice is most definitely tempered with mercy. Not a single one of us can know for sure where Lawrence Brewer is today, because only GOD knows what is in the heart of each one of us. We can think we know, but we don’t. The vineyard is God’s, and He makes the decisions, not us. Praise God!
Report comment to moderator
#6 Is there such a thing as a “love” crime? Aren’t are crimes “hate” crimes? God says forgive but He doesn’t say do away with the justice.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!