The self-esteem bubble pops
The fateful year 1969, celebrated equally for the Apollo moon landing and Woodstock, also saw the publication of Nathan Brandan’s The Psychology of Self-Esteem. This was the book that inspired what some predicted would be a revolution in parenting and pedagogy. Now, finally, the self-esteem movement may be running out of … well, self-esteem. One reason is because it never worked. We probably always knew, deep down, that juvenile achievement wasn’t going to be as easy as laying in a supply of You’re Awesome! stickers, even if they’re the glittery kind. But it’s one thing to argue from common sense, and quite another to get science on your side. Science is now speaking up, with a voice that could spell the end (eventually) for the insidious practice of showering schoolchildren with empty praise.
In a well-known 2006 study conducted by the Brookings Institute, students reported feeling very good about their academic performance, even while scoring lower than kids in other countries who did not report the same level of self-confidence. The shocking truth: When we tell kids they are “smart,” their natural response is to protect that reputation. Therefore, they take fewer chances and back away from challenges, meaning their brains don’t engage and school becomes an utter bore.
But a program called Brainology, based on neuroscience, is beginning to gain some traction in public schools (see video clip below). Developed by Stanford University’s Carol Dweck and Lisa Blackwell, Brainology proposes to make the students partners in their own education. Instead of telling a class that they’re all “above average,” teachers share with the kids what’s going on inside their heads when they learn. Vital to the curriculum is a beginner’s course in neuroscience, where children learn that intelligence is not a matter of being smart, but becoming smart. Rather than a preexisting condition, intelligence is the process of creating connections between nerve cells in the cortex, pathways that grow stronger and faster with use. To fail at a difficult challenge doesn’t mean you’re dumb; it means that you’re forging new trails in the brain. Brainology tries to create a “growth mindset” in the student, where struggle is expected and “being smart” is an achievable goal.
About 300 schools have used the program so far, and the results are encouraging. It’s a step in the right direction, so long as children are allowed to flourish in their own way and not pressed into the service of some utilitarian goal. That’s a big if, and another, bigger IF is whether schools of education will adopt any of the research. It sounds a bit rigorous for them. One thing Christian kids and teachers can take away is that the brain is a marvelous instrument with tremendous potential, because it’s designed by a marvelous Creator.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top34 Comments to “The self-esteem bubble pops”
There was a gal who graduated ahead of me in high school. She took Biology level I in our senior year. I took that in 9th grade! What we really need in both high school and college are certifying exams. If someone walks in and says they studied enough chemistry or French or geology to have a bachelors in it, how smart are they? There are whiz kids who graduate with accounting degrees who still cannot pass the CPA exam. (although with CPA they let you redo the sections you failed. Do you know who was a first time go versus no-go on that or any other certifying board?)
I would of course oppose any such certifying exam sins they scrimat agints stoopid foks
Report comment to moderator
I think most teachers failed me from the git go whenever I raised a hand and- when called upon– would then ask “Kin I ax you a question?”
Report comment to moderator
This new information could be dangerous. It’s in danger of being narrow-minded and discriminatory. It might lead to the notion that we all do not have our own truth after all.
Report comment to moderator
This is a long overdue, positive development. Thanks Janie for bringing it to our attention. It’s refreshing to hear good news now and again.
Report comment to moderator
where children learn that intelligence is not a matter of being smart, but becoming smart.
So we’re replacing self-esteem with another scientifically incorrect notion, i.e. that “being smart” is not born out of any innate difference in cognitive ability.
Some kids are born brilliant. Some are born the opposite. We should not ignore that in favor of a more palatable fiction in which every child is a tabula rasa whose eventual cognitive ability is purely a function of how much effort he’s willing to devote to “becoming smart”.
Report comment to moderator
Buddyglass,
That is true, and kids should be challenged according to their ability. Something that a one size fits all school doesn’t accomplish.
Report comment to moderator
There is a very significant difference between “intelligence is not a matter of being smart, but becoming smart.”, and “eventual cognitive ability is purely a function of how much effort he’s willing to devote…” It is likely a difference distinguishable only to those willing to put in the effort to understand it.
This “Brainology” will probably be most opposed by those who are reluctant to hold individuals accountable for the outcomes of their own lives.
Report comment to moderator
Buddyglass, I agree with your concern, but there’s validity to the idea of “children learn that intelligence is not a matter of being smart, but becoming smart.”
The flip side of your concern is thinking that if you’re born smart, you don’t need to get any smarter, or that if you’re born dumb, you’re stuck being as “dumb” as you are now. It’s true that there are innate limitations and innate superiority, but it’s extremely important to emphasize that raw material isn’t the whole story. Not for the sake of saving kids’ self-esteem, but for the sake of ensuring that they develop what they’ve got.
Report comment to moderator
And then what would become of Fox News?
Ba-dum-tssssh
Report comment to moderator
Pentamom1, you said it much better than I.
Report comment to moderator
I have used a similar approach. I have taught (in the context of general science) about the brain–its parts and their functions to kids. I have taught them how memory and the learning process work and how to enhance their own learning.
BuddyGlass has a point. Each of us is born with certain gifts and talents and a certain potential to learn particular things. What I think the Brainology approach is saying is that we have to strive to reach that potential A star student may have a natural gift to learn math or language, but if that student does nothing, he or she will not be as “smart” as he or she could be.
Certain aspects of being “smart” can be taught. You can teach logic and thinking skills, memorization techniques, effective communication skills, and note-taking, for example.
Report comment to moderator
And then what would become of Fox News?
…um, not sure I understand the reference to the only major news network that isn’t an extension of the DNC.
Report comment to moderator
One thing Christian kids and teachers can take away is that the brain is a marvelous instrument with tremendous potential, because it’s designed by a marvelous Creator.
After a few hundred million years of trial and error…
As to the main point, I think if kids are taught that they can do it, they are more likely to do so.
Report comment to moderator
This study simply tells us what many of us already knew. It is so nice when science eventually catches up. It took anthropologists over a century to realize that they were wrong about race. It took psychologists decades to admit that men and women are actually different.
How long will it take educators to realize that the “joy of learning” is not about making learning fun, but about exerting the effort necessary to excel at something and then to look back and feel the satisfaction of having accomplished something hard.
And the self-esteem movement has produced a generation of spoiled brats where some people prefer to occupy Wall Street rather than occupying a job. Here is a humorous commentary on this condition.
Report comment to moderator
Arcadia says: ‘One thing Christian kids and teachers can take away is that the brain is a marvelous instrument with tremendous potential, because it’s designed by a marvelous Creator.
After a few hundred million years of trial and error…’
Could Arcadia be becoming a theistic creationist? Naw, I don’t believe so. I think she is just mocking Christians.
Arcadia also says: ‘As to the main point, I think if kids are taught that they can do it, they are more likely to do so.’
I agree, It is very encouraging to anyone to know that someone believes in them and their abilities. Of course, this can be detrimental if the expectations are unreasonable – therefore the need to match the teaching with the child.
Report comment to moderator
The columnists presents a caricature of self-esteem’s role. Self-esteem is a necessary part of education and of growing up in general. Its the starting point – as Arcadia points out it does influence eventual success or failure. And in teen health self esteem is important to prevent diseases the have a pyschological origin and end up as physical problems eg eating disorders.
As for Brainology — a new wrapping on what is common knowledge. Curriculum needs to be scaffolded and built from the bottom up since we form neuron connections as we grow. And children need to know how they process the information so they can better process it. Not a terrible brilliant innovation — most teachers try to help students train their brain.
Finally, Cheaney seems willing to embrace neuroscience here. Does this mean she’s willing to embrace the newest research which suggests most of our ethical principles our neurologically based. As Buddyglass suggests we are not tabula rasa and much of what we think is derived from free will is not. Religious beliefs or the tendency to hold strongly to belief systems appears to be neurologically derived.
The best discussion of the latest neuro science and research on the brain is found in Steven Pinker’s book “The Blank Slate”. It may be 10 years old but its still the best and most comprehensive book I’ve come across. That and Pinker is brilliant
http://pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/books/tbs/reviews.html
Report comment to moderator
Another even more in-depth writup on this topic appeared in New York magazine a few years ago, entitled “How Not to Talk to Your Kids”:
http://nymag.com/news/features/27840/
When you’ve got even liberal stalwarts such as the Washington Post and New York magazine coming around to seeing that there is something fundamentally flawed about the self-esteem movement, it becomes increasingly difficult to characterize the critique as stemming solely from a conservative caraciture.
Report comment to moderator
I think it is important to realize there are different kinds of intelligneces. Sort of like what used to be referred to as “book learning” and “walking around sense”.
I fall on the book learning side of things. Give me a date in history and I can probably tell you what happened. I am a little short on interpersonal skills. I have been around people who can size and opponent up and know their strengths and weakenesses and beat them every time.
I have been around people who can sell ice to Eskimos and people who know a whole lot about nothing.
Report comment to moderator
The problem with the self-esteem movement is that it told kids things that were not true. When a child does a bad job he shouldn’t feel great about it.
Here is an interesting article on the technique Bill Bellichick uses to get the Patriots to the Superbowl so often. It is called telling the truth. Truth is the world’s most effective motivator.
The players may be temporarily humiliated by reviewing their shortcomings, but the lessons learned sink in and produce positive results.
Report comment to moderator
Excellent link at 17, Buzzy. Thanks.
Report comment to moderator
With “Outcome Based Education”, who chooses the desired outcome?
For Jonny to feel good about himself even though he can’t read or write leaves want.
I see people that have a lot of knowledge but little wisdom to use it, and others that have lesser knowledge but much wisdom in using what knowledge they have.
The desired outcome should be to gain both knowledge and the wisdom to use it to its fullest potential.
Wisdom is the transmission that puts the full power of knowledge to challenges.
The better wisdom says we gain knowledge.
Report comment to moderator
You need to remember what I tell you or your brain will not grow. Repeat after me.
Report comment to moderator
Fuzzyface: Could Arcadia be becoming a theistic creationist? Naw, I don’t believe so. I think she is just mocking Christians.
Moi?
Report comment to moderator
Fuzzyface – I think she is just mocking Christians.
That would be unlikely. Arcadia is nice to everyone, and doesn’t believe in denigrating anyone. In fact, in a recent thread on Sovereign Grace Ministries, she categorized SGM essentially as a cult while claiming to know nothing about the group or ever intending to find out about it. When I suggested her adverse judgment, under those circumstances, proceeded from her own personal stereotypes, she took me to task, saying it was based on a “pattern” which I had improperly denigrated as a stereotype. QED.
Report comment to moderator
I like the idea of learning as being told the truth, because most kids don’t get the truth from the culture, media or even sometimes in school classes. But if learning was just being told the truth, I’d be a genius…which I ain’t. You learn something when you see it, feel it and have to work through it.
Report comment to moderator
I think there is some available flexibility when it comes to defining “smart” that allows their approach to find a lot of merit. I’m a little less concerned with what is objectively true about “smartness” than I am with what beliefs about smartness encourage good behavior and produce results. In a society of risk taking hard workers I don’t imagine any scenario where we realize we’ve had it all wrong and it’s be devastating to us. And really who cares?! Some people have some innate physical ability that others can never match, yet (perhaps because we can see the effects of exercise on our bodies with our bare eyes) we don’t let it discourage the belief that athletic performance is about what you put into it.
Report comment to moderator
My daughter (a first grade teacher) says teachers, at least in her sch district, are now not even allowed to say a child’s action is wrong.
The study is fascinating. My daughter tells me that one of the things that makes a monumental difference in her students’ ability to learn is whether or not the child is/was read to.
I’ll bet there is a genetic component, however. My three children are all intelligent, but one of their brains reminds me of my father’s, who was a literal rocket scientist. They all have strengths and weaknesses. I love the unique attributes God gave each of his children.
Report comment to moderator
Clayvessel – One of the things that makes a monumental difference in her students’ ability to learn is whether or not the child is/was read to.
I’ve heard that as well. Also, how much were they spoken to when very young makes a huge difference. We saw that first hand with foster children, and knowing something about their background.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_deprivation_experiments
Report comment to moderator
Having watched the link, I have to say that the presentation method might put some off.
That being said, when I took driver training, the driving school had us do an online computer program which helped train our brains in ability to scan, reaction time, multi-tasking, etc. I really noticed a difference in my ability to drive.
But I still don’t like driving. It is possible to excel at something and still not care at all about it. Schools may be able to help children to learn, but it is the prevalent culture which determines whether those children will love to learn. I always felt ashamed of my interests around my peers, since I liked school, but it was the fashion to hate it.
Report comment to moderator
Phos, what is so frustrating to me is that so much energy is put into teaching children, while most of our culture is geared toward undercutting them. They arrive at school from broken homes, from homes reigned by every kind of sin imaginable: alcoholism, drug addiction, physical abuse, sexual abuse, parades of step-parents and sexual partners, etc. My daughter tells me that children have to have a certain bedrock to begin to learn. This year, she threw out the mandated lesson plan, fell behind in the never-stopping schedule of goals and worked on discipline for one week. Her class received the award for most improved, and she was nominated at her school for teacher of the year (not for this decision – I would guess she didn’t tell anyone what she was doing – she might have gotten into trouble!).
She’s also told me (which I didn’t want to hear, as a conservative) that a majority of her children arrive hungry, especially after a weekend. She believes this is sometimes due to sin (addicted, neglectful parents), sometimes to ignorance and sometimes to lack of money. The school sends food home with many (actually, most) of them.
I believe with all my heart that if Christians knew what was going on in schools, they would volunteer, they would help, they would give. But the churches don’t know, and the government is building higher and higher walls to keep them out.
Report comment to moderator
Clayvessel @30: It sounds as if your daughter has figured out the essence of education. I have a funny bookmark which says, “When your education is finished, so are you.” Learning is a lifelong process, just like work. Children in public school develop a mindset that if they just endure 15 to 20 years of this, they’ll never have to study again. So they get to resent how much of their time is taken up by the pursuit. I was homeschooled, and I gradually discovered that whether I was reading the encyclopedia or a Jane Austen novel, I was learning something about the world around me, and that I could keep doing that my whole life. The discovery was tremendously liberating.
Report comment to moderator
I didn’t excel at school until the SRA Reading Laboratory was introduced in 3rd grade, and I had the joy of independent, mastery learning without any fear of failure — it is why the Khan Academy is having such a good effect in the schools now.
The self-motivated learner who does hard things to master difficult material has a inner core of resilience — that is real “self esteem”, not puffery.
Thanks for the link to the details of the study, Buzzy. Now to go read to my girls again.
Report comment to moderator
Yay, Phos and Karen! Just reading, “Now to go read to my girls again” makes me so happy! Those are blessed girls, Karen.
Report comment to moderator
The education blob of America and its educrats will not accept this conclusion. It blows their whole worldview, their ideology; didactic Vs dialectic classroom styles, direct instruction Vs self exploration, teachers Vs facilitators, etc.
The results of Project Follow Through back in 1972 (the most expensive education study at that time) presented these same results. What did our educrats do with the results? Bury them as the results were contrary to their worldview, their ideology.
As Russell Kirk wrote, one of conservatism’s most important insights is that all ideologies are wrong. Ideology takes an intellectual system, a product of one or more philosophers, and says, “This system must be true.” Inevitably, reality ends up contradicting the system, usually on a growing number of points. But the ideology, by its nature, cannot adjust to reality; to do so would be to abandon the system.
Therefore, reality must be suppressed. If the ideology has power, it uses its power to undertake this suppression. It forbids writing or speaking certain facts. Its goal is to prevent not only expression of thoughts that contradict what “must be true,” but thinking such thoughts. In the end, the result is inevitably the concentration camp, the gulag and the grave.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!