No choice for pro-life nurses
Federal law prohibits hospitals that receive federal funds from forcing employees to take part in abortions. In addition, New Jersey law states, “No person shall be required to perform or assist in the performance of an abortion or sterilization.”
Nonetheless, 12 nurses at the hospital run by the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ) were threatened with dismissal for objecting to participating in abortion procedures. According to LifeSiteNews, the hospital receives approximately $60 million annually from the federal government.
In September, nurses who work in the Same Day Surgery Unit at UMDNJ were told that they must assist in abortions or face termination. One nurse who objected was reportedly told by a supervisor that the hospital has “no regard for religious beliefs” when it comes to such cases. The Christian Post reported that the hospital’s policy in the past was to allow staff members to opt out of abortion procedures.
The Alliance Defense Fund (ADF) took on the case of the 12 UMDNJ nurses and yesterday had reason to celebrate at least a preliminary victory. A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order prohibiting the hospital from forcing the nurses to participate in abortions. Another hearing is scheduled for later this month.
ADF legal counsel Matt Bowman said that the hospital’s directive was “flatly illegal.” The Christian Post also reports that the ADF is handling a similar case involving Mount Sinai Hospital in New York.
This seems like a straightforward case of a hospital breaking the law, and perhaps there will be a happy ending. I’m grateful the ADF is on the case, and for the temporary restraining order. But two things concern me. First, I worry about other nurses facing the same situation at hospitals across the country and being afraid to seek out organizations like the ADF. Second, I wonder if hospitals will continue to push these boundaries in the hope that someday pro-life nurses won’t have a choice.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top9 Comments to “No choice for pro-life nurses”
Thank God for the ADF winning this case so far. I don’t understand why there needs to be another hearing since it’s illegal to force the nurses to participate in the culture of death. Even conscientious objectors in the military can’t be forced to kill anyone.
Report comment to moderator
It’s sad that hospitals would even consider forcing this on nurses. My first thought was Why? Then I remembered that abortion is a financially beneficial business to those who perform it. And in the NY area, where both these are, that number is higher than most anywhere else. So is the amount of money they can make off of it. Sad and disgusting.
Report comment to moderator
2: The other reason is a lot more subtle. Nurses have a responsibility to ensure patients recieve care. As regards abortions, what is argued is that the clients wants the care, the institution is providing the care, you as a nurse agreed to work with the institution, there may be no one else to take your place, and clients can’t be abandoned just because of your personal convictions.
Report comment to moderator
Hospitals that receive federal funds have the responsibility to make those arrangements. It is illegal to force nurses to go against their conscience or religious convictions to deny life to a living baby. Neither can soldiers be forced to kill when it goes against conscience or religion, and they are totally paid by the government.
Report comment to moderator
When I graduated from nursing school (1978) I got a job in labor & delivery. At that time they were doing prostaglandin abortions in L&D. I didn’t want to participate so I was given the choice of helping with abortions or working elsewhere. That is how I ended up being a neonatal nurse.
Report comment to moderator
I’m hoping this is an isolated case of ignorance by certain hospital administrators. It looks like the system is working as intended by protecting these individuals.
Report comment to moderator
5: They were doing abortions in L&D! When we asked about that in our Maternal Child rotation, we were told they placed those women on the surgical floors so they wouldn’t have to interact with mothers and babies. When I did my OR training, I was in a Catholic hospital, so I didn’t have to face that, though I did mention that I wouldn’t participate, just in case an unexpected situation arose.
Report comment to moderator
“No choice for pro-life nurses”
The text of the article seems to suggest the exact opposite. The law guarantees choice for pro-life nurses; a hospital broke the law; the nurses sued and have so far emerged victorious.
Report comment to moderator
Buddyglass – I take it you don’t work in healthcare. There are unwritten codes that you don’t break. Those nurses were slowly and subtly forced to the point of being told they had to choose between their jobs and their convictions – at which point they could resort to the law. Before then, they would have endured hints, passive aggressive behaviours and downright abuse for refusing. When a nurse turns to the authorities, you know they have taken all they could endure.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!