Signs and Wonders 02.13
Mainstream media blind spot: It’s big news when tens of thousands of people gather publicly for rallies about one of America’s most significant issues. But the mainstream-media coverage of the Jan. 21 West Coast Walk for Life in San Francisco and the Jan. 23 March for Life in Washington, D.C., was almost nonexistent. Though both events drew large crowds, neither event drew significant coverage from major media outlets. “The lack of media coverage is really shameful,” said Teresa Tomeo, who provided television commentary for the EWTN Catholic network. “The sheer numbers alone—50,000 in San Francisco and 300,000 in Washington—should be reason enough for headlines and lead stories on the evening news.” She’s got a point: The numbers at the pro-life marches dwarfed the numbers at Occupy Wall Street events, yet those events got—and continue to get—daily national media coverage.
Free speech case appealed to Supreme Court: The Thomas More Law Center on Jan. 24 appealed the case of a Southern California teacher to the U.S. Supreme Court. Bradley Johnson, a high school math teacher in the Poway Unified School District near San Diego, had banners hanging in his classroom for 25 years with mottos such as “In God We Trust,” “One Nation Under God” and “God Bless America.” For the last 30 years, the school district has had a policy allowing teachers to use their classrooms for displays of personal belief—a policy other teachers at Johnson’s school have taken advantage of by hanging up Tibetan prayer flags and posters of the Dalai Lama, Malcolm X, and Hindu sayings. In 2007, the school told Johnson to remove his banners, while the other displays remained. A federal district court in 2008 upheld Johnson’s First Amendment rights, but a three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the decision last year—then turned down a request for an en banc hearing by the full court.
The battle of New York: The New York State Senate has passed a bill to give some relief to the churches of New York City who currently rent facilities from the city’s school system. But the bill still has to make it through the House and to the governor’s office. The city’s Department of Education gave churches their eviction notice in late December, after the U.S. Supreme Court refused to rule on a 16-year-old viewpoint-discrimination case of a church in the Bronx that was kicked out of a public school. The city gave some 60-odd churches serving primarily poor neighborhoods until yesterday to find other facilities to call home. If the bill does not pass, New York City apparently would be the first major city nationwide to ban churches from meeting in public schools. But, given the publicity this case has received, if the secularists win here, others will no doubt try in other cities.
WORLD reporters Tiffany Owens and Emily Belz contributed to this report.

















Click to Print
Include Comments











back to top15 Comments to “Signs and Wonders 02.13”
The various “Walks for Life” and “Marches for Life” happen EVERY SINGLE YEAR, and the message is ALWAYS the same. So it’s not news, and for most Americans abortion is pretty much of a settled issue. If your personal religious beliefs inform you that abortion is wrong, please feel free to conduct your own life as your conscience dictates. But don’t presume that your personal religious beliefs should be codified as public policy.
Report comment to moderator
A couple of suggestions for other banners in Mr Johnson’s classroom:
10:34 Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.
10:35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in law.
10:36 And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.
For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death.”
and the iron did swim.
Report comment to moderator
The MSM long ago abandoned the idea of objective reporting. It’s just that they and others on the left cannot see it. So we have blind media instead of blind justice.
Report comment to moderator
The proLife Roe commemorations always occur in the subArctic temps of January. Folks being willing to do anything outside on that day alone is amazing.
The paucity of coverage/attention from the media is longstanding. Which one has more members? NOW or the CWA? Yet which one has a talking head when the news topic is “women’s issues” or “Reproductive Rights”??
The news media will ignore any stories with unfavorable data about day care? Whyso? Maybe cuz their advertisers wish to sell products to the women viewers and the women viewers might flip the channel if you ran a story critical of day care vs at Home Mommy care. Bernie Goldberg discovered this some years back and wrote his book exposing it
Report comment to moderator
Arcadia, what seems to have escaped your notice is that the teacher’s banners were NOT Bible passages.
One is the motto of the United States. Look in your pocket. It’s on our coins.
Another is a part of the Pledge of Allegiance that school children used to recite every day.
The other is the title of a popular song by a great American songwriter.
Report comment to moderator
Don’t confuse her with the facts, Kyle.
Report comment to moderator
Is it any wonder that people feel the way they do about the Ninth Circuit?
Report comment to moderator
Demonstrations only get attention when they are unique. OWS got very little coverage until the numbers grew, the police got involved, violence broke out (if it bleeds it leads),some college girls went topless, etc. A pro-life demo is an annual event and nothing really happens except people walk. Maybe a little extreme street theatre, throw a replica of a fetus at an important public figure, beam messages onto the Court building (OWS did that), stage a sit down at a media outlet, — heck pull a Doukobor – Sons of Freedom and strip naked.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doukhobor
Why do teachers insist on personalize their room to such an extent — post a picture of your kids and leave it at that.
But in this case, since its gov’t approved slogans, the teacher has a case.
Finally, the NYC case has been discussed to death here. Personally its dumb to reject rent money from any non-criminal group but some things in the US never cease to amaze me.
Report comment to moderator
I don’t think so NJL, including their scattered “brethren.”
Report comment to moderator
A few thoughts…
1. What was Smith expecting regarding the reporting of the March for Life. I did a quick web search and found that a number of mainstream news outlets reported on the march. In an age when profit margins for news organizations can be thin, no event is likely to receive wide coverage unless the footage could readily be sold. Outlandish events, like some of the OWS protests, attract news coverage because the news organization can make money from selling the footage.
2. A lot seems to be missing from the story on Johnson v. Poway. The case largely hinged on a legal question of whether a Pickering analysis applied. I am not aware of any Circuit that would not have reversed this case. In fact, the three-judge panel consisted of one liberal, one moderate, and one conservative. All three–despite their political differences–agreed that Johnson was wrong. Also, Smith neglected to note the basis upon which the Court distinguished the Tibetan prayer flags from Johnson’s 10-foot-long posters. Namely, the Tibetan prayer flags were part of a lesson on expeditions of Mt. Everest. It is customary for those who climb Everest to place the Tibetan prayer flags along the way. The teacher didn’t even know whether the flags had any religious significance. In contrast, Johnson taught calculus. The huge signs on his wall had nothing to do with any lesson plan. Johnson’s signs had one purpose and one purpose only–to promote Christianity to the exclusion of other religions.
Report comment to moderator
Demonstrations only get attention when the the leftstream media perceives an opporunity to use it for an immoral or a leftist agenda.
“Why do teachers insist on personalizing their room to such an extent?”
Because they think they live is a free country (freedom with responsibility, that is) AND that good teaching is enhanced with a personalized approach?
Report comment to moderator
How is it “personalized” to have the United States motto, a line from the Pledge of Allegiance, and the title of a popular song by a respected American songwriter? It seems like a good civics lesson to me.
If you want to say that his classroom is personalized because of the banners, then what about the teachers with pictures of the Dalai Lama or quotations from Gandhi or, for that matter, of photographs of Pike’s Peak?
Report comment to moderator
As to the first item, this explains some of it:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/02/13/reports-media-matters-head-coordinates-with-white-house-builds-super-pac/
Report comment to moderator
“How is it ‘personalized’ to have the United States motto, a line from the Pledge of Allegiance, and the title of a popular song by a respected American songwriter?”
I knew what HRW meant when he asked; “Why do teachers insist on personaliz[ing] their room…” These not required banners but personal choices by the teacher to emphasize principles that he or she personally believes need to be taught. They reflect the (hopefully appropriate) personal convictions and priorities of that teacher. EVERY teacher personally “selects” a portion of what he will emphasize and there is always a personal element in any teacher’s approach.
I agree, Kyle. It is a good civics lesson.
The point is that the Dalai Lama pics and Gandhi quotes were NOT opposed or resisted, while posting the official motto of the USA was. It reveals who the intolerant ones are.
Report comment to moderator
Joel Mark, I understand. My point is that the patriotic messages of the teacher should be universal in a public school. They should not be regarded as idiosyncratic or–as HRW seems to think–on the level of putting a picture of his family on the wall.
And, true, the problem in going after this teacher is the discrimination. It thought that liberals were against discrimination. As you say, they are the truly intolerant ones.
Report comment to moderator
back to topJoin The Conversation
You need to be a registered user of WORLDmag.com's Community section to "join the conversation."
If you are not a member yet, what are you waiting for? Register / Login Now!