Georgia schools cut Bible classes to pay bills
Economic troubles are causing public school districts in Georgia to cut Bible education courses, five years after the state became the first to allow the controversial elective.
Superintendents say budget cuts require some classes to have more than 25 students before the classes are affordable. Unlike past years, students have tougher math standards to meet and more Advanced Placement courses.
“We’re not going to utilize a teacher for a whole period with 10-15 students. In the past, we may have considered that, but with the economy being the way it is, we just can’t afford to do that,” said Columbia County schools superintendent Charles Nagle, who has cut the Bible classes from three to one in his tiny district. Four years ago, 48 of Georgia’s 180 school districts offered the classes. This year, only 16 districts have decided to have the classes.
Because Georgia is the only state that tracks Bible electives, it’s hard to be sure if enrollment is decreasing in other states. Officials in Texas, Tennessee, South Carolina, and Oklahoma approve curriculum and let local districts decide whether to offer the classes. Hundreds of school districts in other states, such as Alabama, also offer voluntary Bible electives, even without a statewide law.
According to the Virginia-based Bible Literacy Project, more than 500 schools in 43 states use its public school textbook, The Bible and Its Influence. In 38 states, 2,140 high schools in 593 school districts use The Bible In History and Literature, another popular curriculum from the National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools (NCBCPS). This past August, 10 times more high schools than usual decided to use the NCBCPS curriculum, mostly because it is now available in a more flexible electronic version.
Sarah Jenislawski, executive director for the Bible Literacy Project, said she still sees “a consistent interest from both districts and students in Bible courses,” but that schools are struggling to pay teachers to teach the classes: “They’re having trouble keeping the lights on and keeping the air conditioner running.”
Mark Chancey, chair of the Department of Religious Studies at Southern Methodist University, said teachers have “very few suitable curricular resources.” The Bible and Its Influence is too expensive for some districts, he said, and the NCBCPS curriculum has what he called an “overt bias toward conservative Protestant theology.” Liberals have slammed the NCBCPS textbook for, among other things, listing Old Testament prophecies that Jesus fulfilled.
Liberal and conservative groups have long debated the teaching of the Bible in public schools. Under the Georgia law, Bible education classes must be taught “in an objective and non-devotional manner with no attempt made to indoctrinate students.” Critics worried that the law would open schools to lawsuits, but Georgia districts have avoided legal issues so far by ensuring that their courses conform to strict guidelines.
Some parents say they wish their districts had the Bible classes because children need to know how the text has influenced literature and pop culture. Wendy Labat has an eighth-grade son in a county that has never offered the Bible electives: “Whether you believe in God or not … kids need to have that experience.”
The Associated Press contributed to this report.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top13 Comments to “Georgia schools cut Bible classes to pay bills”
Eh, who cares? Times are tough and cash is strapped. I support focusing on the math requirements and AP options and not spending money on the Bible classes. Parents who want their children to be Bible-literate should try taking them to church. And I’ve always found the whole “the Bible has influenced our culture and kids need to know how” argument as a religious effort to water down education standards. Pop culture studies are interesting as college electives (I wrote at least one college paper on “My So Called Life”) when you expect students to spend a certain amount of time drunk or having pretentious conversations in coffee houses, but we don’t need to start that in high school. And it’s not like we don’t get it; it’s been a long time since I’ve seen a Biblical reference in culture not obvious, flat, and cliche. These things aren’t flying over kids’ heads.
Report comment to moderator
(Sarcasm on)
I think the entire Canon of JudeoChristian scripture should get the boot.
I would however encourage studies of the Quran and the collected works of the Dalai LLama since those exert way more influence over global events than do Matthew Mark Luke and John. In fact a recent poll of the Jr Highers I know had the Gospel writers erroneously described as members of a successful British rock band from the 60s.
(Sarcasm off now)
Report comment to moderator
You cannot fully understand or appreciate Richard Gere or Tina Turner unless you understand Buddhism. Ergo, if we want our kids to not be novices about Hollywood, we need to teach Buddhism and its impact on Hollywood USA.
Report comment to moderator
“And it’s not like we don’t get it; it’s been a long time since I’ve seen a Biblical reference in culture not obvious, flat, and cliche. ”
There’s more to being educated than understanding what’s going on in pop culture. (That you wrote a college paper on “My So Called Life” is more an indication of the weakness of your college education, than anything.) If you want to understand, oh, pretty much any English literature written before 1900, and about half written between 1900 and 1950 in any fashion close to the way the author intended, you need to know more than the “obvious, flat” cliches of biblical allusions.
Probably the way it’s done in public schools doesn’t help all that much with it, but to argue that because most people aren’t spouting Bible references these days, it’s not an (important part of education to understand the vernacular which included frequent Bible allusion) of most people in English-speaking history who lived more than a century ago, does more to prove the point of why a cultural familiarity with the Bible is important, than otherwise.
Report comment to moderator
Yes, I visited the Bible Literacy Project’s website and read a PDF excerpt from the beginning of their teacher’s edition. They offer a more in depth understanding of–among other things–the writings of Flannery O’Connor and William Faulkner…and presumably even more southern American writers. Those are valuable things for sure, but are they in and of themselves the key to preparing teenagers for college or some vocational study? I get it, they are electives. But in a lean budget they are certainly not must haves.
Report comment to moderator
If you want to understand, oh, pretty much any English literature written before 1900, and about half written between 1900 and 1950 in any fashion close to the way the author intended, you need to know more than the “obvious, flat” cliches of biblical allusions.
Then cover it on-the-fly in English Literature classes as needed in order to understand the work being studied.
Report comment to moderator
Electives are always going to be cut when the budget is tight. I would rather that they reduce Bible classes than music or art classes. Not because music and art are more important than the Bible – ideally an education would include all of them – but because art and music are as much about learning skills as acquiring knowledge. And that requires a teacher with the training to teach that skill.
If I were a parent wanting my child to learn what they would have learned in that Bible class, I’d simply buy the book they would have studied.
Report comment to moderator
“Then cover it on-the-fly in English Literature classes as needed in order to understand the work being studied.”
And when the kid goes on to read things on his own, he still won’t get half of it. Again, education is more than teaching the material in front of you, it’s preparing you to understand things in the future as well. You don’t teach reading just so that kids can read the material in the classroom (well, nowadays maybe they *do*) but so that the value of reading can be useful throughout life. And cultural literacy, of which Biblical literacy is a subset, is the same kind of thing.
I understand the “elective” bit and the budgetary necessity, so I’m not objecting to the decision made here, but downplaying the value of this kind of thing where it’s possible is extremely short-sighted.
Report comment to moderator
I find it interesting that in a state as religious as Georgia, so few districts and so few students in those districts have chosen to take an “objective” course in the bible.
That suggests to me that the religiously oriented parents and students are not interested in really reading the bible, but instead go to relatively few portions of it to find justification for their own pre-conceived notions and convictions about it.
There’s a lot of stuff for everybody in the bible, but these parents don’t seem interested in having their kids read either the stuff for other people.
I also think that such a course is useful in understanding all kinds of cultural phenomena, but I’m not sure that high school is the place to do it.
Report comment to moderator
Hmm…nobody to claim that lots of people are really clamoring for objective bible education?
Report comment to moderator
9. All kinds of stereotyping in there.
Report comment to moderator
I had a pastor back in Texas who was actually elated that the school teachers were no longer in the business of teaching Scripture. I attribute his glee to the satisfaction he had in knowing that your avg publik skool teechur does not have a seminary grad’s knowledge of biblical arcana.
I would hope if kids or their parents really wanted to learn the Word maybe they could secede from gummint skools and enroll with the Holy Cross Sisters or some sectarian facility.
Report comment to moderator
Sawgunner, I don’t disagree, but consider the irony: we’re supposed to believe that the public schools are educating our kids, while at the same time they’re admitting they’re not competent to teach the founding document of western civilization that was common knowledge even to the illiterate a couple of centuries ago.
That right there is evidence that while kids absolutely do learn some useful stuff in public school, they’re not being “educated” in any meaningful sense.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!