Color instead of character
At the 2004 Democratic National Convention in Boston, Sen. Barack Obama said, “. . . There is not a black America and a white America and Latino America and Asian America—there is the United States of America.”
Those were welcome and commendable words. Unfortunately, they appear to be only words. Since then, Obama has divided us along race and class lines more than any modern president.
Some of his strongest, high-profile supporters in the black community are now saying that Obama’s race, alone, should be enough for black voters to vote for his reelection.
Krissah Thompson of The Washington Post reports on BlackAmericaWeb.com that on The Tom Joyner Morning Show, which has an estimated 8 million radio listeners, Joyner, who is black, said, “Stick together, black people.” The show reaches one in four African-American adults.
The Rev. Al Sharpton, who also has a radio show and a gig on MSNBC, admonished blacks who have been critical of the president, “I’m not telling you to shut up. I’m telling you: Don’t make some of us have to speak up.”
Joyner went even further on his blog, writes Thompson: “Let’s not deal with the facts right now,” he wrote. “Let’s deal with just our blackness and pride—and loyalty. We have the chance to reelect the first African-American president, and that’s what we ought to be doing. And I’m not afraid or ashamed to say that as black people, we should do it because he’s a black man.”
In the same week the memorial to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. was dedicated in Washington, Joyner and Sharpton are saying that Barack Obama should be judged not on the content of his character and policies, but rather on the color of his skin. How sad. How racist.
If a black president cannot be held accountable for his policies and must receive the votes of African-Americans solely because of his race, then all of the marching for equal rights has been for nothing. The question ought to be this: Are African-Americans, indeed, are all Americans, better off than they were when Barack Obama took office? By any objective standard, the answer must be “no.” How do black people expect their circumstances to improve if Obama is elected for another four years? If they conclude they will not, why not vote for someone who can create the conditions under which more of them might get a job, for example? Black unemployment is 16.7 percent, the highest it’s been in 27 years.
Sharpton and Joyner don’t have to worry too much about their financial futures. But too many African-Americans remain mired in conditions that have characterized many in their community for decades. Why would they want to continue their lifestyles out of “pride” and “loyalty” when the Democratic Party has been disloyal to them and a better way is available?
Recent Washington Post-ABC News polls reveal a decline in the number of blacks with “strongly favorable” views of the president and his efforts to improve the economy. What people like Joyner and Sharpton fear is a loss of a place at the political table, a table that has been set far more elegantly for them than for too many of the African-Americans for whom they claim to speak.
What the slide in Obama’s support in the African-American community demonstrates is that increasing numbers of black people are beginning to understand they have been played for suckers by the Democratic Party. They are right to feel this way. Their loyalty should not be to a party, but to themselves, their families, and their best interests, which lie outside a welfare system that has locked too many of them into dependence and an addiction to a government check. What they need instead is a reality check.
© 2011 Tribune Media Services Inc.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top53 Comments to “Color instead of character”
The cynic in me is wondering if Romney wins the Republican nomination, will the racist views of the LDS church’s past be marched out for airing?
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.
BTW, a relative over the weekend was talking about how poorly Obama has been treated by the Republican-run media. I was so surprised, I didn’t say anything.
Report comment to moderator
The reason the race card works so well (and sadly, it does with all sorts of people & groups today), is because too many Americans today don’t have any other decent cards to deal in their deck!
Report comment to moderator
2. Racism is the new McCarthyism and people are afraid of it. The Obama people have been playing the race card from the beginning. I think it’s the main reason they nominated such an unqualified and inexperienced person. They were hoping the fear of being called a racist would put him above criticism. It’s time to start calling them on it. I’ve done that a few times and you’d be surprised at how many people will back down.
Report comment to moderator
I know it’s anecdotal, but all of the black folks I know (and some of the white ones) will vote for Obama again for the sole reason of his race.
Report comment to moderator
CAL THOMAS wrote: “The question ought to be this: Are African-Americans, indeed, are all Americans, better off than they were when Barack Obama took office?”
“Better off” is a rather subjective term, and often quite narcissistic or self-centered. Ever since we have been asking that question (and I must respectfully criticize Reagan’s 1980 campaign theme here), too many Americans have been presuming that it is the role of gov’t to make us “better off.” I understand that Reagan did not seek to make that a primary gov’t role, but still, the presumption has grown since then that it is.
There are better questions to ask, like…
* Are Americans more legitimately free and is the rule of law being applied more justly across the board?
* Is America being protected sufficiently with peace here and abroad as our legitimate goal (a goal that may include just military action)?
* Are we closer to our “E Pluribus Unum” ideal or have our leaders divided us up into factions balkanizing us for political gain?
* Are decent and faithful Constitution-respecting justices being appointed to the nation’s benches?
* Will human life be more respected under this administration?
* Will the nuclear family be more respected than various political constituent groups (racial, sexual, behavioral or class-based groups)?
______________________
Report comment to moderator
CAL THOMAS wrote: “”Their loyalty should not be to a party, but to themselves, their families, and their best interests . . .”
. . . and the country’s best interests!
But first, “In God We Trust” should be our highest loyalty as Americans (freely and voluntarily, of course). This is our national motto and it is what our nation (not necessarily our “government” but our nation as a whole; people, values, culture and all) was originally founded upon.
Report comment to moderator
The words of Martin Luther King, Jr have been so (b)astardized that they are no longer even known in the context in which they were spoken.
If you go back and watch the news reels of what he actually said and listen to his words, what he was saying is almost 180 degrees from what we have been TOLD he said or meant.
Report comment to moderator
Joel Mark in # 5: Excellent points and I thank you for sharing them. Even we Christians tend to become “me and mine” focused. Thanks for shaking us up a bit.
Report comment to moderator
Pardon me, Michelle. The Republican-run media? Did you mean Fox? Or was this person referring to other media? I don’t understand.
Report comment to moderator
Yes, I appreciate those thoughts, Joel Mark.
Report comment to moderator
Voting for Obama simply because he is black is just plain stupid.
Report comment to moderator
9. My yeller-dog democrat mother-in-law tells me all the time about how the media is totally controlled by the Republicans.
Report comment to moderator
That’s ridiculous. The lamestream media was slobbering all over themselves to get the first black president elected, and now we have the left saying the Republican controlled media hasn’t treated Obama very well….
How soon we forget. Remember when the media relentlessly attacked George W Bush?
The current “mistreatment” of Obama pales in comparison.
Report comment to moderator
Yeah, KBells. How does your MIL account for the fact that GWB was attacked?
Report comment to moderator
14. He deserved it.
Report comment to moderator
My own personal yeller dawg Democrats didn’t like GWB’s “smirk”.
Report comment to moderator
There’s the rub.
Will Mitt Romney’s policies create jobs? They are the same as Bush’s policies — cut taxes for the rich and roll back regulations. Is there any reason to think that will work this time, when it clearly didn’t work when Bush did it? His tax cuts for the wealthy have been in effect for more than ten years. If that is supposed to create jobs, where are they?
How about Cain’s 9-9-9 tax plan? Will black Americans be better off under that plan? Independent analysis shows otherwise — their tax burden will increase significantly. The conservative complaints about the shiftless poor who need to put “some skin in the game” tells the truth about what would happen to working class families (black or white or brown). You can argue that everyone ought to pay something. But you can’t argue that at the same time you argue that those who right now don’t pay anything will be better off financially once you slap them with a $4000 tax bill.
On the other hand, independent analysts have said that Obama’s recent jobs bill would add 2 million jobs next year. Maybe working class Americans of all races would be better if the Republicans in Congress were less intransigent. Or if there were fewer Republicans in Congress.
Report comment to moderator
“The question ought to be this: Are African-Americans, indeed, are all Americans, better off than they were when Barack Obama took office?”
Well, here is what Obama had to say about it:
His campaign slogan should be: “I know I have made things worse, but if you don’t vote for me you are a racist.”
Report comment to moderator
Lines like this just show how unfair your perspective is.
What has Obama ever said to even suggest that if you don’t vote for him, you are a racist?
Report comment to moderator
The Left complains about the media for the same reason the Right has been doing it for years — crying that the umpire is unfair is a tactic for getting future calls made in your favor.
There’s no more truth to their complaint than there is to yours.
The media is biased toward conflict, because conflict sells. Hence any president will constantly be confronted by his critics in press conferences. They are biased toward the establishment, because they are part of the establishment. Hence movements that threaten that (Tea Party or Occupy Wall Street) are treated with some disdain, at least until they are safely co-opted by the establishment (as the Tea Party was).
Report comment to moderator
That’s horsepucky! The media still makes fun of GWB’s speech, never Obama’s.
Report comment to moderator
19. “What has Obama ever said to even suggest that if you don’t vote for him, you are a racist? ”
How about this?
“They know that you’re not real happy with them and so the only way they figure they’re going to win this election is if they make you scared of me,” Obama continued, repeating an attack from earlier in the day. “What they’re saying is ‘Well, we know we’re not very good but you can’t risk electing Obama. You know, he’s new, he doesn’t look like the other presidents on the currency, he’s a got a funny name.’”
Report comment to moderator
The MSM was NEVER biased towards GWB. NEVER.
Report comment to moderator
#19 – “What has Obama ever said to even suggest that if you don’t vote for him, you are a racist?”
In addition to what KBELLS shared:
President Barack H. Obama, speaking about “the other side” (Republicans) in a campaign speech in Philadelphia, said, “They’re counting on… black folks staying home.” ~ October 13, 2010.
Quote in full: “They’re counting on young people staying home and union members staying home and black folks staying home and middle-class families staying home. They’re counting on the fact that they made the argument so ugly in Washington that you just completely turned off and you’re not going to vote for anybody. And if that happens, they win.”
_____________
This is yet another pathetic unpresidential cheap shot. In fact, it’s a political hate crime. The “they” are Republicans (the “other side”) and this is a vicious and dishonest misrepresentation of what Republicans want. Obama is hypocritically casting straw blanket blame at Republicans for doing EXACTLY what he himself is doing–making the argument ugly and divisive with baiting racial, class, and age rhetoric.
Consider your question effectively answered, JJF.
Report comment to moderator
“On the other hand, independent analysts have said that Obama’s recent jobs bill would add 2 million jobs next year.
Maybe. And maybe they are all public sector jobs too.
My personal opinion is that he’s hardly created any jobs so far, what makes you think this is going to be any different since it’s more of the same crap the last stimulus bill did?
And if you tell me that the other bills have created jobs, I know you’re out to lunch… unemployment is still just as high or higher than it’s been the last three years…
Report comment to moderator
I would like to ask the liberals here who continue to “stick by your man”, what do you think of Joyner’s statement?
The US Misery Index is the highest it has been since 1983 and blacks are the hardest hit.
Yet Joyner says, “Let’s not deal with the facts right now,” Let’s reelected Obama “because he’s a black man.”
Really? Really?
Report comment to moderator
I remember in the years immediately subsequent to his acquittal, OJ Simpson made a point of going to black gatherings. A cynic among onlookers/participants wisely saw thru it and acknowledged that “OJ hasnt been black for years.”
Sharpton and Joyner conveniently gloss right over the Martha’s Vineyard vacations and other luxuries unknown to the average OBama supporter if indeed there are any. As I’ve said before, to vote because someone is “one of us” is stupid. It ranks right up there with me voting for McCain because we ea chose to marry women named Cindy.
Report comment to moderator
27. “to vote because someone is “one of us” is stupid.”
Been there. It still galls me that Southerners helped put in Carter and Clinton because they had the right accent.
Report comment to moderator
What do you mean by the media? The news media? Show me a clip or a link.
If you mean late night comedians, they make fun of Obama, too. Not his speech, because it’s not a salient feature like is was for the misunderstimated Bush. But Obama’s hoighty-toighty mannerisms and his penchant for compromise get plenty of jabs.
Report comment to moderator
Your personal opinion? What do you know about it?
According to the CBO, Obama’s stimulus bill saved and/or created 1-3 million jobs.
Report comment to moderator
“saved and/or created” Heh.
Report comment to moderator
It’s not.
Listing times that Obama has mentioned race, or said what is obviously true — that some people are uncomfortable with his ethnicity and Arabic-sounding name (remember it was something of a joke during the 2008 campaign) — is nothing like saying “if you don’t vote for me, you are a racist”.
I remember Obama being baited by an interviewer (again, not because of bias, but because it would make for a compelling and conflict-driven headline) to denounce the Tea Party protests as racially motivated.
And Obama didn’t take the bait. His response was that they have a legitimate grievance, but it’s directed at the wrong people. He has gone out of his way not to play the race card, even when posters of him as an African witch doctor in a grass skirt, or GOP flyers with his grinning face surrounded by watermelon slices and pieces of fried chicken, or leaked emails with racist jokes, gave him plenty of ammunition.
He rightly recognized that those responses were real, but not representative. His comments that you and KBells quoted reflect that understanding.
Report comment to moderator
I’m not up for late night comedians, but after the next GOP debate, watch George Stephanopolous. He ALWAYS editorializes in favor of Obama.
Obama has done nothing for jobs. Nothing. But you’ll defend him, JJF, until the cows come hope. You and people like you have trouble facing reality.
Report comment to moderator
JJF, Consider your question effectively answered, whether you know it or can admit it or not.
Obama was mentored for 20 years and belonged to the church of a virulent racist and race-baiter of the worst kind. And the quotes above provided by KBELLS (#22) and me (#24) don’t just mention race but they clearly illustrate Obama’s horrific race-baiting tactics to a tee! It’s irrefutable, JJF.
Report comment to moderator
“Will Mitt Romney’s policies create jobs?”
I don’t know. But that response to Obama not creating jobs is juvenile and reeks. It amounts to “let’s stick with what we know doesn’t work” — which is stupid.
Report comment to moderator
Here ya go:
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/cbs-airs-fake-george-w-bush-cover-mocking-decision-points/
It didn’t stop even after GWB was out of office.
Report comment to moderator
And what’s Christian “swagger” anyway?
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/tim-graham/2011/08/20/npr-gets-complaint-letters-mocking-rick-perrys-christian-swagger-bush-im
Report comment to moderator
And this:
http://www.akdart.com/med6.html
Report comment to moderator
“Will Mitt Romney’s policies create jobs?”
Probably not because it’s the private sector, not the public sector or politicians that does the heavy lifting on actually creating jobs. But any of the Republican’s policies would promote the creating of more jobs in far greater numbers than the Obama admin, by reducing burdensome regulations and taxation and by creating more confidence that the gov’t will not continue to attack and go after the private sector in unpredictable ways.
Quick lesson in politics:
Right = Empower the private sector.
Left = Empower the public sector.
This generalization is not the only difference between right and left but it is a pretty good reason to go right.
Report comment to moderator
“According to the CBO, Obama’s stimulus bill saved and/or created 1-3 million jobs.”
What do I know about it? For one thing, you can go read the governments own website at http://www.recovery.org and read the numbers:
Even worse most of those jobs were probably temporary public sector jobs. You should be well aware of the smoke and mirrors associated with this whole “job creation” myth promulgated by this administration. “Shovel Ready” pretty much means that the administration has been unloading a lot of that stinky brown stuff on the population.
2-3 million jobs created? In a pigs eye.
Report comment to moderator
Now then..here’s an explanation about where this administration gets it’s numbers:
You personally know anyone who has a permanent private sector job actually created by this stimulus bill?
No?
Hmmmmm…
Report comment to moderator
Gullible much?
Report comment to moderator
Only the Lefties here — if he created that many jobs, why is unemployment so high? Duh.
Report comment to moderator
Xion
The US Misery Index is the highest it has been since 1983 and blacks are the hardest hit.
Wasn’t that Reagan’s first term?
Report comment to moderator
“Wasn’t that Reagan’s first term?”
Exactly, and it was Reagan’s policies that empowered the private sector to begin pulling us out of that misery, and gave us 20 years of economic health.
FYI, HRW, African-Americans, in particular, made greater gains in employment and prosperity after that (under Regan’s economic policies) than at any time before in many ways.
From the end of 1982 to 1989, black unemployment dropped 9 percentage points (from 20.4 percent to 11.4 percent), while white unemployment dropped by only 4 percentage points. Black household income went up 84 percent from 1980 to 1990, versus a white household income increase of 68 percent. The number of black-owned businesses increased from 308,000 in 1982 to 424,000 in 1987, a 38 percent rise versus a 14 percent increase in the total number of firms in the United States. Receipts by black-owned firms more than doubled, from $9.6 billion to $19.8 billion.
Report comment to moderator
Obama’s increased regulations have stifled small business and their job creation. From what I understand, small business and their employees are overrepresented by minorities. His policies actually hurt the most the people he says that he is trying to help.
Report comment to moderator
FUZZYFACE, well I don’t know much about your face but your thinking sure is clear.
Report comment to moderator
And Reagan got us out of it. Don’t see Obama doing that.
Report comment to moderator
#28
I think in those days you could assume that the same conservative southern aversion to big govt would be carried to DC by either man. But once anyone with a D after his name gets in the White House or Congress they soon realize none of the constraints they operated in while in the statehouse apply to Congress.
I’ve never seen anyone become “more conservative” once they hit DC. But we’ve all seen folks who got to DC and after a few terms were way more liberal than they ever would have been back in their homestate.
Report comment to moderator
Troops to leave Iraq?
I hope all the civilian KBR contractors and the locally hired Iraqi translators are on the first flights out.
Otherwise it will be killing fields all over again
Report comment to moderator
If I were a civilian contractor, I’d leave now.
Report comment to moderator
To me, Obama’s re-election shouldn’t be about content of character or color… it should simply be about whether or not he’s qualified!!
Report comment to moderator
I think it would be interesting if Cain runs against Obama. At least the race issue would be moot.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!